Discovery of Fusarium solani as a naturally occurring pathogen of sugarbeet root maggot (Diptera: Ulidiidae) pupae: Prevalence and baseline susceptibility
Introduction
The sugarbeet root maggot, Tetanops myopaeformis (Röder), is the most important insect pest of sugarbeet in the Red River Valley (RRV) of North Dakota and Minnesota. High infestations of this pest in the RRV are typically managed by using synthetic chemical insecticides, and up to two or three applications per growing season are not uncommon. Heavy reliance on these materials could eventually lead to the development of insecticide-resistant root maggot strains. Therefore, alternative control tools are needed to minimize producer dependence on conventional chemical insecticides.
Research on alternative T. myopaeformis control strategies utilizing microbial agents, particularly insect-pathogenic fungi, has met with some success. A native fungus, Syngliocladium tetanopsis Hodge, Humber, and Wozniak, was isolated from field-collected T. myopaeformis larvae and shown to be pathogenic to the insect (Hodge et al., 1998, Wozniak, 1999, Wozniak and Smigocki, 2001). Jonason et al. (2005) compared Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin, and also evaluated several M. anisopliae strains for infectivity to T. myopaeformis larvae. They observed greater virulence against T. myopaeformis larvae in M. anisopliae than in B. bassiana, and found M. anisopliae isolate ATCC 62176 (MA1200) to result in the highest larval mortality among several isolates tested. Campbell et al., 2000, Campbell et al., 2006 tested M. anisopliae for potential as a root maggot mycoinsecticide under field conditions, and achieved encouraging results. They suggested that T. myopaeformis control via entomopathogenic fungi could be improved by using more virulent strains. While most research has focused on fungal control of T. myopaeformis larvae, the available body of literature lacks information regarding pathogen surveys on other life stages of the insect. This key insect pest could be especially vulnerable to infection during the pupal stage because pupae, being incapable of locomotion, are unable move through soil and rub off infective units of a pathogen prior to penetration.
Many Fusarium species are well-known pathogens of plants, insects, and humans. Although the systematic description of this genus is unresolved, Fusarium is unique because some isolates of the common phytopathogenic species (e.g., those associated with root rot diseases) also can infect subterranean insects. More than 13 Fusarium species are pathogenic to insects, and the group has a host range that includes Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera (Humber, 1992). Gupta et al. (1991) isolated the toxin beauvericin, a cyclodepsipeptide, from Fusarium. Those authors showed that beauvericin can kill 50% of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), larval test populations at a 663-ppm dose. Beauvericin also is lethal to dipteran insects such as mosquitoes and blow flies (Tanada and Kaya, 1993). Venugopal et al. (1989) observed that epizootics of Fusarium caused mortality levels that were equal to or greater than predators and parasitoids in populations of the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Epizootics were suggested as being favored by high humidity, low temperatures, and availability of whitefly hosts; however, actual weather parameters were not presented in that report.
According to Humber (1992), Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. is infectious to pupae of the dipteran family Anthomyiidae; however, this pathogen has not been previously reported as infecting T. myopaeformis at any stage of its life cycle. Observations reported herein focus on detection, isolation, and prevalence of F. solani in T. myopaeformis pupae collected from several field sites where sugarbeet had been grown the previous season. The objectives of research were to determine prevalence of F. solani epizootics via field surveys, describe disease progression in T. myopaeformis pupae under laboratory conditions, and quantify baseline susceptibility of pupae to F. solani.
Section snippets
Prevalence study—2004
A field site near St. Thomas (Pembina Co.) in northeastern North Dakota was selected for collections of T. myopaeformis pupae that had overwintered as larvae. The site was chosen based on the known occurrence of high T. myopaeformis infestations in the vicinity during the 2003 season. The field had been planted to sugarbeet in the year that preceded our collections, and potatoes were grown the year before sugarbeet. Spring wheat was growing on the site in 2004 during pupal collections. Major
Results
A total of 3600 pupae collected during the two field surveys were individually screened in this study. In 2004, F. solani prevalence fluctuated from 4% to 80% among pupal collection dates (Table 1). The average prevalence level of F. solani on T. myopaeformis pupae that year was 44%. In 2005, prevalence of F. solani (Table 2) ranged from <1% to 7% at St. Thomas, 6% at Lodema, and <1% at Cavalier. A 15-d incubation period was sufficient to allow mycelial egress from cadavers of infected
Discussion
This is the first report of infection of T. myopaeformis by F. solani, and it was confirmed by conducting two field surveys and laboratory screening. Pupae of T. myopaeformis infected by F. solani were found at the original site on all collection dates in 2004. Infected pupae also were present in 2005, although the frequency of infected insects was much lower than was observed in 2004. Laboratory studies demonstrated high virulence of isolate ARSEF 7382 to T. myopaeformis pupae. The high
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. R.A. Humber of the U.S. Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service Collection of Entomopathogenic Fungal Cultures (ARSEF, Cornell, University, Ithaca, NY), and J.A. Juba and Dr. D.M. Geiser of the Fusarium Research Center, Plant Pathology Department, Pennsylvania State University for identification and accession of fungal cultures. The assistance in disease surveys provided by R. Dregseth, C. Evensvold, C. Zander, B. McCamy, D. Miller, P. Burange, R.D. Adharapurapu, T.
References (25)
- et al.
Fungi: hyphomycetes
- et al.
Lethal effects of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus on the eggs of Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae) with a description of a mite egg bioassay system
Biol. Control.
(2004) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide
J. Econ. Entomol.
(1925)- et al.
Genetic variability within Fusarium solani species as revealed by PCR-fingerprinting based on PCR markers
Braz. J. Microbiol.
(2004) - et al.
Control of sugarbeet root maggot with the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
J. Sugar Beet Res.
(2000) - et al.
Grower-adoptable formulations of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) for sugarbeet root maggot (Diptera: Ulidiidae) management
Environ. Entomol.
(2006) Choosing and Using Statistics: A Biologist’s Guide
(1999)Statistical Methods in Biological Assay
(1964)- et al.
Epidemiological concepts applied to insect epizootiology
- et al.
Occurrence of Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht and its pathogenicity on guava scale Chloropulvinaria psidii Maskell (Hemiptera: Coccidae)
Curr. Sci.
(1989)
Isolation of beauvericin as an insect toxin from Fusarium semitectum and Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans
Mycopathologia
Life history of the sugar-beet root maggot Tetanops myopaeformis (Röder) (Diptera: Otitidae) in southern Alberta
Can. Entomol.
Cited by (35)
Recruitment of an insect and its nematode natural enemy by olfactory cues from a saprophytic fungus
2020, Soil Biology and BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :Fusarium solani is large species complex of soilborne saprophytes, opportunistic plant parasites, and symbionts of insects such as ambrosia beetles that cultivate the fungus in their tunnels for nourishment (Egonyu and Torto, 2018). Entomopathogenic F. solani have been reported, but do not seem to be characteristic of the group (Barson, 1976; Majumdar et al., 2008). Wu et al. (2018) demonstrated that, while F. solani did not infect live Diaprepes root weevil larvae, the fungus readily colonized freeze-killed larvae.
Isolation and structural elucidation of antifungal compounds from Ryudai gold (Curcuma longa) against Fusarium solani sensu lato isolated from American manatee
2019, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part - C: Toxicology and PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :However, no antifungal compound has been identified from the RD rhizomes. Fusarium solani sensu lato (FSSL) causes several diseases in human, animals, and plants (Nelson et al., 1994; Majumdar et al., 2008). According to our previous research, curcumin and demethoxycurcumin which are the major active constituents of turmeric showed the strong inhibitory effect on FSSL.
Phytochemical investigation and biological activities of Fusarium SP. An entomogenous fungus
2019, Biocatalysis and Agricultural BiotechnologyCitation Excerpt :The genus of Fusarium is commonly known as a group of phytopathogenic fungi. However, it is now known that a large number of them act as entomopathogens, covering a wide range of hosts including Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Homoptera, Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera (Majumbar et al., 2008). In the literature there are reports of the action of different strains of Fusarium on lepidoptera, such as F. chlamydosporum, F. equiseti, F. graminearum, F. moniliforme, F. oxysporum, F. poae, F. semitectum, F. sacchari, y F. solani.
The saprophytic fungus Fusarium solani increases the insecticidal efficacy of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema diaprepesi
2018, Journal of Invertebrate PathologyCitation Excerpt :Fusarium species are well-known saprophytic fungi that are abundant in soil (Teetor-Barsch and Roberts, 1983). Some Fusarium species are associated with insects, and some are reported to be entomopathogens (Barson, 1976; Majumdar et al., 2008). Except for a report by Navarro et al. (2014) that F. oxysporum might regulate Heterorhabditis sonorensis populations and reduce their survival, all research with respect to nematodes and Fusarium spp. has involved plant parasitic nematodes (Hallmann and Sikora, 1994; Siddiqui and Shaukat, 2003).
Fipronil enhanced natural occurrence of Fusarium solani (Hypocreales: Nectriaceae) on building infesting termite Heterotermes indicola Wasmann (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae)
2018, Journal of Asia-Pacific EntomologyCitation Excerpt :Sacc species (Roy et al., 2008; Strasser et al., 2010; Fernandes et al., 2012; Hatting, 2012). Among these species, F. solani is a naturally occurring pathogen and its virulence has been assessed against sugar beet root maggot pupae (Diptera), lepidopterans, coleopterans, homopterans, cockroaches (Blattodea), scorpions (Arachnida) and crustaceans (Teetor-Barsch and Roberts, 1983; Hose et al., 1984; Majumdar et al., 2008; Sun and Liu, 2008). This pathogenic infection in insects is established by conidia that contact with cuticle, germinate in favorable conditions and emit germ tube to invade the body through penetration.