Lengthscales of motions that control air–water gas transfer in grid-stirred turbulence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.03.018Get rights and content

Abstract

The relationship between the gas transfer velocity and turbulent lengthscales is investigated experimentally in a grid-stirred turbulent flow. The horizontal velocity field at the water surface is measured using particle image velocimetry (PIV). The gas transfer velocity for oxygen is obtained through reaeration experiments. In addition, the gas transfer process by surface-renewal eddies is visualized using laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) technique, in which carbon dioxide is used as the tracer gas. The definition of the Taylor microscale holds that the root-mean-square (RMS) of the surface divergence is expressed by the square root of the turbulent kinetic energy divided by the Taylor microscale. Experimentally obtained data support this scaling. They show the gas transfer velocity to be proportional to the square root of the RMS of the surface divergence. These experimental results imply that the Taylor microscale is an important parameter for gas transfer velocity at the air–water interface. These relations indicate that a nondimensional gas transfer velocity is proportional to the − 1/4 power of a turbulent-macroscale Reynolds number, which is similar to a small-eddy model, assuming that turbulent eddies with the Kolmogorov scale control the gas transfer process. However, this Reynolds number dependence does not necessarily mean the superiority of turbulent eddies with the Kolmogorov scale in the gas transfer. The LIF visualizations in horizontal and vertical planes close to the air–water interface indicate that the horizontal CO2-concentration field has a fine spatial pattern, which resembles that of the surface divergence field, and that surface-renewal motions observed in the vertical plane have a larger lengthscale than the Kolmogorov scale. We infer from both PIV and LIF results that the Taylor microscale is an important lengthscale for air–water gas transfer.

Introduction

Air–water gas transfer is an important process in various fields such as chemical engineering, geophysical and environmental sciences. For low-diffusivity gases in water, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2), gas transfer across the air–water interface is controlled by resistance in the water. The concentration boundary layer on the water side is formed very close to the air–water interface. This boundary layer is peeled and the interface is renewed by turbulent eddies near the interface. Based on such turbulent processes, various models for computation of gas transfer velocity have been proposed to date (e.g., Danckwerts, 1951, Fortescue and Pearson, 1967, Theofanous et al., 1976, McCready et al., 1986). However, a universal model has not been developed because of the difficulty in understanding the turbulent structure close to the interface.

Free-surface divergence is closely associated with surface-renewal motions. It is believed to be a control parameter of gas transfer. Based on surface divergence, various experiments and models have been produced for gas transfer velocity (e.g., McCready et al., 1986, Banerjee et al., 2004, McKenna and McGillis, 2004). Surface divergence β is expressed using the following continuity equation at the air–water interface:β(x,y,t)=(ux+vy)=wz,where u and v are the horizontal velocities at the interface in the directions of the horizontal coordinate axes x and y, respectively, and w the vertical velocity in the direction of the vertical coordinate axis z taken downward from the interface. In a region of small z, the concentration boundary layer becomes much thinner than the scale of turbulent eddies near the interface. For that reason, we can determine the vertical velocity w from the surface divergence β, i.e.,w=βz.At a stagnation flow point near the air–water interface, the horizontal velocities are thought to become small. Therefore, using Eq. (2), we can approximate the convection–diffusion equation for the gas concentration Cg dissolved in the water at the point asCgtβzCgz=D2Cgz2,where D is the molecular diffusivity of gas in the water. McCready et al. (1986) derived a linear equation for the concentration fluctuation from Eq. (3). On the basis of that equation, they related the concentration fluctuation with the surface divergence. Calculating the turbulent gas flux, as expressed in terms of surface divergence, they obtained the following relation:kL=CDβrms,where kL stands for the gas transfer velocity on the water side, C a dimensionless coefficient and βrms the root-mean-square (RMS) of the surface divergence. The value of βrms indicates the degree of convergence or divergence (i.e., downward and upward vertical flows) at the air–water interface. It is a physical parameter that denotes the magnitude of surface-renewal motions. The validity of the surface divergence model of Eq. (4) has been confirmed experimentally in various studies (e.g., McCready et al., 1986, Tamburrino and Gulliver, 2002, McKenna and McGillis, 2004). Recently, it has been possible to obtain instantaneous surface velocity fields using particle image velocimetry (PIV). Using it, the surface divergence can be calculated directly. In a grid-stirred turbulent flow, which is a simple turbulent field without the mean flow, Orlins and Gulliver (2002) measured surface velocity fields with a PIV method and reported that the surface divergence fluctuates more rapidly and has a smaller spatial scale than the vorticity. McKenna and McGillis (2004) also measured surface velocity fields in a grid-stirred turbulence using PIV and the gas transfer velocity based on a reaeration experiment for O2. They found a linear relation between the gas transfer velocity and the square root of the RMS of the surface divergence. They concluded the validity and importance of the surface divergence model.

However, the relation between βrms and characteristics of free-surface turbulence has not been sufficiently clarified. Particularly, the characteristic lengthscale of βrms is important for development of a gas-transfer velocity model. For example, the dominance of either a large-eddy model proposed by Fortescue and Pearson (1967) or a small-eddy model proposed by Lamont and Scott (1970) has been discussed. Even in an oscillating-grid turbulence, Chu and Jirka (1992) supported the large-eddy model, whereas Asher and Pankow (1986) did the small-eddy model. Although previous studies have mainly examined the relation between statistical quantities of turbulence and the gas transfer velocity, such an analysis seems to present some limitations when we inspect the lengthscale of turbulent eddies, which play an important role in the gas transfer process.

Direct observations of the gas absorption process at the air–water interface provide useful information for characterization of turbulent eddies. In particular, visualization using laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) technique elucidates details of the concentration field close to the air–water interface and surface-renewal motions because of turbulent eddies. An LIF technique based on oxygen quenching of fluorescence by pyrene butyric acid has been used to measure the concentration profiles of dissolved oxygen in water (e.g., Wolff and Hanratty, 1994, Woodrow and Duke, 2001). Herlina and Jirka (2004) investigated the concentration field of oxygen near the air–water interface in a grid-stirred tank using the oxygen-quenching method. Using LIF visualization, they analyzed scales of turbulent eddies, which drive surface-renewal motions. Münsterer and Jähne (1998) investigated vertical profiles of the HCl concentration on the water side close to the air–water interface using LIF technique in a wind-wave tank. They showed that profiles of the mean concentration are explainable using a surface-renewal model with the Schmidt number exponent of 2/3, though these deviate from the prediction based on the small-eddy model. On the basis of those experimental results, they concluded that surface-renewal motions near the interface are induced by large turbulent eddies. Consequently, LIF technique is effective for detecting and quantifying the lengthscale of surface-renewal eddies.

This study is intended to investigate lengthscales of free-surface motions that control the air–water gas transfer in a grid-stirred tank using both PIV and LIF techniques. We intend to calculate the surface divergence in the free-surface turbulence with a flat surface. Scaling of the RMS of the surface divergence is shown based on theoretical analyses and PIV measurements. Using this scaling, the dependence of a nondimensional gas transfer velocity on a turbulent Reynolds number is examined. Finally, to distinguish the lengthscale of turbulent eddies associated with the gas transfer, we use LIF technique to perform direct observations of gas absorption processes close to the air–water interface.

Section snippets

Theoretical background

As shown in Eq. (4), the surface divergence model of the gas transfer velocity is expressed in terms of the RMS of the surface divergence βrms, which has not been parameterized by statistical quantities of free-surface turbulence. For the large-eddy model and the small-eddy model, the scaling of surface-renewal eddies has been examined on the basis of a Reynolds number dependence of the gas transfer velocity. On the other hand, in previous studies, the surface divergence model has not been

Experimental procedure

Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of experimental apparatus. The rectangular water tank is 25 cm long, 25 cm wide and 60 cm deep. A horizontal square grid is oscillated in the vertical direction to generate turbulence. The grid mesh size M is 5.0 cm; the width of crossing square bars is 1.0 cm. Tap water, after processing through a filter system for purification, is used as the working fluid. The water surface is cleaned in advance through removal of the surface water (Kimwipes; Crecia Corp.) to

PIV measurements

Fig. 2a and b show snapshots of the instantaneous horizontal velocity field on the air–water interface, which are obtained respectively from PIV measurements in the cases of Runs 1 and 2. Fewer vectors are drawn in these figures. Both figures show that the turbulent structure is almost isotropic and homogeneous in the horizontal plane. The grid conditions are identical for Runs 1 and 2, whereas zs for Run 2 are less than that for Run 1. Results show that the turbulence intensity at the water

Concluding remarks

In this study, the characteristic lengthscales of turbulent motions controlling the air–water gas transfer in the grid-generated turbulence with a flat surface were investigated experimentally using surface PIV measurements and LIF visualizations. This study was undertaken based on the concept that the surface divergence model expresses the gas transfer velocity, and that the surface divergence should be scaled using the Taylor microscale. Based on the Taylor microscale definition, we show that

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Profs. N. Matsunaga and A. Masuda for helpful discussions. This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References (25)

  • R.A. Handler et al.

    Transport of a passive scalar at a shear-free boundary in fully developed turbulent open channel flow

    Phys. Fluids

    (1999)
  • Herlina et al.

    Application of LIF to investigate gas transfer near the air–water interface in a grid-stirred tank

    Exp. Fluids

    (2004)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Investigating the effects of hydrodynamics and mixing on mass transfer through the free-surface in stirred tank bioreactors

      2017, Chemical Engineering Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      To measure the concentration fields, Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF) has proven to be a suitable measurement technique. It has already been used to assess mixing characteristics (Houcine et al., 1996; Guillard et al., 2000; Fall et al., 2001; Busciglio et al., 2014) in stirred-tank reactors, or to characterize mass transfer through an air-water interface, mainly using oxygen (Woodrow and Duke, 2001; Herlina and Jirka, 2004; Falkenroth et al., 2007; Janzen et al., 2010; Jimenez et al., 2013, 2014) but also carbon dioxide (Tsumori and Sugihara, 2007; Variano and Cowen, 2013). Besides, both techniques are considered as proper tools for numerical CFD model validation (Coroneo et al., 2011; Delafosse et al., 2014).

    • CFD modeling of gas entrainment in stirred tank systems

      2014, Chemical Engineering Research and Design
      Citation Excerpt :

      Predictions by the model proved that LES modeling could be used as a reliable tool to investigate complicated two phase flow features such as vortices and air entrainment. Tsumori and Sugihara (2007) investigated the relationship between gas transfer velocity and turbulent length scales experimentally in a grid stirred turbulent flow. They suggested that Taylor micro scale was an important length scale for air water gas transfer.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text