Bovine babesiosis: Cattle protected in the field with a frozen vaccine containing Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina cultured in vitro with a serum-free medium

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2017.11.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Vaccine with Babesia bovis and B. bigemina cultured in vitro in a serum-free medium.

  • Excellent protection for babesiosis with vaccine derived from in vitro culture in bovine serum-free medium.

  • 100% protection against babesiosis in animals vaccinated with a novel vaccine.

Abstract

An attenuated live vaccine containing Babesia bovis and B. bigemina cultured in vitro with a serum-free medium was assessed for its clinical protection conferred of naïve cattle, under natural tick-challenge in a high endemicity zone to Babesia spp. Three groups of six animals were treated as follows: group I (GI) received a vaccine derived from parasites cultured with a free-serum medium; group II (GII) were immunized with the standard vaccine, with parasites cultured in a medium supplemented with 40% (v/v) bovine serum; and a control group (GIII) inoculated with non-infected bovine erythrocytes. Inocula were administered by IM route. Experimental animals were kept during 23 days after vaccination in a cattle farm free of ticks and Babesia spp. Thereafter, cattle were moved to a high endemicity farm for natural exposure to Babesia spp. transmitted by Rhipicephalus microplus ticks. Protection against clinical babesiosis was observed in bovines belonging to GI (100%) and GII (83.33%), while the control animals (GIII) were not protected, and showed severe clinical signs, closely related to babesiosis, were observed for at least three consecutive days during the challenge. These were fever, anemia, which were measured simultaneously, and circulating parasites were detected by optic light microscopy. All cattle showed B. bovis and B. bigemina in stained blood films during the challenge; B. bovis antibody titers were higher than those to B. bigemina in GI and GII, and lower titers were determined in GIII. The protective capacity of the vaccine derived from B. bovis and B. bigemina cultured in vitro in a serum-free medium was demonstrated.

Introduction

Bovine babesiosis is a disease caused by apicomplexan protozoa of the genus Babesia, it is considered one of the most important among diseases transmitted by arthropods to cattle, and it is characterized by fever, hemolytic anemia, hemoglobinuria, anorexia and often death [1], [2]. In Mexico, the main vector is the tick Rhipicephalus microplus distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, which transmits both Babesia bovis and B. bigemina [3]. Economic losses in cattle by ticks and transmitted diseases such as babesiosis and anaplasmosis, could be in the order of US$10 billion per year in worldwide [4]. The use of live attenuated vaccines is the best intervention strategy for the control of bovine babesiosis, because these can induce a protective immune response in naïve cattle [5]. The use of live vaccines with low virulence strains has been reported in countries such as Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Uruguay, Israel, Malawi and South Africa [6]. Some of these vaccine strains were attenuated either through serial passages in splenectomized cattle [7], [8], [9] or by using the culture in vitro of B. bovis and B. bigemina strains. In Mexico, there is an attenuated live vaccine against both species of Babesia that protects at least 80% of the vaccinated cattle exposed with infected ticks in endemic areas [3], [10], [11]. Thus, there is a need for continuous improvement of live attenuated vaccines to maintain their effectiveness and quality to protect cattle, despite possible antigenic variation and the potential for reversion to virulence of parasite strains [12], [13], [14], [15]. Recently the standard in vitro process for growing Babesia species was modified by Rojas et al. [16], who reported the elimination of bovine serum from the in vitro culture of B. bovis (Bbovis-SF) and B. bigemina (Bbig-SF), and supplemented medium with vital elements such as insulin, transferrin, selenite and putrescine [17], [18]. In this process, to optimize the proliferation of these parasites a perfusion bioreactor was used. However, it remains unknown whether these changes could somehow alter the antigenic make up of parasites grown under such culture conditions. Live vaccine production by using this new process could affect its immunoprotective capacity in susceptible animals during a natural challenge. Therefore, the objective in the present study was to compare the protection between a vaccine derived from B. bovis and B. bigemina cultured in a serum-free medium, supplemented with vital elements as compared to that conferred by and a standard vaccine obtained with culture medium with 40% (v/v) bovine serum as supplement. This experiment was performed by vaccinating susceptible cattle, and naturally challenging these cattle in the babesiosis endemic area in the Gulf coast of Mexico.

Section snippets

Localization

Research was conducted in two phases; vaccination and challenge. In the first phase, vaccination was carried out in a farm located in Central Mexico free of R. microplus ticks. This was to allow the establishment and multiplication of the vaccine parasites, for 23 days. In the second phase, a natural challenge was performed, for which the experimental animals were moved to a farm located in a tropical area in the Gulf of Mexico where the tick R. microplus is endemic. Bovines remained during 21 

Bovine babesiosis prevalence rate

The overall prevalence rate observed in the herd of the farm where the experimental animals were challenged was 96% to Babesia spp., specifically 94% and 93% for B. bovis and B. bigemina as determined by IFAT. By nPCR, the prevalence rates were 88% and 72% for B. bovis and B. bigemina. These results allowed confirmation that the exploitation maintained a hyperendemicity status, which was an ideal condition for the natural challenge.

Rectal temperature (RT)

After vaccination, in GI, there was a moderate increase in

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that B. bovis and B. bigemina (Bbovis-SF, Bbig-SF) strains grown in a serum-free medium supplemented with insulin, transferrin, selenite and putrescine in a bioreactor, are capable to protect naïve cattle against babesiosis in the field.

Increased RT after vaccination in GI and GII was similar to that observed in previous studies on attenuated vaccines against bovine babesiosis, which was noted eight days post-vaccination [25]. Also, a transient increase in body

Conclusion

A new vaccine against bovine babesiosis, derived from the culture in vitro with a serum-free medium, supplemented with insulin, transferrin, selenite and putrescine, is able to protect naïve bovines exposed to a natural infection with B. bovis and B. bigemina in the field.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge CONACYT-Mexico for the scholarship provided to Carmen Rojas Martínez to obtain a PhD from CCBA-UADY, Yucatán, México. This study was supported by INIFAP, Project SIGI No. 10231419344, 14392333021. Authors acknowledge the excellent technical assistance by Diego Jesús Polanco Martínez and Grecia Martínez García.

References (37)

  • W.C. Brown et al.

    Designing blood-stage vaccines against Babesia bovis and B. bigemina

    Parasitol. Today

    (1999)
  • W.C. Brown et al.

    A novel 20-kilodalton protein conserved in Babesia bovis and B. bigemina stimulates memory CD4+ T lymphocyte responses in B. bovis- immune cattle

    Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.

    (2001)
  • W.C. Brown et al.

    Immune control of Babesia bovis infection

    Vet. Parasitol.

    (2006)
  • V. Shkap et al.

    Vaccination of older Bos taurus bulls against bovine babesiosis

    Vet. Parasitol.

    (2005)
  • N. Grande et al.

    Comparison between aseric and seric culture-derived exoantigens of Babesia divergens in their ability to induce immunoprotection in gerbils

    Parasitol. Int.

    (1998)
  • R. Bock et al.

    Bovine babesiosis

    Parasitology

    (2004)
  • J.A. Álvarez et al.

    Field challenge of cattle vaccinated with a combined Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina frozen immunogen

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2004)
  • R.E. Bock et al.

    Immunity following use of the Australian tick fever vaccine: A review of the evidence

    Aust. Vet. J.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (18)

    • A prime-boost combination of a three-protein cocktail and multiepitopic MVA as a vaccine against Babesia bigemina elicits neutralizing antibodies and a Th1 cellular immune response in mice

      2022, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bovine babesiosis, caused by B. bigemina and the related species B. bovis, has a high negative economic impact on the cattle industry due to animal death, weight loss and costs of treatment. Despite several drawbacks, vaccination with live attenuated microorganisms constitutes one of the most cost-effective intervention strategies (Rojas-Martínez et al., 2018). These vaccines induce a long-lasting immunity that triggers potent cellular and humoral immune responses and enhanced protection from infection (Bock et al., 2004).

    • Drug screening of food and drug administration-approved compounds against Babesia bovis in vitro

      2020, Experimental Parasitology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bovine babesiosis is an erythrocytic protozoan infectious disease transmitted by ticks (Rojas-Martínez et al., 2018).

    • Molecular investigation of tick-borne infections in cattle from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

      2020, Parasitology International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Clinical symptoms of cattle infected with B. bovis and B. bigemina include high fever, anemia, hemoglobinuria and even death. Both species can be transmitted by Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus [2]. B. bigemina, B. bovis, B. ovata, B. major and B. orientalis are the causative agents of bovine babesiosis that are reported in China [3,4].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text