Elsevier

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volume 134, February 2015, Pages 76-82
Landscape and Urban Planning

Research paper
The influence of road traffic on birds during autumn period: Implications for planning and management of road network

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Road traffic influences woodland birds during their autumn period.

  • Reduced abundance and diversity of birds near a noisy road.

  • Noise levels below 49 dB did not significantly affect birds.

  • Insectivores preferred the proximity of the road.

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to assess disturbance to birds at stopover sites in the vicinity of roads. We attempted to determine the influence of a busy road on birds during the autumn migration period. To our knowledge this is the first study in Europe carried out during this part of a bird's annual cycle in the context of road noise impact. Individuals were counted using the point method at 36 observation points located at three distances (60 m, 310 m, 560 m) from the road. At each point we determined the habitat parameters and the intensity of noise. In total, 648 individuals from 25 species were recorded on the study plot. The number of birds per point was higher on the second line of points but lower on the last line from the road. Species diversity was lower near the road. The density of the following common species increased with distance from the road: Eurasian jay, great spotted woodpecker, siskin, mistle thrush and nuthatch. Only great tits preferred the proximity of the road. The number and species diversity of birds were correlated with road noise propagation across our study area. Noise levels below 49 dB did not significantly influence the number of birds or species richness. Our results showed that species foraging on invertebrates preferred the neighbourhood of the road. These data may be helpful in planning and managing road environments in the context of bird conservation and protection against road noise.

Introduction

In the annual life cycle of birds, migration takes up nearly one third of the year (Sillett & Holmes, 2002). During this period birds spend more time at stopover sites than actually flying (Wikelski et al., 2003). Indeed, foraging and resting may occupy birds for as much as 95% of the migration time (Hedenstrom and Alerstam, 1997, Alerstam, 2003). Some small passerines in particular are not capable of continuous flight during migration, so they stop frequently during their journey to restock the food resources necessary to fuel further flight (Berthold, 2001). During stopovers, birds have to quickly replenish their fat reserves (Moore, Gauthreaux, Kerlinger, & Simons, 1995). To do so, birds feed voraciously and compete for food; at the same time, however, they are exposed to attack from predators, infections and parasites (Hutto, 1985). Human activities are a significant factor affecting the migration of birds and the duration of their stays at stopover sites. Birds usually avoid sites subject to human interference, because this may have an adverse effect on their foraging (Burger & Gochfeld, 1998), territory use (Andersen, Rongstaf, & Mytton, 1990), survival (West et al., 2002) and numbers (Fernández-Juricic, 2002). The march of civilisation is unceasing, and urbanisation is encroaching on to many areas utilised by animals, including birds (Wight, 2002, Christ et al., 2003). The losses and degradation of habitats used by migrating birds are also contributing to the fall in numbers of many species (Sauer et al., 2011). The construction of new roads has caused environmental degradation through habitat fragmentation and noise pollution (Šálek, Svobodová, & Zasadil, 2010). The negative impact of road traffic on animals has been reported in the literature (Fahrig et al., 1995, Forman and Sperling, 2003, Fahrig and Rytwinski, 2009) and most papers describe the adverse influence of traffic noise on birds (e.g. Reijnen et al., 1997, Kuitunen et al., 2003, Pescador and Peris, 2007), many of them highlighting the rapid decrease in the density and diversity of birds near roads carrying heavy traffic (Palomino and Carrascal, 2007, Polak et al., 2013). Disturbance due to vehicle lights, traffic noise, pollutants in food and the movements of people have been pinpointed by many authors (Pocock and Lawrence, 2005, Wood and Yezerinac, 2006, Slabbekoorn and Ripmeester, 2007, Summers et al., 2011). Mortality as a result of collisions with vehicles is the most important negative effect of roads (Orłowski, 2005, Orłowski, 2008). Even so, some species of birds have adapted to an existence near busy roads (Adams and Geis, 1981, Benitez-López et al., 2010). Although some birds are able to modify their behaviour in a noisy environment (Brumm & Slabbekoorn, 2005), a high level of noise may impair the transmission of sound signals (Kuitunen et al., 2003, Leonard and Horn, 2008, Salaberria and Gil, 2010, Halfwerk et al., 2011).

However, while most papers describing the negative effects of road infrastructure on birds focus on the breeding season, we still know too little about how traffic noise affects avian ecology in the non-breeding period. The “phantom road” experiment, recently carried out during the autumn migration in Idaho, USA, has provided compelling evidence that traffic noise is the main factor impacting adversely on migrating birds near roadways (McClure, Ware, Carlisle, Kaltenecker, & Barber, 2013). In this study the researchers deployed loudspeakers that emitted artificial road noise in a forest. They tested the impact of noise only, avoiding bias from other factors such as light, vehicle movements, pollution or disturbance by humans. The researchers found that the only important factor reducing the density of birds was the noise emitted from loudspeakers.

The principal objective of the present work was therefore to determine the effect of traffic noise on the numbers, species richness and spatial distribution of birds during the autumn migration period. The null hypothesis to be tested was the assumption that the utilisation of a road by vehicles would not cause the numbers and species richness of birds in the vicinity of that road to drop. In the alternative hypothesis we assumed that, in connection with the negative influence of the road, we should expect changes to the distribution pattern and numbers of birds in the zone directly exposed to such an influence. Moreover, we assessed the influence of traffic noise in the vicinity of the road for habitat utilisation by birds from different feeding guilds (insectivores or granivores). We expected that uneven food resources in the vicinity of the road, human disturbance and anthropogenic food might be reasons for the different locations of the various groups of birds in relation to the road.

Section snippets

Study area

The field work was conducted in the Janów Forest in south-eastern Poland (N50°41′-27′ E22°17′; Fig. 1). This extensive, closed-canopy forest complex lies on flat terrain, but there are dune hillocks in places. The habitats are mostly coniferous woodland, but alder woods grow in the depressions and river valleys. The principal tree species is scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), and to a lesser extent silver birch (Betula pendula), oak (Quercus sp.), spruce (Picea abies) and fir (Abies alba). The

Results

During the three counts a total of 648 individual birds belonging to 25 species (Table 1) were recorded. The most numerous species was goldcrest Regulus regulus, which made up 29% of the birds counted in the study area. Seven other species dominated the study site: great tit (Parus major), Eurasian jay (Garrulus glandarius), great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major), siskin (Carduelis spinus), crested tit (Lophophanes cristatus), coal tit (Periparus ater) and mistle thrush (Turdus viscivorus

Discussion

Our study showed that the number of birds and species diversity were lower in the vicinity of the road. We observed that some species clearly avoided the “danger zone” in roadside habitats. This is in agreement with the “phantom road” experiment carried out in the autumn (McClure et al., 2013). The results of our study, performed under natural conditions near a quite heavily trafficked road, and those of the “phantom road” experiment, yielded very similar results. We found that nearly one

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-experimental fieldwork carried out at stopover sites during the autumn period in the context of the impact of traffic noise on woodland birds. Our observations have shown that roads carrying heavy traffic can modify the distribution and species diversity of woodland birds during the autumn to a significant extent. This study indicates that noise levels above 49 dB significantly influence the number of birds and species diversity in the study

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to three anonymous reviewers for useful comments. Peter Senn reviewed the English version of this paper.

References (53)

  • T. Alerstam

    Bird migration speed

  • D. Andersen et al.

    Home range changes of raptors exposed to increased human activity

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    (1990)
  • P. Berthold

    Bird migration: A general survey

    (2001)
  • C.J. Bibby et al.

    Bird census techniques

    (1992)
  • D. Bonter et al.

    Characteristic of important stopover locations for migrating birds: Remote sensing with radar in the Great Lakes Basin

    Conservation Biology

    (2008)
  • J. Burger et al.

    Effects of ecotourists on bird behaviour at Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida

    Environmental Conservation

    (1998)
  • C. Christ et al.

    Tourism and biodiversity: Mapping tourism's global footprint

    (2003)
  • L. Fahrig et al.

    Effects of roads on animal abundance: An empirical review and synthesis

    Ecology and Society

    (2009)
  • E. Fernández-Juricic

    Can human disturbance promote nestedness? A case study with breeding birds in urban habitat fragments

    Oecologia

    (2002)
  • R.T. Forman et al.

    Road ecology: Science and solutions

    (2003)
  • French national method of calculation

    Arrêté du 5 mai 1995 relatif au bruit des infrastructures routières

    Journal Officiel du 10 mai 1995, art. 6

    (1995)
  • W. Halfwerk et al.

    Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    (2011)
  • P. Helle et al.

    Invertebrate numbers in edges between clear-fellings and mature forests in northern Finland

    Silva Fennica

    (1985)
  • E. Huhta et al.

    Breeding success of pied flycatchers in artificial forest edges: The effect of a suboptimally shaped foraging area

    Auk

    (1999)
  • R. Hutto

    Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory land birds

    Habitat selection in birds

    (1985)
  • G. Kriska et al.

    Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera

    The Journal of Experimental Biology

    (1998)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Urban avifauna distribution explained by road noise in an Eastern European city

      2022, Avian Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Romania, the limit value established for streets, roads, and highways is 70 ​dB(A), and for public green spaces, it is 55 ​dB(A) (MMDD et al., 2008). These values are above those mentioned in the scientific literature about birds (Patón et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012; Wiącek et al., 2015). However, in Oradea, the entire ring road and several streets crossing the city and its center have values above 75 ​dB(A).

    • Effect of highways on breeding birds: Example of Hulunbeier, China

      2021, Global Ecology and Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Turnover in bird species within the road effect zone occurs at a broad (continental) spatial scale, potentially resulting in the large-scale homogenization of the avian community because of road construction (Cooke et al., 2020). Traffic noise had no significant effect on the density of breeding birds in the current study, which contrasted with previous studies (Reijnen et al., 1996; Wiacek et al., 2015). This difference might be attributed to most traffic noise degrading within 400 m of the road in the current study, with environmental noise being mild beyond this threshold.

    • Mitigation and management plans should consider all anthropogenic disturbances to fauna

      2021, Global Ecology and Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anthropogenically generated noise represents a global threat to fauna (Slabbekoorn and Ripmeester 2007; Kight and Swaddle 2011; Newport et al. 2014), being typically much louder and occurring with greater rate than natural noises from wind or water (Kight and Swaddle 2011; Newport et al. 2014). Particularly, we found many studies assessing road noise in urban areas (e.g., Yoshida et al. 1997; Li et al. 2002; Murthy et al. 2007), reporting diverse impacts on mating, communication, and foraging behaviour (Verzijden et al. 2010; Kern and Radford 2016; Injaian et al. 2018), species diversity and abundance (Wiącek et al. 2015; Khanaposhtani et al. 2019), and fitness and physiology (Crovo et al. 2015; Injaian et al. 2018). Traffic networks are vast and growing globally, and are a significant source of anthropogenic noise (Siemers and Schaub 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text