Microstructure and mechanical properties of laser surface treated 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steel

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106139Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Temperature cycles that exceed A3 temperature are likely leading into ferrite structures.

  • The dwell time during the austenitic phase is the main influencing factor for the homogeneity in the heat-affected zone.

  • Existence of the ferrite grains reduce the hardness values of the heat-affected zone.

Abstract

Fatigue property improvement for automotive components such as crankshafts can be achieved through material selection and tailored surface design. Microalloyed steels are of high interest for automotive applications due to their balanced properties, excellent hardenability and good machinability. Lasers facilitate efficient and precise surface processing and understanding the laser-material-property interrelationships is the key to process optimisation. This work examines microstructural development during laser surface treatment of 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steel and the resulting mechanical properties. Laser beam shaping techniques are employed to evaluate the impact of beam shaping on the process. It revealed that ferrite structures remain in the treated area surrounded by martensite due to insufficient heating and dwell time of carbon diffusion.

Introduction

Microalloyed steels have good machinability and hardenability properties that can reduce production costs related to heat treatments [1]. Grain refinement and precipitation hardening due to alloying elements improve the strength of microalloyed steels, which makes these steels suitable for automotive application [2]. The first automotive application of microalloyed medium carbon steel was in the manufacturing of crankshafts [3], where fatigue properties are a very important consideration. Long-term fatigue life improvements can be achieved by modifying the materials composition and improving manufacturing processes. High strength materials can sustain heavy load and thus offer longer fatigue life for automotive application, such as 38MnSiVS microalloyed steel that has been commonly used in the automotive industry [4], [5], [6], [7]. Meanwhile, 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steel offers higher strength properties than 38MnSiVS due to its higher carbon content [8]. Therefore, the properties after heat treatment of 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steel are of interest.

Surface hardening is one processing strategy to improve fatigue properties by inducing martensitic transformation through heat treatment. The martensitic structure increases the surface hardness and thus induces the residual stress characteristics that eventually hamper the fatigue crack propagation [9]. Common steel hardening methods, such as induction hardening and deep rolling, have several limitations [10]. For instance, the depth of hardened layers can be inhomogeneous and the processes are potentially less energy efficient than advanced hardening methods such as laser surface hardening [11], [12]. The laser beam acts as a thermal energy source in the material to induce martensitic transformation in the steels [13]. An advantage of using this hardening method is that the characteristics of the laser beam allow flexibility in controlling the heat-treated zone for processing and the gradient of thermal energy input. In this way, the manufacturing process and final products can be more energy efficient and improved. Beam shaping has been reported to deliver different spatial thermal energy inputs during laser processing [14], [15], [16], [17]. This gives a chance to create a specific thermal energy input that is the most efficient for desired processes and products.

Consequently, understanding the martensitic transformation of 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steel during laser surface treatment and observation of the impact of laser beam shaping are important. Therefore, the present work was conducted in order to gain knowledge about laser heat treating 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steels and the influence of laser beam shaping techniques.

Section snippets

Methodology

Fig. 1 illustrates the experimental set-up for this study. Beam shaping optics, namely a kaleidoscope and a Diffractive Optical Element (DOE), were mounted on a Yb:fibre laser system from IPG photonics with a wavelength of 1070 nm to produce single, straight, hardened tracks. The laser output power was 3000 W and the process speed was 100 mm/s for all experiments shown in Table 2. Illustrations of the optical set-up and beam shapes are shown in Fig. 2.

The specimens were 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed

Temperature measurements

Fig. 4 shows the thermal cycles of the pixel outlined in red in Fig. 1 when heating with a Gaussian beam and a rectangular top-hat beam (kaleidoscope). The emission intensity from the hardening process with the DOE was too low for recording the temperature during the process.

The thermal cycle of the rectangular top-hat beam shows different characteristics compared to the Gaussian beam. The rectangular top-hat beam process shows an abrupt increase and drop of temperature in the beginning and the

Microstructures created by short thermal cycles

According to the microstructural results in Fig. 5, Fig. 6, the laser-hardened area can be schematically divided into the three main areas highlighted in Fig. 8.

Temperatures measured on the surface were at values above the known austenization temperature, see Fig. 4. Appropriate heating and cooling rates combined with sufficient time above the A3 temperature were available in the region close to the surface. Therefore, the creation of fully martensitic structures in the ‘A’ area is a reasonable

Conclusions

Laser surface treatments of 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steel using different laser beam shapes have been carried out. Three processes involving different laser beam distributions were characterised by different thermal cycles and power losses, affecting microstructural development and thus hardness values and the residual stress fields. The results using different spatial laser intensity distributions indicate that the laser power and power density mainly defines the hardened zone dimensions. Three

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Handika Sandra Dewi: Investigation, Writing - original draft. Andreas Fischer: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Joerg Volpp: Writing - review & editing, Methodology, Supervision. Thomas Niendorf: Supervision. Alexander F.H. Kaplan: Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the EC Research Fund for Coal and Steel, RFCS, for the project Stiffcrank, no. 754155 and OptoSteel, no. 709954.

References (24)

  • S.F. Medina et al.

    Ti / AI interaction and austenite grain control in crankshaft manufacturing with 38MnSiVS5 steel

    Steels Automot. Apl.

    (2006)
  • I. Equbal et al.

    A full factorial design-based desirability function approach for optimization of hot forged vanadium micro-alloyed steel

    Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Influence of secondary-pass laser treatment on retained ferrite and martensite in 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steel

      2022, Materials Today Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the third step, the regions that have more than 0.05% of carbon will quench to martensite and the rest will revert to ferrite, leaving retained ferrite embedded with martensite as the final microstructure [25]. Homogenization of carbon in the austenite has a major impact on the appearance of the retained ferrite in the resulting microstructure after laser heat treatment [21,26–28]. Previous investigations on adjacent tracks of laser surface hardening found that tempering effects occurred in the overlapping region [12,14,29].

    • Short thermal cycle treatment with laser of vanadium microalloyed steels

      2020, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      These regions of austenite that have more than a certain amount of carbon (0.05 %) will quench into martensite and the rest will revert into ferrite, leaving retained ferrite along with martensite in the final microstructure [42]. Later works also highlighted that homogenisation of carbon in austenite has a major impact on the appearance of retained ferrite [43–47]. Since fast thermal cycles were found to result in different microstructure and mechanical characteristics compared to longer thermal cycles processes, one may question how this knowledge applies for 38MnSiVS5 and 44MnSiVS6 microalloyed steels.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text