An analysis of the modified Dahl and Masing models: Application to a belt tensioner
Introduction
The hysteresis behavior of components permits efficient passive control of mechanical systems but makes response prediction delicate due to their high nonlinearity [1], [2]: basically it is necessary to choose an efficient hysteresis model associated with a numerical integration method to ensure convergence with the scheme. Therefore, there is a much of scientific and technological research devoted to the investigation of such problems.
Vestroni and Noori in Ref. [2] and Visintin in Ref. [3] established an overview of hysteresis models. Among the latter mention can be made of those of Bouc and Wen, Bader and Noori, and Masing. Rheological models and restoring force models are the two main categories widely used in mechanical engineering. The former provide damping and stiffness parameters, while the latter provide a restoring force to be introduced in the second member of the equations.
Let the Masing model (MM) [4], [5] and the modified Dahl model (MDM) proposed by Al Majid [6], [7] be the rheological and restoring force models, respectively, selected for the current analysis. The classical MM is composed of a spring parallel to a spring–dry friction system, but in this study a viscous damping element is added. The MDM originates from the Dahl and Duhem models and is based on a first differential equation that provides the time derivative of the restoring force from the velocity of the deflection and from the envelop curves of the hysteresis loop. The MM is governed by a non-smooth differential equation containing a multi-valued function while the Dahl model is governed by a smooth nonlinear dynamic equation. Consequently, the numerical integration schemes have to take into account these two typical characteristics to obtain a convergence. The reliability of these two hysteresis models have to be tested to predict the hysteretic behavior of a belt tensioner.
Tensioners used in belt drive systems play a predominant role in the dynamic behavior of the belt: they maintain nominal tension in the slack span and reduce transverse vibration levels, see Ref. [8]. Tensioners often require complicated designs in order to satisfy technological challenges, see for example Ref. [9]. This type of design leads to considerably nonlinear behavior mainly due to stick–slip motion [10].
The MDM and MM are described in detail in Section 2 and then applied to a belt tensioner of an automotive engine in Section 3, where an initial experimental setup is used for identifying the model parameters. Section 4 concerns the numerical and experimental investigations performed on a belt–tensioner–mass system in which tensioner behavior is described by the two models studied. This section permits comparing the predicted and measured harmonic responses in order to discuss model reliability.
Section snippets
The models
In this section, two models describing the hysteretic behavior of a one degree of freedom mechanical system are presented. The behavior of the mechanical system studied can be analyzed via the progression of the restoring force versus the deflection, as presented in Fig. 1.
The objective is to find the relation between a restoring force and a deflection u. It is assumed that after a transient phase , the pair belongs to a periodic curve, called hysteresis loop (see Fig. 1 and
Experimental investigation and parameter identification
The tensioner is composed of three parts, see Fig. 7 (a): Part 1 is a solid (Idler pulley) that rotates around axis of part 2; part 2 is the tensioner arm ABC, that rotates around the fixed axis of part 3, bolted to the reference part 4 (i.e. an engine for automotive applications). All the parts are considered as rigid bodies. The pin joint of axis between parts 2 and 3 includes a torsion spring and friction components that cause dry and lubricated contact forces, and a moment
Comparison, validation and prediction
In the previous section, the MDM and MM were formulated for the belt tensioner. The tensioner is now a part of a mechanical system subjected to a variable load excitation. The purpose is to test the models efficiency considering a multi-degree of freedom system and an experimental investigation. Each tensioner model is implemented in the system motion equations that are solved numerically. The predicted and measured results are compared.
Conclusion
Two hysteretic models have been analyzed and tested on a mechanical system containing a belt tensioner exhibiting a stick–slip behavior. The first model, which is the Masing model (MM) with viscous damping, provides, by the way of differential inclusion, the rheological parameters of the equation of motion. The second model, which is the modified Dahl model (MDM), recently proposed, provides a restoring force which takes place in the second member of the equation of motion. A primary
References (21)
- et al.
Nonclassical responses of oscillators with hysteresis
Nonlinear Dynamics
(2003) - et al.
Hysteresis in mechanical systems—modeling and dynamic response
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
(2002) Differential Models of Hysteresis
(1994)- et al.
Study of some rheological models with a finite number of degrees of freedom
European Journal of Mechanics A—Solids
(2000) - et al.
The evolutive masing model and its application to cyclic plasticity and ageing
Nuclear Engineering and Design
(1989) - et al.
Formulation of a hysteretic restoring force model: application to vibration isolation
Nonlinear Dynamics
(2002) - et al.
Harmonic response of a structure mounted on an isolator modelled with a hysteretic operator: experiment and prediction
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(2004) - et al.
Design and analysis of automotive belt drive systems for steady state performance
ASME Journal of Mechanical Design
(1997) Efficient eigensolution, dynamic response, and eigensensitivity of serpentine belt drives
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(2004)- et al.
Nonlinear periodic response of engine accessory drives with dry friction tensioners
ASME Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
(1998)
Cited by (46)
A computationally efficient method for dynamic response analyses of accessory drive systems using harmonic balance method together with alternating frequency/time domain technique
2024, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingModeling of serpentine belt accessory drive system coupled vibrations and utilizing nonlinear tensioner to enhance performances
2022, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingStabilisation effect of strain hysteresis loop for steel 45
2021, International Journal of FatigueCitation Excerpt :Revealing the theoretical and experimental subtleties of the stabilisation regime for various materials improves the quality of the assessment of the strength and resource of a structure subjected by cyclic loading [2]. In the theory of adaptability, the investigated stabilisation mode is not considered temporary and is described by the deformation characteristics of the process, which are considered independent of the loading parameters [3,4]. Nevertheless, the duration of the stabilisation of plastic deformation depends on the strain amplitude and strain rate characteristics of low-cycle loading [5].
Dynamic modeling, simulation and experiment of power transmission belt drives: A systematic review
2021, Journal of Sound and VibrationCitation Excerpt :This experiment technique can be used to forecast dangerous parametric resonances and the critical operating conditions. Most of the measurements on frictional contact of belt drives are focused on belt tension variation [203], belt-pulley friction measurement [117,214,216,261,262], wear in the belt-pulley interface [263] and hysteretic damping measurement of tensioner resulted from its dry friction [7,122,177,255,256]. In 2013, Della Pietra and Timpone [203] designed an experiment to examinethe Grashof's model [190] and Firbank's model [197] in capturing belt-pulley contact mechanics.
Modeling and validation of dynamic performances of timing belt driving systems
2020, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingCitation Excerpt :The model for tensioner torque was validated and the parameters of the model are identified by the measurements. Bastien et al. [30] and Michon et al. [31] proposed a modified Dahl and Masing model to describe the hysteretic behavior of a tensioner. The tensioner was modeled as a torsional spring stiffness, an equivalent friction stiffness and an equivalent viscous damping.