Short communicationOptimization of properties and operating parameters of a passive DMFC mini-stack at ambient temperature
Introduction
Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) are promising candidates for portable electric power sources because of their high energy density, lightweight, compactness, simplicity as well as easy and fast recharging [1], [2], [3], [4]. In the last decades, a large number of publications were focused on the development of DMFC components, such as catalysts, membranes, electrodes, etc. [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Initially, DMFC stacks have been developed for assisted power units (APUs) purpose or for electrotraction [14]. These stacks used a classical configuration where single cells are stacked in series through bipolar plates. More recently, the attention has been focused on portable applications and various stack configurations have been proposed [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Thanks to integrated-circuit (IC) fabrication technology, micro-channel patterns can be featured on the silicon wafer with high resolution and good repeatability [19], [20], [21]. Moreover, in order to be commercially viable, it is necessary to eliminate power losses from auxiliaries, i.e. the pump and the fan that are usually used to feed methanol and air into the stack [22], [23]. To this scope, the concept of passive-feed DMFCs has been proposed [16], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Under this configuration, DMFCs operate without any external devices for feeding methanol and blowing air into the cells. Oxygen can diffuse into the cathode from the ambient due to an air-breathing action of the cell (partial pressure gradient), whereas methanol can reach the catalytic layer from a reservoir driven by a concentration gradient between the electrode and the reservoir and through capillary force action of electrode pores. The use of low cost miniaturised “step-up” DC/DC converters, recently commercialised [30], allows to suitably increase the stack potential with a very small dissipation of power (∼90% efficiency). This approach does not require extensive miniaturisation of the DMFC stack favouring the development of low cost DMFC stack architectures with practical electrode area. In the present paper, an optimization of properties and operating parameters, such as methanol concentration and catalyst loading, of a passive direct methanol fuel cell monopolar stack is presented. The influence of Pt loading, already investigated in a conventional forced-flow DMFC [31], was analysed taking into account the mass transfer constrains caused by high catalyst loading under passive operation.
Section snippets
Experimental
The electrodes for a three-cell stack were composed of commercial gas-diffusion layer-coated carbon cloth for high temperature (HT-ELAT, E-TEK) and low temperature operation (LT-ELAT, E-TEK) at the anode and cathode, respectively. Unsupported Pt–Ru (Johnson-Matthey) and Pt (Johnson-Matthey) catalysts were mixed with 15 wt.% Nafion ionomer (Ion Power, 5 wt.% solution) and deposited onto the backing layer for the anode and cathode, respectively. Nafion 117 (Ion Power) was used as electrolyte. The
Results and discussion
Different Pt loadings were evaluated in order to investigate the effect of catalytic layer thickness on the electrochemical behaviour of the air breathing monopolar stack. A small catalyst loading is associated to a small electrode thickness. This favours an easy access of the reactants to the reaction region (electrode–electrolyte interface) and thus lower mass transfer constrains but there is also a small number of catalytic sites. Fig. 2 shows the polarization and power density curves for
Conclusions
In this study, a characterization of a passive DMFC monopolar stack was carried out, varying the catalyst loading and methanol concentration. From this analysis, it is derived that 4 mg cm−2 Pt loading in the presence of unsupported catalysts appears to be the best compromise between electrode thickness and amount of catalytic sites for suitable mass transport and kinetics of anode and cathode reactions, in particular using a methanol concentration ranging from 2 M up to 5 M. A maximum power of 225
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge support from “Regione Piemonte” (Italy) through the Micro Cell project (Delibera della Giunta Regionale no. 25-14654 del 31/01/05). The authors are grateful to Dr. R. Pedicini (CNR-ITAE, Messina, Italy) for chromatographic measurements.
References (32)
J. Power Sources
(2002)- et al.
J. Power Sources
(2004) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(1998) - et al.
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(1999) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2006) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2004) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2004) - et al.
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(2003) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2006) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2002)
J. Power Sources
Electrochem. Commun.
J. Power Sources
Electrochim. Acta
Fuel Cells Bull.
J. Power Sources
Cited by (64)
Preliminary experimental study of the performances for a print circuit board based planar PEMFC stack
2022, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyComparative analysis of liquid versus vapor-feed passive direct methanol fuel cells
2019, Renewable EnergyA hydrophobic layer-based water feedback structure for passive μ-DMFC
2018, Microelectronic EngineeringCarbon-supported Pd and Pd-Co cathode catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) operating with high methanol concentration
2018, Journal of Electroanalytical ChemistryDirect Methanol Fuel Cells
2017, Encyclopedia of Sustainable TechnologiesPerformance and stability of single and 6-cell stack passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) for long-term operation
2017, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy