Developing discharge practice through education: Module development, delivery and outcomes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.08.008Get rights and content

Summary

In England (UK) the discharge of patients from hospital is a source of constant scrutiny from primary care trusts in order to reduce the patient length of stay in Hospital. To support nurses in practice a part time, post registration discharge practice education module was developed entitled Facilitating Timely Patient Discharge. It was the first of its kind to be accredited at degree level (level 6) during 2006.

University evaluation of the module involved an academic assignment based on a 3000 word case study. Projects in practice were integrated to enable the students to apply theories to clinical practice. This aspect was driven by an organisational impetus to demonstrate learning back in practice to the benefit of Heart of England Foundation Trust (HEFT). Students self assessed their individual ability pre and post the discharge module using questionnaires citing 17 areas of discharge practice analysing knowledge and ability. They demonstrated an increase in knowledge and ability in key areas such as; ‘understanding complex discharge’ and ‘teaching discharge practice to peers’. Although these were not formally included in the outcomes or evaluations they may inform future module development and design of delivery. The questionnaires were designed and developed with support for projects in practice from the Foundation of Nursing Studies in London.

Introduction

This article discusses the development of a part time, post registration discharge practice education module including its content, delivery and outcomes. The module is entitled, Facilitating Timely Patient Discharge.

This title was devised to align with the national multi-professional toolkit (Department of Health, DH, 2004b) and to endorse the proactive multi-professional concept of discharge practice. It was aimed at a range of practitioners working in health and social care settings, detracting from an approach focussed solely on ‘nursing’ or ‘medicine’ (Gair and Hartery, 2001, Opic, 1997).

The module was validated by the Birmingham City University in the UK and upon successful completion 12 degree level university academic transferrable credits are awarded. This module can be selected on the Dimensions in Healthcare pathway – a new and flexible approach to learning beyond registration, linked to the National Health Service (NHS) Knowledge and Skills Framework (KSF), used to design job descriptions nationally, initiated by the Department of Health (Department of Health, 2004a, Department of Health, 2004b). The KSF framework describes the knowledge and skills required for different pay banding for registered staff from band 5 (junior posts) to Band 8 (senior posts).

Section snippets

Background

There has been a renewed and lasting focus upon discharge practice throughout NHS Trusts over the past decade (DH, 2003). For nurses, this focus was promulgated by the ten key roles for nursing, one of which was ‘leading admission and discharge of patients’ (DH, 2000). Further momentum originated from the NHS focus on reducing length of stay and the introduction of ‘Lean’ principles.

Lean is a method used to reduce wastage through overlaps and unnecessary steps in manufacturing processes (DH,

How education is traditionally delivered

The Heart of England Foundation Trust (HEFT) is not too dissimilar to other acute trusts, in terms of its traditional approach to education delivery. Nursing education and training was delivered primarily from a Practice & Professional Development Team. There were informal links to the knowledge and skills framework (Department of Health, 2004a, Department of Health, 2004b) governance, operational or quality agendas but a lack of clarity in terms of assessing the impact of education back into

Developing the module

The module development commenced in 2005; innovative ideas were generated from practice settings within the HEFT shared with Birmingham City University. Such a collaborative approach is commensurate with the educational remit of a consultant nurse post, ‘influencing and developing new education modules’ (Manley, 1997, Manley, 2000a). Nevertheless, the concepts education, training and teaching, are frequently used synonymously and the difference between each is not well understood. While there

Delivery of the module

A problem faced by Trusts, is the difficulty in releasing clinical staff from their place of work (Ayer, 1998, Chapman and Howkins, 2003). When revisiting the delivery the module team explored the options and benefits of a modified approach; delivering the module away from the University to maximise student uptake and attendance (Ayer, 1998). It was agreed to deliver the module on site, at the Hospital and to deliver each session over 3 h per week. The students were expected through project and

The assignment

An academic assignment was set as a 3000 word case study, written at Level 6. The rationale underpinning the approach was to enable Birmingham City University to assess the academic outcome, accredit the students with twelve points at degree level and link the work to practice issues. Case studies require the consideration of storytelling which is a traditional means of sharing information and in doing so develops student skills to become a more reflective practitioner (McDrury and Alterio, 2007

Evaluation of the module results

Throughout the module student attendance was not compulsory for every session, which resulted in part and full module attendance. The rationale was to facilitate adult learning where the student can decide if they needed to attend the lecture or not.

Limitations

In the spirit of adult education students are allowed to attend lectures where they feel learning is needed, hence it is not possible to measure the extent to which incomplete attendance may have adversely influenced the results of the case study assignment mark awarded, or their self assessment using the questionnaires.

Permission to share the individual results from the questionnaires was not sought from the students and these could not be shared.

Conclusion

Modernising nursing careers offers one framework in which nurses will train, develop and apply life long learning in the future (O’Dowd, 2007). It is also feasible, that as workforce and service redesign priorities gathers pace, education funding routes could also change to a position where funding is directed away from professional development and toward workforce and service reconfiguration. Only by truly reflecting the clinical and service needs together into the commissioning process, as

References (41)

  • I. Cave

    Nurse teachers in higher education: without clinical competence do they have a future?

    Nurse Education Today

    (1994)
  • S. Armitage

    Negotiating the discharge of medical patients

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1981)
  • S. Ayer

    Planning flexible education to match the needs of the community: a national survey

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1998)
  • Beddoes-Jones, F., 2005. Evaluating training. In: Train the Trainer, vol. 24. Fenman,...
  • J. Booth et al.

    Happy to be home?

    Professional Nurse

    (1991)
  • J. Brown

    Challenges in Caring: Explorations in Nursing Ethics

    (1992)
  • L.M. Burke

    Competition or collaboration – the tensions within the purchaser provider relationship in nurse education

    Journal of Nursing Management

    (2006)
  • L. Chapman et al.

    Work-based learning: making a difference in practice

    Nursing Standard

    (2003)
  • Department of Health, 2000. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. Department of Health,...
  • Department of Health

    Discharge from Hospital: Pathway, Process and Practice

    (2003)
  • Department for Education and Skills

    The Future of Higher Education

    (2003)
  • Department of Health

    Faster Access: Bed Management Demand and Discharge Predictors, the Stationery Office

    (2004)
  • Department of Health

    The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework and the Development Review Process: The Stationery Office

    (2004)
  • Department of Health, 2007. Institute for Innovation and Improvement: Going Lean in the NHS. The University of...
  • Foundation of Nursing Studies (FoNs) advancing healthcare practicesmall grants module, 2004. Developing the skills of...
  • G. Gair et al.

    Medical dominance in multidisciplinary teamwork: a case study of discharge decision-making in geriatric assessment unit

    Journal of Nursing Management

    (2001)
  • E. Goldratt et al.

    The Goal

    (1993)
  • O. Griscti et al.

    Effectiveness of continuing education programmes in nursing: literature review

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2006)
  • Howatson-Jones

    Designing web-based educational courses for nurses

    Nursing Standard

    (2004)
  • E. Hughes

    Nurses’ perceptions of continuing professional development

    Nursing Standard

    (2005)
  • 1

    Tel.: +44 0121 442 5600.

    2

    Tel.: +44 0121 331 7114.

    View full text