CommunicationModulation of the distance dependence of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements by CSA × DSA cross-correlation
Introduction
Enhanced relaxation of the nuclear spins surrounding a paramagnetic center constituted of one or several unpaired electrons presents one of the most obvious manifestations of paramagnetism [1]. The relaxation enhancement strongly depends on the distance between the nuclear and the electron spin. Since the effect can be observed for significantly longer distances than internuclear interactions, the measurement of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements (PRE) provides an attractive way of accessing long-range distance information between nuclear spins and paramagnetic centers. Consequently, paramagnetic compounds and metal ions have found wide-spread use as sources of long-range distance restraints for structure determination of molecules in solution [2], [3], as indicators of stable or transient intermolecular contacts in molecular biology [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], enzymology [9], drug discovery [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], and organic catalytic synthesis [15], [16], [17], and as probes to study the binding of non-magnetic ions like magnesium or calcium to receptors [18], [19], [20], [21]. In the presence of other, non-paramagnetic sources of nuclear relaxation, such as dipole–dipole and CSA relaxation, the net paramagnetic relaxation enhancement is usually determined as the difference in total relaxation rates between paramagnetic and diamagnetic molecules, i.e., in the presence and absence of the paramagnetic center.
With regard to NMR studies in solution, paramagnetic centers fall into two different classes. Nitroxide radicals and metal ions like Cu2+, Mn2+ or Gd3+ have an isotropic or, as in the case of Cu2+, nearly isotropic magnetic susceptibility [22]. Combined with the absence of low-lying excited states, these paramagnetic centers are characterized by slowly relaxing electronic spins which affect the surrounding nuclear spins through a dipolar (“Solomon”) mechanism [23].
The second class comprises metal ions with fast-relaxing electron spins [22]. The fast modulation of the stochastic dipolar interaction between electron and nuclear spins results in smaller PRE effects for the nuclear spins. Such paramagnetic centers are thus more compatible with high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. In addition, they usually possess anisotropic magnetic susceptibilities which generate pseudocontact shifts and cause an alignment of the molecule with respect to the external magnetic field [24]. Efficient electronic relaxation combined with a large Zeeman splitting creates a net magnetic moment (Curie spin) in thermal equilibrium. Interaction of the Curie spin with nuclear spins constitutes an additional mechanism of nuclear relaxation [25], [26]. It has been noted that the functional form of Curie-spin relaxation is analogous to that of CSA [27], [28]. This similarity was further emphasized by Bertini et al. [29] who pointed out that the Curie contribution can be viewed as an effect originating from the anisotropy of the dipolar shielding (DSA) caused by the electronic susceptibility at the site of the nucleus.
The enhancement of longitudinal and transverse nuclear relaxation is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the proton–electron distance for both Solomon and Curie-spin relaxation mechanisms. Therefore, the simultaneous presence of both mechanisms presents no impediment to the measurement of experimental distances. Deconvolution of the individual contributions requires the accurate knowledge of the electronic and molecular correlation times [22].
Unlike Solomon relaxation which depends on the electronic spin relaxation, Curie relaxation like diamagnetic relaxation mechanisms is caused exclusively by the rotational reorientation of the molecule, resulting in correlated spectral densities with respect to the diamagnetic relaxation. Cross-correlated relaxation between the Curie spin and the dipole–dipole interaction between two nuclear spins is a well-studied phenomenon [28], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. It results in differential line broadening of the doublet components observed for two scalar-coupled nuclear spins.
To the best of our knowledge, the effects of cross-correlation between Curie and CSA relaxation have never been assessed. The present paper examines their relevance for determination of electron–nucleus distances by measurements of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements.
Section snippets
Theory
The evolution of the density matrix can be described bywhere σi are the matrix elements of the density operator, their corresponding equilibrium values and ωi their oscillation frequencies [35]. The elements of the relaxation supermatrix Γi, j are functions of the Hamiltonian terms Hμ responsible for relaxation, where μ identifies a particular relaxation mechanism. The elements of the relaxation supermatrix can readily be calculated when each of the Hamiltonian
Results and discussion
The contribution of the CSA × DSA cross-correlation rate to the R1 and R2 relaxation rates of a nuclear spin I depends on the distance r between the nuclear and electronic spin and on the relative orientation of the CSA and DSA tensors. In the case of axially symmetric CSA and DSA tensorswhere γI is the magnetogyric ratio of nucleus I, B0 is the magnetic field and and denote the
Conclusions
Metal ions with fast relaxing electronic spins and large, anisotropic susceptibilities present a rich source of long-range structural restraints, including distance and angular information. Anisotropic susceptibility tensors are a prerequisite for the observation of pseudocontact shifts and molecular paramagnetic alignment in the magnetic field. In addition, the average susceptibility enhances the relaxation rates of the nuclear spins in a distance-dependent fashion, providing a relaxation
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. Jozef Kowalewski for valuable discussions and for a critical reading of the manuscript. G.P. thanks the EU for a postdoctoral fellowship within the Research Training Network on Cross-Correlation (HPRN-CT-2000-00092). G.O. thanks the Australian Research Council for a Federation Fellowship. Financial support by the Australian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged.
References (45)
- et al.
The structure of the complex of plastocyanin and cytochrome f, determined by paramagnetic NMR and restrained rigid-body molecular dynamics
Structure
(1998) A high-resolution structure of a DNA-chromomycin-Co(II) complex determined from pseudocontact shifts in nuclear magnetic resonance
Struct. Fold Des.
(2000)- et al.
Metal binding and structure–activity relationship of the metalloantibiotic peptide bacitracin
J. Inorg. Biochem.
(2002) Nuclear relaxation in macromolecules by paramagnetic ions: a novel mechanism
J. Magn. Reson.
(1975)- et al.
Are true scalar proton proton connectivities ever measured in cosy spectra of paramagnetic macromolecules?
Chem. Phys. Lett.
(1993) - et al.
Electron spin-nuclear spin cross-correlation effects on multiplet splittings in paramagnetic proteins
J. Magn. Reson.
(1997) - et al.
Cross correlation between the dipole–dipole interaction and the Curie spin relaxation: the effect of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility
J. Magn. Reson.
(2001) Interference effects in the relaxation of a pair of unlike spin-1/2 nuclei
J. Magn. Reson.
(1984)- et al.
Lanthanide induced shifts and relaxation rate enhancements
Prog. NMR Spectrosc.
(1996) - et al.
Nuclear and Electron Relaxation: The Magnetic Nucleus-Unpaired Electron Coupling in Solution
(1991)
Paramagnetic constraints: an aid for quick solution structure determination of paramagnetic metalloproteins
Concept Magn. Reson.
Paramagnetism-based restraints for Xplor-NIH
J. Biomol. NMR
Utilization of site-directed spin labeling and high-resolution heteronuclear nuclear magnetic resonance for global fold determination of large proteins with limited nuclear Overhauser effect data
Biochemistry
A new method to detect long-range protein–RNA contacts: NMR detection of electron–proton relaxation induced by nitroxide spin-labeled RNA
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
EDTA-derivatized deoxythymidine as a tool for rapid determination of protein binding polarity to DNA by intermolecular paramagnetic relaxation enhancement
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
The ATCUN domain as a probe of intermolecular interactions: application to calmodulin–peptide complexes
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Paramagnetic cobalt(II) as a probe for kinetic and NMR relaxation studies of phosphate binding and the catalytic mechanism of Streptomyces dinuclear aminopeptidase
Inorg. Chem.
Spin label enhanced NMR screening
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Proton NMR studies of Co(II) complexes of the peptide antibiotic bacitracin and analogues: insight into structure–activity relationship
Biochemistry
Comprehensive 2D 1H NMR studies of paramagnetic lanthanide(III) complexes of anthracycline antitumor antibiotics
Inorg. Chem.
Lanthanides: Chemistry and Use in Organic Synthesis
Solution versus solid-state structure of ytterbium heterobimetallic catalysts
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Cited by (46)
NMR of paramagnetic metalloproteins in solution: Ubi venire, quo vadis?
2022, Journal of Inorganic BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :Ab-initio calculations of paramagnetic shifts and susceptibility, contributed to design ad-hoc paramagnetic probes and to compute paramagnetism-based structural restraints [178–180]. Relaxation anisotropy, intermolecular interactions, cross correlation, charge delocalization, pose still open questions on the accuracy of paramagnetic relaxation as structural restraints [179,182–184]. Recent developments in EPR spectroscopy open the possibility of guiding these efforts by probing experimentally the deviations from the point dipole approximation [185].
Sequence-specific assignments in NMR spectra of paramagnetic systems: A non-systematic approach
2021, Inorganica Chimica ActaCitation Excerpt :Used to induce orientation, or relaxation or shifts, the binding of paramagnetic tags at specific protein sites contributes to address protein structures [22,23], protein–protein interactions [24–26], RNA [27], invisible states [28–30], membrane proteins [31], intrinsically disordered proteins [32–34], drug discovery [35], in-cell NMR [36,37]. On the one hand, ab-initio calculations of paramagnetic shifts and susceptibility, contributed to design ad-hoc paramagnetic probes and to compute paramagnetism-based structural restraints [38–41]; on the other hand relaxation anisotropy [42,43], intermolecular interactions [44], cross correlations [45–47], charge delocalization [48], still pose questions on the accuracy of paramagnetic relaxation as structural restraints. Methodological aspects play a non-marginal role in this scenario: new experiments have been recently developed to accurately measure relaxation rates greater than 100 s−1 [49,50].
Use of paramagnetic systems to speed-up NMR data acquisition and for structural and dynamic studies
2019, Solid State Nuclear Magnetic ResonancePseudocontact shifts in biomolecular NMR using paramagnetic metal tags
2017, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyConformational freedom of metalloproteins revealed by paramagnetism-assisted NMR
2013, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsCitation Excerpt :PCSs, RDCs and PREs are the most common paramagnetic restraints: they provide structural information because their numerical values depend on the coordinates of the observed nuclei in a frame defined by the paramagnetic center present in the system. Cross correlations between Curie and dipolar relaxation [48,49], or Curie relaxation and chemical shielding anisotropy [50], will not be analyzed in this review because they have not been used for monitoring conformational changes. PCS data can be obtained from the differences in chemical shifts (in ppm) of nuclei in paramagnetic and diamagnetic compounds sharing the same molecular structure.
Magnetic susceptibility and paramagnetism-based NMR
2019, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy