Serial structural and functional assessments of rotator cuff repairs: do they differ at 6 and 19 months postoperatively?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.027Get rights and content

Background

Some studies have shown that rotator cuff tendon (RCT) retears occur early after surgery and ultimate failure strength is reached at between 3 and 6 months. However, few clinical studies have been reported to support their theory. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the RCT integrity after repair showed any difference at 6 months and at 19 months postoperatively.

Methods

Thirty-one patients who underwent complete repair for full-thickness RCT tears that were medium-sized tears or larger and had 2 postoperative follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were included in this study. Retear, fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy were evaluated during the first and second MRI sessions. Clinical assessment was performed by use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and pain visual analog scale preoperatively and at the time of the first and second MRI scans.

Results

The mean time for the two consecutive MRI scans was 5.9 months (range, 3.1-8.3 months) and 19.7 months (range, 10.1-24.3 months). On the first MRI scans, 24 patients had no retear, 5 had partial retears, and 2 had full-thickness retears. In terms of rotator cuff retears, the 2 sets of MRI scans showed exactly the same statuses. The only statistically significant improvement was a reduction in tendinosis on the second MRI scans. In addition, significant improvements in clinical status were observed between the 2 periods.

Conclusion

Our study shows that the structural status of RCTs after arthroscopic repair can be assessed at 6 months after surgery. Furthermore, although functional status improved with time after 6 months, the structural status of repaired cuffs remained unchanged.

Section snippets

Patient selection and clinical assessment

From April 2006 to October 2009, arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed for partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears in 388 patients at our institution. Our inclusion criteria were (1) full-thickness rotator cuff tear that was medium in size or larger and was repaired with suture anchors, (2) complete repair, and (3) the availability of 2 sets of serial postoperative follow-up MRI scans. There were 221 full-thickness tears that were medium in size or larger. Among them, complete

Structural results

Preoperatively, 26 had a medium-sized tear and 5 had a large-sized tear according to the classification of Post et al20 (Table I). On the first postoperative MR images, 4 patients had a type I retear, 20 had a type II retear, 5 had a type III retear, 1 had a type IV retear, and 1 had a type V retear.22 On the second postoperative MR images, 14 patients had a type I retear, 10 had a type II retear, 5 had a type III retear, 1 had a type IV retear, and 1 had a type V retear. A statistically

Discussion

Our results show that rotator cuffs either regain integrity or retear within 6 months of surgery and that they maintain the same status at 19 months postoperatively but that clinical outcomes improve irrespective of postoperative cuff status. This study is the first clinical study performed to date that supports the notion that the rotator cuff either heals or retears within 6 months of repair.9, 17, 25 Furthermore, this study is the first to report the short-term serial follow-up of repaired

Conclusion

Our findings show that the structural status of rotator cuff tendons after arthroscopic repair can be assessed at 6 months after surgery. Furthermore, although functional status improved with time after 6 months, the structural status of repaired cuffs remained unchanged.

Acknowledgments

The authors give special thanks to Hang Seok Choi, PhD, for statistical analysis.

Disclaimer

The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

References (30)

  • D.F. Gazielly et al.

    Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1994)
  • C. Gerber et al.

    The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2000)
  • C. Gerber et al.

    Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1999)
  • D. Goutallier et al.

    Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1994)
  • D.T. Harryman et al.

    Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1991)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Healthcare costs of failed rotator cuff repairs

      2023, JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
    • Nontendinous healing after repairing of retracted rotator cuff tear: an imaging study

      2021, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      This finding can be correlated to the other studies reporting only small percentages of patients, with normal signals of the tendons after rotator cuff repair and healing,3,6 and the rest mostly demonstrating increased signals that may persist even with long-term follow-up.2-4,6,17,21,22,28 Some report that the initially increased signal can persist for at least 6-9 months,21 and the retears usually occur within the first 6 months postoperation;13,16,17,22 thus, our study only included those with the follow-up MRIs that were performed at least 8 months postoperatively, to ensure that some of the vaguely intense areas were less likely to represent retears or initial inflammatory changes. Despite this effort, some patients in the direct healing type had the persistent MRI appearance of the narrow bands of altered signals, filling up the marginal space from the footprint to the reattached tendinous end under closer observation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (IRB study 2009-12-002).

    View full text