Kontakt 2014, 16(2):e94-e101 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2014.05.005

Czech version of Menopause Rating Scale Questionnaire - Preliminary noticeNursing - Original article

Markéta Moravcováa,*, Stanislav Ježekb, Jiří Marešc, Eva Vachkovác
a Univerzita Pardubice, Fakulta zdravotnických studií, katedra porodní asistence a zdravotně sociální práce
b Masarykova univerzita v Brně, Fakulta sociálních studií, katedra psychologie
c Karlova univerzita v Praze, Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové, Ústav sociálního lékařství

Objectives: Given the general ageing of our population, the number of women suffering from the symptoms of oestrogen deficiency in postmenopause, which may affect their health-related quality of life, is increasing. Therefore, health professionals need reliable tools to be able to find out how the strengths and difficulties that affect the health-related quality of life of particular women are perceived. The aim was to create a Czech version of the Menopause Rating Scale, to assess the psychometric characteristics and validate the questionnaire in clinical practice.

Methods: Using a repeated and back translation of the Czech version of the questionnaire used worldwide, a sample of 204 women after natural menopause between the ages of 49 and 63 years was tested. Based on the results obtained, verbal protocols, questionnaire feedback, re-filling methods, and evaluation by client and health care professionals, a standardized Czech version was created.

Results: Clinical practice was given the use of a Czech version of the Menopause Rating Scale, which allows evaluation of the quality of life related to health in women during postmenopause. It is a short screening questionnaire, which has 11 items.

Conclusion: The Czech version of the Menopause Rating Scale is a standardized tool for assessing the quality of life in clinical settings. Although the psychometric structure is difficult, from a practical point of view the questionnaire will help identify three domains: somatic-vegetative, urogenital, and psychological. The questionnaire is also useful for evaluating the intensity of the symptoms of oestrogen deficiency and the possible effect of the applied therapy for women in postmenopause.

Keywords: health related quality of life; Menopause Rating Scale; evaluation instruments; menopause; postmenopause

Received: January 15, 2014; Revised: March 1, 2014; Accepted: May 14, 2014; Published: June 23, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Moravcová M, Ježek S, Mareš J, Vachková E. Czech version of Menopause Rating Scale Questionnaire - Preliminary notice. Kontakt. 2014;16(2):e94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2014.05.005.
Download citation

References

  1. Utian WH. The International Menopause Society menopause-related terminology definitions. Climacteric 1999;2:284-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Český statistický úřad. Statistická ročenka; 2011. [online] [cit. 2013-03-04]. Dostupné z
  3. Acquadro C, Jambon B, Ellis D, Marquis P. Languages and translation issues. Quality of Life and Pharmaco-Econonomics in Clinical Trials 1996:575-85.
  4. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user's guide. 6. vydání. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2010.
  5. Donát J. Perimenopauza - menopauzální přechod v praxi. Praha: DoMeNa; 2001.
  6. Kolařík D, Halaška M, Feyereisl J. Repetitorium gynekologie. Praha: Maxdorf; 2008.
  7. Kupperman HS, Blatt MHG, Wiesbaden H, Filler W. Comparative clinical evaluation of estrogen preparations by the menopausal and amenorrhoeal indices. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology 1953;13:688-703. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Heinemann L. Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) - Development of the scale. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures; 2006. [online] [cit. 2012-02-04]. Dostupné z
  9. Mapi Research Trust. Proqolid; 2002. [online] [cit. 2013-04-02]. Dostupné z
  10. Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research. Menopause Rating Scale; 2008. [online] [cit 2012-12-13]. Dostupné z
  11. Schneider HP, Hauser GA. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS II) - Clusters of Menopausal Symptoms. Maturitas 1997;27(Suppl. 1):201. Go to original source...
  12. Heinemann K, Assmann A, Möhner S, Schneider LPG, Heinemann LAJ. Reliabilität der Menopause-Rating-Skala (MRS). Untersuchung für die Deutsche Bevölkerung. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie 2002;124:161-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Schneider HP, Heinemann LAJ, Thiele K. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): Cultural and linguistic translation into English. Life and Medical Science Online 2002;3. DOI:10.1072/LO0305326.
  14. Chedraui P, Pérez López FR, Mendoza M, Morales B, Martinez MA, Salinas AM et al. Severe menopausal symptoms in middle-aged women are associated to female and male factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010:879-85. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Chuni N, Sreeramareddy, CHT. Frequency of symptoms, determinants of severe symptoms, validity of and cut-off score for Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) as a screening tool: A cross-sectional survey among midlife Nepalese women. BMC Women's Health 2011;11:30. Dostupné z Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Fernandez-Alonso AM, Trabalon-Pastor M, Vara C, Chedraui P, Perez-Lopez FR. Life satisfaction, loneliness and related factors during female midlife. Maturitas 2012;72:88-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Heinemann K, Ruebig A, Potthoff P, Schneider HP, Strelow F, Heinemann LAJ et al. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scale: A methodological review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004;2:45. [online] [cit. 2013-03-04]. Dostupné z Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Potthoff P, Heinemann LA, Schneider HP, Rosemeier HP, Hauser GA. Menopause Rating Skala (MRS): Methodische Standardisierung in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Zentralblatt fűr Gynäkologie 2000;1222:280-6.
  19. Glaser R, York AE, Dimitrakakis C. Beneficial effects of testosterone therapy in women measured by the validated Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Maturitas 2011;29:355-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Wang XY, Yang HY, Nie GH, Wen ZH, Wu DR, Zhang CL et al. Study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese Menopause Rating Scale (CMRS). Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2008;29:882-6. Go to PubMed...
  21. Kakkar V, Kaur D, Chopra K, Kaur A, Kaur IP. Assessment of the variation in menopausal symptoms with age, education and working/non-working status in north-Indian subpopulation using menopause rating scale (MRS). Maturitas 2007;57:306-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Zöllner YF, Acquadro C, Schaefer M. Literature Review of Instruments to assess Health-Related Quality of Life during and after Menopause. Quality of Life Res 2005;14:309-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Dennerstein L, Helmes E. The Menopausal Transition and Quality of Life: Methodologic Issues. Quality of Life Research 2000;9:721-31. Go to original source...
  24. Dinger J, Heinemann LA. Menopause Rating Scale as outcome measure for hormone treatment 2004. [online] [cit. 2013-05-12]. Dostupné z Go to original source...
  25. Heinemann L, Potthoff P, Schneider H. International Versions of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003;28. [online] [cit. 2013-03-04]. Dostupné z Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Raudenská J, Javůrková A. Lékařská psychologie ve zdravotnictví. Praha: Grada; 2011. ISBN 978-80-247-2223-8.
  27. Franke P. Gynekologické a porodnické klinické obrazy nemoci. PSYCHOSOM 2010;8(1), Postgraduální vzdělávání, s. 10-18.
  28. Rohde A. Psychological aspects of the menopause. Annals of General Psychiatry 2008;7(Suppl. 1). [online] [cit. 2011-03-02]. Dostupné z Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Mareš J, Ježek S. Dotazník zjišťující pacientovo pojetí nemoci: IPQ-R.CZ. Československá psychologie 2012;56:558-73.
  30. Garrat AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF-36 health survey questionaire: on outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? MBJ 1993;306:1440-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...