Factors affecting the vertical distribution of the zooplankton assemblage in Lake Michigan: The role of the invasive predator Bythotrephes longimanus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2015.09.017Get rights and content

Abstract

We analyze six years of survey data in Lake Michigan, which spanned large ranges in the abundance of the invasive predatory cladoceran Bythotrephes, to quantify the effect of this predator on the daytime vertical distribution of the nine most common species and life stages of Lake Michigan zooplankton. We found that Bythotrephes abundance and hypolimnion depth explained almost 50% of the variation in the vertical distribution of many zooplankton. Bythotrephes abundance was associated with significant and large (approximately 5–11 m) depth increases in cladocerans Daphnia and Bosmina, adult and copepodite stages of cyclopoid copepods, and adult diaptomid copepods Leptodiaptomus minutus, and Leptodiaptomus ashlandi; but did not significantly affect the depth of copepod nauplii, diaptomid copepodites, and adult Leptodiaptomus sicilis. Whereas other environmental factors, such as light attenuation coefficient, epilimnion and hypolimnion temperature, and sampling date significantly influenced the depth of various species and life stages, the inclusion of such environmental factors into linear models did not significantly lower the predicted influence of Bythotrephes. These results suggest that Bythotrephes abundance has a significant and large influence on the vertical distribution of a large component of the zooplankton assemblage in Lake Michigan. We argue that this pattern is driven by a Bythotrephes-induced anti-predator response in zooplankton prey. Such effects could lead to widespread growth costs to the zooplankton assemblage due to the colder water temperatures experienced at greater depths, which could in turn affect the rapidly changing Lake Michigan food web.

Introduction

The vertical distribution of zooplankton in the world's lakes and oceans has critical economic and ecological importance. Zooplankton are resources for larval and young of year stages of many commercially and ecologically important fishes (Cushing, 1972, Horwood et al., 2000) and zooplankton vertical distribution may affect zooplankton growth rate (and hence abundance) and dictate their positional overlap and hence availability to fish. The vertical migrations of zooplankton also affect transport and cycling of carbon and nutrients (Steinberg et al., 2000), and so environmentally induced changes in their distribution may influence energy transfer and ecosystem functioning.

Predators are generally thought to play a central role in the vertical distribution of some zooplankton (Hays, 2003b, Lampert, 1989, Zaret and Suffern, 1976). Visually-orienting planktivores can exert strong predation pressure, which zooplankton avoid by migrating downward where it is darker (e.g., Aksnes and Giske, 1993). Based on this predation pressure, and because predation pressure may vary, many zooplankton have been shown to modify their daytime vertical position in response to changes in the abundance of fish which are visually-oriented (Bollens and Frost, 1991, Lass and Spaak, 2003, Van Gool and Ringelberg, 1998).

Bythotrephes longimanus is an invasive predatory cladoceran in the Great Lakes with the potential to strongly affect zooplankton vertical distribution. A visual predator, Bythotrephes can reach high densities in the epi- and metalimnion (Bourdeau et al., 2011, Pangle et al., 2007), representing a risk to zooplankton in the upper lake strata. A behavioral shift to occupy deeper, darker water below areas of high predation risk by Bythotrephes could therefore be adaptive for Lake Michigan zooplankton. Such adaptive avoidance responses to invertebrate predators have been documented in zooplankton groups (cladocerans and copepods) similar to those found in Lake Michigan (Neill, 1990, Nesbitt et al., 1996).

Previous research suggests that Bythotrephes may be affecting the vertical position of zooplankton in Lake Michigan. Laboratory studies indicate that the cladoceran Daphnia mendotae, and the copepods Diacyclops thomasi and Leptodiaptomus minutus respond to water-borne chemical cues from Bythotrephes by moving deeper in experimental water columns (Bourdeau et al., 2011, Pangle and Peacor, 2006,). Further, field surveys in the Great Lakes indicate positive associations between Bythotrephes abundance and the depths of D. mendotae, Daphnia retrocurva, Bosmina longirostris (Lehman and Cáceres, 1993, Pangle et al., 2007) and the adult stages of cyclopoid and diaptomid copepods (Bourdeau et al., 2011).

Whereas these previous lab and field patterns suggest that Bythotrephes is affecting zooplankton distribution in the field, potential confounding environmental influences on zooplankton depth in the field have not yet been considered. Further, previous studies have not quantified how deep zooplankton move in response to changes in Bythotrephes abundance — especially when considering the influence of other potentially correlated factors, such as light, temperature, and food resources. Quantifying the effect of Bythotrephes abundance within the context of other environmental influences in the field is important for two main reasons: (1) factors other than predator abundance can influence zooplankton vertical position, and (2) the effects of predators on zooplankton vertical distribution can be complex and indirect and cannot easily be extrapolated from laboratory studies. For example, zooplankton daytime distribution may be influenced by a number of factors other than just predator abundance; including water temperature (Cooke et al., 2008), water transparency (e.g., Dodson, 1990), and vertical gradients of food (e.g., Leibold, 1990) and light (e.g., Van Gool and Ringelberg, 1998). Moreover, variables such as predator abundance, light, and temperature, which are often studied in isolation in the laboratory, are correlated in the field and may co-vary seasonally. Further, whereas laboratory studies can be instructive by e.g., showing that zooplankton can sense predator kairomones and that they can respond by migrating (e.g. downwards), the magnitude of the response in the field cannot be determined.

The effect Bythotrephes has on the vertical position of zooplankton under prevailing environmental conditions in the field is important because it could influence the effect of Bythotrephes on zooplankton abundance, which has been suggested to be large in the Great Lakes and other ecosystems it has invaded (Bunnell et al., 2011, Strecker et al., 2011, Vanderploeg et al., 2012). Several mechanisms may be involved. First, costs associated with Bythotrephes-induced vertical shifts could reduce zooplankton growth rates. One particular cost to vertical avoidance behavior is a significant reduction in growth rate due to low temperatures (Dawidowicz and Loose, 1992, Loose and Dawidowicz, 1994). Such costs could be particularly large in the summer when large lakes are thermally stratified. For example, we have proposed Bythotrephes negatively affects Lake Michigan D. mendotae populations through the induction of greater downward vertical migration into cool suboptimal feeding habitats during the day (Pangle et al., 2007). In laboratory experiments, we found that D. mendotae incurred a 36% reduction in somatic growth rate in the presence of Bythotrephes kairomones by migrating to lower positions in experimental columns with a thermal gradient (Pangle and Peacor, 2006). We have predicted similar reductions in D. mendotae's population growth rate in the field due to an observed correlation between deeper depths of Daphnia and Bythotrephes density (Pangle et al., 2007). Second, induced changes in zooplankton vertical distribution can affect the availability of these prey to both Bythotrephes and larval and young-of-the-year fish. Lastly, among-species and life stage differences in the magnitude of vertical responses and associated costs could shift the balance of competitive interactions within the zooplankton assemblage.

Here we combine six years of field survey data to quantify the relative importance and magnitude of the effect of Bythotrephes abundance on the daytime vertical distribution of the nine most common species and life stages of the Lake Michigan crustacean zooplankton assemblage. Previous laboratory studies have shown that several species respond to waterborne chemical cues (kairomones) from Bythotrephes in laboratory experiments (Bourdeau et al., 2011, Pangle and Peacor, 2006) and correlations between zooplankton depth and Bythotrephes abundance have been documented over shorter-term studies (Bourdeau et al., 2011, Pangle et al., 2007). Our goal here is to more thoroughly explore the effect of Bythotrephes on zooplankton vertical distribution in Lake Michigan with a larger data set and with a more comprehensive statistical analyses in order to both consider the influence of other (potentially confounding) environmental factors, and to estimate the magnitude of the effect (rather than simply testing whether it exists). We discuss the implications of our findings in the context of non-consumptive effects in the rapidly changing Lake Michigan food web.

Section snippets

General overview

We conducted field surveys in which we sampled the daytime vertical distribution of the most abundant species and life stages of crustacean zooplankton (9 groups total), the abundance of their potential predator, the planktivorous cladoceran B. longimanus, and several relevant limnological variables (e.g., light, temperature, and food) over a range of dates and locations in Lake Michigan.

We used three complimentary statistical approaches to examine if Bythotrephes abundance and other factors

Results

Bythotrephes densities in our survey ranged from 0 to 368 ind. m 2. Bythotrephes was present in 80% (20 out of 25) of our sampling events, and reached densities > 60 ind. m 2 in roughly half (55%) of them. The upper range of our survey were therefore not especially high; densities above 400 ind. m 2 were found in 5 of 6 years by Cavaletto et al. (2010) in Lake Michigan, with density reported as high as 1400 ind. m 2. Bythotrephes have also been found to reach densities above 600 ind. m 2 in Lake Erie (

Discussion

Our results provide compelling evidence that Bythotrephes has an important and large effect on the vertical distribution of several of the most common zooplankton in Lake Michigan. Even after accounting for other biotic and abiotic factors, some of which had their own significant effects on zooplankton vertical distribution, we observed that six of nine of the zooplankton groups included in the analysis were deeper to a strong and significant degree, between approximately 5 to 11 m in response

Acknowledgments

We thank D. Donahue, D. Mason, S. Pothoven, E. Rutherford, and H. Vanderploeg for logistical support and the captains and crew of the R/V Laurentian for help collecting zooplankton; especially B. Breymer, J. Workman, and A. Yagiela. We are grateful to M. Bach, N. Davenport, A. Kellerman, R. Komosinski, D. Kreuger, E. Reed, and A. Sookhai for laboratory and field assistance. Comments by 2 anonymous reviewers improved the manuscript. Funding was provided by the Fishery Research Program of the

References (54)

  • S.M. Bollens et al.

    Diel vertical migration in zooplankton — rapid individual response to predators

    J. Plankton Res.

    (1991)
  • P.E. Bourdeau et al.

    The invasive predator Bythotrephes induces changes in the vertical distribution of native copepods in Lake Michigan

    Biol. Invasions

    (2011)
  • S.B. Brandt et al.

    Acoustic measures of the abundance and size of pelagic planktivores in Lake Michigan

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1991)
  • D.B. Bunnell et al.

    Planktivory in the changing Lake Huron zooplankton community: bythotrephes consumption exceeds that of Mysis and fish

    Freshw. Biol.

    (2011)
  • K.P. Burnham et al.

    Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach

    (2002)
  • L.M. Carrascal et al.

    Partial least squares regression as an alternative to current regression methods used in ecology

    Oikos

    (2009)
  • S.L. Cooke et al.

    Effects of temperature and ultraviolet radiation on diel vertical migration of freshwater crustacean zooplankton

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (2008)
  • G. Cumming et al.

    Error bars in experimental biology

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2007)
  • D.H. Cushing

    The production cycle and the numbers of marine fish

    Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond.

    (1972)
  • P. Dawidowicz et al.

    Metabolic costs during predator-induced diel vertical migration of Daphnia

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (1992)
  • S. Dodson

    Predicting diel vertical migration in zooplankton

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (1990)
  • C.F. Dormann et al.

    Collinearity: a review of methods to with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance

    Ecography

    (2013)
  • R.W. Elner

    The influence of temperature, sex and chela size in the foraging strategy of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (L.). Mar. Freshw

    Behav. Physiol.

    (1980)
  • J. Fox et al.

    An R Companion to Applied Regression

    (2011)
  • M.Z. Gliwicz

    Predation and the evolution of vertical migration in zooplankton

    Nature

    (1986)
  • G.C. Hays

    A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations

    Hydrobiologia

    (2003)
  • G.C. Hays

    A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations

  • Cited by (20)

    • Heterogeneity in zooplankton distributions and vertical migrations: Application of a laser optical plankton counter in offshore Lake Michigan

      2020, Journal of Great Lakes Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, Lake Michigan commonly forms a DCM in the offshore zone and has a relatively high abundance of tactile invertebrate predators (such as Mysis diluviana), both of which may affect DVM behavior in zooplankton. Much of previous research on zooplankton distributions and DVM in Lake Michigan has employed stratified sampling of the water column with closing nets or discrete-depth sampling techniques (Beeton, 1960; Bourdeau et al., 2015; Carter and Goudie, 1986; Vanderploeg et al., 2012), which can only provide relatively coarse spatial resolution and require extensive resources to complete taxonomic analysis of samples. However, newer technologies have made it possible to investigate zooplankton distributions on much finer spatial scales and over larger distances, allowing us to study zooplankton communities in innovative ways.

    • Biotic and abiotic factors influencing zooplankton vertical distribution in Lake Huron

      2017, Journal of Great Lakes Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      These movements can influence night-time movements of their prey, driving some zooplankton species further upward towards the surface (Peacor et al., 2005). Alternatively, the nonindigenous predatory cladoceran, Bythotrephes longimanus Leydig (spiny water flea, hereafter called Bythotrephes), is an epilimnetic predator that has also been documented to influence zooplankton vertical position in both the laboratory (Pangle and Peacor, 2006) and in the field (Bourdeau et al., 2011; Bourdeau et al., 2015). In the Great Lakes, Bythotrephes occupies the epilimnion during both day and night in the summer months (Lehman and Caceres, 1993; Ptáčníková et al., 2015), but has been documented to occur ~ 15–20 m deeper (into the metalimnion) during the day in autumn and then ascend to the epilimnion at night (Lehman and Caceres, 1993).

    • It's like night and day: Diel net-effects on Cercopagidae densities in the Laurentian Great Lakes

      2017, Journal of Great Lakes Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      They can be the dominant planktivore, competing with fish and other invertebrates for food (Bunnell et al., 2011; Hoffman et al., 2001), along with serving as a prey item themselves for planktivorous and benthivorous fish (Bunnell et al., 2015; Pothoven et al., 2009) as well as Mysis (O'Malley and Bunnell, 2014). Bythotrephes can change the vertical position of some zooplankton (Bourdeau et al., 2011, 2015; Lehman and Cáceres, 1993), thus affecting their energy costs, reproduction, and probability of being preyed upon (Pangle and Peacor, 2006; Pangle et al., 2007). Bythotrephes and Cercopagis have both been found to decrease the abundance of small zooplankters such as Bosmina, and affect the overall species composition (Barbiero and Tuchman, 2004; Warner et al., 2006; Yan and Pawson, 1997).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text