Elsevier

Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

Volume 833, 15 January 2019, Pages 198-204
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

A new model for predicting the grain size of electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel coatings containing sulphur, phosphorus or boron based on typical systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.11.057Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Model is developed for Ni-S, Ni-B and Ni-P protective coatings.

  • Understanding the influence of metalloid content in Ni coatings for corrosion protection

  • Model correlating applied electrochemical deposition parameters to the grain size of the deposit

Abstract

Controlling the grain size in electrodeposited coatings for the prevention of corrosion is highly important. To understand the relationship with grain size and electrochemical performance many experiments need to be undertaken to vary the grain size of the deposit. In the present work the (crystallite) grain size of electrodeposited Ni coatings formed in the presence of metalloids such as boron (B), sulphur (S) and phosphorus (P) was estimated from analysing mass transfer at the cathode-electrolyte interface. A mathematical model has been proposed which indicates that the grain size of the deposit is directly proportional to current efficiency and the deposition rate while being inversely proportional to the current density and metalloid (B, S, P) content in the coatings. A simple relationship is developed which is in agreement with experimental data and data that is reported in the literature. The development of such a model should significantly decrease the amount of experimentation required to achieve the desired grain size in such systems (Ni-B, Ni-S, Ni-P coatings) obtained by electrodeposition.

Introduction

During the last two decades, electrodeposition has been proven to be an economical process to obtain virtually porosity free bulk nanocrystalline nickel (Ni) and Ni alloy coatings for corrosion and wear resistance [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]]. These coatings are either nickel phosphorus (Ni-P) [[13], [14], [15], [16]], nickel boron (Ni-B) [[17], [18], [19], [20]] or Ni containing sulphur (Ni-S) [4,5,[21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]] where each composition has individual physical properties as well as different applications. Electrodeposition parameters such as current density, additive (metalloid) concentration and temperature have an influence on the nanocrystalline structure of these coatings. In the final stages of electrocrystallization, after reduction, the means by which an adatom is incorporated into the crystal lattice will determine the crystal size of the deposit. Many models have been proposed to correlate these parameters with the obtained grain size through electrocrystallization [[27], [28], [29], [30]]. Budevski et al. [31] presented a review on electrocrystallization nucleation and growth phenomena in electrodeposited coatings. Wong et al. [30] proposed a mathematical model for electrocrystallization in pulsed electrodeposition mode using different types of waveforms and found that ramp-down waveforms can be employed to obtain fine grained structures. In a similar way, Molina and Hoyos [32] estimated the hardness of pulse current deposited nickel through the indirect effect of grain size on hardness. Choo et al. [28] qualitatively concluded that in order to have nanocrystalline grain sizes, during electrodeposition, a high negative over potential, high adion population and low adion surface mobility are required for a high nucleation rate and therefore reduced grain size. Rashidi and Amadeh [25] proposed a relationship between saccharin concentrations in the plating electrolyte with Ni grain size using a Langmuir type adsorption isotherm. However, this model does not give a relationship between grain size and the sulphur content in the coating. In another semi-quantitative study [8] these authors suggested that current density can lead to different grain sizes in Ni coatings depending upon the composition of the electrolyte. However, there was no direct quantification of the influence of current density on grain size. Indeed, many studies reveal conflicting data for the relationship between grain size and current density [33,34], however, many of these proposed relationships are qualitative in nature via interpreting direct experimental observation rather than developing a physical model behind the electrodeposition process.

During electrodeposition, there are many parameters (current density, current efficiency, deposition rate, alloying/impurity content etc.) for a given pH and temperature which can be experimentally chosen. We believe for a given experiment; all these parameters have a collective effect on the grain size of a Ni coating. The main aim of the present work is therefore, to study the influence of the above mentioned parameters to quantify the grain size of electrodeposited Ni coatings containing metalloid atoms such as sulphur, phosphorus and boron and develop a phenomenological model to predict the final grain size under specific conditions. This model can also be utilized to estimate the sulphur or phosphorus or boron content of electrodeposited Ni (Ni-S, Ni-P or Ni-B) coatings if current efficiency and grain size is known. The proposed model can also be used to predict hardness of the coatings through the estimated grain size utilizing the classical Hall-Petch relation.

Section snippets

A model for predicting the grain size in electrodeposited coatings

The source of metalloids such as sulphur (S), phosphorus (P) and boron (B) used in Nickel plating baths are saccharin, phosphoric acid and borane dimethylamine respectively to generate Ni-S, Ni-P and Ni-B coatings. The S, P and B atoms or metalloids are deposited with Ni during the electrodeposition process. Since the room temperature solid solubility of these atoms is near to zero in Ni, the only space they can deposit is at the grain boundaries of Ni thereby contributing to controlling the

Conclusions

A phenomenological model which correlates experimentally obtained parameters such as current efficiency and metalloid content with the grain size of electrodeposited Ni coatings is proposed provided that the metalloid has no solid solubility at room temperature with Ni. It was predicted that the grain size of electrodeposited Ni containing boron, sulphur, or phosphorus is directly proportional to the current efficiency, deposition rate and is inversely proportional to metalloid content and

Acknowledgement

Nitin P. Wasekar thanks Indian National Science Academy (INSA) for awarding Indo-Australia Early and Mid-Career Researchers (EMCR) Fellowship (IA/INDO-AUST/F-7/2017/1875) Programme 2016–2017 (supported by Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India).

References (49)

  • J.R. López et al.

    The effect of boron content, crystal structure, crystal size on the hardness and the corrosion resistance of electrodeposited Ni-B coatings

    Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.

    (2016)
  • K.H. Lee et al.

    Properties of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni–B alloy films

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2005)
  • E. Moti et al.

    Electrodeposition of nanocrystalline nickel by using rotating cylindrical electrodes

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2008)
  • A.M. Rashidi et al.

    The effect of saccharin addition and bath temperature on the grain size of nanocrystalline nickel coatings

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2009)
  • D. Grujicic et al.

    Electrodeposition of copper: the nucleation mechanisms

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • K.P. Wong et al.

    Modeling of electrocrystallization for pulse current electroforming of nickel

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • E. Budevski et al.

    Electrocrystallization: nucleation and growth phenomena

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2000)
  • J. Molina et al.

    Modeling of grain size and hardness for pulse current electroplating

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2009)
  • N. Ibl

    Some theoretical aspects of pulse electrolysis

    Surf. Technol.

    (1980)
  • G.D. Hibbard et al.

    The effect of starting nanostructure on the thermal stability of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Co

    Acta Mater.

    (2006)
  • L. Beaunier et al.

    A kinetical model for the electrochemical grooving of grain boundaries

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1980)
  • L. Wang et al.

    A comparative study on the tribological behavior of nanocrystalline nickel and cobalt coatings correlated with grain size and phase structure

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2006)
  • J.-X. Kang et al.

    Influence of electrodeposition parameters on the deposition rate and microhardness of nanocrystalline Ni coatings

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2009)
  • A. Ordine et al.

    Electrochemical study on Ni–P electrodeposition

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2006)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Compositionally modulated Ni-W multilayer coatings: A facile approach to enhance the tribological performance

      2023, Tribology International
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, a keen observation of the low-W regime in Fig. 1(a) shows that the grain size has huge scatter (at least an order). A thorough analysis revealed that along with the solute element ‘W′, the impurities such as sulfur and carbon [42,43] also affect the grain size by segregating to the grain boundaries and thus dominantly controls the grain size at lower-W contents. This suggests that in order to deposit soft Ni-W layers, we not only need to control the W-content but also the impurity concentration.

    • Effect of grain size on the thermal stability of electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel: X-ray diffraction studies

      2022, Thin Solid Films
      Citation Excerpt :

      The additives used during electrodeposition generate sulfur and carbon impurities in the coatings. The source of carbon and sulfur impurities and the effect of change in impurity concentration on the grain size has been reported [16,17]. The concentration of sulfur and carbon impurities which was measured using Leco CS 600, USA analyzer is given in Table 2.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    ISE member.

    View full text