Elsevier

Journal of Environmental Management

Volume 246, 15 September 2019, Pages 583-593
Journal of Environmental Management

Research article
A spatial approach to identify priority areas for pesticide pollution mitigation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.120Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A model approach for mapping priority areas for mitigation of pesticide pollution.

  • Belgian case study was compared with method from field data and local knowledge.

  • Both methods equally classified 50% of the areas.

  • Crop rotation is an important factor to evaluate temporal variation of risk areas.

  • Results were used to raise awareness and invite farmers to implement measures.

Abstract

Identifying priority areas is an essential step in developing management strategies to reduce pesticide loads in surface water. A spatially explicit model-based approach was developed to detect priority areas for diffuse pesticide pollution at catchment scale. The method uses available datasets and considers different pesticide pathways in the environment post-application. The approach was applied in a catchment area in SE Flanders (Belgium) as a case study. Calculated risk areas were obtained using detailed landscape data and combining pesticide emissions and hydrological connectivity. The risk areas obtained were further compared with an alternative observation-based method, developed specifically for this study site that includes long-term field observations and local expert knowledge. Both methods equally classified 50% of the areas. The impact of crop rotation on the calculated risk was analysed. High-risk areas were identified and added to a cumulative map over all five years to evaluate temporal variations. The model-based approach was used for the initial identification of risk areas at the study site. The tool helps to prioritise zones and detect particular fields to target landscape mitigation measures to reduce diffuse pesticide pollution reaching surface water bodies.

Introduction

Pesticide residues frequently occur in surface waters in Europe (Reemtsma et al., 2013, VMM, 2017, VMM, 2015) potentially having an impact on aquatic organisms or communities (Lefrancq et al., 2017). Treatment or targeted mitigation can prevent pesticide pollution from dispersing in the environment (Gregoire et al., 2009). Therefore, there is a need to implement mitigation measures in agriculture to ensure food production while reducing the environmental impact of pesticides and simultaneously achieving good water quality (European Commission, 2000, European Commission, 2009).

Agricultural non-point-source (NPS) pesticide pollution is defined as inputs along the entire watercourse from applications of agrochemicals onto farmland (Holvoet et al., 2007). Once pesticides are applied and released in the environment, their fate is affected by their physical and chemical properties and the interactions with soil (Borggaard and Gimsing, 2008, Chaplain et al., 2011, Maqueda et al., 2017), climatology (Doppler et al., 2014, Leu et al., 2004a, Leu et al., 2004b), and agricultural practices (Alletto et al., 2010, Potter et al., 2015). The most important routes of diffuse pesticide pollution in water bodies are surface runoff and soil erosion, drain flow, leaching and spray drift (Reichenberger et al., 2007, Tang et al., 2012). Knowledge of these pathways and their relative importance is a prerequisite for developing mitigation strategies for polluted surface water (Bereswill et al., 2014, Holvoet et al., 2007, Reichenberger et al., 2007, Tang et al., 2012).

Areas within a catchment pose varying risks of pollution. Critical source areas (CSAs) contribute a considerable fraction of the pollution load to surface water. A CSA is where pesticide sources intersect with areas of high mobilisation potential which have the highest propensity for surface runoff generation, pollutant transport and delivery via hydrologically connected pathways (Doppler et al., 2014, Doppler et al., 2012, Frey et al., 2009). The spatial variability of pesticide losses to waterbodies can be significant (Freitas et al., 2008, Leu et al., 2004a, Leu et al., 2004b) therefore the identification of CSA will help target mitigation measures efficiently to locations where they can strongly reduce pesticide loads into river courses.

The spatial variability within a catchment, e.g. different soils and land uses, different travel times and flow lengths from each parcel to the catchment outlet and different application dates of pesticides increase the complexity and the variables that must be included to determine where mitigation measures should be proposed. Topography (which governs the flow paths of surface water) and the position of landscape elements such as riparian buffer strips, grassed waterways, hedges, ditches, decisively influence if and what fraction of applied pesticide ultimately reaches a watercourse (Reichenberger et al., 2007). The amounts of pesticides reaching water resources vary considerably in time and space and are highly dependent upon application rates and the chemical characteristics of the pesticides, as well as soil and climate conditions (Doppler et al., 2014, Doppler et al., 2012, Freitas et al., 2008, Leu et al., 2004a).

Assessment and identification of areas contributing to non-point source (NPS) pollution by pesticides has been performed in other approaches using hydrological models to approximate contaminant transport (Bach et al., 2002, Lescot et al., 2013, Wohlfahrt et al., 2010), a combination of indicators and multi-criteria analysis (Macary et al., 2014), GIS modelling to prioritise catchments or streams within a watershed (Zhang et al., 2008), or the use of long-term pesticide monitoring data (Di Guardo and Finizio, 2018). These approaches were applied mainly to larger scales (watershed) to identify risk zones. Also, these studies do not consider the microscale required for recommendations within a small catchment. Although the watershed scale is proper to achieve environmental goals for water quality, changes in agricultural practices and the implementation of mitigation measures like field buffer strips take place at field level (McGonigle et al., 2012). Therefore, risk assessment at field scale is useful when the implementation of actions by farmers is needed (Bereswill et al., 2014).

A range of management techniques is available to control agricultural pollutants such as the reduction of pesticide use and the installation of landscape features like buffer zones, hedgerows, retention ponds and wetlands that can capture and degrade pollutants before they reach watercourses (Bereswill et al., 2014, Reichenberger et al., 2007). The use of mitigation measures that minimise the risk of off-site pesticide pollution caused by spray drift, drain flow and runoff could contribute to achieve the good status of water bodies (Aguiar et al., 2015, Maillard et al., 2012).

We propose a robust and spatially explicit model-based (Mb) risk approach to identify priority areas to target landscape mitigation measures in order to reduce pesticide pollution and erosion in surface water. The Mb risk relies on geospatial emission modelling and connectivity of parcel sites towards waterbodies. The impact of crop rotation during five-years is analysed for this catchment. The Mb risk method is applied in a case study in the southeast of Flanders, Belgium. The Mb risk areas are then compared with an observation-based (Ob) approach that includes field observations for relevant processes identified for this catchment by local experts.

Section snippets

Site description

The catchment for this study is located in Sint-Truiden, SE Flanders, Belgium (Fig. 1). The site has an area of 10,7 km2 with altitudes ranging from 51 to 107 m above sea level. The Cicindria river flows from South to North with a length of 6.5 km within the catchment limits. The dominant land use is agriculture covering 72% of the area; 32% with fruit trees (apple, pears and cherries) and 68% arable crops (cereals, beets, maize mainly).

The area is characterised by a hilly topography with

Model-based risk areas

Our purpose was to develop a desktop analysis to identify critical areas that could be included in a mitigation action plan to reduce pesticide loads into surface water. The approach considers the potential pesticide emissions and the hydrological connectivity of each parcel. Fig. 5 shows the resulting Mb risk map for 2012.

The Mb risk map allows the identification and prioritisation of specific fields within the catchment. Once the critical areas are identified, the within-field hotspots need

Conclusions

We developed a GIS-based tool for water resource managers to help in the identification and prioritisation of critical source areas. The tool is relatively simple to apply and uses geospatial data that it is often relatively accessible. We propose the model-based risk method as a valuable approach to detect priority areas for actions against diffuse pesticide pollution. It identifies areas in which mitigation measures seem necessary and could, therefore, contribute to improving water quality.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Katrien Wouters for the compilation of field observations and Petra Deproost from the Bureau for Environment (Flemish Department of Planning) for the erosion sensitivity maps.

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 675120.

References (62)

  • P.I.A. Kinnell

    Event soil loss, runoff and the Universal Soil Loss Equation family of models: a review

    J. Hydrol.

    (2010)
  • M. Lefrancq et al.

    High frequency monitoring of pesticides in runoff water to improve understanding of their transport and environmental impacts

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • J.-M. Lescot et al.

    A spatially-distributed cost-effectiveness analysis framework for controlling water pollution

    Environ. Model. Softw

    (2013)
  • F. Macary et al.

    A multi-scale method to assess pesticide contamination risks in agricultural watersheds

    Ecol. Indicat.

    (2014)
  • C. Maqueda et al.

    Behaviour of glyphosate in a reservoir and the surrounding agricultural soils

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • D.F. McGonigle et al.

    Towards a more strategic approach to research to support catchment-based policy approaches to mitigate agricultural water pollution: a UK case-study

    Environ. Sci. Policy

    (2012)
  • A.D. Muscutt et al.

    Buffer zones to improve water quality: a review of their potential use in UK agriculture

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (1993)
  • E. Okada et al.

    Adsorption and mobility of glyphosate in different soils under no-till and conventional tillage

    Geoderma

    (2016)
  • T.L. Potter et al.

    Tillage impact on herbicide loss by surface runoff and lateral subsurface flow

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2015)
  • T. Reemtsma et al.

    Emerging pesticide metabolites in groundwater and surface water as determined by the application of a multimethod for 150 pesticide metabolites

    Water Res.

    (2013)
  • S. Reichenberger et al.

    Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into ground- and surface water and their effectiveness; A review

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2007)
  • N. Syversen et al.

    Vegetative buffer zones as pesticide filters for simulated surface runoff

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2004)
  • X. Tang et al.

    A review of rapid transport of pesticides from sloping farmland to surface waters: processes and mitigation strategies

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2012)
  • J. Wohlfahrt et al.

    Assessing the impact of the spatial arrangement of agricultural practices on pesticide runoff in small catchments: combining hydrological modeling and supervised learning

    Ecol. Indicat.

    (2010)
  • X. Yang et al.

    Decay characteristics and erosion-related transport of glyphosate in Chinese loess soil under field conditions

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2015)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2010)
  • T.R. Aguiar et al.

    Riparian buffer zones as pesticide filters of no-till crops

    Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.

    (2015)
  • L. Alletto et al.

    Tillage management effects on pesticide fate in soils

    A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev.

    (2010)
  • M. Bach et al.

    Pesticide river load from diffuse sources in Germany: A modelling approach

  • W.A. Battaglin et al.

    Glyphosate and its degradation product AMPA occur frequently and widely in U.S. soils, surface water, groundwater, and precipitation

    J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.

    (2014)
  • C.M. Benbrook

    Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally

    Environ. Sci. Eur.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (24)

    • A review of modeling pesticides in freshwaters: Current status, progress achieved and desirable improvements.

      2023, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      The third, based on topography and stream network, determines the connectivity between the different parcels of the basin. Lastly, for each parcel, the gross emission is calculated and the Mb risk map is generated (Quaglia et al., 2019). Results are provided annually and at the basin or parcel spatial scale.

    • Multiple pesticides in lentic small water bodies: Exposure, ecotoxicological risk, and contamination origin

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      In general, precipitation enables the infiltration of moderately mobile to mobile pesticides into the soil and the transport of sorptive pesticides via surface runoff from the target field (Willkommen et al., 2019). In addition, precipitation and soil moisture control the subsurface connectivity of fields with the surrounding surface water bodies and define which areas contribute to water and pesticide transport into a water body (Doppler et al., 2014; Quaglia et al., 2019). The precipitation during the sampling period was 138% (April), 78% (May), and 72% (June) of the 30-year mean value (DWD, 2021).

    • Toward harmonizing global pesticide regulations for surface freshwaters in support of protecting human health

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among anthropogenic pollutants that can reach the freshwater environment, pesticides take a special role due to their environmental release in large quantities and because they are designed to affect selected pests but can frequently also harm several non-target species (Bueno et al., 2017; Fantke, 2019; Fantke et al., 2012, 2021; Hageman et al., 2006; Legind et al., 2011; Quaglia et al., 2019; Rasmussen et al., 2015; Rein et al., 2011; Villamizar et al., 2020; Vryzas et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text