ReviewModels of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms
Section snippets
Early horse-race models of response inhibition
The idea that response inhibition depends on the relative finishing time of a go process and a stop process has always dominated the stop-signal literature. Vince (1948) showed that subjects could stop their response only when the delay between the go stimulus and the stop signal (stop-signal delay or SSD) was short (i.e., 50 ms). At longer delays (i.e., 100 ms and longer), response inhibition was very rare, which suggests that the stop process started too late to cancel the response. Lappin and
The independent horse-race model
Early horse-race models mainly focused on describing go and stop performance either qualitatively (Lappin and Eriksen, 1966) or with narrowly focused quantitative assumptions (Ollman, 1973). These models were limited in generality and lacked a precise description of the main variables of interest, namely the difficulty of the stop process and the latency of the stop process (stop-signal reaction time or SSRT). Unlike the latency of an overt choice response, the latency of the response to the
Independence of the go and stop process
The independent horse-race model assumes independence between the finishing times of the go process and stop process (Logan and Cowan, 1984). The independence assumption takes two forms: context independence (also referred to as signal independence) and stochastic independence. Context independence refers to the assumption that the go RT distribution is the same for no-stop-signal trials and stop-signal trials. Stochastic independence refers to the assumption that trial-by-trial variability in
The role of the stop process in inhibiting a response
Logan and Cowan (1984) described how respond inhibition depends on the relative finishing time of a go process and a stop process. Boucher et al., 2007a, Boucher et al., 2007b elaborated this idea and described how a stop unit strongly inhibits inhibit a go unit after an afferent delay. Central to these models is that a go response is inhibited by the activation of a stop process. An alternative to this idea is that a go response is inhibited by the preparation of an alternative go response. In
Concluding remarks
The stop-signal paradigm is very useful for the study of response inhibition in a laboratory setting judging from the widespread use of the paradigm in cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology. Performance in the stop-signal paradigm is typically described as a race between a go process and a stop process. This horse race was formalized by Logan and Cowan (1984). After more than 25 years, their independent horse-race model still offers a remarkably
Acknowledgments
Frederick Verbruggen is a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation—Flanders. Gordon D. Logan is supported by grant BCS 0646588 from the National Science Foundation, grant no. FA9550-07-1-0192 from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant, and by National Institute of Mental Health Grant R01-MH073879-01. We thank Guido Band, Adam Aron and an anonymous reviewer for their useful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
References (126)
Frontal cortex as the central executive of working memory: time to revise our view
Cortex
(2003)- et al.
Methylphenidate improves response inhibition in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Biological Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2004) - et al.
Saccadic countermanding: a comparison of central and peripheral stop signals
Vision Research
(2001) - et al.
Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure
Acta Psychologica
(2003) - et al.
Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque
Vision Research
(2007) - et al.
Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model
Vision Research
(2001) - et al.
Cognitive control in the posterior frontolateral cortex: evidence from common activations in task coordination, interference control, and working memory
Neuroimage
(2004) - et al.
Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects?
Biological Psychology
(2008) - et al.
Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys
Vision Research
(2007)
Subjective impulsivity and baseline EEG in relation to stopping performance
Brain Research
Performance monitoring and stop signal inhibition in abstinent patients with cocaine dependence
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Executive control of thought and action
Acta Psychologica
The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis
Cognitive Psychology
Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action
Neuroimage
Poor response inhibition as a predictor of problem drinking and illicit drug use in adolescents at risk for alcoholism and other substance use disorders
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Impaired response inhibition in obsessive compulsive disorder
European Psychiatry
Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated
Brain and Cognition
Monitoring and control of action by the frontal lobes
Neuron
Halting in single word production: a test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring
Journal of Memory and Language
Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task
Clinical Neurophysiology
Inhibitory control of eye movements during oculomotor countermanding in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Experimental Brain Research
The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control
Neuroscientist
Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI
Journal of Neuroscience
Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans
Nature Neuroscience
Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus
Journal of Neuroscience
Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades
Psychological Review
Stopping eye and hand movements: are the processes independent?
Perception & Psychophysics
Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex
Science
Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals
Experimental Brain Research
At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?
Experimental Brain Research
Motor inhibition and cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania
American Journal of Psychiatry
Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex
Journal of Neurophysiology
Executive “brake failure” following deactivation of human frontal lobe
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Automaticity in motor sequence learning does not impair response inhibition
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
A note on the stop-signal paradigm, or how to observe the unobservable
Psychological Review
Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
In search of the point of no return—the control of response processes
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: anterior cingulate cortex
Journal of Neurophysiology
The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis
Journal of Experimental Psychology-General
The modification of an already-programmed response—a new interpretation of Henry and Harrison (1961)
Journal of Motor Behavior
Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: visual, movement, and fixation activity
Journal of Neurophysiology
Countermanding saccades in macaque
Visual Neuroscience
Performance monitoring by the anterior cingulate cortex during saccade countermanding
Science
Inhibition in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as indexed by heart rate change
Developmental Psychology
Canceling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys
Journal of Neurophysiology
Cited by (553)
Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on reactive response inhibition
2024, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsNeural mechanisms of domain-general inhibitory control
2024, Trends in Cognitive SciencesCortico-spinal modularity in the parieto-frontal system: A new perspective on action control
2023, Progress in NeurobiologyThe effects of cocaine use severity and abstinence on behavioral performance and neural processes of response inhibition
2023, Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging
- 1
Tel.: +32 615 322 2529; fax: +32 615 343 0449.