Wind loads on low buildings: in the wake of Alan Davenport's contributions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.019Get rights and content

Abstract

The paper reviews the evolution of knowledge and its current state regarding the evaluation of wind loads on low buildings by placing particular emphasis on Alan Davenport's contributions. These contributions have paved the way to the current state-of-the-art and have influenced the thinking of not only Alan's closest collaborators but also of other researchers in this area around the world. The paper will provide a brief historical perspective, followed by some detailed description of the University of Western Ontario's research on wind loads on low buildings carried out in the 1970s. Visualizing the wake of Davenport's contributions in this area, the paper will refer to the influence of this knowledge in the formulation of design load provisions in contemporary wind standards and codes of practice. The paper will also discuss the status of computational wind engineering as well as the so-called computer-aided wind engineering in the evaluation of wind pressures on low buildings.

Introduction

Alan Garnett Davenport, a Doyen of Wind Engineering, is more well known for his extraordinary achievements in the development of wind engineering, as far as the statistical description of wind loading or the design of major structures such as the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York are concerned. However, as one of Davenport's graduate students in the 1970s, I had the direct opportunity to appreciate his thoughtful insight and his many contributions in the evaluation of wind loads on low buildings, particularly in the development of wind code and design standard provisions.

State-of-the-art papers on wind loads on low buildings have been written by Holmes [1], Stathopoulos [2], Krishna [3] and others. This paper will refer to the evolution of research and thinking in the formulation of wind loading provisions under the influence of Alan Davenport. Although these provisions have found their way in the North American wind standards and codes of practice, to which this paper particularly refers, they have also influenced and continue to play a significant role in the development of other national and international standards. The level of confidence in the new provisions becomes higher but the complexity of the specifications also increases. Typical key results are presented and outstanding issues requiring more research are also discussed. These include but are not limited to the effects of upstream roughness and its variation for different azimuths on the evaluation of wind loads on low buildings; the wind loads on buildings with geometries different from those examined in previous studies, particularly the evaluation of appropriate loading for the design of primary structural systems and other indirectly loaded surfaces; the total wind load acting on architectural features such as parapets and the like.

The paper will also address some of the most recent developments, in the wake of Alan Davenport's contributions. The effect of new technologies on the evaluation of wind loads on low buildings will be discussed. Particular emphasis will be placed on innovative computational techniques, means of artificial intelligence as well as numerical simulation and their current and potential influence on the generation and application of knowledge in this area.

Section snippets

Evaluation of wind pressures on low buildings

Historical reviews about the evaluation of wind loads on low buildings have been provided by Stathopoulos [4] and Surry [5]. Although wind pressures on buildings reported prior to the postulation of Jensen's “Model Law for Phenomena in Natural Wind” [46], may not be representative, some of the early ideas hold well up to date. As early as 1884, Sir Benjamin Baker, following wind load measurement experiments on boards of various sizes, stated that the mean wind pressure on a large area must be

Additional wind load considerations for low buildings

The UWO study under the direction of Alan Davenport in the 1970s has found that the effect of roof slope and building height are significant but the dependence of load coefficients on height reduces considerably by referencing them to the velocity pressure at eaves or mid-roof height; the influence of length on the wind loads is not so significant; the effect of tributary area was recognized as a key parameter in the wind load evaluation of various roof and wall components. The dynamic

Computational evaluation of wind loads

Computational Wind Engineering (CWE) deals with the application of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methodologies, typically numerical solutions of Navier–Stokes equations using appropriate turbulence models, into wind engineering problems. Methods for turbulence treatment can be classified into three groups, i.e. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with a turbulence model, large eddy simulation and direct numerical simulation; these methods were reviewed by Murakami [25].

At the present

Computer simulation

Wind tunnel and field experimentation is the traditional approach for the investigation of wind-induced pressure fluctuations and time histories. However, the collection of long time histories of wind and pressure data might be time consuming and laborious, considering the inherent variability in such time histories affected by building geometry, measurement location, surroundings and other factors. This, on the other hand, can be efficiently handled by computer simulation using

Summary and conclusions

The paper has reviewed the latest developments and the progress made in the evaluation of wind loads on low buildings in the wake of Alan Davenport contributions. It refers to some of the most recent studies that have led or will lead to the updating of the North American and other national wind codes and standards. Such updates relate with the re-examination of wind-induced pressures on gable-roof low buildings with intermediate roof angles (10–30°), the introduction of pressure coefficient

Acknowledgments

The author thanks heartily Alan G. Davenport for all the help, support and ongoing appreciation he has provided to his research efforts both directly and indirectly. Words are not sufficient to express this gratitude and indebtedness for all the things learned from his association with Alan. It may only be possible to try to radiate this experience and appreciation to his graduate students and co-workers. One of them, Mr. Girma T. Bitsuamlak, needs particular mentioning for the assistance he

References (54)

  • A. Hunt

    Wind-tunnel measurement of surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams

    J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.

    (1982)
  • S. Murakami et al.

    3-D numerical simulation of airflow around a cubic model by means of the k–ε model

    J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.

    (1988)
  • D. Paterson et al.

    Simulation of flow past a cube in turbulent boundary layer

    J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.

    (1990)
  • C.X. Zhang

    Numerical predictions of turbulent recirculating flows with a k–ε model

    J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.

    (1994)
  • J.D. Holmes, Wind loads on low-rise buildings—a review, CSIRO-Division of Building Research, Highett, Victoria,...
  • P. Krishna, Wind loads on low-rise building—a review, Proceedings of the Third Asia Pacific Symposium on Wind...
  • T. Stathopoulos

    Evaluation of Wind Loads on Low Buildings—a Brief Historical Review, A State-of-the-Art in Wind Engineering, International Association for Wind Engineering

    (1995)
  • D. Surry, Wind loads on low-rise buildings: past, present and future, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference...
  • A.G. Davenport

    Perspectives on the full-scale measurement of wind effects

    J. Ind. Aerodyn.

    (1975)
  • T.E. Stanton, Report on the measurement of the pressure of wind on structures, Minutes of the Proceedings of the...
  • D. Surry, T. Stathopoulos, An experimental approach to the economical measurement of spatially averaged wind loads, J....
  • NBCC, National Building Code User's Guide—Commentaries on Part 4 including requirements for plain and reinforced...
  • NBCC, National Building Code User's Guide—Structural Commentaries, Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes,...
  • H.W. Tieleman, M.R. Hajj, T.A. Rainhold, Pressure characteristics for separated flows, in: A. Larsen, G.L. Larose, F.M....
  • B.J. Vickery, Wind loads on low-rise buildings, Proceedings of the D.R.C. Seminar, Darwin,...
  • J.D. Holmes, Mean and fluctuating internal pressures induced by wind, Wind engineering, Proceedings of the Fifth ICWE,...
  • T.C.E. Ho, Variability of low building wind loads, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario,...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text