Factors affecting children's participation and amount of labor on family farms
Introduction
Family members are important sources of labor for family farm operations. Most farm children work on their family farms in the United States (Light et al., 1985, Saupe & Bentley, 1994). However, there is little knowledge about children's labor supply on family farms. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore why children work on their family farms and how much do they work?
Previous child labor studies have focused on cases in developing countries. These studies highlight economic motivations as a way of explaining children's labor supply (Yotopoulos & Kuroda, 1988). However, the primary motivation for children's labor supply on family farms in the United States is children's social development (Kim & Zepeda, 2004). In addition, agriculture is dangerous; children on family farms experience accidents and even deaths from farm equipment and animals (Landrigan & McCammon, 1997, National Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health, 1999). Furthermore, children's work may affect educational activities due to fatigue and lack of time (Greenberger & Steinberg, 1986).
These differences in motivations and social concern for children's labor supply between the United States and developing countries have initiated the need for incorporating non-economic benefits, risks, and the traditional economic motivations into the decision-making process for the children's labor supply on U.S. family farms. Understanding children's labor supply on the family farm is important because it is directly related to two issues of family farm survival: (a) make a living and (b) create a good rural lifestyle.
The fact that family farm households need children as a source of labor implies that many family farms currently encounter labor shortages and associated economic hardships (Lee et al., 1997, Saupe & Bentley, 1994). As a result, the number of family farms has decreased due to financial difficulty. At the same time, most family farm households have the perspective that it is important for parents and children to work and learn together (Kim & Zepeda, 2004, Saupe & Bentley, 1994). Consequently, finding the factors that influence children's labor supply will provide information about farm family well-being and family farm survival.
In order to explore why children work and how much they work, a two-stage decision making model is proposed in this study. Whether children work and how much they work may not be determined by the same factors and/or may not have same signs and magnitudes. A unitary household model (Bryant, 1990) and a Nash-cooperative bargaining model (McElroy & Horney, 1981) provide competing theoretical frameworks for the two-stage decision-making process and the associated empirical analysis. The approaches used in this study will contribute to understanding the importance of non-economic factors in child labor in the United States and to targeting effective policies and education programs on child labor issues.
Section snippets
Two-stage decision making
It is proposed that participation and the amount of labor are decisions made in a sequential manner by parents because the factors that affect children's labor participation may be different from those that influence the amount of children's labor supply. Separating the two decisions is useful to capture the significance of non-economic factors in the participation decision. A key non-economic factor is whether parents feel that their children benefit from the work experience. These benefits
Model
Among the theoretical frameworks considered for children's participation and amount of labor are a unitary model and a household bargaining model. The argument for selecting the framework is whether parents have the same preferences concerning their children's labor supply. Previous child labor studies in developing countries have assumed that a household has a single preference for children's labor supply (Levy, 1985, Mergos, 1992, Yotopoulos & Kuroda, 1988). Yet, literature in intra-household
Data
The analysis focuses on the children's labor supply on family farms in Wisconsin. Wisconsin is an interesting state because a large proportion of family farms are dairy farms. Dairy farms require constant high levels of year-round work, and a high proportion of children work on family dairy farms. They face risks of injuries from animals as well as equipment (National Research Council [NRC], 1998).
Data for this study were collected in a farm household survey designed and conducted by Zepeda in
Results
In both the unitary (Table 2) and bargaining frameworks (Table 3), the factors that influence the participation significantly are: (a) household characteristics variables such as age of children, age of father, the square value of father's age, the existence of a working sibling, mother's education level, and IRG adoption in Crawford county; (b) social development variables such as mother's perception about her leisure time with children; and (c) economic variables such as children's and
Conclusions
This study examines the factors that influence labor participation and the amount of work of children on family farms. The two-stage decision-making model derived is used to explain the different motivations and factors for children's participation and labor supply on family farms using unitary and cooperative bargaining frameworks. In particular, these models incorporate non-economic factors into the decision-making process. Since the models allow for a different stochastic process for the
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a Hatch grant from the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The authors would like to thank Mark Purschwitz for his valuable comments. Gratitude is expressed by the second author to the Helen Riaboff Whiteley Center and staff of the University of Washington Friday Harbor Marine Lab for facilitating completion of this article. The article is jointly authored; the authors are solely responsible for any errors.
Jongsoog Kim is a research fellow at the Women's Development Institute, Seoul, Korea.
References (38)
- et al.
An econometric application of the theory of the farm household
Journal of Development Economics
(1979) - et al.
The economics of production
(1985) Children's participation in household labor: Child socialization versus the need for household labor
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
(1992)- et al.
Women and the demand for alcohol: Estimating participation and consumption
Journal of Consumer Affairs
(1993) The economic organization of the household
(1990)- et al.
A test of the heterogeneity of family and hired labor in Asian agriculture
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
(1987) Time allocation in rural Philippine households
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
(1978)Children's labor supply in agriculture: Changes needed to better protect health and educational opportunities
At-home consumption of cheese: A purchase-in frequency model
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
(1992)- et al.
When teenagers work: The psychological and social costs of adolescent employment
(1986)
Limdep version 7 user's manual
Wage comparisons—A selectivity bias
Journal of Political Economy
Rural youth disability prevention project survey: Results from 169 Iowa farm families
Journal of Rural Health
Sample selection bias as a specification error
Econometrica
Shadow wages and peasant family labor supply: An econometric application to the Peruvian Sierra
Review of Economic Studies
Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought
Time allocation by fathers, mothers and children in U.S. family farm households: A bargaining approach
Feminist Economics
Children's labor supply: Still with us after all these years
Public Health Reports
The linear logarithmic expenditure system: An application to consumption-leisure choice
Econometrica
Cited by (0)
Jongsoog Kim is a research fellow at the Women's Development Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Lydia Zepeda is a professor of Consumer Science and Senior Fellow of the Center for World Affairs and the Global Economy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.