Elsevier

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volume 154, October 2016, Pages 8-10
Landscape and Urban Planning

Collaborative rationality as a strategy for working with wicked problems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • It requires diverse and interdependent participants using authentic dialogue.

  • Collaborative rationality leads to learning and new relationships.

  • It can lead to adaptations of the system and re-solving of wicked problems.

Abstract

In this essay we argue that while classical modern planning cannot solve wicked problems, collaborative rationality can successfully move beyond them and develop useful and innovative strategies. We then outline the characteristics of a collaboratively rational planning process, which we have developed on the basis of decades of research and practice and Habermas' concept of communicative rationality. We show how it offers a model for the second generation systems-approach which Rittel and Webber called for. We talk about the practicalities of getting such processes organized and close with commentary of what planner's roles are in them.

References (2)

  • J.E. Innes et al.

    Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy

    (2010)
  • H.W.J. Rittel et al.

    Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

    Policy Sciences

    (1973)

Cited by (100)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text