Prenatal methylmercury exposure increases responding under clocked and unclocked fixed interval schedules of reinforcement
Introduction
Methylmercury (MeHg) is a known developmental neurotoxicant found in fish and marine mammals. Fish, however, are also an important source of nutrients such as selenium and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. In rodent studies examining adult-onset MeHg exposure, selenium (Se) ameliorated some of the effects of chronic, high-level MeHg exposure [9], [12], [21]. For developmental MeHg exposure, however, evidence that Se confers protection is less pronounced. With developmental MeHg exposure, a diet severely deficient in Se enhanced MeHg's fetolethality [30], as well as MeHg's detrimental effects on the development of gait, thermal preference, and open-field activity, but these effects did not persist into adulthood [46]. In contrast, a Se-sufficient diet has not attenuated MeHg's neurobehavioral toxicity [4], [36] with the exception of one study [46]. In that study, Se excess attenuated MeHg-induced hypoactivity in animals exposed to 6 mg/kg MeHg by gavage on days 6–9 of gestation and examined at two months of age [8]. Thus, while Se ameliorates some of MeHg's effects following adult-onset exposure, the picture is less clear for developmental exposure.
A recent study focused on the potential interactions between low-level developmental MeHg exposure and nutritionally relevant dietary Se on spatial discrimination reversals in adulthood [36]. Although all rats acquired the original discrimination similarly, MeHg-exposed rats, regardless of Se exposure, made more errors than controls on the first and third reversals, which were away from the lever that was reinforced in the original discrimination. MeHg-exposed rats also had shorter choice latencies than controls, implying an impulsive or perseverative response pattern. Rats consuming a low-Se diet, regardless of their MeHg exposure, made more omissions (trials without a response) during the first reversal and required more sessions to complete this reversal than rats exposed to a high-Se diet. Thus, while there were main effects of both MeHg and Se, on no measure was there an interaction between Se and MeHg exposure. However, behavioral procedures that permit greater variation in response rate, such as the fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement, might be sensitive to such an interaction.
The behavioral effects produced by MeHg exposure could be viewed as reflecting a reduced sensitivity to changing reinforcement contingencies or an increased reinforcer efficacy [23]. Disentangling these two ideas is difficult, since each would result in persistent, or even perseverative, responding when reinforcement contingencies are altered. Both interpretations are consistent with findings that gestational MeHg exposure slowed transitions during a choice in-transition procedure [27], [28], resulted in more rapid acquisition of lever-pressing and lack of ratio strain under large fixed ratio schedules of reinforcement [32], and a tolerance for higher ratios under a progressive ratio procedure [32], [35].
The behavioral patterns seen in MeHg-treated animals in previous studies allow us to make predictions about the behavior of exposed animals under other reinforcement schedules. For example, response rates under fixed interval (FI) schedules are positively related to the reinforcement magnitude of food pellets [19], [20], sucrose solution [42], and cocaine [2]. If a reinforcer's efficacy is increased for animals exposed to MeHg, then increased response rates under the FI schedule, especially in the last portion of the interval, would be expected.
Previous studies of developmental MeHg exposure have not identified deficits in discrimination [e.g. [5], [39], [41]], an observation that supports a second prediction. If exteroceptive stimuli are correlated with the passage of time in an FI schedule, a “clocked” FI (CFI) [16], [31], then we would expect animals to make fewer responses, particularly in the first portion of the interval, as compared with the typical FI. Since there is little evidence that developmental MeHg exposure affects discrimination processes [5], [24], [39], [41], then we might expect no differential effect of MeHg on clocked performance. However, MeHg-exposed animals might be expected to have greater response rates during the latter portion of the interval in both components if reinforcer efficacy is altered by MeHg exposure. Finally, if the reinforcer is omitted at the end of the FI and CFI components, but responses continue to be recorded, then we would expect MeHg-exposed animals to make more responses than controls.
The present study was designed to examine the role of exteroceptive stimuli and reinforcement omission in rats exposed developmentally to MeHg and chronically to a diet either marginal or rich in Se, a nutrient hypothesized to protect against MeHg's neurotoxic effects [18], [34], [44], [45], [48]. The experiments were conducted using a 2 (chronic Se) × 3 (gestational MeHg) full factorial design, which allows for the direct examination of the interactions between MeHg and Se, as well as the main effects of either element. The MeHg concentrations chosen produce levels spanning the low to moderate range [6], [26], as determined by brain mercury [25]. Likewise, the Se diets were at the low and high end of recommended intakes. The 0.06 ppm Se concentration is lowest possible with a casein-based diet and is still a nutritionally adequate level for rodents [22], [38]. The higher, 0.6 ppm, concentration is at the high end of adequate and represents an excess over the AIN-93 formulation, which contains 0.15 ppm of Se [37], [38], but is below that thought to be toxic [1].
Upon reaching adulthood, female offspring were trained to respond under a Mult FI 120″, Clock FI (CFI) 120″ schedule of reinforcement. When the FI schedule was in effect, the first lever-press after 120″ produced sucrose. When the CFI was in effect, five distinct auditory stimuli were presented sequentially for 24″ each, resulting in a 120″ interval, and the first lever-press after 120″ produced sucrose. Rats experienced twenty-two sessions of the Mult FI CFI schedule with auditory stimuli before group comparisons of baseline responding were made at 13 months of age. After this first comparison, drug challenges began (to be described elsewhere) with multiple doses of cocaine, desipramine, SKF-38393, quinpirole, SCH-23390 and sulpiride. At 20 months of age, thirty days after completing the last dose-effect determination, responding under the Mult FI CFI schedule was reassessed and compared with their performance at 13 months of age. Finally, reinforcement omission trials were instated for 10 sessions at 21 months of age: responses at the end of the interval were not followed by sucrose for half of the FI and CFI components, but responding continued to be monitored for an additional 240″. The responses at the end of the interval in the remaining FI and CFI components were followed by sucrose as in previous sessions.
Section snippets
Subjects
The subjects were 42 female Long–Evans rats (F1 generation) housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled, AAALAC-accredited colony room that was maintained on a 12-hour light-dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.). Subjects were bred at the Biological Research Facility at Auburn University (described below), and each was randomly selected from a separate litter, so the litter served as the statistical unit for all analyses. These rats were exposed in utero to MeHg via maternal consumption of
FI CFI condition: 13 months
There was a within-subject effect of the clock on all response rate measures. As seen in Fig. 2, overall response rates were slightly higher in the FI component, [F(1,36) = 4.180, P = .048], as were FI rates in bins 1 and 2 averaged [F(1,36) = 6.943, P = .012], and bin 5 [F(1,36) = 7.943, P = .008]. This effect is hard to see in the figure. It occurred because each rat had a higher FI than CFI rate, but the figure shows group averages.
There was a between-subjects effect of MeHg on overall rate [F(2,36) =
Discussion
Prenatal exposure to MeHg and a lifelong diet that was either marginal or rich in Se were manipulated in a 2 (Se) × 3 (MeHg) factorial design, a design that allowed for the assessment of the main effects of both elements, as well as their potential interaction. Since little is known about the behavioral effects of Se, the ability to examine this trace element is a particular advantage of this design.
The fixed interval schedule was selected because both low- and high-rates of responding can be
Acknowledgement
Supported by NIH ES10865. The research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health.
References (48)
- et al.
Co-consumption of selenium and vitamin E altered the reproductive and developmental toxicity of methylmercury in rats
Neurotoxicology & Teratology
(2006) - et al.
Methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity: a comparison of effects in humans and animals
Neurotoxicology and Teratology
(1990) - et al.
Fixed-interval/fixed ratio performance in adult monkeys exposed in utero to methylmercury
Neurotoxicology & Teratology
(1996) - et al.
Localization of mercury in CNS of the rat. IV. The effect of selenium on orally administered organic and inorganic mercury
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
(1991) - et al.
Prolonged behavioral effects of in utero exposure to lead or methyl mercury: reduced sensitivity to changes in reinforcement contingencies during behavioral transitions and in steady-state
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
(1994) - et al.
Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats
Neurotoxicology & Teratology
(2004) - et al.
Brain and blood mercury and selenium after chronic and developmental exposure to methylmercury
Neurotoxicology
(2006) - et al.
Gestational exposure to methylmercury and n-3 fatty acids: effects on high- and low-rate operant behavior in adulthood
Neurotoxicology and Teratology
(2006) - et al.
Gestational exposure to methylmercury and selenium: effects on spatial discrimination reversal in adulthood
Neurotoxicology
(2006) - et al.
AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet
Journal of Nutrition
(1993)