Short communicationDetermination of genotoxic impurity in atazanavir sulphate drug substance by LC–MS
Introduction
The international regulatory bodies from various regions have been emphasized the determination of impurities in the drug substances and drug products because of their toxicological concern [1]. Genotoxic impurities are those have potential to cause cancer [2]. These impurities (GTIs) carry to a drug substance in the manufacturing process as starting materials, reagents, intermediates, by-products, degradants, etc. [3]. If impurity contains structural alert for mutagenicity, it can be considered as a genotoxic impurity [4]. The European Medicines Agency released guidelines on the control of GTI and ICH also released guidelines on Genotoxic impurities [ICH M7] [4], [5]. These guidelines proposed a threshold of toxicological concern value (1.5 μg/day). The limit for the determination of these impurities was set based on the maximum daily dose (MDD) of the drug. Atazanavir sulphate (Fig. 1a) is an HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) and sold under the trade name Reyataz. The chemical name of atazanavir is [methyl N-[(1S)-1-{[(2S,3S)-3-hydroxy-4-[(2S)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)amino]-3,3-dimethyl-N'-{[4-(pyridin-2-yl) phenyl]methyl}butane hydrazido]-1-phenylbutan-2-yl]carbamoyl}-2,2-dimethylpropyl] carbamate]. Its molecular formula is C38H52N6O7•H2SO4, which corresponds to a molecular weight of 802.9 (sulfuric acid salt). Tert-butyl 2-[4-(pyridine-2-yl) benzyl] hydrazine carboxylate (GTI-A) (Fig. 1b) is a chemical used in atazanavir sulphate process at early stage. Since there is a structural alert, it is essential to control and prove that this material is not carried to final stage. Atazanavir sulphate is available in different dosages 150, 200 and 300 mg. Based on the daily dosage, the limit of GTI-A was fixed as 3.8 ppm. The authors attempted to develop an LC–MS method for the determination of GTI-A and validated.
Section snippets
Chemicals and reagents
The Atazanavir sulphate Drug substance was obtained from Hetero Drugs limited (R&D), Hyderabad, India. The GTI-A (Tert-butyl 2-[4-(pyridine-2-yl) benzyl] hydrazine carboxylate) was obtained from Rampex labs (P) ltd, Hyderabad, India. Ammonium formate (AR grade) formic acid (AR grade), high pure acetonitrile and methanol (HPLC grade) were obtained from Merck Life sciences, Mumbai, India.
Instrumentation
LC–MS analysis was carried out on LC–MS 2010 EV single quadrupole mass spectrometer having LCMS solutions
Method development
The limit for GTI-A in atazanavir sulphate was identified as 3.8 ppm based on the MDD of the drug. There are some literature reports available for the determination of process related and degradant impurities in atazanavir sulphate [6]. No literature is available for the determination of GTI-A, the authors are attempted to develop and validate the method for the determination of GTI-A in atazanvir sulphate. Initially the trials were carried out using HPLC UV method with phosphate buffer and
Conclusion
The findings of our current studies prove that the developed and validated method for the determination of tert-butyl 2-[4-(pyridine-2-yl)benzyl] hydrazine carboxylate (GTI-A), a genotoxic impurity in atazanavir sulphate drug substance is a sensitive LC–MS method in respect of QL, DL, linearity and accuracy. This method can be used in Quality control laboratories of pharmaceutical industry if and when required.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the management of Hetero Drugs Ltd., Hyderabad for their support. We would also like to express our appreciation to the authorities of Vignan University for constant encouragement.
References (7)
- et al.
Regulation of genotoxic and carcinogenic impurities in drug substances and products
Trends Anal. Chem
(2006) - et al.
A rationale for determining testing, and controlling specific impurities in pharmaceuticals that posses potential for genotoxicity
Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
(2006) - et al.
Gradient RP-HPLC method for the determination of potential impurities in atazanavir sulphate
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
(2011)
Cited by (17)
Isolation, identification, characterization, synthesis and quality control strategy of new process-related impurities in ambrisentan
2019, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical AnalysisCitation Excerpt :After the treatment, the median survival time is 3.6 (interquartile range 1.4–7.4) years [14]. Based on the maximum daily dose of 10 mg and the treatment period (1–10 years), 1000 ppm (0.1%) would be the limit of a specific genotoxic impurity which would also be the ‘target analyte level’ (TAL) from an analytical perspective [15,16], and the conventional analytical instrumentation such as HPLC with UV detection completely achieve the request of sensitivity. Methyl 2-chloroacetate, 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy-3,3-diphenylpropanoic acid, benzophenone, 4,6-dimethyl-2-(methylsulfonyl)pyrimidine, 4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-ol and deuterated solvents (for NMR) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Trade Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, CN).
An available strategy for elemental composition determination of organic impurities in commercial preparations based on accurate mass and peak ratio of isotopic fine structures (IFSs) by dual mode combined-FT-ICR-MS and fraction collection technology
2018, Analytica Chimica ActaCitation Excerpt :For safety reasons, organic impurities that exceed 0.1% in a drug must be identified prior to clinical trials [1]. Recently, an identification tool using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has developed for structure elucidation of completely unknown impurities, because LC-MS combines separation capability of chromatography with qualitative advantages of mass spectrometry [2–5]. In this process, the most crucial step is to determine the elemental composition of organic impurities based on the accurate mass detected by MS. However, even the accurate mass detected with very high mass accuracy (<1 ppm) by high-resolution MS, a large number of chemically possible formulae can be obtained [6].
Analytical control strategies for mutagenic impurities: Current challenges and future opportunities?
2018, TrAC - Trends in Analytical ChemistryCitation Excerpt :The method used a 1.8 μm UPLC stationary phase (50 × 2.1 mm) and UV detection at 226 nm, an LOQ of 0.09 ppm was achieved. Most research groups using HPLC analysis for these sulfonate esters utilize derivatization to address analyte volatility and MS detection [65,48]) or MS/MS [67,64]) to achieve the required sensitivity; so the application of direct analysis and simple UV detection would be a significant advancement. However, it isn't clear how this group achieved this enhanced sensitivity.
Analysis of potential genotoxic impurities in rabeprazole active pharmaceutical ingredient via Liquid Chromatography-tandem Mass Spectrometry, following quality-by-design principles for method development
2018, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical AnalysisCitation Excerpt :Conventional techniques such as HPLC with UV or PDA detector or GC with flame ionization detection (FID) are usually inadequate for their accurate determination in low concentrations. In challenging cases, like the current one, when low ppm levels have to be reached, sophisticated techniques such as LC–MS or GC–MS have become very popular in the field of GTIs trace analysis due to their superior sensitivity and specificity [9–13]. Therefore, a robust method should be developed and validated for similar cases and to this purpose chemometrics constitutes a valuable tool [14].
Research progress in genotoxic impurities of drugs and detection methods
2023, Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology