Short communicationEvaluation of proton conducting BCY10-based anode supported cells by co-pressing method: Up-scaling, performances and durability
Introduction
The high energy conversion efficiency and the low impact to the environment are part of great advantages of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs), which are promising devices for electricity generation. They convert directly the chemical energy from the fuel to electricity. However, most of technical issues of SOFCs remain the high operating temperatures (>700 °C), leading to accelerated ageing of materials. During the last ten years, Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell has considerably attracted attention thanks to the lower temperature range (400–600 °C) and the interest of a better energy efficiency with the non-dilution of the fuel since the water is produced to the air electrode side.
Since Iwahara published in the 80's his work on protonic perovskites as electrolyte for fuel cells [1], [2], [3], [4], many proton conducting oxide structures have been studied, like perovskites [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], based-perovskites (like Ba3Ca1,18Nb1,82O9 or BaIn0,8Ti0,2O2,6□0,4) [12], [13], [14], [15], ortho-niobates [16], [17], [18] and others candidates [19], [20], [21], [22].
Now, most of protons conducting ceramic cell researches are devoted to the optimization of their performances and reliability. This aspect request notably the strict reduction of ohmic resistance of each interface layers by promoting very thin and dense electrolyte layer [23], [24], [25], [26], a well-architecture anode functional layer to increase the triple-phase boundary (TPB) for hydrogen electrode reactions [27], [28] and a good chemical compatibility and microstructure for air electrodes side [29], [30], [31], [32].
But, until now, most of electrical performances related in the literature do refer to lab-scale size cell below 10 mm of diameter. Thus, no real investigations of efficient up scaling routes have been led until now in order to fit to the industrial requirements for the introduction of cells in stacks. This aspect appears fundamental to approach the stack manufacturing then the system integration key steps research in a reasonable term.
Here proposed is the assessment of co-pressing methods for an up-scaling of PCFC anode- supported cell manufacture. Microstructure and electrical performances of such cells are investigated.
Section snippets
Powders
All samples were prepared using commercial powders (Marion Technologies®) produced at kilogram scale, listed below:
- -
Electrolytes: BaCe0,9Y0,1O3−δ (BCY10)
- -
Anode (cermet): NiO–BaCe0,9Y0,1O3−δ
- -
Cathode: Pr2NiO4 + δ
Cells elaboration
The half cells were made by co-pressing of powders (at AIME laboratory and Céramiques Techniques Industrielles CTI®). In a first time, cermet spray-dried powder (NiO-BCY10) was pressed (100 MPa) into discs (−25–40–80 mm in diameter, 2 mm in thickness). Then, a given weight of electrolyte
Characterization of powders
As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, the as-prepared powders of BaCe0,9Y0,1O3−δ and Pr2NiO4 + δ exhibit a well-developed crystallization and all the peaks can be well indexed as pure perovskite and Ruddlesden–Popper phases, respectively. It could be clearly seen that there is no evidence of the formation of other substances. All the XRD measurements made on the synthesized-phases are in agreement with the corresponding JCPDS card (n° 82–2372 for BaCe0,9Y0,1O3−δ, n° 44–1159 for NiO, n° 34–1113 for Pr2NiO
Conclusion
In this work, proton conducting ceramic oxide materials were synthesized. The up-scaling of powder synthesis at industrial scale was successfully performed, as well as increasing the size of cell from 25 to 40 mm in diameter. Afterwards, co-pressing method has been assessed to elaborate Proton conducting Ceramic Cells (PCC). Regarding feasibility and reproducibility, this shaping method is only efficient at the laboratory scale in order to evaluate quick performances of materials or assemblies
Acknowledgements
Funding by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the CONDOR project (ANR-08-PANH-004-01) is acknowledged with thanks. The authors would also like to thank industrial support from Flexitallic® and Fiaxell®.
References (38)
- et al.
Solid State Ionics
(1981) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(1983) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(1989) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(2000) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(2010) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(2009) - et al.
J. Solid State Chem.
(2010) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(2008) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(1999) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(1997)
Solid State Ionics
J. Power Sources
Solid State Ionics
Solid State Ionics
Solid State Ionics
J. Solid State Chem.
J. Alloys Compd.
Electrochim. Acta
Ceram. Int.
Cited by (19)
Large-area anode-supported protonic ceramic fuel cells combining with multilayer-tape casting and hot-pressing lamination technology
2023, Journal of the European Ceramic SocietySolid oxide fuel and electrolysis cells
2019, Advanced Ceramics for Energy Conversion and StorageLong term testing of BCZY-based protonic ceramic fuel cell PCFC: Micro-generation profile and reversible production of hydrogen and electricity
2017, Solid State IonicsCitation Excerpt :Moreover, Proton conducting solid oxide technology could allow to be versatile in a wide range of environmental-based applications, in particular methane reforming [1] and steam electrolysis applications [2,3,4]. Among all ceramic materials studied, perovskite-based oxides keep the leadership as electrolyte or electrodes into optimized lab-scaled cell fabrication processes [5,6]. In particular, the investigation of Ba-based perovskite type oxides led to promising outcomes in terms of cell performances beyond 400 mW·cm− 2 [4,7,8,9,10] and reliability for several hundred hours [7,11,12].
Application of a novel (Pr<inf>0.9</inf>La<inf>0.1</inf>)<inf>2</inf>(Ni<inf>0.74</inf>Cu<inf>0.21</inf>Nb<inf>0.05</inf>)O<inf>4+δ</inf>-infiltrated BaZr<inf>0.1</inf>Ce<inf>0.7</inf>Y<inf>0.2</inf>O<inf>3-δ</inf> cathode for high performance protonic ceramic fuel cells
2017, Journal of Power SourcesCitation Excerpt :Nb doping in this catalyst was aimed to improve the concentration of interstitial oxygen and enhance the stability of the catalyst material. In studies investigating the use of Ruddlesden–Popper-type (A2BO4) oxides as the cathode materials of PCFCs [34–39], Taillades et al. [34] proposed Pr2NiO4+δ (PN) as a cathode of PCFCs, the cell of which provided power density of more than 0.13 W cm−2 at 650 °C. Later, Dailly et al. developed Nb2NiO4+δ (NNO) [35] as the cathode material of HSOFCs.
High performing BaCe<inf>0.8</inf>Zr<inf>0.1</inf>Y<inf>0.1</inf>O<inf>3-Δ</inf>-Sm<inf>0.5</inf>Sr<inf>0.5</inf>CoO<inf>3-Δ</inf> based protonic ceramic fuel cell
2017, Journal of Power SourcesCitation Excerpt :Although maximum power density beyond 400 mW cm−2 have been already achieved at 600 °C by using anode supported perovskite Ba(Ce, Zr)O3-δ-based proton conducting ceramic cells, most of the results available in the literature are related to lab-scale size below 10 mm in diameter (active area lower than 1 cm2). Besides, the fabrication of such lab-scaled cells are commonly elaborated by using the non-industrial co-pressing/co-sintering method [4–14]. The low operating temperature of PCFC leads to a significant decrease in cathode activity.
Spray coating of dense proton-conducting BaCe<inf>0.7</inf>Zr<inf>0.1</inf>Y<inf>0.2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> electrolyte for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells
2016, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy