Review Article
Impact of Surgery for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis before In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.007Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

ABSTRACT

Objective

The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare reproductive outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) before in vitro fertilization (IVF) with those in patients who underwent IVF without a previous surgery for DIE, to analyze data according to different types of surgery (complete or incomplete) or subgroups of patients (DIE with or without bowel involvement), and to assess surgical and IVF complications and data regarding safety concerns.

Data Sources

A systematic literature search from January 1980 to November 2019 with no language restriction was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The search strategy used the following Medical Subject Headings terms: “in vitro,” “fertilization,” “IVF,” “assisted reproduction,” “colorectal,” “endometriosis,” “deep,” “infiltrating,” “deep infiltrative endometriosis,” “intestinal,” “bowel,” “rectovaginal,” “uterosacral,” “vaginal,” and “bladder.”

Methods of Study Selection

We included studies that compared reproductive outcomes in women with infertility with DIE who received IVF with or without a previous surgery for DIE lesions. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan v.5.3; Cochrane Training, London, United Kingdom). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration.

Tabulation, Integration, and Results

The systematic search retrieved 150 articles; 98 studies were potentially eligible, and their full texts were reviewed. Of these, 12 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 5 presented data suitable for inclusion in a meta-analysis; however, 2 of the studies provided overlapping data, and only the larger study was finally included. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were found. The pregnancy rate per patient was 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28–2.64), the pregnancy rate per cycle was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.26–2.70), and the live birth rate per patient was 2.22 (95% CI, 1.42–3.46) times more likely for operated patients than for nonoperated ones. The addition of data from the incomplete surgery groups also showed a higher pregnancy rate per patient for surgery before IVF (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; 95% CI, 1.16–2.28). The results favor previous surgery in DIE with digestive involvement (OR 2.43; 95% CI, 1.13–5.22) and also in DIE without digestive involvement (OR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.61–3.95). A qualitative analysis of the complications of surgery and IVF showed a partial or complete lack of information on these issues as well as high heterogeneity in the reported data. None of these studies is an RCT; therefore, all have a high risk of selection and allocation bias, except for 1 study that statistically controlled the latter risk by using propensity scores. Funnel plots showed no asymmetry.

Conclusion

The results were very consistent for all the studied outcomes, showing a statistically significant benefit for surgery before IVF, although they should be confirmed with RCTs. In addition to the reproductive outcomes, safety data should also be reported to obtain a complete assessment of the risks and benefits.

Keywords

Colorectal endometriosis
Assisted reproduction
Infertility
Reproductive outcomes

Cited by (0)

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: 2020 CRD42020162480.

Data will be made available on request made to the corresponding author.