Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes
Introduction
Safety and quality of patient care is recognized as a priority for health care organizations worldwide. However, large studies across North America and Europe have shown that health care systems are prone to error and that the risk of adverse events is significant (de Vries et al., 2008, Kohn et al., 1999). Adverse patient outcomes or events are defined as unintended injuries or complications caused by health care management rather than the patient's underlying disease process, resulting in prolonged hospital stay, disability, or death (Baker et al., 2004). The Institute of Medicine (IOM) landmark report, To Err is Human, estimates that up to 98,000 patients die, and more than 1 million are injured each year in the United States as a result of preventable medical errors (Kohn et al., 1999). Equally alarming, the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) estimates that in more than 138,000 hospitalizations in Canada in 2014 to 2015, about 30,000—or one in every 18 patients suffered preventable harm that compromised their care (CIHI, 2016). Research has shown that the economic costs of adverse events are also significant, and the burden in developed countries remains high. For instance, the cost of adverse events to the Canadian health care system was estimated at $1.1 billion in 2009 to 2010 (Etchells et al., 2012). Analogous costs have been reported in the United States.
Despite progress in the past 15 years after the IOM report, patient safety remains an important public health challenge (Pronovost, Cleeman, Wright, & Srinivasan, 2016). Studies indicate that alarmingly high rates of adverse events in hospitals are a result of preventable incidents, some of which are likely because of nursing-related factors (Aiken et al., 2002, Institute of Medicine, 2004). Researchers have linked patient safety outcomes to the quality of nursing work environments and lack of effective leadership (Aiken et al., 2002, Institute of Medicine, 2004). In the organizational literature, relational leadership styles (i.e., transformational leadership) have been linked to reduced adverse patient outcomes (Cummings et al., 2010). Few studies, however, have investigated the mechanisms through which leadership influences employee behavior and subsequent implications on patient safety outcomes (Wong, Cummings, & Ducharme, 2013). In the context of the foregoing, one of the biggest knowledge gaps is how nursing leadership and workplace factors influence health care quality and safety outcomes. Thus, the purpose of this study was to test a model linking transformational leadership and structural empowerment to nurses' job satisfaction and prevalence of adverse events in acute care settings. In this study, the researchers examined how transformational leadership influenced patient safety outcomes and job satisfaction through the mediator, structural empowerment.
Transformational leadership is a behavior-based approach to obtain performance beyond basic expectations of workers and to strive for excellence (Bass & Avolio, 1994). Studies have shown that transformational leadership is key in creating supportive work environments in which nurses are structurally empowered to provide optimal patient care (Cummings et al., 2010). Several authors (Gabel, 2013, Institute of Medicine, 2004) have suggested that transformational leadership styles seem particularly relevant in current turbulent and stressful health care work environments. Applying the concept of transformational leadership to this issue may provide insight into the ways in which leadership can influence patient outcomes.
This study integrates concepts from the transformational leadership theory of Bass (1985) and theory of structural empowerment by Kanter (1993) to examine how workplace factors influence patient safety outcomes and job satisfaction. The theoretical underpinnings of the concepts in the proposed model are described in the subsequent paragraphs.
Transformational leadership is a relational leadership style in which followers have trust and respect for the leader and are motivated to do more than is formally expected of them to achieve organizational goals (Bass, 1985). Transformational leadership consists of four core dimensions: idealized influence (attributes and behaviors) describes a manager who is exemplary role model for followers, sets high standards of conduct, and is able to articulate the vision of the organization in an effort to win the trust of the followers. The second dimension, inspirational motivation, reflects a leader's clear articulation of a compelling vision through words, symbols, and imagery (Bass, 1985) to inspire followers to act. The third dimension, intellectual stimulation, reflects the extent to which a leader solicits employees' perspective on problems and considers a wide variety of opinions in making decisions (Bass, 1985). Finally, leaders engaging in individualized consideration, the fourth dimension of transformational leadership, attend to the individual differences in the needs of their employees and seek to coach or mentor them in an effort to help them reach their full potential (Avolio, Bass, & Jung, 1999).
Transformational leadership has consistently been linked to employee attitudes and behaviors in both management settings and nursing. Researcher suggests that the four dimensions of transformational leaders may serve as antecedents to creating structurally empowering work environments. For instance, through intellectual stimulation, a transformational leader encourages employees to participate in the decision-making process, which fosters critical thinking and development of skills and knowledge. Such leader creates empowering conditions for nurses by shaping the quality of support, information, and resources available in the workplace. Transformational leadership behavior is frequently associated with higher levels of employee satisfaction (Walumbwa, Orwa, Wang, & Lawler, 2005), organizational performance, follower work engagement (Zhu, Avolio, & Walumbwa, 2009), and employees' willingness to exert extra effort to reach a given goal. In a study of more than 700 nurses from seven Canadian acute care hospitals, McCutcheon, Doran, Evans, Hall, and Pringle (2009) found important relationships between transformational leadership behaviors of nurse managers and job satisfaction. More recently, Higgins (2015) found that transformational leaders improve the quality of patient care by creating supportive practice environment and organizational citizenship behaviors. These studies highlight the importance of transformational leadership in creating work environments that support professional nursing practice and thus, promote better outcomes for patients and nurses. By developing positive relationships, transformational leaders gain trust of their followers and anticipate their needs by providing access to structurally empowering factors (i.e., information, support, resources) necessary for employees to accomplish their work in a meaningful manner.
The theory of structural empowerment by Kanter (1993) explains how leaders can influence employees to accomplish their work effectively by providing access to these four organizational structures: information, support, resources, and opportunities. Access to information refers to having knowledge of organizational goals, values, and policies as well as the technical knowledge and expertise required to be effective at work. Access to support includes guidance and feedback provided by peers, subordinates, and supervisors, as well as social and emotional support from colleagues. Access to resources refers to having materials, supplies, money, time, and equipment needed to accomplish the job. Finally, access to opportunities for mobility and growth entails access to challenges, rewards, increased status, recognition for competence and skills, and professional development opportunities that increase one's knowledge and skills (Kanter, 1993, Laschinger et al., 2001).
Numerous studies have been conducted to test the structural empowerment theory by Kanter in a variety of nursing populations and settings. Structural empowerment has been associated with magnet hospital characteristics, such as higher levels of nurse autonomy, control, and better relations with physicians (Laschinger et al., 2003, Upenieks, 2003). When working in empowering environments, nurses have collegial support and adequate resources required for high-quality patient care (Armstrong and Laschinger, 2006, Laschinger et al., 2003). Structural empowerment has been shown to be a significant predictor of higher nurse job satisfaction (Cicolini et al., 2014, Laschinger et al., 2004), work engagement (Boamah & Laschinger, 2014), organizational trust and commitment (Laschinger et al., 2001), turnover intentions (Laschinger, 2012), and improve quality of care (Donahue, Piazza, Griffin, Dykes, & Fitzpatrick, 2008). Researchers suggest that nurses led by transformational leaders may experience increased structural empowerment leading to improved working conditions and high-quality outcomes (Laschinger and Leiter, 2006, Spence Laschinger, 2008).
The primary concern of any health care delivery system, and in essence nursing, is the achievement of optimum patient outcomes (WHO, 2005). Patient outcome research has attributed most adverse patient outcomes to factors in the work environment (Aiken, Sloane, Bruyneel, Van den Heede, & Sermeus, 2013) and lack of effective and visible leadership (Institute of Medicine, 2004, Kohn et al., 1999). Aiken et al. (2001) found that the poor working conditions and inadequate nurse staffing were predictors of adverse patient outcomes, such as medication errors, pressure ulcers, pneumonia, failure to rescue, and mortality. In a subsequent subanalysis of Canadian data from this study, similar results were reported (Laschinger & Leiter, 2006). In the present study, nurse-assessed adverse patient outcomes or events include patient falls, medication errors, hospital-acquired infections, pressure ulcers, and patient and/or family complaints as perceived by nurses not from administrative or regulatory database sources. Nurse ratings of quality of care provide related yet distinct information about patient outcomes because nurses are involved virtually at all points of patient care, which make their perspective a valuable source of information. In a study of more than 16,000 nurses in 396 U.S. hospitals, McHugh and Stimpfel (2012) found that nurse-assessed quality of patient care was associated with objective hospital quality indicators, such as patient satisfaction, failure to rescue, and mortality rates, suggesting that the actual and nurse-perceived evaluation of patient outcomes are entwined.
Job satisfaction is an important nursing outcome, which is affected by quality of the work environment. Despite the voluminous research that has been conducted on job satisfaction, high levels of job dissatisfaction among nurses still persist (Hayes et al., 2010, Lu et al., 2012). A growing body of research has linked the quality of nurse work environment and nurse job satisfaction (Laschinger et al., 2004, Laschinger, 2012). It was found that the characteristics of the work environment, pace, balanced workload, relations with coworkers, professional opportunities, and the ability to meet patients' needs influenced job satisfaction. Researchers (Boamah et al., 2017, Cicolini et al., 2014) have shown strong positive relationship between structural empowerment and nurses' job satisfaction. Job satisfaction of nurses is critical to meeting the challenges of quality outcomes, patient satisfaction, and retention of nurses in hospitals (Aiken et al., 2002, Cicolini et al., 2014, Hayes et al., 2010). Although it is well acknowledged that effective nursing leadership is the driving force for creating healthy work environment that fosters positive nurse and patient outcomes, little empirical studies have been undertaken that clearly describe and identify the direct and indirect mechanisms by which leaders effect change in individuals and patient outcomes. The present study draws from theory and research to propose a theoretical model linking transformational leadership to workplace empowerment and, subsequently, to nurse job satisfaction and nurse-assessed adverse patient outcomes.
The hypothesized model illustrating the proposed relationships is depicted in Figure 1. Overall, it is hypothesized that higher staff ratings of their manager's transformational leadership would be related to greater structural empowerment (hypothesis 1), which in turn, would contribute to increased job satisfaction (hypothesis 2), and lower adverse events (hypothesis 3). Higher job satisfaction would lead to lower adverse patient outcomes (hypothesis 4).
Section snippets
Design and Sample
A cross-sectional predictive survey design was used to test the hypothesized model. A random sample of registered nurses (n = 1,000) working in direct patient care in acute care hospitals across Ontario was selected from the College of Nursing provincial registry database and invited to participate in this study. A total of 378 nurses responded to the questionnaire for a response rate of 38%. Eligible participants were nurses working in direct patient care settings. After obtaining ethics
Participant Characteristics
The demographic characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1. On average, nurses were 46 years old with 21 years of nursing experience and 12.2 years working on their current hospital unit. Most nurses were females (94%), and about 45% were baccalaureate prepared and worked full time (68%) in medical–surgical units (30%) and critical care units (30%). Overall, characteristics of this study cohort are relatively similar to those reported for all Ontario nurses (CIHI, 2016).
Descriptive Results for Major Study Variables
Table 2
Discussion
The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and nurse-assessed adverse patient outcomes using mediating mechanism of structural empowerment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide empirical support for this proposition. Perhaps the most important finding in this study was the significant indirect effect of transformational leadership on adverse patient outcomes through structural empowerment. Although transformational
Conclusion
In summary, the findings of this study underscore the important role that transformational leaders play in enhancing the quality of the work environment for nurses to produce better outcomes for patients. The results contribute to a small but growing body of empirical evidence showing an association between relational leadership and patient outcomes. Findings from this study suggest that transformational leadership is paramount for improving patient safety and increasing nurses' satisfaction at
Acknowledgments
Sincere gratitude goes to the registered nurses who participated in this study and the Western University Dissertation Scholarship for their funding resources. This study was funded in part by the Canadian Nurses Foundation, the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, and contributions from the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario's Research, and Education Interest Group grants.
References (68)
- et al.
Nurses' reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2013) Improving care requires leadership in nursing
Nurse Education Today
(1999)- et al.
Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2010) - et al.
The relationship between nurses' perceptions of empowerment and patient satisfaction
Applied Nursing Research
(2008) - et al.
Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
(1976) - et al.
Job satisfaction among hospital nurses revisited: A systematic review
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2012) - et al.
The impact of leadership styles on nurses' satisfaction and intention to stay among Saudi nurses
Journal of Nursing Management
(2012) - et al.
Nurses' reports on hospital care in five countries
Health Affairs
(2001) - et al.
Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction
JAMA
(2002) Nurse staffing and patient outcomes in the inpatient hospital setting
(2000)
IBM SPSS AmosTM 21 user's guide
Structural empowerment, Magnet hospital characteristics, and patient safety culture: Making the link
Journal of Nursing Care Quality
The impact of transformational leadership on nurse psychological empowerment
International Journal of Hospital Research
Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Manual
Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: The incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Leadership and performance beyond expectations
Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership
Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
Psychological Bulletin
The influence of transformational leadership on nurse-reported patient safety outcomes
Engaging new nurses: The role of psychological capital and workplace empowerment
Journal of Research in Nursing
Factors influencing new graduate nurse burnout development, job satisfaction and patient care quality: A time-lagged study
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Structural empowerment, job satisfaction, and turnover intention of Chinese clinical nurses
Nursing & Health Sciences
Measuring patient harm in Canadian hospitals. With what can be done to improve patient safety?
Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: A meta-analysis of techniques to improve response
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Workplace empowerment and nurses' job satisfaction: A systematic literature review
Journal of Nursing Management
The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: A systematic review
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method
The economics of patient safety in acute care
Transformational leadership and healthcare
Medical Science Educator
Factors contributing to nurse job satisfaction in the acute hospital setting: A review of recent literature
Journal of Nursing Management
The influence of nurse manager transformational leadership on nurse and patient outcomes: Mediating effects of supportive practice environments, organizational citizenship behaviours, patient safety culture and nurse job satisfaction
Cited by (279)
Views from Australian osteopaths and industry stakeholders about the profession: A qualitative study
2023, International Journal of Osteopathic MedicineThe practice environment of primary care nurses: A cross-sectional study of five health care districts in San Paulo, Brazil
2023, International Journal of Nursing Studies AdvancesAn educational program to elevate the financial acumen of nurse leaders
2024, Nursing Management