Research articles
Accurate approximants of inverse Brillouin functions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168895Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The polynomial part of the analytical approximation of inverse Brillouin functions was improved.

  • The polynomial fit is tabulated for the inverse Brillouin functions of experimental interest.

  • The investigation might interest the experimentalists due to the accessible implementation of a sextic polynomial in the inverse Brillouin functions.

Abstract

We present an investigation to improve the polynomial part of an analytical approximation of inverse Brillouin functions, recently proposed in the literature. For the analytical approximation, we employ a sextic polynomial model. To determine the best fit coefficients of the model, we apply a simple statistical analysis. We obtained the same accuracy as the only case presented in the literature, but with three orders of magnitude fewer points involved in the statistical analysis, which translates into a faster convergence of the coefficients. We extend the investigation to the most interesting cases for physical applications. The method can be applied to any other desired inverse Brillouin functions or polynomial approximations of special functions.

Introduction

The inverse Brillouin functions play a central role in ferromagnetism [1], for instance in order to obtain the Curie temperature in a positive feedback model [2], in the theory of magnetic anisotropy and magnetostriction [3], in the magnetization and ferromagnetic resonance in multilayers [4], [5], or in exact renormalization group calculations for some quantum spin systems as Ising or Kondo models [6], [7], [8]. For a recent review, see [9] and the references contained therein. As the Brillouin functions Bσ are defined by Bσx=2σ+12σcoth2σ+12σx12σcoth12σx,they are rational functions of expx/2σ. So, finding the inverse function Bσ1 is equivalent to solving an algebraic equation, namely a 2σorder one. The exact expressions of B1/21 and B11 are known analytically [9], [10]. Although the evaluation of B3/21 and B21 is an elementary, although tedious exercise, their form is too complicated to be used in practical calculations. This is why analytic calculations involving inverse Brillouin functions with σ>1 can be carried out using only analytic approximations for such functions.

In recent years, significant progress was made in obtaining exact formulas for the inverse of B1/2(x)/x, or the Langevin function [11], [12], but even in these cases, the analytic approximations remain important due to their simplicity. For some recent papers on the approximations on inverse Brillouin and Langevin functions, see [13] and [14], [15], respectively.

In a seminal study of analytical approximations of inverse Langevin and Brillouin functions, Kröger [16] obtains an accurate formula for the approximants of Bσ1 (for keeping the notations simple, we shall use the same symbol for the exact inverse Brillouin function, and for its approximants) Bσ1y=1+a2y2a1+b2y2ln1+y1y,with a1 - linear, and a2,b2 - quadratic polynomials in σ.

Later on, Bârsan [17] proposed an approximant with the following functional form Bσ1y=3σ1+σPσyln11y,where Pσy is a polynomial. Its specific form results from the compromise between the simplicity and accuracy of the approximant: in principle, we could expect that a higher-order polynomial would provide higher accuracy but a more complicated expression, and vice-versa.

Section snippets

Simple methods for obtaining the polynomial Pσ

One practical way of obtaining the polynomial Pσ is to choose a set of intermediary points yj,0<yj<1,to calculate Pσyj numerically and to use, for example, the Fit command in Mathematica [18]. According to Eq. (3): Pσyi=1+σ3σBσ1yiln11yiThe values Pσyj can be obtained noticing that, for any yj, there is a xj, satisfying the relation Bσxj=yj, and its numerical value (given for instance by the FindRoot command [19]) xj=Bσ1yi can be replaced in the r.h.s. of (4). As indicated in [10], [17], the

An optimization of the polynomial approximation

We shall try to improve and extend to higher σ the polynomial approximation described in the previous sections, i.e. to find the sextic polynomial which gives the best fit for a set of points, yi,Pσyi; yi are equispaced and 0yi1. So, our model is defined by Pσy=1+n=16cnσyn.

We shall limit our analysis for σ9/2, which includes the most interesting physical applications, but it can be extended to any larger values of σ.

The condition Pσ0=1 is already satisfied, but the second restriction of

Conclusion

In this paper, we present an investigation aimed to improve the analytical approximation of inverse Brillouin functions, Bσ(x)/x, with σ of experimental interest. Contrary to previous approaches, we avoided imposing a certain numerical value of the approximants at the right end of the interpolation interval. We used equispaced fitted points, but this condition can be changed to improve the approximant accuracy, near y=1. One of our conclusions is that the best precision of the approximation is

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ovidiu Niţescu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks to Dr. Victor Bârsan for fruitful discussions and support during the article’s stages.

The figures for this article have been created using the SciDraw scientific figure preparation system [25].

This work has been supported by the grant of the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization through the Project No. PN19-030102-INCDFM.

References (25)

  • TarasevychD. et al.

    A rich man’s derivation of scaling laws for the Kondo model

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2018)
  • BârsanV.

    Inverses of Langevin, Brillouin and related functions: A status report

    Romanian Rep. Phys.

    (2020)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text