Approaches to studying across the adult life span: Evidence from distance education
Introduction
Interview-based research in the 1970s found that students in higher education adopted different approaches or orientations towards their studies: a deep approach, or an orientation towards understanding the meaning of their learning materials; a surface approach, or an orientation towards being able to reproduce the materials for the purposes of assessment; and a strategic approach, or an orientation towards achieving the highest possible marks or grades (Laurillard, 1979, Marton, 1976, Ramsden, 1979).
Various questionnaires were devised to measure approaches to studying in larger numbers of students, and these broadly confirmed the existence of deep, surface and strategic approaches as dimensions underlying individual differences in student learning in higher education. These questionnaires included versions of the Approaches to Studying Inventory (Ramsden & Entwistle, 1981), which later gave rise to versions of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI: Tait & Entwistle, 1996) and the Approaches to Learning and Studying Inventory (ALSI: Entwistle, McCune, & Hounsell, 2003); versions of the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ: Biggs, 1978), which later gave rise to the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (Biggs, Kember, & Leung, 2001); and versions of the Inventory of Learning Styles (Vermunt & van Rijswijk, 1988).1
The advent of these instruments meant that it was possible systematically to explore the relationships between demographic and contextual variables and students' approaches to studying. This article is concerned specifically with the relationship between students' ages and approaches to studying. At least 38 studies have reported evidence on this relationship, and their findings are summarised in Table 1. First, the modal finding (in 31 of 38 studies) is that older students tend to obtain higher scores than younger students on scales measuring a deep approach (a meaning orientation) or one or more of the relevant subscales. Second, the modal finding (in just 23 of 38 studies) is that older students tend to obtain lower scores than younger students on scales measuring a surface approach (a reproducing orientation) or one or more of the relevant subscales. Third, there is also a suggestion (in only 9 of 24 studies) that older students tend to obtain higher scores than younger students on scales measuring a strategic approach (an achieving orientation) or one or more of the relevant subscales.
It is generally assumed that a deep approach and a strategic approach are desirable forms of study behaviour, whereas a surface approach is an undesirable form of study behaviour. The evidence therefore indicates that older students are more likely to display desirable forms of study behaviour than younger students. The most commonly suggested explanation for these findings is that older students are more likely than younger students to be studying out of intrinsic interest or for their personal development (Gow and Kember, 1990, Watkins, 1982), and there is evidence from interview-based studies to support this (Gibbs, Morgan, & Taylor, 1984). Other explanations include changing teaching practices in secondary education during the 20th century and the impact of life experience in promoting desirable approaches to studying (Richardson, 1994).
Even so, there are a number of research issues that militate against an uncritical acceptance of the idea that older students display more desirable forms of study behaviour.
First, many studies listed in Table 1 provided only limited information about the age distribution of the participants. Indeed, several earlier studies provided no information about their ages at all. More recent studies tend to report age ranges and means. In many cases, the students in question were predominantly younger adults, and this leaves it unclear whether the effects in Table 1 simply reflect a contrast between secondary-school leavers and older students. However, similar results have been found in students taking courses by distance learning, who tend to be older and more diverse in age than campus-based students.
The second issue is that of how the variable of age has been operationalised. Once again, several earlier studies provided no information at all on this matter. In some cases, it would appear that the participants were simply divided into an older group and a younger group, but no cut-off was specified. Some later studies used the ages of 23 or 25 as cut-offs. More recent studies have used age as a covariate or predictor in multiple regression analyses. This assumes that the relationships between students' ages and their approaches to studying are linear across the entire adult life span.
The latter issue was addressed by Biggs, 1985, Biggs, 1987, who obtained responses to the SPQ from 2365 students at 15 institutions of higher education in Australia. Their scores on deep approach were relatively constant between the ages of 18 and 22 but showed a monotonic increase in older students. Their scores on surface approach were relatively constant between the ages of 18 and 20 but showed a monotonic decline thereafter. Finally, their scores on achieving (strategic) approach exhibited a U-shaped pattern, declining from 19 to 22 years but increasing thereafter.
Biggs did not consider the possibility that older students might be studying different subjects or at different levels from younger students. Regarding subject of study, Ramsden, 1979, Ramsden, 1983 and Ramsden and Entwistle (1981) found that arts students were more likely to adopt a deep approach and less likely to adopt a surface approach or a strategic approach than were science or social-science students. Similar results were obtained by Biggs, 1985, Biggs, 1987, Lawless and Richardson (2002), Prosser, Ramsden, Trigwell, and Martin (2003), Vermunt (2005) and Kember, Leung, and McNaught (2008). Regarding level of study, undergraduate students adopt progressively less desirable approaches to studying as they proceed through their programmes (Biggs, 1985, Biggs, 1987, Gow and Kember, 1990, Richardson, 2006b, Volet et al., 1994, Watkins and Hattie, 1985). Thus, Biggs' data might have been contaminated by confounded variations in subject and level of study.
Another variable that should be considered is that of gender. Richardson and King (1991) argued that there were no intrinsic differences in approaches to studying between men and women, and this was supported by several subsequent studies (e.g., Byrne et al., 2002, Kreber, 2003, Richardson, 1993, Vermunt, 2005). Even so, there is evidence that differences may arise in specific contexts (e.g., Duff, 2003, Hayes and Richardson, 1995, Meyer et al., 1994, Sadler-Smith, 1996, Smith and Miller, 2005). Several studies found that in distance education women were more likely than men to adopt a surface approach (Richardson, 2005, Richardson, 2006a, Richardson et al., 1999, Richardson and Price, 2003).
One further issue is whether the relationships between age and approaches to studying are of any theoretical or practical importance. Differences in the scores obtained by different groups of students may be statistically highly significant yet small in magnitude. As a result, researchers are encouraged to report measures of effect size as well as test statistics. Only two studies in Table 1 explicitly reported measures of effect size: Richardson (2005) found that variations in age explained merely 1%, 2% and 1% of the variations in students' scores on deep, strategic and surface approaches, respectively, while Burton et al. (2009) found that variations in age explained merely 2%, 2% and 4% of the variations in scores on deep, strategic and surface approaches, respectively. These results suggest that the effects of age on approaches to studying are only very modest.
The present study was carried out to address these issues by investigating variations in approaches to studying over the adult life span in students taking courses by distance learning with the U.K. Open University. Samples were drawn within age bands corresponding to successive decades of the adult life span. Students completed a questionnaire that yielded scores on deep approach, surface approach and two different aspects of a strategic approach. Comparisons were made across the age bands both in terms of their actual scores and when the effects of the students' gender, subject of study and level of study had been statistically controlled. Measures of effect size were calculated to determine whether any differences that attained statistical significance were of theoretical or practical importance.
Section snippets
Context
The Open University was founded in 1969 to provide degree programmes by distance education across the United Kingdom. Originally, nearly all of its courses were delivered by correspondence materials, combined with television and radio broadcasts, video and audio recordings, tutorial support at a local level and (in some cases) week-long residential schools. Nowadays, the Open University uses computer-based support, particularly DVDs, subject support websites and networking sites. For most
Respondents
Completed questionnaires were returned by 4066 (or 58.1%) of the students, which would be regarded as a good response rate for a postal survey (Babbie, 1990, Kidder, 1981). The response rate increased monotonically from 30.8% for students aged 21–29 to 81.2% for those aged 70 and over, and a chi-square test showed that this variation was highly significant, χ2(5, N = 7000) = 975.70, p < .001. Of the respondents, 60.4% had responded online, whereas 39.6% had completed the paper questionnaire. The
Conclusions
This investigation has provided a definitive assessment of variations in approaches to studying in a very large sample of students, stratified by age across the adult life span, while statistically controlling for the confounded variables of gender, subject of study and level of study and while quantifying the effects of age against established objective benchmarks. The students' scores on deep approach and two aspects of a strategic approach tended to increase with age, whereas their scores on
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to the staff of the Open University's Survey Office for designing, distributing and processing this survey, to Stephanie Lay for identifying the samples of participants, to James Hartley for his comments on a previous version of this article and to Marlies Baeten for suggestions regarding the review of previous research.
References (73)
- et al.
Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness
Educational Research Review
(2010) - et al.
Mainly Openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches
Learning and Individual Differences
(2009) - et al.
The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance
Personality and Individual Differences
(2004) - et al.
Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge
Personality and Individual Differences
(2007) - et al.
Criteria for scale selection and evaluation
- et al.
The effect of problem-based learning on students' approaches to learning in the context of clinical nursing education
Nurse Education Today
(2006) Does the big five predict learning approaches?
Personality and Individual Differences
(2003)Survey research methods
(1990)Individual and group differences in study processes
British Journal of Educational Psychology
(1978)The role of metalearning in study processes
British Journal of Educational Psychology
(1985)
Student approaches to learning and studying
The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Learning approaches, personality and concepts of knowledge of first-year students: Mature-age versus school leaver
Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development
The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: A study of Irish accounting students
Accounting Education
Students' approaches to learning in an innovative medical school: A cross-sectional study
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
Psychometrika
Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
Access policy and approaches to learning
Accounting Education
Quality of learning on an MBA programme: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance
Educational Psychology
Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: The role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement
Accounting Education
Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching–learning environments: Measuring students' approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching
The world of the learner
The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes
European Journal of Psychology of Education
Assessing the approaches to learning of twinning programme students in Malaysia
Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction
Does higher education promote independent learning?
Higher Education
Approaches to study of distance education students
British Journal of Educational Technology
Gender, subject and context as determinants of approaches to studying in higher education
Studies in Higher Education
Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement?
British Journal of Educational Technology
Perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying among disabled and nondisabled students in distance education
Studies in Higher Education
A workshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to studying are influenced by the teaching and learning environment
Active Learning in Higher Education
Sellitz, Wrightsman and Cook's research methods in social relations
The relationship between students' course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience
Higher Education Research and Development
The processes of student learning
Higher Education
Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education
Higher Education
Cited by (42)
To evaluate the effect of challenge-based learning on the approaches to learning of Chinese nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
2020, Nurse Education TodayCitation Excerpt :Millennial students are used to acquiring knowledge and using collective effort, instead of individual effort, to complete a task with the aid of technology. Their learning habit heavily influences their perception of the learning environment, including teaching methods, appropriateness of assessments, expected interactivity and responsibilities in the class and so, too, it influences their preference for a learning approach (Baeten et al., 2010; Diseth et al., 2010; Entwistle and McCune, 2004; Lindblom-Ylanne et al., 2013; Pimparyon et al., 2000; Richardson, 2003). The current learner-centred strategies, which include problem-based learning, simulation, etc., seem not to instil sufficient elements into a learning environment for deep thinking and thus cannot fully address the learning needs of millennial students.
The role of demographics in online learning; A decision tree based approach
2019, Computers and EducationCitation Excerpt :Diep et al. (2016) reported similar results in a study with 181 adult learners, whereby no substantial contribution of age to their predictive model was found. In contrast, Richardson (2013), found a small, yet important, effect of age on distinct studying approaches of distance learning using a large, age-stratified sample of 3861 distance learners. Nevertheless, recent studies recommended examining the role of age in online participation and achievement as a predictor, controlled or moderating variable (Diep et al., 2016; Kizilcec et al., 2017; Richardson, 2013).
Australian student nurse's knowledge of and attitudes toward primary health care: A cross-sectional study
2018, Nurse Education TodayCitation Excerpt :We suggest that perhaps this can be explained by life experience, where participants as adults responsible for their own and possibly other family member's health, may have had greater exposure to various strategies of health promotion, illness prevention and experiences of health services especially if they have previous work experience (Koch et al., 2014; Montgomery et al., 2009). In addition, authors have identified that older students, particularly females, are more likely to take a deep approach to learning rather than a surface one (Richardson, 2013; Rubin et al., 2016). Overall, the students demonstrated an understanding of accessibility, and the principles of global health equity for both developed and developing countries, as defined by the WHO (Clarke et al., 2016; WHO, n.d.).
Approaches to studying: changes during a three-year undergraduate study program
2024, Scandinavian Journal of Educational ResearchModelling Retention and Success in Traditional and Contemporary Universities
2023, Adapting to Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education: Supporting the Retention and Success of the Expanded and Diversified Intake