Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Historical perspective and nomenclature of potentially malignant or potentially premalignant oral epithelial lesions with emphasis on leukoplakia—some suggestions for modifications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.11.023Get rights and content

Of the potentially (pre)maligant oral epithelial lesions, leukoplakia is the most common. A brief overview of the various definitions of leukoplakia that have been used in the past is presented here. A proposal has been made to modify the current definition. Clinically, for decades, leukoplakias have been divided into homogeneous and nonhomogeneous leukoplakias and further into different subtypes. A proposal has been made to slightly rearrange these subtypes. Furthermore, attention has been paid to a number of keratotic lesions that have been reported in the literature. It is expected that the increasing knowledge on carcinogenesis, including various genetic aspects, will be reflected in the definition of oral potentially (pre)malignant lesions in the near future.

Section snippets

Definition

In 2005, in another WHO-guided conference on the definition and terminology related to leukoplakia and leukoplakia-like (leukoplakic) lesions, the 1978 WHO definition was amended as follows: “The term leukoplakia should be used to recognize white plaques of questionable risk having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no increased risk for cancer.”9 It was added that leukoplakia is primarily a clinical term and has no specific histology. In Table I, a series of well-defined,

Preleukoplakia

There have been some reports in the literature on preleukoplakia, thought of as a precursor stage of leukoplakia and decribed as a gray or grayish-white area with indistinct borders blending into the adjacent normal mucosa.14, 15 This term may perhaps be applied to flat changes of the mucosa that are not white enough to qualify for the term leukoplakia.

Keratoses

The use of the term keratosis for a number of oral white lesions is somewhat confusing. In fact, keratosis is primarily a histologic term, used

Discussion and Some Suggestions for Modifications of the Definition of Leukoplakia and the Clinical Classification

In view of the increasing knowledge about carcinogenesis, including various genetic aspects, it is no surprise that suggestions already have been made to modify the definition of potentially (pre)malignantlesions and diseases. An example is the one provided by Sarode et al.: “It is a group of disorders of varying etiologies, usually tobacco, characterized by mutagen associated, spontaneous, or hereditary alterations or mutations in the genetic material of oral epithelial cells with or without

References (28)

  • I. van der Waal

    Potentially malignant disorders of the oral and oropharyngeal mucosa: terminology, classification and present concepts of management

    Oral Oncol

    (2009)
  • P. Holmstrup et al.

    Long-term treatment outcome of oral premalignant lesions

    Oral Oncol

    (2006)
  • E. Schwimmer

    Die idiopathischen Schleimhautplaques der Mundhöhle (Leukoplakia buccalis)

    Arch Derm Syphilol

    (1877)
  • World Health Organization

    Report from a Meeting on Investigators on the Histological Definition of Precancerous Lesions

    (1972)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Bibliometric analysis of the top-100 cited articles on oral potentially malignant disorders to guide research topic and direction

      2020, Journal of Dental Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Currently, preference is given to the term ‘potentially malignant’ instead of the terms ‘premalignant and precancerous’, was recommended at a workshop of the WHO Collaborating Centre held in 2005.1 It is a more precise term because there is no certainty that all precancerous lesions will eventually develop into cancer.1,2 Clinically, oral leukoplakia, erythroplakia, submucous fibrosis, lichen planus are individual disorders of OPMD.3

    • Causal inference and directed acyclic graph: An epidemiological concept much needed for oral submucous fibrosis

      2020, Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although occasionally preceded by, or associated with, the formation of vesicles, it is always associated with a juxta-epithelial inflammatory reaction followed by a fibroelastic change of the lamina propria and epithelial atrophy that leads to stiffness of the oral mucosa and causes trismus and an inability to eat’.1–3 Since 1962, various nomenclatures have been proposed in the scientific literature including Juxta-epithelial fibrosis, Idiopathic palatal fibrosis, Idiopathic scleroderma of mouth, Diffuse oral submucous fibrosis, Sclerosing stomatitis, and Oral fibrosis.4 Since the disorder is most commonly diagnosed as a clinical entity with a wide range of presentation of symptoms including pain, burning sensations, ulcerations, progressive restriction in mouth opening, blanching of the mucosa, depapillation of the tongue, loss of pigmentation and dysphonia, and hearing impairment in advanced cases (Fig. 1),6–9 recently, a clinical definition was proposed describing OSMF as ‘a debilitating, progressive, irreversible collagen metabolic disorder induced by chronic chewing of areca nut and its commercial preparations; affecting the oral mucosa and occasionally the pharynx and esophagus; leading to mucosal stiffness and functional morbidity; and has a potential risk of malignant transformation’.5

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text