Review
Contemporary enzyme based technologies for bioremediation: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.075Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Microbial enzymes involved in degradation of various toxic pollutants.

  • Major biodegrdative enzymes over-expressed using recombinant DNA technology.

  • Enzyme immobilization techniques increase the half-life, stability and activity of enzymes.

  • Nanozymes used for bioremediation purpose.

Abstract

The persistent disposal of xenobiotic compounds like insecticides, pesticides, fertilizers, plastics and other hydrocarbon containing substances is the major source of environmental pollution which needs to be eliminated. Many contemporary remediation methods such as physical, chemical and biological are currently being used, but they are not sufficient to clean the environment. The enzyme based bioremediation is an easy, quick, eco-friendly and socially acceptable approach used for the bioremediation of these recalcitrant xenobiotic compounds from the natural environment. Several microbial enzymes with bioremediation capability have been isolated and characterized from different natural sources, but less production of such enzymes is a limiting their further exploitation. The genetic engineering approach has the potential to get large amount of recombinant enzymes. Along with this, enzyme immobilization techniques can boost the half-life, stability and activity of enzymes at a significant level. Recently, nanozymes may offer the potential bioremediation ability towards a broad range of pollutants. In the present review, we have described a brief overview of the microbial enzymes, different enzymes techniques (genetic engineering and immobilization of enzymes) and nanozymes involved in bioremediation of toxic, carcinogenic and hazardous environmental pollutants.

Introduction

A large number of pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyl compounds (PCBs), hydrocarbons, dyes, pesticides, esters, heavy metals, petroleum products and nitrogen containing chemicals persist in the environment which are released from various industrial and agricultural resources (Dua et al., 2002). These pollutants are highly toxic and carcinogenic in nature and accumulations of these chemicals becomes hazardous to the environment and also flora and fauna living in the environment (Wasilkowski et al., 2012). Recently, removal and degradation of pollutants are major problem for environmental scientists. Initially, wastes released from various industries and agricultural resources were treated by dumping off in a hole, high temperature based incineration and using UV rays. But these methods don't prove very effective due to their less effectiveness, complex nature, high cost and formation of others recalcitrant derivatives (Vidali, 2001). After that, bioremediation provides a way for the degradation of these chemicals (Dzionek et al., 2016).

Generally, bioremediation involves the use of microorganisms and their enzymes for the degradation and transformation of pollutants into another form which is less toxic to the environment. Various species of archaea, bacteria, algae and fungi's demonstrating bioremediation ability have been discovered (Dua et al., 2002). Plants and their associated bacteria also play a significant role in the degradation of compounds present in the soil and air. Use of plants for the purpose of removal of contaminants is known as phytoremediation (Pattanayak and Dhal, 2014). Plants such as Cyperus brevifolius and Helianthus annuus have the ability to secrete some oxidative enzymes from their roots for the biotransformation of highly toxic recalcitrant chemical compounds into their less toxic derivatives (Adongbede and Majekodunmi, 2016).

Use of microbes and their enzymes for the removal of pollutants is an effective, safe and less expensive method (Karigar and Rao, 2011). Advances in molecular and recombinant DNA technology, genetic machinery of the plants and microorganisms can be changed to enhance the bioremediation (Vallero, 2016, Kumar et al., 2016). There are several types of enzymes such as oxidoreductases, laccases, hydrolases and peroxidases actively involved in bioremediation process (Kadri et al., 2017). Different fields of bioremediation such as microbial, enzymatic including phytoremediation and their strategies are depicted in Fig. 1.

Several environmental parameters such as temperature, moisture content and pH change the microorganism growth. Manipulation and optimization of these parameters can increase the rate of degradation at significant levels (Guarino et al., 2017). There are only a few species of algae (Monoraphidium braunii, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii etc.), fungi (Tramates versicolor, Pleurotus eryngii, Phanerochacte chryososporium etc.) and bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Rhodococcus erythropolis etc.) have been discovered which have a catabolic pathway for the degradation of pollutants at the sites of pollution. Some species of microorganisms have the ability to degrade contaminants only in laboratory conditions (Joutey et al., 2013).

In this review, our aim is to discuss the bioremediation, its types, major enzymes involved in bioremediation of recalcitrant and harmful chemicals which are toxic to the environment. We have also described the current limitations of enzymes and the techniques such as genetic engineering and enzyme immobilization used to overcome these limitations. We hope this review will provide the significant information about enzymes and various enzymes based techniques that can be used for biodegradation of pollutants at significant levels.

Section snippets

Bioremediation types

Bioremediation through microorganisms can be classified into 2 types: In-situ bioremediation and ex-situ bioremediation (Marykensa, 2011). In-situ bioremediation is the treatment of polluted soil and water at the site where it was present. This process is very effective and less expensive. The main advantage of this method is no need to unearth the soil. It involves the use of non-pathogenic microorganisms for the purpose of bioremediation (Gomes et al., 2013). In-situ bioremediation is mainly

Enzymes used in bioremediation

Degradation of contaminants with the help of microorganisms is a slow process, which decrease the feasibility of bioremediation in actual practice (Ghosh et al., 2017). In the last few years, microbial enzymes separated from their cells have been used for bioremediation as compared to using whole microorganisms, to overcome the above limitations (Thatoi et al., 2014). Enzymes are complex biological macromolecules which act as catalyst for a number of biochemical reactions involved in the

Enzyme based tools and advanced techniques

Practical applications of enzymes in bioremediation face several problems such as less stability, productivity and activity. Enzymes are macromolecules having very complex structural conformation. Any physical and chemical change results lost of the enzyme activity (Nigam and Shukla, 2015). In natural environmental conditions, microbes are unable to produce sufficient amount of enzyme. Many environmental scientists are continuously engaged to isolate novel enzymes producing microbes having

Conclusion

Over the last few years, because of urbanization, enlargement in population size and industrial development; accumulation of pollutants in environment reached at alarming level. The only eco-friendly solution for this problem is bioremediation approach which can be done in two ways: in situ and ex situ method. Bioremediation using enzyme is a good and cost-effective alternative. A diverse range of microbes from different natural sources has been explored in isolation of enzymes containing

Future perspectives

Scientists have been working continuously to provide the effective solution of increasing environmental pollution. So, there is a need for the discovery of new enzymes and their role in the bioremediation. A schematic diagram describing the discovery of novel enzymes has been shown in Fig. 3. The larger number of microflora present in the environment is still unknown due to limited cultivation technology which may have immense bioremediation potential. It is required to isolate and characterize

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgement

Authors duly acknowledge M.D. University, Rohtak, India for providing infrastructural facilities. BS acknowledges the support as University Research Scholarship by M.D. University, Rohtak, India.

References (162)

  • H. Chakroun et al.

    Purification and characterization of a novel laccase from the ascomycete Trichoderma atroviride: application on bioremediation of phenolic compounds

    Process Biochem.

    (2010)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Cloning and expression of a new manganese peroxidase from Irpex lacteus F17 and its application in decolorization of reactive black 5

    Process Biochem.

    (2015)
  • F. Coulon et al.

    When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2010)
  • I. Cummins et al.

    Structure activity studies with xenobiotic substrates using carboxylesterases isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana

    Phytochemistry

    (2007)
  • A. Dzionek et al.

    Natural carriers in bioremediation: a review

    Electron. J. Biotechnol.

    (2016)
  • A. Fortova et al.

    DspA from Strongylocentrotus purpuratus: the first biochemically characterized haloalkane dehalogenase of non-microbial origin

    Biochimie

    (2013)
  • Y. Gao et al.

    Bioremediation of pesticide contaminated water using an organophosphate degrading enzyme immobilized on nonwoven polyester textiles

    Enzym. Microb. Technol.

    (2014)
  • A. Ghosh et al.

    Bioremediation of chromium complex dyes and treatment of sludge generated during the process

    Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.

    (2017)
  • H.I. Gomes et al.

    Overview of in situ and ex situ remediation technologies for PCB-contaminated soils and sediments and obstacles for full-scale application

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2013)
  • C. Guarino et al.

    Assessment of three approaches of bioremediation (Natural Attenuation, Landfarming and Bioagumentation – assistited Landfarming) for a petroleum hydrocarbons contaminated soil

    Chemosphere

    (2017)
  • T. Gundinger et al.

    A comparative approach to recombinantly produce the plant enzyme horseradish peroxidase in Escherichia coli

    J. Biotechnol.

    (2017)
  • R. Hawwa et al.

    Structural basis for thermostability revealed through the identification and characterization of a highly thermostable phosphotriesterase-like lactonase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (2009)
  • R. Heidari et al.

    Hydrolysis of organophosphorus insecticides by in vitro modified carboxylesterase E3 from Lucilia cuprina

    Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2005)
  • S.G. Hong et al.

    Single enzyme nanoparticles armored by a thin silicate network: single enzyme caged nanoparticles

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • A. Huang et al.

    Conformation and activity alteration of horseradish peroxidase induced by the interaction with gene carrier polyethyleneimines

    Spectrochim. Acta Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.

    (2018)
  • K.S. Jorgensen

    In situ bioremediation

    Adv. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2007)
  • T. Kadri et al.

    Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by fungal enzymes: a review

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2017)
  • N. Kalogerakis et al.

    Bioremediation advances

    N. Biotech.

    (2017)
  • M. Kotik et al.

    Sequence diversity in haloalkane dehalogenases, as revealed by PCR using family-specific primers

    J. Microbiol. Meth.

    (2012)
  • A.H. Lee

    Heterologous expression of a new manganese-dependent peroxidase gene from Peniophora incarnata KUC8836 and its ability to remove anthracene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.

    (2016)
  • J. Lei et al.

    Hydrolysis mechanism of carbendazim hydrolase from the strain Microbacterium sp. djl-6F

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2017)
  • X. Ma et al.

    High-level expression of a bacterial laccase, CueOfrom Escherichia coli K12 in Pichia pastoris GS115 and its application on the decolorization of synthetic dyes

    Enzym. Microb. Technol.

    (2017)
  • A.M. Mayer et al.

    Laccase: new functions for an old enzyme

    Phytochem.

    (2002)
  • J.D.C. Medina et al.

    Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering production, isolation and purification of industrial products

    Peroxidases

    (2017)
  • M. Megharaj et al.

    Bioremediation. Encyclopedia of Toxicology

    (2014)
  • J. Mehta et al.

    Recent advances in enzyme immobilization techniques: metal-organic frameworks as novel substrates

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2016)
  • D. Menendez-Vega et al.

    Engineered in situ bioremediation of soil and groundwater polluted with weathered hydrocarbons

    Eur. J. Soil Biol.

    (2007)
  • C. Novotny et al.

    Ligninolytic fungi in bioremediation: extracellular enzyme production and degradation rate

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2004)
  • M. Oppenheimer et al.

    Recombinant expression, purification, and characterization of ThmD, the oxidoreductase component of tetrahydrofuran monooxygenase

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (2010)
  • R.E. Parales et al.

    Degradation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Comprehensive Biotechnology

    (2011)
  • A.M. Abdel-Hamid et al.

    Insights into lignin degradation and its potential industrial applications

    Adv. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2013)
  • E.M. Adongbede et al.

    Biomass production and petroleum hydrocarbon degradation by Aspergilus niger isolated from the root zone of Helianthus annuus L

    Int. J. Environ. Biorem. Biodegrad.

    (2016)
  • R. Ahmad et al.

    Enzyme immobilization: an overview on nanoparticles as immobilization matrix

    Biochem. Anal. Biochem.

    (2015)
  • J. Aislabie et al.

    Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils

    Extremophiles

    (2006)
  • M.I. Ali et al.

    Polymeric pollutant biodegradation through microbial oxidoreductase; a better strategy to safe environment

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (2017)
  • A.D. Annibale et al.

    Panus tigrinus efficiently removes phenols, color and organic load from olive-mill wastewater

    Res. Microbiol.

    (2004)
  • P.K. Arora et al.

    Application of monooxygenases in dehalogenation, desulphurization, denitrification and hydroxylation of aromatic compounds

    J. Biorem. Biodegrad.

    (2010)
  • S. Aslam et al.

    Production of cellulase by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-ASK11 under high chromium stress

    Waste and Biomass Valorization

    (2017)
  • A. Bajaj et al.

    Isolation and characterization of a Pseudomonas sp. strain IITR01 capable of degrading α-endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2010)
  • N. Bansal et al.

    Peroxidase(s) in environment protection

    Sci. World J.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (382)

    • Treatment of refinery wastewater: Current status and prospects

      2024, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Equal contribution.

    View full text