Elsevier

Journal of Proteomics

Volume 198, 30 April 2019, Pages 36-44
Journal of Proteomics

Proteomics turns functional

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2018.12.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Proteomics generates new functional hypotheses by systems biology.

  • Proteomics emergent properties are defined by pathway and network analyses.

  • Interactomics data provides a snapshot of specific condition complexes.

  • Terminomics reveals new functional outcomes of proteolysis.

Abstract

Proteomics is acquiring a pivotal role in the comprehensive understanding of human biology. Biochemical processes involved in complex diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes and cancer, can be identified by combining proteomics analysis and bioinformatics tools. In the last ten years, the main output of differential proteomics investigations evolved from long lists of proteins to the generation of new hypotheses and their functional verification. The Journal of Proteomics participated to this progress, reporting more and more biologically-oriented papers with functional interpretation of proteomics data. This change in the field was due to both technological development and novel strategies in exploiting the deep characterization of proteomes. In this review, we explore several approaches that allow proteomics to turn functional. In particular, systems biology tools for data analysis are now routinely used to interpret results, thus defining the biological meaning of differentially abundant proteins. Moreover, by considering the importance of protein-protein interactions and the composition of macromolecular complexes, interactomics is complementing the information given by differential quantitative proteomics. Eventually, terminomics is unveiling new functions for cleaved proteoforms, by analyzing the effect of proteolysis globally.

Significance

Proteomics is rapidly evolving not only technologically but also strategically. The correct interpretation of proteomics data can reveal new functions of proteins in several biological backgrounds. Systems biology tools allow researchers to formulate new hypotheses to be further functionally tested. Interactomics is shedding new light on protein complexes truly involved in biochemical pathways and how their alteration can lead to dysfunctionality (in disease pathogenesis, for example). Terminomics is revealing the function of new discovered proteoforms and attributing a novel role to proteolysis. This review would provide the biologist important insights into current applications of several proteomic approaches that could offer new strategies to investigate biological systems.

Introduction

Complex biological events usually involve the interplay of genes, transcripts, proteins, metabolites and lipids. Thus, the development of omics methodologies (genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics) can unravel new domains in the complexity of biological systems. In particular, the understanding of complex diseases (such as cancer or neurodegenerative diseases) takes advantage of these approaches, to identify the numerous genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors involved. Even more meaningful would be a global approach of integrated omics, where potentially all molecular factors (e.g., proteins, genes, transcripts) will be simultaneously measured over time in cells, networks of cells or whole organisms.

High-throughput proteomics approaches are used to quantify proteins, to localize and identify post-translational modifications and to study protein–protein interactions (PPI), specifically related to particular physiological or pathological conditions. In the past twenty years, proteomics approaches have evolved from the technological point of view and moved from the mere identification of proteins to their quantification and finally to post-translational modifications characterization [1,2]. These technological improvements aided the proteome depiction to turn functional. Indeed, proteomics started to have a pivotal role in the study of biological systems (Fig. 1) and became a tool for the identification of disease-related proteins. In this frame, the goal of differential proteomics studies profoundly changed. Initially, they were designed to generate long lists of differentially abundant proteins to be validated by an independent technique, such as Western blot. Nowadays, proteomics projects are hypothesis-generating and focused on a functional interpretation of results. Consequently, the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) finalities also evolved. The aim of the chromosome-centric Human Proteome Project (C-HPP) was the identification and characterization of at least one protein product of the 20,300 human protein-coding genes, together with related post-translational modifications, single amino acid polymorphisms and splice variant isoforms [3]. Conversely, the Biology and Disease-driven Human Proteome Project (B/D-HPP) now aims at describing the molecular basis of physiological and pathological processes, by identifying the driver proteins involved.

The Journal of Proteomics witnessed this functional evolution, reporting papers more and more focused on the biological meaning of proteomics results. Technological advancements lead to a deeper characterization of proteomes. Therefore, more complete datasets are interpreted to highlight the emergent properties of the biomedical problem examined. Moreover, verification steps of more recent papers do not simply confirm the role of every single protein but aim at unveiling the biochemical pathways underlying biological processes.

In the present review, we will explore how proteomics turned functional in studying biochemical processes involved in disease pathogenesis, with a focus on systems biology tools for data analysis and on the development of specific proteomics branches, such as interactomics and terminomics.

Section snippets

Differential quantitative proteomics followed by systems biology unveils the biochemical pathways perturbed by diseases

Differential quantitative proteomics refers to the analysis of two or more groups of samples by globally and quantitatively comparing their proteomes. Mass spectrometry (MS) has become the method of choice in quantitative proteomics approaches, due to its unique ability to measure changes in complex protein mixtures [4]. Protein quantification was initially obtained by data dependent acquisition (DDA) methods, where only the most intense precursor ions eluting at a given time point in a

Interactomics contributes to the dynamic view of cellular functions

The quantitative proteomics approach unveils qualitative and quantitative changes of a specific proteome, though it does not give back any information about protein complexes in biological samples. Instead of analyzing proteins as single entities, the study of the interactome is essential to get a more dynamic and complete picture of cellular functions [31]. Indeed, interactomics approaches are essential to study the assembly of specific protein complexes and to highlight interaction changes

Positional proteomics reveals the functional effects of proteolysis

An underexplored aspect of the human proteome is the proteolytic processing of proteins, which gives rise to different proteoforms, sometimes with new functions. Degradomics is an expanding field in proteomics, whose aim is a comprehensive characterization of all proteases in a specific biological system, together with their protein targets. Over the past decade, a consistent amount of data regarding proteases was collected by degradomics studies. Unfortunately, protease substrates with

Conclusions

In conclusion, proteomics moved from being an isolated field to an integrated tool for biologists, both for the generation of new hypotheses and for the explanation of biological functions. New strategies to analyse and interpret proteomics data are influencing all the workflow of proteomics studies, from the study design to the verification step. In this last case, for example, it is not the identity of each single protein to be proved but the real involvement of a cellular pathway in a given

Acknowledgments

C.M. is grateful to Italian Proteomics Association (ItPA) and to European Proteomics Association (EuPA) for the continuous support with travel grants during her PhD program. We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Maria Monti for her kind help in the revision of the interactomics section.

References (88)

  • D.B. Lima et al.

    SIM-XL: a powerful and user-friendly tool for peptide cross-linking analysis

    J. Proteome

    (2015)
  • A.B. Mak et al.

    A versatile lentiviral expression system to identify mammalian protein-protein interactions

    Methods

    (2012)
  • S.P. Goulding et al.

    A mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of Homer2-interacting proteins in the mouse brain

    J. Proteome

    (2017)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    LC-MS/MS-based targeted proteomics quantitatively detects the interaction between p53 and MDM2 in breast cancer

    J. Proteome

    (2017)
  • C. Jeronimo et al.

    Systematic analysis of the protein interaction network for the human transcription machinery reveals the identity of the 7SK capping enzyme

    Mol. Cell

    (2007)
  • P.C. Havugimana et al.

    A census of human soluble protein complexes

    Cell

    (2012)
  • A.H. Smits et al.

    Characterizing Protein-Protein Interactions using Mass Spectrometry: challenges and Opportunities

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2016)
  • S. Di Palma et al.

    Recent advances in peptide separation by multidimensional liquid chromatography for proteome analysis

    J. Proteome

    (2012)
  • C. López-Otín et al.

    Proteases: multifunctional enzymes in life and disease

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2008)
  • M. Vizovišek et al.

    Current trends and challenges in proteomic identification of protease substrates

    Biochimie

    (2016)
  • C.H. Borchers et al.

    Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium. The Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium: integrating chromosome-centric and biology/disease driven strategies

    J. Proteomics.

    (2014)
  • J.V. Jorrin-Novo et al.

    Gel electrophoresis-based plant proteomics: Past, present, and future. Happy 10th anniversary Journal of Proteomics!

    J Proteomics

    (2018)
  • D.L. Winter et al.

    Differential ion mobility-mass spectrometry for detailed analysis of the proteome

    Trends Biotechnol

    (2018)
  • P. Legrain et al.

    The human proteome project: current state and future direction

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2011)
  • S.I. Anjo et al.

    SWATH-MS as a tool for biomarker discovery: From basic research to clinical applications

    Proteomics

    (2017)
  • F. Koopmans et al.

    Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM-DIA, and Untargeted DIA

    Proteomics

    (2018)
  • M. Fasano et al.

    A systems biology-led insight into the role of the proteome in neurodegenerative diseases

    Expert Rev Proteomics.

    (2016)
  • A. Fabregat et al.

    The reactome pathway knowledgebase

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2018)
  • M. Kanehisa et al.

    KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2017)
  • The Gene Ontology Consortium

    Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2017)
  • D.N. Slenter et al.

    WikiPathways: a multifaceted pathway database bridging metabolomics to other omics research

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2018)
  • E.G. Cerami et al.

    Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2011)
  • W. Huang et al.

    Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources

    Nat. Protoc.

    (2009)
  • M.V. Kuleshov et al.

    Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2016)
  • C. Xie et al.

    KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2011)
  • H. Mi et al.

    PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2017)
  • M. Kutmon et al.

    PathVisio 3: an extendable pathway analysis toolbox

    PLoS Comput. Biol.

    (2015)
  • J. Wang et al.

    WebGestalt 2017: a more comprehensive, powerful, flexible and interactive gene set enrichment analysis toolkit

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2017)
  • J.A. Santiago et al.

    Integrative network analysis unveils convergent molecular pathways in Parkinson's disease and diabetes

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • D. Rende et al.

    Complex disease interventions from a network model for type 2 diabetes

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Exploring the pathogenetic association between schizophrenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus diseases based on pathway analysis

    BMC Med. Genet.

    (2013)
  • C. Monti et al.

    Network Analysis Identifies Disease-specific Pathways for Parkinson's Disease

    Mol. Neurobiol.

    (2018)
  • C. Monti et al.

    Systems biology analysis of the proteomic alterations induced by MPP(+), a Parkinson's disease-related mitochondrial toxin

    Front. Cell. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • N. Amiri Dash Atan et al.

    Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis of Salivary Proteomic Data in Oral Cancer Cases

    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Proteomics provides insights into the theranostic potential of extracellular vesicles

      2024, Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text