Thermophysical properties of water ethylene glycol (WEG) mixture-based Fe3O4 nanofluids at low concentration and temperature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112606Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Preparation and characterization of Fe3O4 water/ethylene glycol (50/50 in vol%) based nanofluids

  • Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity, dynamic viscosity and surface tension

  • Influence of nanoparticle loading 0.01/0.1 vol% and temperature 253.15–293.15 K

  • Enhanced properties relevant for cooling applications

Abstract

In the present work, Fe3O4 nanoparticles produced by the ultrasonic precipitation method and characterized by XRD, SEM, and BET methods are used to produce nanofluids using a mixture of water and ethylene glycol (WEG 50:50) as a base fluid and both sodium dodecyl sulfonate and oleic acid as surfactants. The thermal conductivity, dynamic viscosity and surface tension of these Fe3O4 nanofluids are experimentally evaluated for temperatures ranging from 253.15 to 293.15 K and different volume concentrations of nanoparticles, 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1% respectively. Experiments indicate that the thermophysical properties of nanofluids are strongly dependant on concentrations of nanoparticles and temperatures, particularly at sub-zero temperatures. Actually, it is shown that the thermal conductivity of nanofluids increases with almost 9.5%, and 14.3%, at 263.15 K and 293.15 K respectively, with 0.1 vol%. The thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids with concentration and temperature is compared to some relevant theoretical models. A good agreement is achieved with a comprehensive model taking into consideration effective medium theory, the nanolayer effect of molecules around the solid particle, Brownian motion of nanoparticles encompassing aggregation and nano-convection. It is also found that the dynamic viscosity of nanofluids decreases with nanoparticle content in particular below 273.15 K, up to 40% at 0.1% in volume. Surface tension decreases by adding the surfactant to the base fluid and then increases with Fe3O4 concentration with nearly 38% and 33% with 0.1% in nanoparticle volume fraction at 253.15 and 293.15 K, respectively. Finally, these results are promising in view of Fe3O4 nanofluids use in cooling applications.

Introduction

Nanofluids, now well-known as suspended nanoparticles in molecular liquids, are promising thermal liquids, because of their thermal transfer properties that are generally significantly better than base fluids [1]. Water, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, engine oil, and refrigerants are commonly used in literature as base fluids. Nanofluids have special properties that make them conceivably valuable in many applications, such as microelectronics, engine transmission oil, refrigeration, drilling, lubrication, thermal storage, the improved heat transfer efficiency of chillers, engine cooling and hybrid-powered engines, domestic refrigerator-freezers, machining cooling, nuclear reactor, pharmaceutical processes, etc. [2]. Nanofluid thermal conductivities are usually higher than the ones of base fluid and the enhancement is linked to nanoparticle content, size, shape, nature… However, this is also generally coupled to viscosity enhancement that is detrimental in view of practical perspectives. Among all nanofluids, Fe3O4 nanofluids have great potential applications, because of unique magnetic properties that can be combined to thermal efficiency. Basically, Fe3O4 oil-based nanofluids were introduced by Akoh et al. [3]. Use of magnetic fluids for heat transfer applications has been reported previously in [[3], [4], [5]]. Li et al. [6] investigated the viscosity and the thermal conductivity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles dispersed in water-based fluid with a volume fraction from 1% to 5% wt. at 293.15 K. The impact of agglomeration and alignment of nanoparticles on the thermal physical properties of Fe3O4 nanofluids in the volume fraction range of 0.5–5% have been studied by Zhu et al. [7]. The outcomes demonstrated that Fe3O4 nanofluids from have higher thermal conductivities than various compound aqueous nanofluids at room temperature. They found that even at the volume fraction of 0.005 the thermal conductivity ratios increased by >15.0%. In wider context, the open literature shows that most researches have been performed at intermediate and high temperatures in particular to enhance the rate of heat transfer in heating applications. The use of nanofluids and their marketing in cooling industrial applications is still limited due to the weak development of nanofluid research at low temperatures [8]. Aladag et al. [9] studied Al2O3 and CNT water-based nanofluids at small concentrations for a range of temperatures from 271.15 to 283.15 K. Experiments demonstrated that the nanofluids behaved as either Newtonian or non-Newtonian fluids, based on the shear rate. Halelfadl et al. [10] reported the steady-state dynamic viscosity of water-based nanofluids based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes, taking into account the influence of particle volume fraction (0.0055% and 0.55%) and temperature from 273.15 to 313.15 K. Nanofluids behaved as shear-thinning materials for high particle content while the nanofluids are rather Newtonian for lower particle content. Water with ethylene glycol or polyethylene glycol is usually used as a base fluid at low temperature because of the low freezing point of water. Some researchers used water/ethylene glycol and water/propylene glycol mixtures as a base fluid for nanofluid preparation. Namburu et al. [11] studied the viscosity CuO nanofluid for 40:60% of W/EG mixture in the temperature range from 238.15 to 323.15 K. Kulkarni et al. [[11], [12], [13]] studied the effect of low temperature on viscosity of CuO, SiO2, and Al2O3 water/ethylene glycol-based nanofluids in the same temperature range. Their results indicate that for higher temperatures, the nanofluids behave as Newtonian fluids and for lower temperature, a shear-thinning behaviour was obtained. They indicated that with the increase in temperature, the viscosity reduces exponentially. Naik et al. [14] measured the viscosity of CuO nanoparticles into water and propylene glycol (40:60 by weight) with different particle volume concentration of 0.025 to 1.2% at temperatures between 258.15 and 303.15 K. They noted an exponential increase in viscosity as temperature decreases. ϒ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with different volume fractions from 0.005 to 0.02 were considered by Guo et al. [15] to produce nanofluids with a mixture of water and ethylene glycol with volume ratio of 55:45 in the temperature range from 263.15 to 333.15 K. Sundar et al. [16] investigated the viscosity measurement of Fe3O4 nanoparticles dispersed in water/ethylene glycol mixture at concentrations ranging from 0 to 1.0 vol%, the temperature range varying from 273.15 to 323.15 K. It was shown that nanofluid viscosity rises with volume concentration and decreases with temperature. Naik and Sundar [17] also prepared CuO nanofluid with a water/propylene glycol mixture (30:70%) as base fluid and noticed thermal conductivity enhancements of 10.9% and 43.37% for 1.2 vol% and at 298.15 and 338.15 K, respectively. Their results also indicated that the thermal conductivity of CuO nanofluids is improved with the increase in the concentration of CuO nanoparticles. Sundar et al. [18] also investigated the thermal conductivity and viscosity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into 20:80% and 40:60% of propylene glycol and water mixture as based fluids in the temperatures of 273.15 and 333.15 K. Results show that the nanofluid thermal conductivity increases with nanoparticle content and temperature. Nanofluid viscosity also increases with concentrations of nanoparticles. The rheological measurements between 263.15 and 313.15 K for TiO2 nanoparticle dispersions in polyethylene glycol were also reported by Yapici et al. [19].

In summary, this short literature overview shows that the thermophysical properties of nanofluids are still rarely investigated at low and sub-zero temperatures (in °C), in particular using Fe3O4 nanoparticles that are considered as emerging and promising candidates for nanofluid applications. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to investigate the thermophysical properties of Fe3O4 nanofluids such as the thermal conductivity, viscosity and surface tension. The nanofluids are presently produced with water-ethylene glycol mixture (WEG 50:50 by volume at 20 °C) and with sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) and oleic acid (OA) as surfactants. Several concentrations in nanoparticles were considered, such as 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10 vol% respectively. Also, the nanofluid properties were experimentally evaluated in the temperature range from 253.15 to 293.15 K to verify the performance of such nanofluids in cold condition and demonstrate their potential as coolants.

Section snippets

Nanoparticles and nanofluid preparation

All the chemicals were purchased from Merck and used as received. Similarly to the reference [20], firstly, 2.0 g of FeCl2·4H2O and 8.13 g of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O were dissolved in deionized water and the solution was ultrasonicated for 10 min. Then the solution was added dropwise to 300 ml of NH4OH (33%) under ultrasonication at 70 °C. After 60 min, a brown powder at pH around 13.4 was collected by centrifugation, washed with deionized water several times until the pH of 7 was obtained, then dried at

Characterization of nanoparticles

The XRD patterns of the crystalline Fe3O4 are shown in Fig. 2. Diffraction peaks of the Fe3O4 (JCPDS file No. 75-0449) are indicated at 30.3°, 35.7°, 43.3°, 53.7°, 57.3° and 62.9°, and correspond to the crystallographic planes of (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440), respectively. Although the patterns Fe3O4 and α-Fe2O3 phases are similar, no trace of the peaks corresponding to α-Fe2O3 can be seen [16,24]. An average crystal size of 10 nm is obtained from the Scherrer equation, defined

Conclusion

The synthesis and the thermophysical characterization of Fe3O4 nanofluids were performed in this study. The nanofluids were produced with a mixture of deionized water (W) 50% and ethylene glycol (EG) (WEG 50%) and both sodium dodecyl sulfonate and oleic acid as surfactants. The thermal conductivity, dynamic viscosity and surface tension of these Fe3O4 nanofluids were measured for temperatures ranging from 253.15 to 293.15 K and different volume concentrations of nanoparticles, 0.01, 0.05 and

Nomenclature

    T

    temperature [K]

    W

    water

    EG

    ethylene glycol

    SDS

    sodium dodecyl sulfonate

    OA

    oleic acid

    ST

    surface tension [mN/m]

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

AB acknowledges EU COST for the STSM grant ref. COST-STSM-CA15119-42469 linked to the Cost Action “Overcoming Barriers to Nanofluids Market Uptake (NANOUPTAKE)” and for financial support in the participation of the 1st International Conference on Nanofluids (ICNf) and the 2nd European Symposium on Nanofluids (ESNf) held at the University of Castellón, Spain during 26–28 June 2019. PE acknowledges the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Ministry of Higher

References (59)

  • N. Salih et al.

    The physicochemical and tribological properties of oleic acid based triester biolubricants

    Ind. Crop. Prod.

    (2011)
  • J. Yang et al.

    Viscosity and sedimentation behaviors of the magnetorheological suspensions with oleic acid/dimer acid as surfactants

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2016)
  • S.M.S. Murshed et al.

    A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2017)
  • S. Zeroual et al.

    Viscosity of Ar-Cu nanofluids by molecular dynamics simulations: Effects of nanoparticle content, temperature and potential interaction

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2018)
  • R. Gómez-Villarejo et al.

    Experimental analysis of water-based nanofluids using boron nitride nanotubes with improved thermal properties

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2019)
  • T.X. Phuoc et al.

    Viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanofluids containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes stabilized by chitosan

    Int. J. Therm. Sci.

    (2011)
  • J. Philip et al.

    Thermal properties of nanofluids

    Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.

    (2012)
  • D.S. Wen et al.

    Review of nanofluids for heat transfer applications

    Particuology

    (2009)
  • A. Ghadimi et al.

    A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2011)
  • O. Mahian et al.

    Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-part I: fundamentals and theory

    Phys. Rep.

    (2019)
  • W. Evans et al.

    Effect of aggregation and interfacial thermal resistance on thermal conductivity of nanocomposites and colloidal nanofluids

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2008)
  • C. Pang et al.

    Aggregation based model for heat conduction mechanism in nanofluids

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2014)
  • P. Estellé et al.

    Current trends in surface tension and wetting behavior of nanofluids

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2018)
  • N. Berrada et al.

    Surface tension of functionalized MWCNT-based nanofluids in water and commercial propylene-glycol mixture

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2019)
  • R. Gómez-Villarejo et al.

    Boron nitride nanotubes-based nanofluids with enhanced thermal properties for use as heat transfer fluids in solar thermal applications

    Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

    (2020)
  • S.U.S. Choi

    Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles

  • D. Kirby et al.

    Centrifugo-magnetophoretic particle separation

    Microfluid. Nanofluid.

    (2012)
  • H. Zhu et al.

    Effects of nanoparticle clustering and alignment on thermal conductivities of Fe3O4 aqueous nanofluids

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2006)
  • G. Sekrani et al.

    Ethylene- and propylene-glycol based nanofluids: a literature review on their thermophysical properties and thermal performances

    Appl. Sci.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (46)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text