Short communicationElemental metals for environmental remediation: Learning from cementation process
Introduction
The use of metallic iron (Fe0) for environmental remediation is now well established [1], [2], [3], [4]. However, the exact mechanism of aqueous contaminant removal in the presence of Fe0 is not fully understood. It is univocally accepted that contaminant removal is due to the process of iron oxidative dissolution (iron corrosion). However, a net discrepancy exists on the role of the oxide scale on Fe0 in the process of contaminant removal. Oxide scale formation on Fe0 at pH > 4.5 is a fundamental characteristic of aqueous iron corrosion [5], [6], [7], [8]. The universal oxide scale on Fe0 is either regarded as beneficial (blessing) or inhibitory (curse) for aqueous contaminant removal in the presence of Fe0.
The prevailing concept was introduced in the early phase of investigations regarding the mechanism of aqueous contaminant removal by Fe0 [9], [10]. This concept considers that contaminant is removed mainly by a heterogeneous chemical reduction, ideally at the surface of Fe0. Accordingly, the oxide scale on Fe0 is a curse as its represents a diffusion barrier slowing down the kinetics of contaminant removal [11], [12]. The initial model assuming the local existence of oxide-free Fe0 in the aqueous solution was proven unrealistic by Bonin et al. [13]. A new conceptual model for the reductive transformation was proposed [8], [13], [14]. The conceptual model of Bonin et al. [13] indicated that the reductive transformation is controlled by electron transfer through the surface film. Accordingly the film must be electronic conductive. However, no such conductive film is expected in nature [6], [15], [16]. Moreover, the concept regarding oxide scale as curse is built on the premise that Fe0 is a strong reducing agent. The concept is strictly applicable only to reducible contaminants.
It is important to notice that the reductive transformation concept has never been univocally accepted [17], [18]. For example, Warren et al. [17] wrote that “a convincing mechanism for the reductive dehalogenation of haloorganics by zero-valence metals has not yet been proposed. Matheson and Tratnyek [9] maintained that dehalogenation was not mediated by H2(g) or FeII in the bulk aqueous-phase solution, suggesting that observed reactions take place at the metal surface.” Three years later, O’Hannesin and Gillham [1] acknowledged that “there is a broad consensus that the process is an abiotic redox reaction involving reduction of the organic compound and oxidation of the metal”. Despite this “broad consensus”, the reductive transformation concept has felt to explain many experimental observations [19], [20], [21].
An alternative concept regards the oxide scale on Fe0 as beneficial (a blessing) for the process of aqueous contaminant removal [22], [23], [24], [25]. Independent researchers could traceably demonstrate that quantitative contaminant removal is only observed when iron corrosion products are allowed to precipitate in the system [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. Their results suggest that adsorption and co-precipitation are the fundamental (not the dominant or the major) contaminant removal mechanisms. Accordingly, relevant contaminants could be further (quantitatively) chemically transformed (reduced or oxidized). The first merit of this concept it that its explains why a contaminant like zinc which is non-reducible by Fe0 (Table 1) could be quantitatively removed in the presence of Fe0 [32].
The present communication is motivated by recent publications speaking disparagingly about the concept of adsorption/co-precipitation as fundamental mechanisms of aqueous contaminant removal in the presence of Fe0 [33], [34]. The similarities between aqueous contaminant removal by Fe0 and metal iron cementation on elemental metals (mostly Al0, Fe0, Zn0) will be discussed with the aim to present results from the hydrometallurgical process of cementation which could help to understand and further develop the process of aqueous contaminant removal by Fe0. Both processes are heterogeneous and the metal surface is covered by a scale acting as diffusion barrier. For the sake of clarity the diffusion barrier in the Fe0 remediation will first be presented.
Section snippets
Aqueous contaminant removal by metallic iron
Aqueous iron corrosion on which remediation with metallic iron is based is a heterogeneous electrochemical process. A simplistic mechanism for iron oxidative dissolution involves four major steps: (i) diffusion of the oxidizing agent (H+, O2, contaminant) to the Fe0 surface, (ii) adsorption of the oxidizing agent onto the iron surface, (iii) the reduction of the oxidizing agent, and (iv) diffusion of reaction products (including FeII species) away from the reactive site on Fe0. Because aqueous
Cementation and its use in the hydrometallurgy
Cementation is an electrochemical process by which a more noble metal ion (Mn+ – Eq. (1)) is precipitated from solution and replaced by a metal higher in the electromotive series ( – Eq. (2)) [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]. Cementation, also known as contact reduction or metal displacement, is necessarily a spontaneous heterogeneous reaction (ΔG0 < 0) that takes place through the galvanic cell (Eq. (3)):
Cementation using Al, Fe and Zn
The control of the pH value is a key task for the cementation process for a variety of reasons including: (i) corrosion damage of reactors, (ii) excess dissolution of the reducing metal (Al, Fe and Zn), and (iii) hydroxide precipitation. Accordingly, the determination of the optimal pH value is an important economical issue for any cementation plant. The impact of pH on the performance of Al, Fe and Zn as reducing metal will be discussed on the basis of the results from Hg2+ cementation by Al0,
Diffusion layers on remediation elemental metals
Diffusion is a spontaneous process involving mobility of species due to the existence of a concentration gradient in a system. The extend of diffusion depend on (i) the properties of the diffusing species (including their size) and (ii) the structure of the diffusion layer (connectivity, morphology, porosity, pore site distribution or tortuosity). Here the diffusion layer is a precipitated scale (oxide scale).
Oxide layers on remediation metals are formed at pH > 5.0 which is the pH of natural
Concluding remarks
The formation of surface scale on immersed elemental metals is a common feature for remediation with metallic elements and electrochemical cementation (Table 2). In both cases the surface scale primarily inhibits the metal dissolution and thus the kinetics of the concerned process. The formation of an oxide film on the cementation agent can be prevented (or limited) by a rational selection of the operational conditions (e.g. pH value, amount of cementation agent, and mixing operations).
References (54)
- et al.
Use of iron-based technologies in contaminated land and groundwater remediation: a review
Sci. Total Environ.
(2008) - et al.
Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation
J. Ind. Eng. Chem.
(2008) The distribution and velocity of the corrosion of metals
J. Franklin Inst.
(1929)- et al.
The mechanism of the oxygen reduction on rust-covered metal substrates
Corros. Sci.
(1994) - et al.
Degradation of carbon tetrachloride by iron metal: complexation effects on the oxide surface
J. Contam. Hydrol.
(1998) - et al.
Influence of chlorinated solvents on polarization and corrosion behaviour of iron in borate buffer
Corros. Sci.
(1998) - et al.
Mechanism of oxide film formation on iron in simulating groundwater solutions: Raman spectroscopic studies
Corros. Sci.
(1998) - et al.
Kinetics and mechanism of reductive dehalogenation of carbon tetrachloride using zero-valence metals
J. Hazard. Mater.
(1995) - et al.
Polarographic studies of zero valent iron as a reductant for remediation of nitroaromatics in the environment
Microchem. J.
(2001) - et al.
Role of iron surface oxidation layers in decomposition of azo-dye water pollutants in weak acidic solutions
Appl. Catal. B
(2005)
Mechanism of uranium (VI) fixation by elemental iron
J. Hazard. Mater.
Reductive destruction and decontamination of aqueous solutions of chlorinated antimicrobial agent using bimetallic systems
J. Hazard. Mater.
Characterizing the discoloration of methylene blue in Fe0/H2O systems
J. Hazard. Mater.
Removal of As, Mn, Mo, Se, U, V and Zn from groundwater by zero-valent iron in a passive treatment cell: reaction progress modeling
J. Contam. Hydrol.
Effective dechlorination of HCB by nanoscale Cu/Fe particles
J. Hazard. Mater.
Kinetics of reductive denitrification by nanoscale zero-valent iron
Chemosphere
Fluidized zero valent iron bed reactor for nitrate removal
Chemosphere
Reduction of chromate from electroplating wastewater from pH 1 to 2 using fluidized zero valent iron process
J. Hazard. Mater.
Evaluation of the effects of shaking intensity on the process of methylene blue discoloration by metallic iron
J. Hazard. Mater.
Fluidized cathode cementation of copper
Hydrometallurgy
A short history of hydrometallurgy
Hydrometallurgy
Kinetics and deposit morphology of copper cementation onto zinc, iron and aluminium
Hydrometallurgy
Rate of cadmium ions removal from dilute solutions by cementation on zinc using a rotating fixed bed reactor
Hydrometallurgy
The effect of nonylphenylpolyethylene glycol on the kinetics and morphology of silver cemented using zinc, iron, copper and aluminium
Hydrometallurgy
Gold cementation from thiocyanate solutions by iron powder
Miner. Eng.
Metallic lead recovery from lead-acid battery paste by urea acetate dissolution and cementation on iron
Hydrometallurgy
Study of the mechanism of silver ions cementation onto copper from acidic sulphate solutions and the morphology of the silver deposit
Hydrometallurgy
Cited by (53)
Investigation of zero-valent iron (ZVI)/H<inf>2</inf>O continuous processes using multivariate analysis and artificial neural networks
2023, Chemical Engineering JournalCitation Excerpt :Yet, there are still discrepancies concerning the relative contributions of the different mechanisms of contaminant removal, which may include: (i) adsorption, (ii) co-precipitation, (iii) size-exclusion, and (iv) chemical transformation. Moreover, depending on the contaminant nature and the operating conditions, either chemical transformation or nonspecific mechanisms related to iron corrosion products may prevail [26–28]. It is worth noting that, given the versatility of ZVI-based technologies, optimal treatment conditions may strongly vary with the dominant mechanism and the target pollutant.
Addition of Fe<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> as electron mediator for enhanced cementation of Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Zn<sup>2+</sup> on aluminum powder from sulfate solutions and magnetic separation to concentrate cemented metals from cementation products
2021, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Cementation is a method to remove and recover metal ions from aqueous solutions via reductive deposition of target metals using another type of metal having a lower standard redox potential than target metals. Cementation has been widely used in extractive metallurgy and environmental remediation [1–3]. Generally, iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and aluminum (Al) have been used as electron donors (or reducing agents) [2–6].
Modeling, Optimization, and Control of Zinc Hydrometallurgical Purification Process
2021, Modeling, Optimization, and Control of Zinc Hydrometallurgical Purification ProcessOptimisation of biohydrometallurgical batch reactor process for copper extraction and recovery from non-pulverized waste printed circuit boards
2020, HydrometallurgyCitation Excerpt :Various cementing agents are used for the process such as scrap iron, zinc, and aluminium (Karavasteva, 2005). Iron is the most used agent for the cementation of copper because of the difference of redox potential of these two metals is very high (Noubactep, 2010). The data of recovered copper during cementation is shown in Fig. 6(I).