Elsevier

Journal of Transport Geography

Volume 25, November 2012, Pages 58-69
Journal of Transport Geography

New port development and global city making: emergence of the Shanghai–Yangshan multilayered gateway hub

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Planned as Shanghai’s new port, Yangshan is currently expanding its roles as transhipment hub and integrated logistics/industrial center in the Asia–Pacific region. This paper examines the impact of the emergence of Yangshan on the spatial pattern of the Yangtze River Delta since the 1970s, with reference to existing port system spatial evolutionary models. While this emergence confirms the trend of offshore hub development and regionalization processes observed in other regions, we also discuss noticeable deviations due to territorial and governance issues. Strong national policies favoring Shanghai’s vicinity rather than Ningbo as well as the growth of Yangshan beyond sole transhipment functions all contribute to Shanghai’s transformation into a global city.

Highlights

► Port systems generally evolve through concentration and de-concentration phases. ► Shanghai and the Yangtze case exhibits important deviations from existing models. ► Central and local governments consolidate Shanghai’s global functions. ► Yangshan new port develops both hinterland and transshipment activities. ► Shanghai and Yangshan emerge as a new form of dual hub and gateway.

Introduction

Throughout the literature on port cities, a majority of the research provides a separate discussion on either port or urban functions. Port and urban specialists often focus on what may appear as processes and actors of distinctly different nature. One example is the large body of research on so-called port systems where neighboring port nodes go through successive development phases marked by varying traffic concentration levels. Geographers have been particularly active in describing the spatial evolution of port systems where load centers and offshore hubs influence the port hierarchy due to their competitiveness and attractiveness in the transport and logistics chain at sea and on land (Fleming and Hayuth, 1994, Notteboom and Rodrigue, 2005). Yet, reference to the territorial aspects of these changes is generally kept minimal due to a central focus on transport players and flows.

This paper chooses another perspective that is to consider port dynamics as illustrations and components of wider urban transformation processes. Maritime ports have been recently recognized to be still important part of urban areas despite many changes in the distribution and operation of transport and value chains (Hall and Jacobs, 2012). Although ports and port terminals perform specific activities not always in accordance with their adjacent economy, they can usually be seen as one function among others in the wider urban fabric. Port cities are thus typical illustrations of local–global interactions taking place between territories, production networks, and commodity chains through physical transfers and sector-specific services (Hesse, 2010, Jacobs et al., 2010, Jacobs et al., 2011). Such port-city-region relationships are particularly intense in Asia where urban and port issues are very much intermingled, which seem to be less significant in contexts such as Europe (Van der Lugt and De Langen, 2005, Lee and Ducruet, 2009). Many case studies confirm this fact. For example studies of Kaohsiung (Haynes et al., 1997), Busan (Frémont and Ducruet, 2005), Dubai (Jacobs and Hall, 2007), Hong Kong (Wang and Cheng, 2010), and Incheon (Ducruet et al., 2012) all show that port dynamics are adapted to broader metropolitan processes. These adaptations may be changing as new types of nodes are emerging through a combination of transport, supply chain, logistics, and international trade activities (Palmer, 1999) which have created multilayered gateways ensuring multiple functions which together have new urban impacts.

To date little has been said about the case of Shanghai, which has developed as one of the world’s largest seaports and global financial center. Research that has been done has most likely studied Shanghai’s urban functions with reference to Pudong rather than its port (Yeung and Li, 1999, Wu, 2000, Yusuf and Weiping, 2002, Cai and Sit, 2003, Wei and Leung, 2005, Lai, 2009), or explored its maritime functions barely mentioning its emerging global city functions (Wang et al., 2004). Exceptions have been the recent study by Huang (2009), questioning Shanghai’s place as an Asian model city and the earlier study by Yan and Tang (1990) on the interdependence between port and urban growth in Shanghai’s history. The coincidence of rapid urban and port growth in Shanghai thus deserves special attention. That attention will need to include insight on the evolution of global hub port cities, believed to exhibit certain similarities across Asia (Lee et al., 2008). In addition the rapid integration of China in global shipping and logistics networks has been well documented (Comtois, 1999, Cullinane, 2005, Yap and Lam, 2006) as well as the diffusion of containerization and the emergence of hub ports (Rimmer and Comtois, 2009, Cullinane and Song, 2007). Scholars have principally looked at Chinese ports such as port-FEZ bundles in Tianjin (Wang and Olivier, 2006), port development in the Pearl River Delta (Wang and Slack, 2000, Airriess, 2001), and traffic reorientation across the Yellow Sea (Lee and Rodrigue, 2006). Shanghai’s prominence as main gateway for the Yangtze River has been well discussed in terms of port competition and corridor formation and insight has extended to include the current hinterland penetration of logistics networks across the Yangtze River Valley (YRV) (Cullinane et al., 2005, Veenstra and Notteboom, 2011). To date very limited attention has been paid to Yangshan, a gigantic new port project operating since 2005 which has lifted Shanghai into a new level of global activity.

Yangshan raises some problems and opportunities that reflect the coincidence between port expansion and global city formation. Beyond the sole provision of additional capacity and better technical standards, one main factor in the emergence of Yangshan is the difficulty for Shanghai to maintain and increase both its gateway (hinterland) and hub (maritime) functions at a single node. Such pressures are felt simultaneously at regional and local level and are expressed in the shift of some shipping activity away from the inner port (as in the spatial development model of Bird (1963)) and captured in port system evolution models (see Ducruet et al. (2009) for a synthesis). A dual system mixing hub and gateway functions is thus emerging in contrast to more classic experiments of new port development elsewhere.

Another factor central to Yangshan’s influence upon Shanghai is highly political, as seen in problems of cross-border governance among different provincial jurisdictions. Here its experience is shared with other Asian port cities such as Busan and Incheon in South Korea (Frémont and Ducruet, 2005; Ducruet et al., 2012), Hong Kong and Shenzhen (Song, 2002), and some other peripheral port developments in Asia (Slack and Wang, 2002). These two dimensions emerge as growing global cities emphasize the control of physically grounded port and logistics functions in a competitive context, and how port dynamics, in turn, can foster economic activities beyond sole transhipments. It is the interdependencies between these two aspects that provide the agenda of the research reported in this paper.

The remainder of the paper is as follows. Section 2 describes the evolution of the entire YRD port system since the early 1970s in the light of port system evolutionary models. Section 3 analyzes with more scrutiny the deviations from the models, with a special focus on the emergence of Yangshan new port in terms of (trans-)port governance, urban and regional planning, economic development problems and opportunities. Conclusions are proposed in Section 4 about the lessons learned from this case study for further research on port system evolution.

Section snippets

Port system evolution in the Yangtze River Delta (1970–2010)

Since the 1960s, a wide-ranging literature has provided a number of port system evolutionary models and applications, recently classified by Ducruet et al. (2009) into concentration and de-concentration factors. Although such ideal-typical approaches remain limited in explaining particular cases and contexts (Weber, 2004), they are used in this paper to help reveal local deviations caused by specific territorial and governance issues and to facilitate comparisons with other port systems

The metropolitan dimension of port dynamics

The evolution of the YRD port system in relation to Shanghai witnesses several deviations from the generic model presented in Fig. 1 and used as a benchmark. While such differences were expected and can be largely attributed to the national factor of a rapid transition from a command economy to market-oriented economy, a more in-depth analysis of local factors remains necessary in order to fully understand the role of territorial and governance issues.

Firstly, recent logistics development in

Conclusion

The current transformation of Shanghai into a global city is in many ways similar to other development paths occurring in other large Asian port cities. However, Shanghai remains unique with regard to the crucial importance of the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) that developed since the 1970s as a corridor and gateway connecting China with the rest of the world, thereby conferring Shanghai specific logistics and multimodal functions for hinterland control. While those maritime and logistics functions

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41171108).

References (54)

  • James Wang et al.

    The evolution of a regional container port system: the Pearl River Delta

    Journal of Transport Geography

    (2000)
  • Wei-Yim Yap et al.

    Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia

    Transportation Research Part A

    (2006)
  • Alfred J. Baird

    Global strategic management in liner container shipping

  • James Bird

    The Major Seaports of the United Kingdom

    (1963)
  • Jianming Cai et al.

    Measuring world city formation: the case of Shanghai

    The Annals of Regional Science

    (2003)
  • Claude Comtois

    The integration of China’s port system into global container shipping

    Geojournal

    (1999)
  • Kevin Cullinane

    The container shipping industry and the impact of China’s Accession to the WTO

    Research in Transportation Economics

    (2005)
  • Kevin Cullinane et al.

    Port competition between Shanghai and Ninbgo

    Maritime Policy and Management

    (2005)
  • Kevin Cullinane et al.

    Asian Container Ports: Development, Competition and Co-operation

    (2007)
  • César Ducruet et al.

    Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy

    Maritime Policy and Management

    (2010)
  • Ducruet, César, de Carvalho, Luis, Roussin, Stanislas, 2012. The flight of Icarus? Incheon’s transformation from port...
  • Antoine Frémont et al.

    The emergence of a mega-port: the case of Busan, from the local to the global

    Tijdschrift voor Economische En Sociale Geografie

    (2005)
  • Hall, Peter V., Jacobs, Wouter, 2012. Why are maritime ports (still) urban, and why should policy makers care? Maritime...
  • Kingsley E. Haynes et al.

    Regional port dynamics in the global economy: the case of Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Maritime Policy and Management

    (1997)
  • Yehuda Hayuth

    Rationalization and concentration of the US container port system

    The Professional Geographer

    (1988)
  • Markus Hesse

    Cities, material flows and the geography of spatial interaction: urban places in the system of chains

    Global Networks

    (2010)
  • Yefang Huang

    The growth of global hub port cities under globalisation: the case of Shanghai international shipping centre

    International Development Planning Review

    (2009)
  • Cited by (71)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text