Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 44, Issue 2, 15 January 2009, Pages 502-508
NeuroImage

Altered brain activity during pain processing in fibromyalgia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is characterized by widespread pain. Studies with functional neuroimaging support the hypothesis of central pain augmentation in FMS. We tested this in our study with a novel paradigm of tonic pain induced by a single stimulus. Tonic pain, in contrast to phasic pain, seems to be a more appropriate experimental approach to study adaptive mechanisms of pain processing in FMS. We hypothesized that brain areas related to the “medial” pain system and the amygdalae will present different activation in patients compared to healthy subjects. An fMRI-block design before, during and after an incision was made in patients with FMS and in healthy controls. Acute pain caused by the incision was measured during the course of the experiment. A 2 factorial model of BOLD-signal changes was designed to explore significant differences of brain activation between both groups during the pain stimulus. Additionally the first Eigenvariates in those areas which show an interaction between both factors were determined over the time course of pain stimulation. Differences of activation in the fronto-cingulate cortex, the supplemental motor areas, and the thalamus were found between both groups with distinct differences in BOLD-signals changes over the time course of pain stimulation, even during anticipation of pain. Our results support the hypothesis that central mechanisms of pain processing in the medial pain system, favourable cognitive/affective factors even during the anticipation of pain, may play an important role for pain processing in patients with FMS.

Introduction

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a pain syndrome characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain and diffuse tenderness at multiple tenderpoints (Wolfe et al., 1990). Patients with FMS present lower pain thresholds and report higher pain ratings than healthy controls in response to different stimuli (Desmeules et al., 2003, Granges and Littlejohn, 1993, Petzke et al., 2003). The etiology of this chronic pain condition is largely unknown.

Functional imaging during experimental pain with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) presented similar brain activation in regions involved in pain processing in patients with FMS and healthy controls, however with increased pain sensitivity and brain activation in comparison to healthy controls during comparable stimulus (Gracely et al., 2002). In another study, increased brain activity in FMS compared to controls during non-painful stimuli was detected, with greatest differences in regions involved in processing of sensory, cognitive and emotional aspects of pain (Cook et al., 2004). Additionally, a cognitive style of catastrophizing, that means responses to pain will be perceived as being awful, horrible and unbearable, in patients with FMS was associated with the activity in brain areas related to anticipation of pain (medial frontal cortex, cerebellum), attention to pain (dorsal ACC, dorsolateral–prefrontal cortex), motor control and emotional aspects of pain (claustrum) (Gracely et al., 2004). Additionally, Giesecke et al. (2005) found amygdala activation during pressure pain restricted to the subset of FMS patients with comorbid depression.

Functional brain imaging in healthy controls has identified a complex network of brain areas involved in serial and parallel pain processing (for overview see (Porro, 2003, Treede et al., 1999)): Areas of the “lateral pain system”, mainly attributed to the sensory-discriminative component of pain (sensory cortex, inferior parietal cortex, posterior insula) are related to mechanisms of stimulus localization, intensity and quality discrimination. Parts of the cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and frontal cortex, attributed to the ”medial pain system”, are mainly related to affective–motivational components of pain, e.g. its unpleasantness. Furthermore, studies provided important information about influences of psychological mechanisms (e.g. cognition, attention, anticipation, emotion) on pain processing in healthy subjects (Bantick et al., 2002, Ploghaus et al., 2003, Porro et al., 2003, Wager et al., 2004). The amygdalae, for which no definite functional allocation into the pain network has been established so far, seem to be important in pain processing in regard of cognitive factors of pain anticipation (Tracey, 2005, Bernard et al., 1992, Hadjipavlou et al., 2006).

In patients with chronic pain disorders, like in FMS, a major question is about the factors which are important in the transition from acute to chronic pain. In regard of the results of functional imaging (Cook et al., 2004, Gracely et al., 2004, Giesecke et al., 2005) and other studies (Thieme et al., 2005, Giesecke et al., 2003, Montoya et al., 2005) in patients with FMS it is very much reasonable to suspect central sensitization due to affective/cognitive factors as important constitutes in the transition from acute to chronic pain in FMS.

All fMRI studies in FMS published so far used repetitive phasic noxious stimuli to induce pain in “block-designs”. A growing body of evidence indicates that the neurobiological mechanisms of acute pain perception are at least partially different from that seen in chronic clinical pain conditions. Moreover chronic pain engages brain regions critical for cognitive/emotional assessments (for review see Apkarian et al., 2005). When answering the question whether affective/cognitive factors may play an important role in FMS, which seem to be related to more subtle changes in brain activity, a tonic pain as an experimental approximation to chronic pain may be more appropriate in detecting the temporal changes of brain activation in adaptation of pain (Wiech et al., 2005).

Kawamata et al. (2002) introduced a new kind of a pain model in humans by performing an incision at the volar forearm which is thought to be related to peripheral and central sensitization mechanisms and causes a pain which decreases over several minutes. With this new pain model of tonic pain we expected to detect subtle and adaptive mechanisms of pain processing in functional imaging in a population of patients with a chronic pain disorder.

We hypothesized that during the course of pain experience brain areas of the “medial” pain system, including the amygdalae, as important areas in pain anticipation and affective/cognitive processing, will present differing activation in patients with FMS compared to healthy subjects. Differences between patients with FMS and healthy controls should occur even in the time of anticipation of pain and without the presence of a painful stimulation.

Section snippets

Subjects

The study was conducted at the University Hospital Münster, Germany. 18 female Patients and 19 healthy female controls participated in the study. Patients with FMS were recruited through the University Hospital or by advertising in local newspaper, had to met American College of Rheumatology criteria for FMS and had pain as their major complaint (Wolfe et al., 1990). An extensive review of prior diagnostic procedures of the patients chart was done by a registered rheumatologist (M.G.) to

fMRI data pre-processing

SPM5 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) standard routines and templates were used for pre-processing of functional MRI data (Realignment, Normalization (resulting voxel size 2 × 2 × 2 mm3), Smoothing (8 mm isotropic Gaussian kernel; high-pass filter cut-off to 160 s)). Each session of image acquisition was defined as a separate session in the realignment procedure.

First-level analyses

After pre-processing the data, individual data analysis was performed using SPM5. For each participant the preprocessed data were assigned to

Subject characteristics

Patients and controls did not differ according to their age. Patients reported more impairment in their daily activities due to their pain and higher mental burden. Patients feel more anxious prior the study than controls; however there was no difference according anxiousness after the study. During the course of the fMRI experiment, patients reported significant higher pain ratings (NRS) than controls during and after incision (see Table 1).

BOLD-signal changes between groups (interaction ‘Group’ × ‘Time’)

Patients with FMS and healthy controls showed

Discussion

The main goal of the present study was to characterize the temporal differences of brain activation between patients with FMS and healthy controls in response to an acute and tonic pain stimulus that causes prolonged pain and hyperalgesia as a result of peripheral and central sensitization. The main findings of our study was, that higher amounts of pain ratings of patients compared to healthy controls paralleled atypical brain activation of patients in areas of the pain network. Patients

Acknowledgments

Prof. Dr. Pogatzki-Zahn was supported by the “Innovative Medizinische Förderung” (IMF), University of Münster, Germany (IMF PO619838). Dr. Burgmer was supported by the “Verein zur Förderung der Universität Münster”.

References (56)

  • PetzkeF. et al.

    Increased pain sensitivity in fibromyalgia: effects of stimulus type and mode of presentation

    Pain

    (2003)
  • PicardN. et al.

    Imaging the premotor areas

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2001)
  • PloghausA. et al.

    Neural circuitry underlying pain modulation: expectation, hypnosis, placebo

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2003)
  • PorroC.A. et al.

    Functional activity mapping of the mesial hemispheric wall during anticipation of pain

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • StaudR. et al.

    Brain activity related to temporal summation of C-fiber evoked pain

    Pain

    (2007)
  • SumnerP. et al.

    Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • TraceyI.

    Nociceptive processing in the human brain

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2005)
  • TreedeR.D. et al.

    The cortical representation of pain

    Pain

    (1999)
  • Tzourio-MazoyerN. et al.

    Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • VierckC.J.

    Mechanisms underlying development of spatially distributed chronic pain (fibromyalgia)

    Pain

    (2006)
  • WiechK. et al.

    Modulation of pain processing in hyperalgesia by cognitive demand

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • WrightK.D. et al.

    Factorial validity of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ)

    Eur. J. Pain

    (2001)
  • ZambreanuL. et al.

    A role for the brainstem in central sensitisation in humans. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Pain

    (2005)
  • BantickS.J. et al.

    Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI

    Brain

    (2002)
  • BaronR. et al.

    Brain processing of capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia: a functional MRI study

    Neurology

    (1999)
  • BernardJ.F. et al.

    Nucleus centralis of the amygdala and the globus pallidus ventralis: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1992)
  • CoghillR.C. et al.

    Distributed processing of pain and vibration by the human brain

    J. Neurosci.

    (1994)
  • CookD.B. et al.

    Functional imaging of pain in patients with primary fibromyalgia

    J. Rheumatol.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (137)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text