Thermophysical properties of water ethylene glycol (WEG) mixture-based Fe3O4 nanofluids at low concentration and temperature
Introduction
Nanofluids, now well-known as suspended nanoparticles in molecular liquids, are promising thermal liquids, because of their thermal transfer properties that are generally significantly better than base fluids [1]. Water, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, engine oil, and refrigerants are commonly used in literature as base fluids. Nanofluids have special properties that make them conceivably valuable in many applications, such as microelectronics, engine transmission oil, refrigeration, drilling, lubrication, thermal storage, the improved heat transfer efficiency of chillers, engine cooling and hybrid-powered engines, domestic refrigerator-freezers, machining cooling, nuclear reactor, pharmaceutical processes, etc. [2]. Nanofluid thermal conductivities are usually higher than the ones of base fluid and the enhancement is linked to nanoparticle content, size, shape, nature… However, this is also generally coupled to viscosity enhancement that is detrimental in view of practical perspectives. Among all nanofluids, Fe3O4 nanofluids have great potential applications, because of unique magnetic properties that can be combined to thermal efficiency. Basically, Fe3O4 oil-based nanofluids were introduced by Akoh et al. [3]. Use of magnetic fluids for heat transfer applications has been reported previously in [[3], [4], [5]]. Li et al. [6] investigated the viscosity and the thermal conductivity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles dispersed in water-based fluid with a volume fraction from 1% to 5% wt. at 293.15 K. The impact of agglomeration and alignment of nanoparticles on the thermal physical properties of Fe3O4 nanofluids in the volume fraction range of 0.5–5% have been studied by Zhu et al. [7]. The outcomes demonstrated that Fe3O4 nanofluids from have higher thermal conductivities than various compound aqueous nanofluids at room temperature. They found that even at the volume fraction of 0.005 the thermal conductivity ratios increased by >15.0%. In wider context, the open literature shows that most researches have been performed at intermediate and high temperatures in particular to enhance the rate of heat transfer in heating applications. The use of nanofluids and their marketing in cooling industrial applications is still limited due to the weak development of nanofluid research at low temperatures [8]. Aladag et al. [9] studied Al2O3 and CNT water-based nanofluids at small concentrations for a range of temperatures from 271.15 to 283.15 K. Experiments demonstrated that the nanofluids behaved as either Newtonian or non-Newtonian fluids, based on the shear rate. Halelfadl et al. [10] reported the steady-state dynamic viscosity of water-based nanofluids based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes, taking into account the influence of particle volume fraction (0.0055% and 0.55%) and temperature from 273.15 to 313.15 K. Nanofluids behaved as shear-thinning materials for high particle content while the nanofluids are rather Newtonian for lower particle content. Water with ethylene glycol or polyethylene glycol is usually used as a base fluid at low temperature because of the low freezing point of water. Some researchers used water/ethylene glycol and water/propylene glycol mixtures as a base fluid for nanofluid preparation. Namburu et al. [11] studied the viscosity CuO nanofluid for 40:60% of W/EG mixture in the temperature range from 238.15 to 323.15 K. Kulkarni et al. [[11], [12], [13]] studied the effect of low temperature on viscosity of CuO, SiO2, and Al2O3 water/ethylene glycol-based nanofluids in the same temperature range. Their results indicate that for higher temperatures, the nanofluids behave as Newtonian fluids and for lower temperature, a shear-thinning behaviour was obtained. They indicated that with the increase in temperature, the viscosity reduces exponentially. Naik et al. [14] measured the viscosity of CuO nanoparticles into water and propylene glycol (40:60 by weight) with different particle volume concentration of 0.025 to 1.2% at temperatures between 258.15 and 303.15 K. They noted an exponential increase in viscosity as temperature decreases. ϒ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with different volume fractions from 0.005 to 0.02 were considered by Guo et al. [15] to produce nanofluids with a mixture of water and ethylene glycol with volume ratio of 55:45 in the temperature range from 263.15 to 333.15 K. Sundar et al. [16] investigated the viscosity measurement of Fe3O4 nanoparticles dispersed in water/ethylene glycol mixture at concentrations ranging from 0 to 1.0 vol%, the temperature range varying from 273.15 to 323.15 K. It was shown that nanofluid viscosity rises with volume concentration and decreases with temperature. Naik and Sundar [17] also prepared CuO nanofluid with a water/propylene glycol mixture (30:70%) as base fluid and noticed thermal conductivity enhancements of 10.9% and 43.37% for 1.2 vol% and at 298.15 and 338.15 K, respectively. Their results also indicated that the thermal conductivity of CuO nanofluids is improved with the increase in the concentration of CuO nanoparticles. Sundar et al. [18] also investigated the thermal conductivity and viscosity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into 20:80% and 40:60% of propylene glycol and water mixture as based fluids in the temperatures of 273.15 and 333.15 K. Results show that the nanofluid thermal conductivity increases with nanoparticle content and temperature. Nanofluid viscosity also increases with concentrations of nanoparticles. The rheological measurements between 263.15 and 313.15 K for TiO2 nanoparticle dispersions in polyethylene glycol were also reported by Yapici et al. [19].
In summary, this short literature overview shows that the thermophysical properties of nanofluids are still rarely investigated at low and sub-zero temperatures (in °C), in particular using Fe3O4 nanoparticles that are considered as emerging and promising candidates for nanofluid applications. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to investigate the thermophysical properties of Fe3O4 nanofluids such as the thermal conductivity, viscosity and surface tension. The nanofluids are presently produced with water-ethylene glycol mixture (WEG 50:50 by volume at 20 °C) and with sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) and oleic acid (OA) as surfactants. Several concentrations in nanoparticles were considered, such as 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10 vol% respectively. Also, the nanofluid properties were experimentally evaluated in the temperature range from 253.15 to 293.15 K to verify the performance of such nanofluids in cold condition and demonstrate their potential as coolants.
Section snippets
Nanoparticles and nanofluid preparation
All the chemicals were purchased from Merck and used as received. Similarly to the reference [20], firstly, 2.0 g of FeCl2·4H2O and 8.13 g of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O were dissolved in deionized water and the solution was ultrasonicated for 10 min. Then the solution was added dropwise to 300 ml of NH4OH (33%) under ultrasonication at 70 °C. After 60 min, a brown powder at pH around 13.4 was collected by centrifugation, washed with deionized water several times until the pH of 7 was obtained, then dried at
Characterization of nanoparticles
The XRD patterns of the crystalline Fe3O4 are shown in Fig. 2. Diffraction peaks of the Fe3O4 (JCPDS file No. 75-0449) are indicated at 30.3°, 35.7°, 43.3°, 53.7°, 57.3° and 62.9°, and correspond to the crystallographic planes of (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440), respectively. Although the patterns Fe3O4 and α-Fe2O3 phases are similar, no trace of the peaks corresponding to α-Fe2O3 can be seen [16,24]. An average crystal size of 10 nm is obtained from the Scherrer equation, defined
Conclusion
The synthesis and the thermophysical characterization of Fe3O4 nanofluids were performed in this study. The nanofluids were produced with a mixture of deionized water (W) 50% and ethylene glycol (EG) (WEG 50%) and both sodium dodecyl sulfonate and oleic acid as surfactants. The thermal conductivity, dynamic viscosity and surface tension of these Fe3O4 nanofluids were measured for temperatures ranging from 253.15 to 293.15 K and different volume concentrations of nanoparticles, 0.01, 0.05 and
Nomenclature
- T
temperature [K]
- W
water
- EG
ethylene glycol
- SDS
sodium dodecyl sulfonate
- OA
oleic acid
- ST
surface tension [mN/m]
Declaration of competing interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
AB acknowledges EU COST for the STSM grant ref. COST-STSM-CA15119-42469 linked to the Cost Action “Overcoming Barriers to Nanofluids Market Uptake (NANOUPTAKE)” and for financial support in the participation of the 1st International Conference on Nanofluids (ICNf) and the 2nd European Symposium on Nanofluids (ESNf) held at the University of Castellón, Spain during 26–28 June 2019. PE acknowledges the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Ministry of Higher
References (59)
- et al.
A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids
Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
(2011) - et al.
Magnetic properties of ferromagnetic ultrafine particles prepared by vacuum evaporation on running oil substrate
J. Cryst. Growth
(1978) - et al.
Convective heat transfer in a composite trapezoidal microchannel during magnetic heating
Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer
(2010) - et al.
Experimental investigations on transport properties of magnetic fluids
Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci.
(2005) - et al.
Experimental investigations of the viscosity of nanofluids at low temperatures
Appl. Energy
(2012) - et al.
Viscosity of carbon nanotubes water-based nanofluids: influence of concentration and temperature
Int. J. Therm. Sci.
(2013) - et al.
Viscosity of copper oxide nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol and water mixture
Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Application of nanofluids in heating buildings and reducing pollution
Appl. Energy
(2009) - et al.
Thermophysical and dielectric profiles of ethylene glycol based titanium nitride (TiN–EG) nanofluids with various size of particles
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
(2017) - et al.
Highly active Fe2O3-doped TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of trichloroethylene in air under UV and visible light irradiation: experimental and computational studies
Appl. Catal. B Environ.
(2015)
The physicochemical and tribological properties of oleic acid based triester biolubricants
Ind. Crop. Prod.
Viscosity and sedimentation behaviors of the magnetorheological suspensions with oleic acid/dimer acid as surfactants
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids
Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
Viscosity of Ar-Cu nanofluids by molecular dynamics simulations: Effects of nanoparticle content, temperature and potential interaction
J. Mol. Liq.
Experimental analysis of water-based nanofluids using boron nitride nanotubes with improved thermal properties
J. Mol. Liq.
Viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanofluids containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes stabilized by chitosan
Int. J. Therm. Sci.
Thermal properties of nanofluids
Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.
Review of nanofluids for heat transfer applications
Particuology
A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-part I: fundamentals and theory
Phys. Rep.
Effect of aggregation and interfacial thermal resistance on thermal conductivity of nanocomposites and colloidal nanofluids
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
Aggregation based model for heat conduction mechanism in nanofluids
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
Current trends in surface tension and wetting behavior of nanofluids
Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
Surface tension of functionalized MWCNT-based nanofluids in water and commercial propylene-glycol mixture
J. Mol. Liq.
Boron nitride nanotubes-based nanofluids with enhanced thermal properties for use as heat transfer fluids in solar thermal applications
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles
Centrifugo-magnetophoretic particle separation
Microfluid. Nanofluid.
Effects of nanoparticle clustering and alignment on thermal conductivities of Fe3O4 aqueous nanofluids
Appl. Phys. Lett.
Ethylene- and propylene-glycol based nanofluids: a literature review on their thermophysical properties and thermal performances
Appl. Sci.
Cited by (46)
Experimental study on the performance of power battery module heating management under a low–temperatures charging scenario
2024, International Journal of Heat and Mass TransferExperimental investigation on Ag NPs-rGO-water/ethylene-glycol hybrid nanofluids used in solar applications
2024, Diamond and Related MaterialsExperimental study of nanofluid heat transfer for geothermal applications
2024, Renewable EnergySurface tension of Ag NPs-rGO based hybrid nanofluids
2023, Journal of Molecular LiquidsExperimental investigation of thermophysical properties of ethylene glycol based secondary fluids
2023, International Journal of Refrigeration