Fipronil resistance mechanisms in the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Walker

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Fipronil resistance mechanisms were studied between the laboratory susceptible strain and the selective field population of rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Walker in the laboratory. The borer population was collected from Wenzhou county, Zhejiang province. After five generations of selection, fipronil resistance ratio was 45.3-fold compared to the susceptible strain. Synergism experiments showed that the synergistic ratios of PBO, TPP and DEF on fipronil in susceptible and resistant strains of C. suppressalis were 7.55-, 1.93- and 2.91-fold, respectively, and DEM showed no obvious synergistic action on fipronil. Activities of carboxylesterase and microsomal-O-demethylase in the resistant strain were 1.89- and 1.36-fold higher that in susceptible strain, and no significant difference of glutathione-S-transferase activity was found between the resistant and susceptible strains. The Km and Vmax experiments also demonstrated that fipronil resistance of C. suppressalis was closely relative to the enhanced activities of carboxylesterase and microsomal-O-demethylase. Moreover, cross-resistance between fipronil and other conventional insecticides and the multiple resistant properties of the original Wenzhou’s population were also discussed.

Introduction

The rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Walker is one of the most important insect pests of many subtropical and tropic paddyfields in Asia, North Africa and Southern Europe. In China, it is mainly found in the Yangtze drainage areas and hilly areas of southern provinces beyond Yangtze River. This insect feeds on rice causing significant economic losses to farmers. Besides, it also causes great damage to other crops including water bamboo, sugarcane, sorghum, corn, wheat, millet, horsebean and rape [1]. Since 1970s, there have been several outbreaks of pest attack in China because of the changes in the rice cultivation system and the use of hybrid varieties [2], [3]. The major control measure for the rice stem borer is the application of chemicals, which are known to cause resistance and control problems. Before 1980s, rice stem borer was mainly controlled by BHC, trichlorphon, parathion, parathionmethyl and chlordimeforn, however, these insecticides were banned for the bioaccumulation in food chain, chronic toxicity and/or high resistance at the end of 1980s. From the beginning of 1980s to the middle of 1990s, some organophosphate and nereistoxin insecticides such as methamidophos, triazophos, monosultap and dimehypo were mainly used to control the pest. However, because of long-term use of insecticides, some studies reported that rice stem borer is resistant to lots of conventional insecticides [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. At the end of 1990s, fipronil and abamectin were used for control and showed excellent effects. Recently, there are few reports about rice stem borer with low or middle level of resistance to fipronil [12], [13].

Fipronil [(±)-5-amino-1-(2,6-dichloro-α,α,α-trifluoro-p-tolyl)-4-trifluoromethylsulfinylpyr-azole-3-carbonitrile] is the first member of the phenylpyrazole insecticide. Its mode of action involves disruption of chloride ion flow by interacting at the GABA-gated chloride ionophore of the central nervous system [14], [15], or fipronil potently blocks glutamate-activated chloride channel and strongly inhibits glutamate-induced chloride ion flow [16]. Moreover, its oxidative sulfone is reported as the most effective inhibitor of glutamate-gated chloride channel than other metabolites [17]. Since 1997 the first use in Wentai region of Zhejiang province, fipronil has been used extensively in the whole Yangtze middle and downriver and Southeast coastal areas, and the dosage was increased year after year. Herein, the purpose of this study is to investigate the characterization and mechanisms of fipronil resistance in C. suppressalis, in order to offer some guidance for fipronil resistance management and reasonable use.

Section snippets

Insects

The strain of rice stem borer was obtained from Nanjing Agricultural University, China. This strain was originally collected from a mountain area of Taihu county, Anhui province, and raised in laboratory without any contact with insecticides from 2000. For obtaining more susceptible strain to fipronil, the strain was selected from single egg mass that was produced by one-pair mating adult under conditions free of insecticides from 2005. The most sensitive larvae to fipronil were used as the

Susceptibility taming and resistance selection

The responses of the fourth-instar larvae of C. suppressalis to fipronil in different generations of the susceptible and resistant strains after selection are presented in Table 1. For the susceptible strain taming, LD50 value of fipronil against the fourth-instar larvae of parental generation was 0.0073 μg/larva and it decreased to 0.0038 μg/larva after three generations of selection, the susceptibility of population to fipronil increased 1.92-fold. For the resistant strain, LD50 value of

Discussion

Fipronil is high toxic to both piercing–sucking and chewing insects and has shown excellent activity against a broad spectrum of insect orders [15], and has shown no obvious cross-resistance to other action mechanism insecticides [23]. Many researches indicated that fipronil was transformed to the more toxic sulfone metabolites by cytochrome P450-mediated microsomal monooxygenase in insect [17], [24], [25]. However, due to increased frequency and years of use, fipronil resistance had appeared

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. V. Shyam kumar, P.G. Department of Sericulture Karnatak University, Dharwad, India for critical review and helpful discussion of the manuscript. We also thank the National Key Project for Basic Research (2003CB114402), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30400295), the Shanghai Foundation of Science and Technology, and the Shanghai Education Commission for financial support.

References (30)

  • Y. Konno et al.

    Resistance mechanism of the rice stem borer to organophosphorus insecticides

    J. Pesticide Sci.

    (1985)
  • Y. Konno et al.

    Studies on resistance mechanism and synergism in the OP-resistance rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Walker

    Agrochemical Bioregulators

    (1989)
  • Y. Konno

    Carboxylesterase of the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). responsible for feniteothion resistance as sequesting protein

    J. Pestic. Sci.

    (1996)
  • Q.F. Han et al.

    The mechanism of resistance to fenitrothion in the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis Walker

    Acta Entomol. Sin.

    (1995)
  • Y. Peng et al.

    Resistance measurement of Chilo suppressalis from Jiangsu province and its resistance mechanism to methamidophos

    Acta Phytophylacica Sin.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (66)

    • Inheritance mode and properties of fipronil resistance in Oxycarenus hyalinipennis Costa (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)

      2020, Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This results in hypersensitivity and ultimately causes death (Hainzl et al., 1998; Ratra and Casida, 2001; Ratra et al., 2001; Narahashi et al., 2010). Fipronil resistance has been reported in Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) (Tang et al., 2010), Anopheles stephensio Liston (Kolaczinski and Curtis, 2001), Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Sayyed and Wright, 2004), Musca domestica Linnaeus (Abbas et al., 2014a) and Chilo suppressalis Walker (Li et al., 2007). Information about genetics and the mechanism of resistance are important aspects for better management of resistance (Roush and Daly, 1990).

    • Fipronil resistance in pink stem borer, Sesamia inferens (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Pakistan: Cross-resistance, genetics and realized heritability

      2019, Crop Protection
      Citation Excerpt :

      Five concentrations (treatments) of each insecticide were made and each concentration was tested with four replicates (Robertson and Preisler, 1992). One microliter of the solution was directly applied on the dorsal thorax of larvae with the help of handheld micro-applicator as described by Li et al. (2007a,b). A total of 40 larvae (10/replicate) were tested for each concentration.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text