First archaeointensity results from Ecuador with rock magnetic analyses and 14C dates to constrain the geomagnetic field evolution in South America: Enhancing the knowledge of geomagnetic field intensity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102733Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This article is to determine the strength of the geomagnetic field.

  • We recovered ~56 pieces of pottery from the highlands in northern Ecuador from 2 mounds and one excavation site.

  • The radiometric dates were determined by means of 14C.

  • The archaeomagnetic intensity was obtained by means of a modified Thellier-Coe protocol.

Abstract

Archaeomagnetic records from low-latitude sites are very scarce. Thus, the information about the geomagnetic field evolution in South America or Ecuador is sparse and more data are needed to constrain the field evolution in South America. In this study we present new absolute archaeointensity results from a set of 14C well-dated (i.e. calibrated ages) prehistoric archaeological sites in northern Ecuador (South America). Potsherd fragments were sampled during archaeological excavations of 2 earthen mounds in the vicinity of Atuntaqui and Otavalo cities, and pits at La Chimba site. The pottery covers 2 distinct archaeological periods defined as 1) Ecuadorian Formative period (700 BC – 1AD) and 2) the prehistoric Late period (1250–1505/1525 AD). Successful archaeointensity determinations were obtained from 56 sherds using the Thellier-Coe protocol and their rock magnetic properties.

The absolute palaeointensity determinations have yielded AI values of 43.6 ± 1.3 μT for Atuntaqui, 34.2 ± 1.4 μT for the Otavalo Mound 3 (lower charcoal lens), 39.5 ± 1.4 μT for Otavalo Mound 3 (upper charcoal lens) and a range of absolute archaeointensities from 7.0 ± 0.97 μT up to 42.2 ± 2.06 μT, with a mean average of 21.20 ± 1.15 μT for La Chimba. Archaeointensity (AI) determinations of the successful mean abolute archaeointensity for the early phase (700–440BC) excavation levels 27.8 ± 1.315 μT, middle levels phase (440–40BC), 15.07 ± 0.78 μT and the late levels phase (44BC-250AD) 25.52 ± 1.575 μT. These results are in good correlation with the data from Palpa in South Peru as well as a few data results from Colombia, South America.

Introduction

It has been known for several decades that archaeological artifacts can be reliable recorders of the Earth's magnetic field behavior in the past (e.g. Eighmy and Sternberg, 1990; Shibuya, 1980; Aidona et al., 2010, Aguilar-Reyes et al., 2013). The archaeological baked clays can generally offer a better temporal and spatial resolution than volcanic rocks, mainly due to their precise 14C radiometric dating, and due to the fact that they can be found all around the world without being limited to volcanic areas. The radiocarbon dating of the pieces of pottery of northern Ecuador highlands (Fig. 1) was carried out using charcoal remains, (e.g. maize, corn, organic food residues, Appendix A, Fig. 2), as well as pollen and volcanic ash, for Atuntaqui and Otavalo mounds (e.g. Athens and Osborn, 1974; Athens, 1999, 2003). The radiocarbon dating of La Chimba was based on Athens (1990) and Stahl and Athens (2001) where almost 40,000 specimens were recovered during excavations that started in 1972 at La Chimba site, Pichincha Province, Ecuador. A listing (including weights and counts) of all remains recovered from the 1989 investigations is provided in Athens (1990), including diagnostic ceramics. Identified macrobotanical remains at La Chimba include charred specimens of small maize cobs and kernels, two types of tubers (potatoes and oca), and seeds of quinoa, beans, and other unidentified types Potatoes, oca, and quinoa had not been previously identified in archaeological sites in the northern highlands (Athens, 1990). Fifteen radiocarbon determinations were obtained from TP-7 and appear to encompass the complete occupational history of La Chimba. Using absolute dates assigned to all levels based on a non-quantitatively determined best fit radiocarbon depth-age curve, it appears that initial occupation occurred sometime around 700 B.C. (2640 B.P. calibrated). Occupation was apparently continuous until the site was abandoned around A.C. 250 (1700 B.P. calibrated). The ages of the different test units are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2 of Athens (1990) which presents a generalized chronological scheme for the site (see Athens, 1978). La Chimba is at present the earliest known Ecuadorian ceramic period site north of Quito. Archaeomagnetic data, however, still remain sparse and very unevenly distributed in both time and space to well-describe and understand the pattern of the geomagnetic field's secular variation (SV) over millennial timescales on a global scale (Valet et al., 2008; Pavón-Carrasco et al., 2014a; Panovska et al., 2015). For instance, very few data come from the southern hemisphere and less than 3% of the archaeointensity entries in the GEOMAGIA database (Brown et al., 2015) come from sites with latitudes between −10 and 10°. In particular, archaeomagnetic data from South America are scarce, and in many cases, come from old studies that are characterized by scattering (Goguitchaichvili et al., 2019). Thus, in order to enhance, improve and contribute to the development of reliable global geomagnetic field models, it is necessary to improve the spatial global coverage with well-dated and high-quality reference data (e.g. Pavón-Carrasco et al., 2014b). In this paper, we present a new set of absolute archaeointensity determinations from pottery collections recovered from three archaeological sites located at the highlands of north central Ecuador. The new results were obtained with the modified Thellier-Coe protocol that implies that instead of measuring the NRM first, we preferred to apply a TRM before heating the sample in zero field (e.g. that Aitken et al., 1988, Valet et al., 1998, Herrero-Bervera and Valet, 2005, 2009; Herrero-Bervera et al., 2016), including partial thermoremanent magnetization (pTRM) checks that helps out to monitor possible magnetomineralogical alterations that can take place during experimental heating. The ages of the samples studied were determined through calibrated radiometric data and archaeological evidence based on diagnostic pottery. Only, a few previous available studies from Ecuador, data from neighboring Peru and Colombia covering the same time periods of our study are avaliable and were used for comparison with our new archaeointensity determinations. It is very important to point out that the archaeointensity results of this study will only be very useful and meaningful for the study of the evolution of the generation of the geomagnetic field at equatorial latitudes of ~110 North and for a time windows of our analysis (i.e. 700 BC-1 AD, 1250–1505/1525 AD, 700–440BC, 440–40BC and 44BC-250AD) and within a 600–700 km circle (e.g. Tema and Knodopoulou, 2011) and centered at the northen ecuador sites correlatable to the Earth's core generated signals. Beyond this circle (i.e. radius of 600–700 km) any attempt to correlate to distant locations such as central America, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Chile and Bolivia is meaningless due to the way the geomagnetic field is generated.

Section snippets

Archaeological sites and studied material

The potsherds studied come from three prehistoric archaeological sites situated in northern Ecuador (Fig. 1): Atuntaqui (Mound 30, Lat. 0.34° S, Long. 78.2° W), Otavalo (Mound 3, Lat. 0.24° S, Long. 78.3° W) and La Chimba (Test Pits 5 and 7, Lat. 0.14° S, Long. 78.0° W).

The prehistoric Ecuadorian cultures excelled in the production of pottery, with each cultural phase being characterized by its own style. Therefore, the pottery can also be used as an important cultural marker (Athens, 1990, 1995

Magnetic mineralogy

The magnetic mineralogy of representative samples were investigated at the Paleomagnetics and Petrofabrics Laboratory of the Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology (HIGP)-SOEST University of Hawaii at Manoa (Honolulu, Hawaii), at the CIMaN-ALP Paleomagnetic laboratory (Peveragno, Italy), and at the Geophysics Institute of the University of Mexico (UNAM, Mexico).

Isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) curves were obtained after imparting a step-wise increasing direct field with an ASC

Archaeointensity determination

Paleointensity (PI) experiments were performed at the SOEST-HIGP Magnetic Materials, Paleomagnetics and Petrofabrics Laboratory at the University of Hawaii at Manoa (Hawaii, USA). A total of 58 pottery specimens were analyzed using the Coe version (Coe, 1967) of the classical Thellier and Thellier method. However, instead of measuring the NRM first, we preferred to apply a TRM before heating the sample in zero field (Aitken et al., 1988; Valet et al., 1998; Herrero-Bervera and Valet., 2005, 2009

Discussion

We present here new, well-determined absolute paleointensity results from three archaeological sites from Ecuador. The new data come from precisely dated pottery, and therefore offer a very valuable set of information about the past intensity variation in Ecuador. At the same time, they enrich the global reference data from low-latitude ites that are still very scarce woldwide

The new estimated average archaeomagnetic absolute paleointensities obtained in this study of 43.6 ± 1.3 μT for

Conclusions

The studied Ecuadorian ceramics proved to be excellent recorders of the past geomagnetic field, rendering successful archaeointensity determinations with a high success rate. The samples collected from the three different archaeological sites were well dated by means of radiocarbon techniques (Appendix A, Fig. 3) and can therefore be used as reference points for enriching our knowledge of the past Earth's magnetic field intensity secular variation at low latitudes (i.e. equatorial latitudes).

Declaration of competing interest

The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent licensing arrangements),or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed

Acknowledgements

We are pleased to thank Mr James Lau for his assistance during the laboratory experiments. Professor Manuel Calvo Rathert read and critically reviewed the manuscript suggesting corrections, upgrades and improvements that made the manuscript much better than the original version of the article, we thank him for his help. We also thank in advance two anonymous referees for their very constructive, “spot on”, sharp criticisms and overall help. Data reduction was mainly processed using the Paleomac

References (74)

  • P. Roperch et al.

    Partial self-reversal of TRM in baked soils and ceramics from Ecuador, Physics

    Earth. And Planet. Ints.

    (2012)
  • E. Tema et al.

    Intensity of the Earth's magnetic field in Greece during the last five millennia: new data from Greek pottery

    Phys. Earth Planet. In.

    (2012)
  • J.P. Valet et al.

    Absolute paleointensity from Hawaiian lavas younger than 35 ka

    Earth Planet Sci. Lett.

    (1998)
  • R. Zhu et al.

    Geomagnetic palaeointensity just prior to the cretaceous normal superchron

    Phys. Earth Planet. In.

    (2001)
  • B. Aguilar Reyes et al.

    An integrated archeomagnetic and C14 study on pre-Columbian potsherds and associated charcoals intercalated between Holocene lacustrine sediments in Western Mexico: geomagnetic implications

    J. Geophys. Res. B

    (2013)
  • E. Aidona et al.

    First archaeomagnetic results and dating of Neolithic structures in Northern Greece

    Studia Geophys. Geod.

    (2012)
  • E. Aidona et al.

    Archaeomagnetic studies in kilns from Northern Greece

    Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece

    (2010)
  • M.J. Aitken et al.

    Archeomagnetic determi- nation of the past geomagnetic intensity using ancient ceramics: allowance for anisotropy

    Archeometry23

    (1981)
  • M.J. Aitken et al.

    Determination of the intensity of the Earth's magnetic during archaeological times: reliability of the Thellier technique

    Rev. Geophys.

    (1988)
  • J.S. Athens
    (1980)
  • J.S. Athens

    Prehistoric Agricultural Expansion and Population Growth in Northern Highland Ecuador: Interim Report for 1989 Field Work

    (1990)
  • J.S. Athens

    Ethnicity and adaptation: the Late period-cara occupation in northern highland Ecuador

  • J.S. Athens

    Relaciones interregionales prehistoricas en el Norte de los Andes: evidencia del sitio La Chimba en el Ecuador Septentrional

  • J.S. Athens

    Volcanism and archaeology in the northern highlands of Ecuador

  • J.S. Athens

    Inventory of Earthen Mound Sites, Northern Highland Ecuador. Final Project Report

    (2003)
  • S.J. Athens

    Evolutionary Process in Complex Societies and the Late Period-Cara Occupation of Northern Highland Ecuador

    (1978)
  • J.S. Athens et al.

    Archaeological Investigations in the Highlands of Northern Ecuador: Two Preliminary Reports

    (1974)
  • M. Blaauw

    R-code for “Classical” Age-Modelling (CLAM V1.0) of Radiocarbon Sequences

    (2010)
  • M.C. Brown et al.

    GEOMAGIA50.v3: 1. General structure and modifications to the archeological and volcanic database

    Earth Planets Space

    (2015)
  • A.F. Buddington et al.

    Iron-titanium oxide minerals and synthetic equivalents

    J. Petrol.

    (1964)
  • M. Calvo-Rathert et al.

    Roproducibility of archaeointensity determinations with a multimethod approach on archaeological material reproductions

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2019)
  • R.S. Coe

    Paleo-intensities of the Earth's magnetic field determined from tertiary and quaternary rocks

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1967)
  • R.S. Coe et al.

    Geomagnetic paleointensities from radiocarbon-dated lava flows on Hawaii and the question of the pacific nondipole low

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1978)
  • J.P. Cogne′

    PaleoMac: a Macintosh application for treating paleomagnetic data and making plate reconstructions

    G-cubed

    (2003)
  • M.H. Dodson et al.

    Magnetic blocking temperatures of simple domain grains during slow cooling

    Jour. Geophsy. Res.

    (1980)
  • U. Draeger et al.

    Single-domain chemical, thermochemical and thermal remanences in basaltic rock

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2006)
  • D.J. Dunlop

    Theory and application of the Day plot (Mrs/Ms versus Hcr/Hc) 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite data

    J. Geophys. Res. B

    (2002)
  • Cited by (3)

    • New <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar age of the full vector Upper Mammoth geomagnetic polarity transition recorded in the Pu'u Kualakauila volcanic sequence, Hawaii

      2022, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Absolute paleointensity determinations (P.I.) experiments were performed using the Coe version (Coe, 1967) of the Thellier and Thellier-experiments, but with a different protocol. Such protocol is applied by instead of measuring the NRM first, we applied a TRM before heating the sample in zero field (Aitken et al., 1988; Aitken, 1990; Valet et al., 2010; Herrero-Bervera and Valet, 2005, 2009; Herrero-Bervera and Acton, 2011, Herrero-Bervera et al., 2020). In this case, magnetomineralogical transformations occur in the presence of a field, resulting in a CRM (chemical remanent magnetization) component which is detected by a deviation of the NRM toward the oven field direction.

    • Global archaeomagnetic data: The state of the art and future challenges

      2021, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
      Citation Excerpt :

      As we move closer to the equator the amount of available data shrinks with <2% of database entries from between ±10∘ latitude. Six studies have produced new data in this latitude band over the past 10 years, with the first archaeomagnetic data from Kenya (Tchibinda Madingou et al., 2020) and the Ivory Coast (Kapper et al., 2020), and others building on small data sets from Ecuador (Herrero-Bervera et al., 2020) and Colombia (Cejudo et al., 2019). The spatial distribution of directional and intensity data are distinctly different (Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4).

    View full text