Communication
Modulation of the distance dependence of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements by CSA × DSA cross-correlation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2004.08.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Paramagnetic metal ions with fast-relaxing electronic spin and anisotropic susceptibility tensor provide a rich source of structural information that can be derived from pseudo-contact shifts, residual dipolar couplings, dipole–dipole Curie spin cross-correlation, and paramagnetic relaxation enhancements. The present study draws attention to a cross-correlation effect between nuclear relaxation due to anisotropic chemical shielding (CSA) and due to the anisotropic dipolar shielding (DSA) caused by the electronic Curie spin. This CSA × DSA cross-correlation contribution seems to have been overlooked in previous interpretations of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements. It is shown to be sufficiently large to compromise the 1/r6 distance dependence usually assumed. The effect cannot experimentally be separated from auto-correlated DSA relaxation. It can increase or decrease the observed paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. Under certain conditions, the effect can dominate the entire paramagnetic relaxation, resulting in nuclear resonances narrower than in the absence of the paramagnetic center. CSA × DSA cross-correlation becomes important when paramagnetic relaxation is predominantly due to the Curie rather than the Solomon mechanism. Therefore the effect is most pronounced for relaxation by metal ions with large magnetic susceptibility and fast-relaxing electron spin. It most strongly affects paramagnetic enhancements of transverse relaxation in macromolecules and of longitudinal relaxation in small molecules.

Introduction

Enhanced relaxation of the nuclear spins surrounding a paramagnetic center constituted of one or several unpaired electrons presents one of the most obvious manifestations of paramagnetism [1]. The relaxation enhancement strongly depends on the distance between the nuclear and the electron spin. Since the effect can be observed for significantly longer distances than internuclear interactions, the measurement of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements (PRE) provides an attractive way of accessing long-range distance information between nuclear spins and paramagnetic centers. Consequently, paramagnetic compounds and metal ions have found wide-spread use as sources of long-range distance restraints for structure determination of molecules in solution [2], [3], as indicators of stable or transient intermolecular contacts in molecular biology [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], enzymology [9], drug discovery [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], and organic catalytic synthesis [15], [16], [17], and as probes to study the binding of non-magnetic ions like magnesium or calcium to receptors [18], [19], [20], [21]. In the presence of other, non-paramagnetic sources of nuclear relaxation, such as dipole–dipole and CSA relaxation, the net paramagnetic relaxation enhancement is usually determined as the difference in total relaxation rates between paramagnetic and diamagnetic molecules, i.e., in the presence and absence of the paramagnetic center.

With regard to NMR studies in solution, paramagnetic centers fall into two different classes. Nitroxide radicals and metal ions like Cu2+, Mn2+ or Gd3+ have an isotropic or, as in the case of Cu2+, nearly isotropic magnetic susceptibility [22]. Combined with the absence of low-lying excited states, these paramagnetic centers are characterized by slowly relaxing electronic spins which affect the surrounding nuclear spins through a dipolar (“Solomon”) mechanism [23].

The second class comprises metal ions with fast-relaxing electron spins [22]. The fast modulation of the stochastic dipolar interaction between electron and nuclear spins results in smaller PRE effects for the nuclear spins. Such paramagnetic centers are thus more compatible with high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. In addition, they usually possess anisotropic magnetic susceptibilities which generate pseudocontact shifts and cause an alignment of the molecule with respect to the external magnetic field [24]. Efficient electronic relaxation combined with a large Zeeman splitting creates a net magnetic moment (Curie spin) in thermal equilibrium. Interaction of the Curie spin with nuclear spins constitutes an additional mechanism of nuclear relaxation [25], [26]. It has been noted that the functional form of Curie-spin relaxation is analogous to that of CSA [27], [28]. This similarity was further emphasized by Bertini et al. [29] who pointed out that the Curie contribution can be viewed as an effect originating from the anisotropy of the dipolar shielding (DSA) caused by the electronic susceptibility at the site of the nucleus.

The enhancement of longitudinal and transverse nuclear relaxation is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the proton–electron distance for both Solomon and Curie-spin relaxation mechanisms. Therefore, the simultaneous presence of both mechanisms presents no impediment to the measurement of experimental distances. Deconvolution of the individual contributions requires the accurate knowledge of the electronic and molecular correlation times [22].

Unlike Solomon relaxation which depends on the electronic spin relaxation, Curie relaxation like diamagnetic relaxation mechanisms is caused exclusively by the rotational reorientation of the molecule, resulting in correlated spectral densities with respect to the diamagnetic relaxation. Cross-correlated relaxation between the Curie spin and the dipole–dipole interaction between two nuclear spins is a well-studied phenomenon [28], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. It results in differential line broadening of the doublet components observed for two scalar-coupled nuclear spins.

To the best of our knowledge, the effects of cross-correlation between Curie and CSA relaxation have never been assessed. The present paper examines their relevance for determination of electron–nucleus distances by measurements of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements.

Section snippets

Theory

The evolution of the density matrix can be described byddtσi=-iωiσi+jΓi,j(σj-σjeq),where σi are the matrix elements of the density operator, σieq their corresponding equilibrium values and ωi their oscillation frequencies [35]. The elements of the relaxation supermatrix Γi, j are functions of the Hamiltonian terms Hμ responsible for relaxation, where μ identifies a particular relaxation mechanism. The elements of the relaxation supermatrix can readily be calculated when each of the Hamiltonian

Results and discussion

The contribution of the CSA × DSA cross-correlation rate R1,2CSA×DSA to the R1 and R2 relaxation rates of a nuclear spin I depends on the distance r between the nuclear and electronic spin and on the relative orientation of the CSA and DSA tensors. In the case of axially symmetric CSA and DSA tensorsR1,2CSA×DSAξCSA·ξDSA·P2(cosθCSA,DSA)γI2B02ΔσICSAΔσIDSA·P2(cosθCSA,DSA)P2(cosθCSA,DSA)r3,where γI is the magnetogyric ratio of nucleus I, B0 is the magnetic field and ΔσICSA and ΔσIDSA denote the

Conclusions

Metal ions with fast relaxing electronic spins and large, anisotropic susceptibilities present a rich source of long-range structural restraints, including distance and angular information. Anisotropic susceptibility tensors are a prerequisite for the observation of pseudocontact shifts and molecular paramagnetic alignment in the magnetic field. In addition, the average susceptibility enhances the relaxation rates of the nuclear spins in a distance-dependent fashion, providing a relaxation

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Jozef Kowalewski for valuable discussions and for a critical reading of the manuscript. G.P. thanks the EU for a postdoctoral fellowship within the Research Training Network on Cross-Correlation (HPRN-CT-2000-00092). G.O. thanks the Australian Research Council for a Federation Fellowship. Financial support by the Australian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged.

References (45)

  • I. Bertini et al.

    Paramagnetic constraints: an aid for quick solution structure determination of paramagnetic metalloproteins

    Concept Magn. Reson.

    (2002)
  • L. Banci et al.

    Paramagnetism-based restraints for Xplor-NIH

    J. Biomol. NMR

    (2004)
  • J.L. Battiste et al.

    Utilization of site-directed spin labeling and high-resolution heteronuclear nuclear magnetic resonance for global fold determination of large proteins with limited nuclear Overhauser effect data

    Biochemistry

    (2000)
  • A. Ramos et al.

    A new method to detect long-range protein–RNA contacts: NMR detection of electron–proton relaxation induced by nitroxide spin-labeled RNA

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1998)
  • J. Iwahara et al.

    EDTA-derivatized deoxythymidine as a tool for rapid determination of protein binding polarity to DNA by intermolecular paramagnetic relaxation enhancement

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
  • T.K. Mal et al.

    The ATCUN domain as a probe of intermolecular interactions: application to calmodulin–peptide complexes

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2002)
  • M.N. Harris et al.

    Paramagnetic cobalt(II) as a probe for kinetic and NMR relaxation studies of phosphate binding and the catalytic mechanism of Streptomyces dinuclear aminopeptidase

    Inorg. Chem.

    (2002)
  • W. Jahnke et al.

    Spin label enhanced NMR screening

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2001)
  • J.D. Epperson et al.

    Proton NMR studies of Co(II) complexes of the peptide antibiotic bacitracin and analogues: insight into structure–activity relationship

    Biochemistry

    (2000)
  • X. Wei et al.

    Comprehensive 2D 1H NMR studies of paramagnetic lanthanide(III) complexes of anthracycline antitumor antibiotics

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1998)
  • S. Kobayashi

    Lanthanides: Chemistry and Use in Organic Synthesis

    (1999)
  • L. Di Bari et al.

    Solution versus solid-state structure of ytterbium heterobimetallic catalysts

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (46)

    • NMR of paramagnetic metalloproteins in solution: Ubi venire, quo vadis?

      2022, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ab-initio calculations of paramagnetic shifts and susceptibility, contributed to design ad-hoc paramagnetic probes and to compute paramagnetism-based structural restraints [178–180]. Relaxation anisotropy, intermolecular interactions, cross correlation, charge delocalization, pose still open questions on the accuracy of paramagnetic relaxation as structural restraints [179,182–184]. Recent developments in EPR spectroscopy open the possibility of guiding these efforts by probing experimentally the deviations from the point dipole approximation [185].

    • Sequence-specific assignments in NMR spectra of paramagnetic systems: A non-systematic approach

      2021, Inorganica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Used to induce orientation, or relaxation or shifts, the binding of paramagnetic tags at specific protein sites contributes to address protein structures [22,23], protein–protein interactions [24–26], RNA [27], invisible states [28–30], membrane proteins [31], intrinsically disordered proteins [32–34], drug discovery [35], in-cell NMR [36,37]. On the one hand, ab-initio calculations of paramagnetic shifts and susceptibility, contributed to design ad-hoc paramagnetic probes and to compute paramagnetism-based structural restraints [38–41]; on the other hand relaxation anisotropy [42,43], intermolecular interactions [44], cross correlations [45–47], charge delocalization [48], still pose questions on the accuracy of paramagnetic relaxation as structural restraints. Methodological aspects play a non-marginal role in this scenario: new experiments have been recently developed to accurately measure relaxation rates greater than 100 s−1 [49,50].

    • Pseudocontact shifts in biomolecular NMR using paramagnetic metal tags

      2017, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
    • Conformational freedom of metalloproteins revealed by paramagnetism-assisted NMR

      2013, Coordination Chemistry Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      PCSs, RDCs and PREs are the most common paramagnetic restraints: they provide structural information because their numerical values depend on the coordinates of the observed nuclei in a frame defined by the paramagnetic center present in the system. Cross correlations between Curie and dipolar relaxation [48,49], or Curie relaxation and chemical shielding anisotropy [50], will not be analyzed in this review because they have not been used for monitoring conformational changes. PCS data can be obtained from the differences in chemical shifts (in ppm) of nuclei in paramagnetic and diamagnetic compounds sharing the same molecular structure.

    • Magnetic susceptibility and paramagnetism-based NMR

      2019, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text