The conundrum of waste cooking oil: Transforming hazard into energy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126129Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Disposal of WCO caused deterioration of the environment and health issues.

  • WCO has the potential to generate electricity, hydrogen, biodiesel and biogas.

  • Anaerobic co-digestion of WCO produces satisfying yield of biogas.

  • Utilization of WCO as the substrate for hydrogen gas production shows viability.

  • WCO for bioenergy can reduce the reliance on second-generation raw materials.

Abstract

Waste cooking oil (WCO) is considered as one of the hazardous wastes because improper disposal of WCO can cause significant environmental problems such as blockages of drains and sewers as well as water or soil pollution. In this review, the physical and chemical properties of WCO are evaluated along with its regulations and policies in different countries to promote WCO refined biofuels. Blended WCO can be an auxiliary fuel for municipal solid waste incinerators while the heat produced is able to form superheated steam and subsequently generate electricity via combined heat and power system. Also, WCO contains high ratio of hydrogen atoms compared to carbon and oxygen atoms, making it able to be catalytically cracked, synthesizing hydrogen gas. WCO-based biodiesel has been traditionally produced by transesterification in order to substitute petroleum-based diesel which has non-degradability as well as non-renewable features. Hence, the potentials of hazardous WCO as a green alternative energy source for electricity generation, hydrogen gas as well as biofuels production (e.g. biodiesel, biogas, biojet fuel) are critically discussed due to its attractive psychochemical properties as well as its economic feasibility. Challenges of the WCO utilization as a source of energy are also reported while highlighting its future prospects.

Introduction

Currently, global waste generation throughout every year is increasingly worse due to consumerism and the growing disposability of waste. In 2016, global waste generation was up to 2.017 billion tons/year and in 2050, the global waste generated is expected to be increased by 70% which is up to 3.4 billion tons/year (Ellis, 2018; Tiseo, 2020). There is no sign for this trend to slow down due to the factors such as population, economic growth as well as urbanization. For instance, 2.5 kg of waste per citizen per day are produced in the United States and Norway. In Italy, on the other hand, 89,000 tons of waste are produced in the urban area alone (César et al., 2017). Waste cooking oil (WCO), or so called “gutter oil”, generally, can be defined as kitchen waste, gutters and animal fat as well as the recycled cooking oil or the practice of reusing the cooking oil which has been fried before for some of the restaurants (Ye and Pei, 2012). WCO is considered as one of the hazards to the environment and human health if dispose improperly. Typically, WCO is collected from households and restaurants which is required to be processed and utilized in various segments of production in order to reduce the environmental impacts due to the disposal of waste oil. Thus, the utilization of the recycled WCO or even other waste materials can be beneficial for the future energy supply due to its high heating value and high energy potential (Ortner et al., 2016).

However, up to date, the waste recovery is still low as there is a lack of regulations and laws regarding proper management of waste oils for many countries, besides unconscious social action. In fact, César et al. (2017) reported that, only 2% of the waste material was recycled in Brazil, which in reality there were 40% of urban waste made up of recyclable materials (César et al., 2017). Tsai et al. (2007) also pointed out that the total energy supply in Taiwan from 1990 to 2003 increased from 58.57 million kiloliters of oil equivalent (KLOE) to 121.22 KLOE (Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2004; Tsai et al., 2007). From the waste-to-energy perspective, WCO is the best choice of being the feedstock for energy generation in the future as the demand of vegetable oil is increased in order to cater for the large increment of inhabitants every year (Ortner et al., 2016). As a result, subsidies and tax cuts as well as low interest funding should be initiated to promote the collection of WCOs which originate from hospitality and industrial sectors in order to increase the waste recovery instead of elimination.

Regarding utilization of the WCO, the most famous and generally accepted application is the production of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) which is usually referred to biodiesel (Sadaf et al., 2018). This is due to the ability of biodiesel to be blended with diesel fuel to produce different characteristics of biodiesel and applied to any engine without modification (Nisar et al., 2018). For instance, Costa Neto et al. (2000) found that the biodiesel produced has a higher viscosity and density than diesel oil and this difference is reduced to B20 mixture (blending mixture of 20% biodiesel with 80% diesel) (Costa Neto et al., 2000). In addition, WCO can become an alternative source of energy applied in external combustion steam engine due to its high heating value for generation of electricity (Wang, 2002). Furthermore, hydrogen gas can also be produced from WCO via gasification and steam reforming, as WCO contains large fraction of hydrogen atoms (Gardy et al., 2018). Ortner et al. (2016) had examined three different utilization paths of WCO from households which are conversion of WCO to biodiesel, direct combustion in a cogeneration plant and production of biogas within an agricultural biogas plant. Remarkably, it was found that all three strategies contribute to a saving of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions when assessing their environmental performance (Ortner et al., 2016).

This review critically evaluates the valorization of WCO as a potential substitute source of energy to generate electricity, hydrogen gas and biofuel. Various methods of generating electricity, synthesizing hydrogen gas as well as biofuel from WCO are analyzed and summarized accordingly. Also, physical and chemical properties of WCO as well as regulations of WCO in different countries are presented. Comparison between WCO and different feedstock particularly for hydrogen and biodiesel production are presented in this review. Also, challenges and future prospects have been highlighted to present the way forward for this old problem at the global level.

Section snippets

Overview of waste cooking oil

The improper management of WCO has been troublesome to the environment, especially the water source. This is because WCO was disposed through water drainage and directly contaminated environmental water such as sea water and groundwater (Kulkarni and Dalai, 2006). According to Jafari (2010), the layer of oil covering the surface of water will lead to negative impacts due to the physical, biological and chemical processes of the oil. The high spreading speed of oil on the water surface will

Waste cooking oil as a source of energy

Up to date, the continuously and increasing energy demand due to the fast industrialization and population growth has caused the depletion of major fossil-fuels based energy sources such as petroleum, coal and natural gas as most of these natural sources are non-renewable and depleting day by day (Arshad et al., 2018). As a result, utilizing alternative energy sources such as biofuels from the hazardous waste, for instance WCO, are considered as one of the most possible solution in reducing

Challenges and future prospective

Despite current technological and technical limitations for WCOs processes, there are still a number of negative impacts associated with use of WCOs in different processes (Orjuela and Clark, 2020). Biomass-based biofuels are traditionally said to be sustainable and renewable, but their negative drawbacks such as food security, increase of living expenses depending of the use of different biomass as well as deforestation have been concerned over the years (Lynch et al., 2017). Thus,

Conclusion

WCO is considered as one of the hazardous waste if disposed and managed improperly. The present paper discusses the potential of WCO as an alternate energy source in many miscellaneous applications due to its suitable physicochemical properties. Currently, the utilization of a biodegradable fuel is favorable in order to cope with the rapid growth of population as well as industrialization yet reserving a clean environment. However, the major concern in finding alternative energy source is its

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Wei Han Foo: Data curation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Wen Yi Chia: Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Doris Ying Ying Tang: Methodology, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Sherlyn Sze Ning Koay: Data curation, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Siew Shee Lim: Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Kit Wayne Chew: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by Xiamen University Malaysia Research Fund (Grant number: XMUMRF/2021-C7/IENG/0033).

References (171)

  • A.d.S. César et al.

    The potential of waste cooking oil as supply for the Brazilian biodiesel chain

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • M. Chai et al.

    Esterification pretreatment of free fatty acid in biodiesel production, from laboratory to industry

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2014)
  • F. Che et al.

    Exploring a promising feedstock for biodiesel production in Mediterranean countries: a study on free fatty acid esterification of olive pomace oil

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2012)
  • F. Chen et al.

    Catalytic steam reforming of volatiles released via pyrolysis of wood sawdust for hydrogen-rich gas production on Fe–Zn/Al2O3 nanocatalysts

    Fuel

    (2015)
  • G. Chen et al.

    Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in a magnetically fluidized bed reactor using whole-cell biocatalysts

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2017)
  • R. Chen et al.

    Production of hydrogen-rich gas and multi-walled carbon nanotubes from ethanol decomposition over molybdenum modified Ni/MgO catalysts

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2014)
  • T.H. Doğan

    The testing of the effects of cooking conditions on the quality of biodiesel produced from waste cooking oils

    Renew. Energy

    (2016)
  • G. Duman et al.

    Two-step steam pyrolysis of biomass for hydrogen production

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2017)
  • Z. Eller et al.

    Advanced production process of jet fuel components from technical grade coconut oil with special hydrocracking

    Fuel

    (2016)
  • A. Elreedy et al.

    Nickel-graphene nanocomposite as a novel supplement for enhancement of biohydrogen production from industrial wastewater containing mono-ethylene glycol

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2017)
  • K. Harding et al.

    A life-cycle comparison between inorganic and biological catalysis for the production of biodiesel

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2008)
  • H.-W. Lin et al.

    Bi-metallic MOFs possessing hierarchical synergistic effects as high performance electrocatalysts for overall water splitting at high current densities

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2019)
  • T. Liu et al.

    Restaurants’ behaviour, awareness, and willingness to submit waste cooking oil for biofuel production in Beijing

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • J. Long et al.

    Anaerobic co-digestion of fat, oil, and grease (FOG): a review of gas production and process limitations

    Process Saf. Environ. Prot.

    (2012)
  • S. Luostarinen et al.

    Increased biogas production at wastewater treatment plants through co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge from a meat processing plant

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2009)
  • D. Chiaramonti et al.

    Bio-hydrocarbons through catalytic pyrolysis of used cooking oils: towards sustainable jet and road fuels

    Energy Procedia

    (2015)
  • P.L. Chu et al.

    Process modeling of hydrodeoxygenation to produce renewable jet fuel and other hydrocarbon fuels

    Fuel

    (2017)
  • V.C. Eze et al.

    Intensified one-step biodiesel production from high water and free fatty acid waste cooking oils

    Fuel

    (2018)
  • L. Fereidooni et al.

    Experimental assessment of electrolysis method in production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using zeolite/chitosan catalyst with a focus on waste biorefinery

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2017)
  • J.F. García-Martín et al.

    Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in an oscillatory flow reactor. Performance as a fuel on a TDI diesel engine

    Renew. Energy

    (2018)
  • J. Gardy et al.

    A magnetically separable SO4/Fe-Al-TiO2 solid acid catalyst for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2018)
  • T. Geißler et al.

    Hydrogen production via methane pyrolysis in a liquid metal bubble column reactor with a packed bed

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • L. Goding et al.

    Preferences for bio jet fuel in Sweden: the case of business travel from a city airport

    Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.

    (2018)
  • D. Gogoi et al.

    Ag-doped TiO2 photocatalysts with effective charge transfer for highly efficient hydrogen production through water splitting

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2020)
  • B.H.H. Goh et al.

    Progress in utilisation of waste cooking oil for sustainable biodiesel and biojet fuel production

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2020)
  • A. Guldhe et al.

    Biodiesel synthesis from microalgal lipids using tungstated zirconia as a heterogeneous acid catalyst and its comparison with homogeneous acid and enzyme catalysts

    Fuel

    (2017)
  • S.K. Hoekman et al.

    Review of the effects of biodiesel on NOx emissions

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2012)
  • L. Iglesias et al.

    A life cycle assessment comparison between centralized and decentralized biodiesel production from raw sunflower oil and waste cooking oils

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2012)
  • A. Islam et al.

    Improving the hydrogen production from water over MgO promoted Ni–Si/CNTs photocatalyst

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2019)
  • K.R. Jegannathan et al.

    Economic assessment of biodiesel production: comparison of alkali and biocatalyst processes

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2011)
  • S. Joshi et al.

    Intensification of biodiesel production from soybean oil and waste cooking oil in the presence of heterogeneous catalyst using high speed homogenizer

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2017)
  • B. Mendecka et al.

    Probabilistic multi-criteria analysis for evaluation of biodiesel production technologies from used cooking oil

    Renew. Energy

    (2020)
  • X. Miao et al.

    Biodiesel production from heterotrophic microalgal oil

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2006)
  • M. Kaur et al.

    Tungsten supported Ti/SiO2 nanoflowers as reusable heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production

    Renew. Energy

    (2018)
  • H.M. Khan et al.

    Current scenario and potential of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in Pakistan: an overview

    Chin. J. Chem. Eng.

    (2019)
  • E. Kraleva et al.

    Hydrogen production by bioethanol partial oxidation over Ni based catalysts

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2015)
  • S. Lycourghiotis et al.

    Nickel catalysts supported on palygorskite for transformation of waste cooking oils into green diesel

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2019)
  • D.H.J. Lynch et al.

    Unraveling Dutch citizens’ perceptions on the bio-based economy: the case of bioplastics, bio-jetfuels and small-scale bio-refineries

    Ind. Crop. Prod.

    (2017)
  • A. Mannu et al.

    Improving the recycling technology of waste cooking oils: chemical fingerprint as tool for non-biodiesel application

    Waste Manag.

    (2019)
  • J. Marchetti et al.

    Techno-economic study of different alternatives for biodiesel production

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Social sustainability of biojet fuel for net zero aviation

      2024, Energy for Sustainable Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text