A comparative study of Nafion series membranes for vanadium redox flow batteries
Graphical abstract
Introduction
With the increasing requirement of medium- and large-scale energy storage for the efficient utilization of renewable energy such as wind and solar energy [1], [2], [3], all-vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) has received tremendous attention because of its fast response to energy demand change, low environmental impact, long life cycle and flexible operation [4], [5], [6]. Compared to other flow batteries, VRFB utilizes VO2+/VO2+and V3+/V2+redox couples as positive and negative electrolytes respectively, which avoids the elements' cross-contamination of electrolytes [7], [8], [9].
The membrane (separator), which is used to separate the positive and negative half-cell and to provide ion conduction, is a key component of VRFB since it decides the efficiency, lifespan and cost of VRFB system [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. An ideal membrane for VRFB should possess high proton conductivity, low vanadium ion permeability, excellent stability, and outstanding mechanical strength. Currently, perfluorinated sulfonic acid membranes such as Nafion have been commonly used in VRFB for its high proton conductivity and superior chemical stability [17], [18], [19], [20]. However, high cost and fast crossover of vanadium ions limit its practical application in VRFB [10], [11]. Recently, the research attention has ever been shifted to seeking the alternative non-perfluorinated membranes, such as sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK), sulfonated poly(ether sulfone) (SPES), sulfonated poly(imide) (SPI) and polybenzimidazole (PBI) [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Interestingly, inspiration usually comes from previous studies in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) and direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC) [21]. Other than cation exchange membranes (CEM), anion exchange membranes (AEM) [15], [16] and porous nanofiltration membranes [22] have also been investigated towards VRFB application. Although lower cost and probably better cell performance than Nafion, the non-perfluorinated membranes are easy to degrade under the harsh acid and oxidation environment of vanadium electrolytes, resulting in poor cycling life [23], [24], [25], [26]. Therefore, Nafion membranes are by now still the best choice for most large scale VRFB energy storage systems due to its extremely chemical stability [17], [18], [19], [27]. Currently, much effort has been contributed to decrease the cost (by using recast ultrathin membrane) and improve the ionic selectivity (by the strategy of surface modification or organic–inorganic hybrid) of Nafion based membrane for VRFB application [28], [29], [30].
After thorough literature browsing in the field of VRFB, we found that Nafion membranes with thickness ranging from 25 μm (recast Nafion) [28] to 220 μm (wet Nafion 117) [31] have been reported. The performance of VRFBs is highly related to the properties of membrane, since it governs the coulombic efficiency (CE) of cell and is also responsible for a large percentage of the ohmic loss which directly affects the overall voltage efficiency (VE) and energy efficiency (EE) of the systems [10], [11], [12]. For instance, thick membrane has high cell resistance, which straightforwardly reduce the VE of cell and then further leads to the drop of EE, while thin membrane yields fast crossover of vanadium ions, which diminish the CE of cell and contribute to lower EE, and simultaneously increases the imbalance of electrolytes [32], [33], [34]. In addition, the thickness of membrane will also affect the life and cost of the total VRFB system [35]. In order to find a balance between price and performance (efficiency and cycling stability), an optimized thickness of membrane should be chosen.
Recently, a few preliminary studies in terms of membrane thickness-related performance of VRFB have been reported [18], [32], [33], [34]. Researchers from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have compared the use of Nafion 115 (125 μm), Nafion 212 (50 μm) and Nafion 211 (25 μm) membranes in a 3-cell 1 kW class VRFB stack based on sulfate-chloride mixed acid electrolytes at current density of 80, 160 and 240 mA cm−2. They found that Nafion 212 could be used as a direct replacement for Nafion 115 with improved performance and lower costs [18]. On the contrary, Jeong et al. revealed that vanadium ions crossover would play more dominant role than electrochemical reaction resistance in deciding performance of VRFB; as a result, VRFB using thick Nafion 117 (175 μm) membrane was more stable than that using thin Nafion 212 (50 μm) under the current density of 6.0–8.4 mA cm−2 [32]. Apart from Nafion membranes, the thickness impact of other ion exchange membrane (IEM) has also been studied. Jung et al. investigated the different thickness (30, 50, 100 and 150 μm) of SPEEK membranes on performance of VRFB and found that 50 μm thick SPEEK exhibited low over potential, high energy efficiency, high maximum power density and small capacity loss rate during charge–discharge cycles at current density of 40 mA cm−2 [33]. Hickner et al. studied three different thicknesses (28, 45 and 80 μm) of sulfonated fluorinated poly(arylene ether) (SFPAE) membranes for VRFB application and concluded that 45 μm was the optimized membrane thickness under the current density of 20–80 mA cm−2 [34]. It can be seen that relatively narrow current density ranges and only short-term cycle life test (up to 60 cycles) have been applied to study the effect of membrane thickness on VRFB performance in previous works. The systematic evaluation of Nafion membrane thickness impact on VRFB performance such as electrolyte utilization, imbalance of electrolyte, and capacity fading mechanism have not been revealed yet.
In this study, we chose the commercial Nafion series of membranes (equivalent weight of 1100 g mol−1) with thickness of 50 μm (Nafion 112), 88 μm (Nafion 1135), 125 μm (Nafion 115), and 175 μm (Nafion 117) [36] to investigate the thickness impact of Nafion on VRFB performances under current density of 40–320 mA cm−2. The self-discharge process, cell efficiencies, electrolyte utilization, and long-term cycling stability of VRFBs with different Nafion membranes are presented comprehensively. A powerful online monitoring system (OMS) is developed for the first time to monitor the electrolyte imbalance during the cycle-life test of VRFB. The capacity fading mechanism of VRFBs with different Nafion membranes is also discussed in details.
Section snippets
Materials
Nafion 112, 1135, 115 and 117 membranes, denoted as N112, N1135, N115 and N117 respectively, were purchased from DuPont Company. Other chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification.
Membrane pretreatment
The as-received Nafion membranes were treated by standard procedures which include: first, being boiled in 3 wt% H2O2 solution for 1 h and then in deionized water for 1 h; afterwards, being boiled in 1 M H2SO4 solution for 1 h and then in deionized water for 1 h; finally, being stored in
Membrane characterization
The physicochemical properties of various Nafion membranes including thickness (dry state and wet state), water uptake, swelling ratio and IEC are listed in Table 1. It should be noted that the swelling ratio defined in this work is the volume expansion rate of wet membrane. The thickness of wet N112, N1135, N115 and N117 membranes are 71 μm, 112 μm, 161 μm and 220 μm, respectively. N1135, N115 and N117 membranes have close water uptake (32.1–34.1%) and swelling ratio (63.0–69.0%) values and the
Conclusions
A series of commercialized Nafion membranes (N112, N1135, N115 and N117) with different thickness have been investigated towards VRFB application. Our work demonstrates that: (1) The thicker membrane exhibits lower vanadium ions permeability. As a result, the order of self-discharge time and CE is N112<N1135<N115<N117, while the discharge capacity fading rate and electrolyte volume change rate show a completely opposite trend; (2) The thinner membrane with lower area resistance is more suitable
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21576154), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2015A030313894) and Basic Research Project of Shenzhen City (JCYJ20150331151358143, JCYJ20150630114140630 and JCYJ20140417115840235).
References (54)
- et al.
Review of materials research and development for vanadium redox flow battery applications
Electrochim. Acta
(2013) - et al.
Electrochemical activation of graphite felt electrode for VO2+/VO2+redox couple application
Electrochim. Acta
(2013) - et al.
Preparation and characterization of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/polyvinylidene fluoride blend membrane for vanadium redox flow battery application
J. Power Sources
(2013) - et al.
Characteristics and performance of 10 kW class all-vanadium redox-flow battery stack
J. Power Sources
(2006) - et al.
Performance of Nafion N115, Nafion NR-212, and Nafion NR-211 in a 1 kW class all vanadium mixed acid redox flow battery
J. Power Sources
(2015) - et al.
Nafion/SiO2 hybrid membrane for vanadium redox flow battery
J. Power Sources
(2007) - et al.
Effect of degree of sulfonation and casting solvent on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membrane for vanadium redox flow battery
J. Power Sources
(2015) - et al.
Ultra-thin polytetrafluoroethene/Nafion/silica composite membrane with high performance for vanadium redox flow battery
J. Power Sources
(2014) - et al.
Optimizing membrane thickness for vanadium redox flow batteries
J. Membr. Sci.
(2013) - et al.
Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/mesoporous silica hybrid membrane for high performance vanadium redox flow battery
J. Power Sources
(2014)
Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone)/graphene composite membrane for vanadium redox flow battery
Electrochim. Acta
Broad temperature adaptability of vanadium redox flow battery – Part 1: electrolyte research
Electrochim. Acta
On the development of proton conducting polymer membranes for hydrogen and methanol fuel cells
J. Membr. Sci.
Investigations on the self-discharge process in vanadium flow battery
J. Power Sources
The transfer behavior of different ions across anion and cation exchange membranes under vanadium flow battery medium
J. Power Sources
Selective anion exchange membranes for high coulombic efficiency vanadium redox flow batteries
Electrochem. Commun.
Colloidal silicalite-nafion composite ion exchange membrane for vanadium redox-flow battery
J. Membr. Sci.
In-situ investigation of vanadium ion transport in redox flow battery
J. Power Sources
Investigations on transfer of water and vanadium ions across Nafion membrane in an operating vanadium redox flow battery
J. Power Sources
Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices
Science
Electrochemical energy storage for green grid
Chem. Rev.
Progress in flow battery research and development
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Recent progress in redox flow battery research and development
Adv. Funct. Mater.
Flow batteries: current status and trends
Chem. Rev.
Vanadium flow battery for energy storage: prospects and challenges
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
Ion exchange membranes for vanadium redox battery (VRB) applications
Energy Environ. Sci.
Cited by (383)
Carbon black-coated SPEEK membrane for efficient vanadium flow batteries
2024, Journal of Energy StorageHigh-performance SPEEK composite membrane with ultrahigh selectivity enabled by sulfonated PANI for vanadium flow battery
2024, Journal of Membrane SciencePerformance of a hybrid direct ammonia fuel cell with hydrogen peroxide reduction
2024, Journal of Power Sources
- 1
These authors contributed equally to this paper.