Experimental research on bearing mechanism of perfobond rib shear connectors
Introduction
Nowadays steel–concrete composite structure, with its remarkable technological and economical benefits, has been widely used in civil engineering. In steel–concrete composite structures, it is the shear connectors between concrete slab and steel girder that ensure the two parts work collaboratively to bear external loads [1], [2], [3], [4]. In steel and concrete composite bridges, headed stud is the most widely used one among all kinds of shear connectors [5], [6], [7], [8]. Notwithstanding headed stud could bring about inconvenience of construction in site to a great extent, some evidences indicate that the headed studs subjected to repeated loading may suffer from fatigue failure [9], [10].
In order to overcome the drawbacks of headed studs, Fritz Leonhardt developed a new kind of shear connector, named as perfobond rib connector [9], [11]. Perfobond rib connector refers to a piece of steel plate, on which a certain number of holes are punched. After pouring of the concrete slabs, concrete dowels could be formed in these holes. The concrete dowels could resist the shear force and also the up-lifting force between the concrete slab and the steel girder. It is very convenient to install the perfobond rib connectors on the steel components and no special welding equipment is required. Besides, shear bearing capacity of perfobond rib connector is larger than that of headed studs, i.e. bearing capacity of the perfobond rib connector with one hole is several times that of single stud shear connector. No evident fatigue problem of perfobond rib connector in engineering practices was reported so far. If transverse reinforcement is provided in the holes, the shear bearing capacity could increase significantly. Due to these merits, perfobond rib connector is a promising connector in steel–concrete composite structure.
Much attention has been paid on the structural behavior of perfobond rib connectors recently and various calculation methods for the shear bearing capacity were proposed [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Nonetheless, some studies show that calculated results of these methods do no not agree well with experimental results and the results diverge with each other in a large degree. This is mainly caused by the discrepancy in specimen size and test methods [18], [19], [20].
To this end, in this paper, a novel push-out test method for perfobond rib connector was proposed. 7 different groups of perfobond rib connectors, totally 21 push-out test specimens, were conducted to obtain the load–slip relationships of the specimens and to verify the rationality of the proposed test method. Based on the test results, influence of the parameters of the shear connectors on the bearing capacity was discussed.
Section snippets
Conventional test methods
Nowadays, both push-out test and full-scale composite beam test are usually adopted to investigate the shear bearing capacity of shear connectors [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Full-scale beam test method is feasible for small composite beams used in building structure, and it is difficult to test the shear bearing capacity of perfobond rib connectors in composite bridge using this method because the sizes of the connector and the girder are very large. Therefore, push-out test results are
Load–slip relationship
Load–slip curves of all the specimens obtained in the push-out tests are shown in Fig. 7. Relative slips between the steel and concrete are the average values measured by two LVDTs.
It can be seen from the load–slip curves of the 7 groups in the entire process that the load–slip curves of the 3 specimens in each group were very close to each other, and the dispersion of the bearing capacities was smaller than that of conventional push-out test results, which further proved the rationality of the
Discussions
Due to the scatter of the test result, according to the data process procedure suggested by Eurocode 4, in this paper the values whose deviation from the mean exceeds 10% in each group were removed. The bearing capacity of one group is denoted as Qu and the relative slip corresponding to Qu is denoted as Su. Bearing capacity of each specimens (Qu,i), average bearing capacity of each group (Qu,Ave), relative slips between the steel and concrete corresponding to the bearing capacity (Su,i) and
Conclusions
The following conclusions can be drawn based on the investigations in this paper.
- (1)
The push-out test method proposed in this paper could eliminate the influence of specimen size and friction effect on structural performance of perfobond rib connector, thus it could effectively evaluate the contributions of concrete dowel and the transverse reinforcements in the loading process of perfobond rib connectors.
- (2)
The relative slip between the steel and the concrete at the point of bearing capacity is very
Acknowledgments
This research is sponsored by Key Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 Program, Grant No: 2013CB036303), and National Science and Technology Support Program of China (No. 2009BAG15B02). These supports are gratefully acknowledged.
References (26)
- et al.
Resistance of headed studs subjected to fatigue loading—part I: experimental study
J Constr Steel Res
(2007) - et al.
Shear resistance of the perfobond-rib shear connector depending on concrete strength and rib arrangement
J Constr Steel Res
(2010) - et al.
Numerical analysis of push-out specimens with perfobond rib connectors
Comput Struct
(1997) - et al.
Experimental evaluation of the structural response of perfobond shear connectors
Eng Struct
(2010) - et al.
Experimental analysis of perfobond shear connection between steel and lightweight concrete
J Constr Steel Res
(2004) - et al.
Experimental analysis of shear connection between steel and lightweight concrete
J Constr Steel Res
(2009) - et al.
Static behavior of large stud shear connectors
Eng Struct
(2004) - et al.
Experimental evaluation of the shear resistance of corrugated perfobond rib shear connections
Adv Struct Eng
(2011) - et al.
Experimental and analytical investigations on the hat shaped shear connector in the steel–concrete composite flexural member
Int J Steel Struct
(2011) - et al.
Structural performance of composite joints using bent studs
Int J Steel Struct
(2010)
Evaluation of the load carrying capacity of the perforated shear connector with flange heads
Static behavior of large stud shear connectors
Eng Struct
Behavior of shear studs subjected to fully reversed cyclic loading
J Struct Eng Asce
Cited by (60)
Flexural performance of SCSP-concrete composite structures with equidistant transverse rebar
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringExperimental investigation on mechanical behavior of T-type perfobond rid shear connectors under combined shear and tension
2023, Journal of Building EngineeringExperimental study on interfacial shear behavior of PBL shear connector deeply embedded in UHPC
2023, Case Studies in Construction Materials