An optimized method for the bio-harvesting of microalgae, Botryococcus braunii, using Aspergillus sp. in large-scale studies

Graphical abstract


Method details
Background Global warming caused by the utilization of fossil fuel resources for domestic and industrial purposes is a great challenge in the modern world from an environmental perspective. Combustion of fossil fuels generates CO 2 , which has been implicated in global warming. The extensive use of fossil fuels can result in their accidental release into the environment causing pollution. Fossil fuel pollutants are toxic, carcinogenic and recalcitrant and present significant risks to public health [1]. They are also finite resources and not a sustainable energy source (non-renewable). Some microalgae such Botryococcus braunii can be a viable alternative source of fuel, such as biodiesel and bio-oil, which are highly degradable [2]. This is because they are non-food feedstocks and are therefore not affected by co-demand by human population for use as food. Their ability to convert CO 2 to carbon-rich compounds (including biodiesels) is also greater than that of traditional oleaginous crops [3,4]. They are renewable sources of fuel because they can be easily cultured within a comparably short timeframe unlike fossil fuels, which were formed over millions of years.
To fully exploit this potential, efficient and economical methods of culturing and harvesting cultivated microalgae must be developed. There have been multiple studies designed to determine the best growth medium for culturing specific groups of microalgae. These include the use of Conway and f/2 media for the culture of marine microalgae such Chlorella and Dunaliella sp. [5] and wastewater for species such as Chlorella and Scenedesmus [6,7]. Harvesting of microalgae can account for up to 50% of the total cost of biofuel production due to its energy-intensive nature [8]. Different methods of harvesting microalgae such as thermal drying, spray drying, centrifugation and filtration are known. However, these methods are either time consuming, require large drying areas, can damage the microalgae, energy-intensive or costly [9][10][11].
One innovative and cost-effective method of harvesting microalgae is by bio-flocculation. Some filamentous fungi can form pellets when grown in solution alone or with microalgae naturally without any chemical inducement. These pellets will sink to the bottom of the growth medium and are therefore easily harvested. When introduced into a micro-algae culture, these fungal species will trap the microalgae, forming pellets which settle at the bottom of the growth tank. These have been successfully carried out in a number of studies on some microalgae but at small scale levels [12] and may require optimization of C/N ratios for optimal growth, as practised in aquaculture bio-flocculation [13]. Oil (lipids) can then be extracted from the harvested biomass using different methods such as chloroformmethanol, hexane and supercritical CO 2 lipid extraction methods [14,15]. A great challenge for most scientific studies is a successful translation of small-scale studies into large-scale studies. In this study, a protocol that was successfully developed and optimized to bio-flocculate a bio-diesel producing microalgae, B. braunii, from a small 1 L scale to large 250 L scale experiments is described. Data that showed that bio-flocculation did not have any significant effect on the microalgae characteristics, with the harvested micro-algae being suitable for further downstream applications are presented.

Selection of fungal species
The fungal isolates selected for use in harvesting B. braunii must be able to grow in the form of pellets (ball-like forms). It was, therefore, necessary to test any prospective fungal candidate for this ability. In this study, the ability of the strains of Aspergillus fumigatus (obtained from RMIT's local repository of cultures) to form pellets was tested using the simple procedures described in the sections (a) and (b).

Culturing of fungal species
(a) Pelletization tests on fungal growth medium: (i) Sterile Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and Broth (PDB) media (Oxoid) were prepared by the addition of 39 g of the selected media to 1 L of RO water for each medium. Complete medium dissolution was achieved by slowly bring to the mixture to boil.
(ii) The prepared media were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 C for 15 min. Sterile PDA medium was allowed to cool to around 50 C and tetracycline at 0.015 g L À1 added to the medium. After being shaken gently to mix, the medium was poured into sterile plates (20 mL per plate).
(iii) Sterile plates were inoculated with 50-100 mL of Aspergillus sp. (or any fungal candidate of choice) spores (from a 50% glycerol stock). Inocula were spread unto the plates with a sterile glass or plastic spreader. (iv) Inoculated plates were incubated at 25-30 C for up to 7 days to allow for profuse fungal species growth (cover most parts of the plate). (v) A cork borer was dipped into 70% ethanol, briefly passed through the flames of a Bunsen burner, allowed to cool for 30-60 s and used to punch a plug on the mycelia covered PDA plate. (vi) Up to 5 fungal plugs (1 cm 2 ) were aseptically added to 100 mL of PDB in sterile 250 mL flasks. (vii) Inoculated flasks were placed onto an orbital shake, set to a temperature of 28 C and shaken at 150 rpm for up to 5 days (viii) The formation of balls of fungal mycelia ( Fig. 1) was visually assessed after 5 days. (b) Pelletization in algal broth; It was important to ensure that the selected fungal candidate(s) could also grow and form pellets in the medium used for culturing B. braunii (or any other chosen microalgae). This was carried out following the protocol described in this section.
(i) B. braunii was cultured in BG11 media for up to 4 days at 25 C and 100 rpm by inoculating 500 ml of BG11 medium with 0.04 g L À1 of microalgae culture. (ii) BG11 medium was prepared by adding different compounds into 1 L flask. The compounds and concentrations (in g L À1 ) used were; NaNO 3 , 1.   (viii) Non-destructive samplings were carried out at time 0 and every 4 or 6 h over 120 h by aseptically taking 1-1.5 ml of broth culture supernatant from each flask into sterile 2 ml tubes. (ix) Broth culture supernatant sample (1 ml) was added to a cuvette and the OD of culture supernatant measured at two wavelengths (680 and 750 nm) (x) Obtained data was recorded and plotted as graphs of OD over time for each ratio (Fig.2).

(d) Large-scale bio harvesting
The analyses of the result were carried out and the flocculation efficiency (FE) determined with the formula; FE% = [(A-B)/A] Â100. A refers to the OD at time 0, B refers to OD at desired or selected time interval [8]. In the study with B. braunii strains, ratio 1:40 was observed to recover about 96-97% of microalgae. Therefore, for the large-scale study, the 1:40 ratio was used. A similar biomass recovery trend was observed at both 680 and 750 nm. Therefore, only the 680 nm OD measurements are presented (Fig. 2). For large-scale bio-harvesting, the protocol described in this section was followed.
(i) Cultures of B. braunii strains (labelled as K1 and O1 and 20 L of each strain) were prepared as earlier described in b (i) to b (iii). (ii) Thirty litres of modified BG11 culture broth were prepared for each strain. (iii) Two circular fiberglass tanks (600 L capacity each) were cleaned initially with MilliQ grade water or sterile RO water before being flushed twice with sterile water. (iv) To each tank was attached multiple air lines to supply filtered air.
(v) Four hundred and ninety (490) litres of water was added to each tank after which 10 L of modified BG11 culture broth was added. (vi) The filtered air was introduced at 19 m 3 min À1 or higher which ensured that aeration caused the medium in the tank to swirl or mix properly.   As the harvested B. braunii was likely to be used for biofuel production, it was crucial to show that harvesting these strains with the fungus did not cause any significant alteration in microalgae composition. Bioenergy analyses of the microalgae biomass harvested by flocculation with fungus and that of the microalgae harvested by centrifugation were carried out using pyrolysis (analytical Py-GC-MS and preparative pyrolysis) and compared [2]. Fig. 4 showed that the bioenergy of the biomass harvested with Aspergillus sp. was not significantly different from that of the biomass harvested by centrifugation (P ! 0.05). Therefore, the method use for bio-harvesting was highly efficient and would have no adverse impact on the downstream use of the microalgae.