Elsevier

Journal of Crystal Growth

Volume 456, 15 December 2016, Pages 121-132
Journal of Crystal Growth

Critical issues for homoepitaxial GaN growth by molecular beam epitaxy on hydride vapor-phase epitaxy-grown GaN substrates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.08.047Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Critical issues affecting the surfaces of freestanding GaN substrates are reviewed.

  • Effect of these issues on homoepitaxial growth by MBE are evaluated.

  • Procedures are outlined for obtaining high crystal quality homoepitaxial GaN.

  • High crystal quality homoepitaxial GaN grown by MBE is demonstrated.

Abstract

While the heteroepitaxial growth of gallium nitride-based materials and devices on substrates such as SiC, sapphire, and Si has been well-documented, the lack of a cost-effective source of bulk GaN crystals has hindered similar progress on homoepitaxy. Nevertheless, freestanding GaN wafers are becoming more widely available, and there is great interest in growing GaN films and devices on bulk GaN substrates, in order to take advantage of the greatly reduced density of threading dislocations, particularly for vertical devices. However, homoepitaxial GaN growth is far from a trivial task due to the reactivity and different chemical sensitivities of N-polar (0001) and Ga-polar (0001) GaN surfaces, which can affect the microstructure and concentrations of impurities in homoepitaxial GaN layers. In order to achieve high quality, high purity homoepitaxial GaN, it is necessary to investigate the effect of the ex situ wet chemical clean, the use of in situ cleaning procedures, the sensitivity of the GaN surface to thermal decomposition, and the effect of growth temperature. We review the current understanding of these issues with a focus on homoepitaxial growth of GaN by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on c-plane surfaces of freestanding GaN substrates grown by hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE), as HVPE-grown substrates are most widely available. We demonstrate methods for obtaining homoepitaxial GaN layers by plasma-assisted MBE in which no additional threading dislocations are generated from the regrowth interface and impurity concentrations are greatly reduced.

Introduction

Gallium nitride-based materials and devices have progressed from the research laboratory to the commercial sector over the past decade, facilitated by improvements in heteroepitaxial growth of group III-N device layers on non-native substrates such as SiC, sapphire, and Si. Heteroepitaxial growth has been necessitated by the limited availability of bulk single-crystal III-N materials that can be used as substrates. However, there have been substantial simultaneous improvements in the growth and availability of bulk nitrides, and a number of groups have already demonstrated a wide variety of devices grown on freestanding GaN substrates, such as light emitting diodes (LEDs) [1], [2], laser diodes [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], solar cells [10], [11], [12], vertical power p–n diodes [13], [14], Schottky diodes [15], and high electron mobility transistors [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27].

While high pressure [28], [29] and ammonothermal [30], [31] growth of bulk GaN have resulted in crystals with very low densities of threading dislocations (TDs), i.e.,<102 cm−2 and 5×104 cm−2, respectively, hydride vapor-phase epitaxy (HVPE) has been used most frequently for producing freestanding GaN substrates due to its wider availability, faster growth rates, and larger and more uniform wafer size [32]. The threading dislocation density (TDD) of HVPE-grown GaN substrates is typically 106–107 cm−2, several orders of magnitude greater than for high pressure- or ammonothermally-grown GaN. Nevertheless, the TDD of heteroepitaxial GaN is typically 108–1010 cm−2; hence, homoepitaxy on HVPE-grown GaN offers significant reductions in TDD compared to heteroepitaxy. Thus, a device measuring 10×10 µm2 might reasonably be expected to contain from one to ten TDs on average if fabricated on homoepitaxial GaN layers, but 102 to 104 if fabricated on heteroepitaxial layers.

Section snippets

Development of freestanding HVPE GaN

Naniwae et al. [33] provided one of the first descriptions of GaN grown by HVPE on sapphire, and the subsequent growth of a GaN layer by metal-organic vapor-phase epitaxy (MOVPE). Within two years, Detchprohm et al. [34] reported the growth of high-quality, single-crystal GaN by HVPE on sapphire using ZnO buffer layers. Although they obtained freestanding GaN by etching the ZnO buffer and peeling the films from the substrate, the lateral dimensions were limited to 2–4 mm due to cracking of the

Experiment

We have investigated various methods for preparing Ga-polar HVPE GaN surfaces for homoepitaxial growth. In the following sections we provide details of these methods and describe their effects on microstructure and impurity incorporation in GaN layers grown by plasma-assisted MBE.

Results and discussion

Samples VG2344 and VG2345 were both grown on solvent-only cleaned wafers at a substrate temperature of 650 °C. The only significant difference between the two samples was the insertion of an ultrathin (1.5 nm) AlN NL at the beginning of the layer growth of VG2345. A high density of threading dislocations, primarily edge or mixed dislocations, are visible in XTEM; micrographs of VG2344 are shown in Fig. 4 (the micrographs from VG2345 are very similar and are not shown for brevity). Plan-view TEM (

Conclusions

This paper has reviewed the challenges associated with homoepitaxial GaN growth on freestanding, c-plane HVPE-grown GaN substrates of N- and Ga-polarities, including the chemical reactivity of the surfaces and their susceptibility to thermal decomposition or roughening. Methods are described for preparing these substrates for growth by plasma-assisted MBE in order to obtain homoepitaxial GaN layers with high structural quality and low impurity concentrations. For optimal growth on either the

Acknowledgments

The work at NRL was supported by the Office of Naval Research. The authors also acknowledge the use of the facilities in the John M. Cowley Center for High Resolution Electron Microscopy at Arizona State University.

References (100)

  • D.F. Storm et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2005)
  • D.F. Storm et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2007)
  • D.F. Storm et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2007)
  • D.F. Storm et al.

    Solid State Electron.

    (2010)
  • D.F. Storm et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2013)
  • M. Bockowski et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2005)
  • R. Dwiliński et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2008)
  • R. Dwiliński et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2009)
  • K. Naniwae et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1990)
  • R.J. Molnar et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1997)
  • S.T. Kim et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1998)
  • K. Motoki et al.

    J., Cryst. Growth

    (2002)
  • A.D. Williams et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2007)
  • K. Fujito et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2009)
  • D.F. Storm et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2015)
  • M. Diale et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2005)
  • G. Hao et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • M.A. Mastro et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2005)
  • A. Rebey et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1999)
  • H. Suzuki et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2008)
  • D. Zhuang et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. R

    (2005)
  • W. Guo et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2013)
  • C. Mion et al.

    Superlattice Micro.

    (2006)
  • S.K. Bose

    Solid State Commun.

    (2013)
  • A. Chakraborty et al.

    Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.

    (2005)
  • K. Okamoto et al.

    Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.

    (2006)
  • S.-I. Nagahama et al.

    Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.

    (2000)
  • C. Skierbiszewski et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2005)
  • C. Skierbiszewski et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2006)
  • T. Miyoshi et al.

    Appl. Phys. Express

    (2009)
  • K. Okamoto et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2009)
  • C. Skierbiszewski et al.

    J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.

    (2014)
  • Y. Aolki et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2015)
  • Y. Kuwahara et al.

    Appl. Phys. Express

    (2010)
  • Y. Kuwahara et al.

    Appl. Phys. Express

    (2011)
  • M. Mori, S. Yamamoto, Y. Kuwahara, T. Fujii, T. Sugiyama, M. Iwaya, T. Takeuchi, S. Kamiyama, I. Akasaki, and H. Amano,...
  • I.C. Kizilyalli et al.

    IEEE Trans. Electron Dev.

    (2013)
  • I.C. Kizilyalli et al.

    IEEE Trans. Electron Dev.

    (2015)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Semicond. Sci. Technol.

    (2010)
  • E. Frayssinet et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2000)
  • D.F. Storm et al.

    Electron. Lett.

    (2004)
  • D.F. Storm et al.

    Electron. Lett.

    (2006)
  • D.J. Meyer et al.

    IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett.

    (2013)
  • D.A. Deen et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2014)
  • P. Kruszewski et al.

    Semicond. Sci. Technol.

    (2014)
  • M.T. Hardy et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (2015)
  • I. Grzegory

    J. Phys. Condens. Matter

    (2001)
  • T. Paskova et al.

    IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.

    (2009)
  • T. Detchprohm et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1992)
  • C.Q. Chen et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Systematic suppression of parasitic conductivity highlights undistorted quantum transport in GaN/AlGaN 2DEGs

      2022, Journal of Crystal Growth
      Citation Excerpt :

      The parasitic channel results from atmospheric silicon adhesion at the substrate surface. In our experience, silicon is always present at the regrowth interface, even after applying aggressive cleaning procedures [11]. Further we show that carbon acting as a deep acceptor in GaN [12] can compensate for the silicon contamination.

    • Threading dislocations in GaN high-voltage switches

      2021, Microelectronics Reliability
      Citation Excerpt :

      While the exact mechanism of the dynamic RON maximum and subsequent decrease with higher off-state voltages in planar HEMTS is not yet fully understood, it is clear that vertical devices with current flow parallel to threading dislocations, display superior dynamic performance [61,62]. The primary criterion for reducing dislocation density based on heteroepitaxial substrate choice is the lattice mismatch, and for homoepitaxial GaN-on-GaN it is the dislocation density of the bulk single crystal substrate [5,63]. High lattice mismatch increases strain on the GaN film that generates misfit dislocations at the substrate/film interface and allows for the generation of threading dislocations through the epitaxial layer [64].

    • Study on the effects of growth rate on GaN films properties grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy

      2020, Journal of Crystal Growth
      Citation Excerpt :

      Firstly, we determined the growth rate from the measured GaN epilayer thickness divided by the growth time. However, the previously published literatures reveal that the interface between MBE-grown GaN films and GaN templates is invisible even in cross-section transmission electron microscope, thus resulting in difficulties to estimate the thickness of GaN epitaxial layers [16,17]. However, impurities from atmosphere can be rapidly adsorbed on the surface of GaN templates when its exposure to air ambient at cleaning and loading into the MBE chamber.

    • Influence of HVPE substrates on homoepitaxy of GaN grown by MOCVD

      2018, Journal of Crystal Growth
      Citation Excerpt :

      Homoepitaxial growth is not simply applying the developed growth parameters for heteroepitaxial growth to native substrates. It has been shown that merely doing so, without understanding substrate preparation can lead to nucleation of dislocations and other defects at the growth interface, undermining the benefits of using a native substrate [14]. Additionally, epitaxial roughness on native substrates has been shown to be a key factor in leakage current in vertical structures [15].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Ames Laboratory, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

    View full text