Strategies for formulating and delivering poorly water-soluble drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2015.05.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Water solubility is a key parameter in drug formulation since it highly influences drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In the past decades, the challenge with poorly water soluble drugs has been growing continuously. As a matter of fact, poorly soluble compounds represent 40% of the top 200 oral drugs marketed in the US, 33% of drugs listed in the US Pharmacopeia, 75% of compounds under development and 90% of new chemical entities. The present article presents and discusses the pharmaceutical strategies available to overcome poor water solubility in light of final drug product examples. First, chemical modifications based on the adjustment of the pH and the design of prodrugs are presented and discussed. Physical modifications based on modified solid states of the drug, small drug particles, cosolvents, surfactants, lipids and cyclodextrins are discussed in a second part. Finally, the option of modifying the route of administration is briefly presented.

Introduction

The water solubility of drugs strongly influences their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and is a key parameter for formulators. Drug solubilization is based on the breaking of some drug–drug and water–water interactions for the creation of new drug–water interactions. The strength of such interactions determines the solubility of a drug in water. Water solubility is one of the main parameters of the biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) of drugs, as illustrated in Fig. 1A [1]. Moreover, “Lipinski's rule of 5” considers the solubility of drug candidates in view of the rejection of inappropriate candidates at early stages of the drug discovery process [2].

In the past decades, the challenges linked to poor water solubility have been continuously growing. The surge of combinatorial chemistry and high throughput miniaturized screening methods for drug discovery have resulted in an increase in molecular weight and lipophilicity of drug candidates [3], [4], [5]. In addition, the push towards increasing the potency of drugs often resulted in an increase in their lipophilicity (leading to stronger interactions with their receptors). Currently, poorly soluble compounds represent approximately 40% of the top 200 oral drugs marketed in the US and Europe, as shown in Fig. 1B [6]. In addition, they represent 90% of new chemical entities, 75% of compounds under development and 33% of drugs listed in the US Pharmacopeia [2], [3], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Interestingly, a variety of pharmaceutical strategies have been designed to address the formulation and delivery challenges presented by poorly soluble drugs, these are reviewed and discussed in the present article.

Section snippets

Strategies for formulating and delivering poorly water-soluble drugs

The pharmaceutical strategies to address the poor water solubility of a drug can be organized into three categories according to the nature of the modification involved: the chemical, physical and administration strategies, as illustrated in Fig. 2. These approaches can of course be used separately or combined.

Over the past decades, many efforts have been made to improve the formulation and delivery of poorly water-soluble immunosuppressants, prostaglandins and antineoplastic agents, which will

Conclusion

During the last decades, a number of pharmaceutical strategies have been developed for the formulation and delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. In this article, eight of these strategies have been presented and critically discussed in light of examples of marketed products. The presented approaches included i) chemical modifications such as the adjustment of the pH and the design of prodrugs, ii) physical modifications such as the use of modified solid states of the drug, small drug

References (121)

  • C.M. Walko et al.

    Capecitabine: a review

    Clin. Ther.

    (2005)
  • N. Shimma et al.

    The design and synthesis of a new tumor-selective fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2000)
  • M. Miwa et al.

    Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (1998)
  • J. Filipovicgrcic et al.

    Macromolecular prodrugs .4. Alginate-Chitosan microspheres of Phea-L-dopa adduct

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1995)
  • P. De Caprariis et al.

    Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of oligoethylene ester derivatives as indomethacin oral prodrugs

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1994)
  • B. Rihova et al.

    Bioaffinity therapy with antibodies and drugs bound to soluble synthetic polymers

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1986)
  • J. Kopecek et al.

    HPMA copolymer-anticancer drug conjugates: design, activity, and mechanism of action

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2000)
  • L. Varticovski et al.

    Water-soluble HPMA copolymer-wortmannin conjugate retains phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitory activity in vitro and in vivo

    J. Control Release

    (2001)
  • R. Duncan et al.

    Polymer-drug conjugates, PDEPT and PELT: basic principles for design and transfer from the laboratory to clinic

    J. Control Release

    (2001)
  • D.E. Duggan et al.

    Comparative disposition of sulindac and metabolites in five species

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1978)
  • N. Blagden et al.

    Crystal engineering of active pharmaceutical ingredients to improve solubility and dissolution rates

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2007)
  • M. Pudipeddi et al.

    Trends in solubility of polymorphs

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2005)
  • J. Haleblian et al.

    Pharmaceutical applications of polymorphism

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1969)
  • G.G. Zhang et al.

    Phase transformation considerations during process development and manufacture of solid oral dosage forms

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2004)
  • R. Suryanarayanan et al.

    Phase transitions of calcium gluceptate

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1986)
  • M. Stoltz et al.

    Physical and structural comparison of oxyphenbutazone monohydrate and anhydrate

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1989)
  • R.K. Khankari et al.

    Pharmaceutical hydrates

    Thermochim. Acta

    (1995)
  • A.T. Serajuddin

    Salt formation to improve drug solubility

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2007)
  • A. Avdeef

    Solubility of sparingly-soluble ionizable drugs

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2007)
  • H.R. Guzman et al.

    Combined use of crystalline salt forms and precipitation inhibitors to improve oral absorption of celecoxib from solid oral formulations

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2007)
  • S. Onoue et al.

    Improved dissolution and pharmacokinetic behavior of cyclosporine A using high-energy amorphous solid dispersion approach

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2010)
  • M. Mosharraf et al.

    The effect of particle-size and shape on the surface specific dissolution rate of microsized practically insoluble drugs

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1995)
  • D. Horter et al.

    Influence of physicochemical properties on dissolution of drugs in the gastrointestinal tract

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2001)
  • P. Kocbek et al.

    Preparation and evaluation of nanosuspensions for enhancing the dissolution of poorly soluble drugs

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2006)
  • J.P. Sylvestre et al.

    Nanonization of megestrol acetate by laser fragmentation in aqueous milieu

    J. Control Release

    (2011)
  • S. Onoue et al.

    Formulation design and photochemical studies on nanocrystal solid dispersion of curcumin with improved oral bioavailability

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2010)
  • Y. Kawabata et al.

    Novel crystalline solid dispersion of tranilast with high photostability and improved oral bioavailability

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci.

    (2010)
  • Y. Wu et al.

    The role of biopharmaceutics in the development of a clinical nanoparticle formulation of MK-0869: a Beagle dog model predicts improved bioavailability and diminished food effect on absorption in human

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2004)
  • Y. Yamamoto et al.

    Long-circulating poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(D,L-lactide) block copolymer micelles with modulated surface charge

    J. Control Release

    (2001)
  • K. Mondon et al.

    Novel cyclosporin A formulations using MPEG-hexyl-substituted polylactide micelles: a suitability study

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2011)
  • C. Di Tommaso et al.

    Novel micelle carriers for cyclosporin A topical ocular delivery: in vivo cornea penetration, ocular distribution and efficacy studies

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2012)
  • R.H. Muller et al.

    Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery - a review of the state of the art

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2000)
  • C.W. Pouton

    Formulation of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (1997)
  • T. Loftsson et al.

    Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. 1. Drug solubilization and stabilization

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1996)
  • R.A. Rajewski et al.

    Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. 2. In vivo drug delivery

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1996)
  • M.E. Brewster et al.

    Cyclodextrins as pharmaceutical solubilizers

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2007)
  • T. Loftsson et al.

    Cyclodextrins and their pharmaceutical applications

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2007)
  • G.L. Amidon et al.

    A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability

    Pharm. Res.

    (1995)
  • R.A. Lipper
  • T. Takagi et al.

    A provisional biopharmaceutical classification of the top 200 oral drug products in the United States, Great Britain, Spain, and Japan

    Mol. Pharm.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (136)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text