Glucose Control
Safer glycemic control using isomaltulose-based enteral formula: A pilot randomized crossover trial,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.07.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

Preventing harmful hyperglycemia is important in critical illness. However, insulin therapy increases the risk of hypoglycemia. In patients with diabetes, isomaltulose-based enteral formula (IF) feeding has been shown to reduce glycemia. This randomized controlled crossover study was conducted to determine whether IF feeding improves glycemia in postoperative critically ill patients.

Material and Methods

Eight patients who developed hyperglycemia (>150 mg/dL) after esophagectomy were included. Patients were randomized to either the IF or the standard feeding formula (SF) arm. After 16 hours of administration of randomized formula and 8 hours of washout, patients crossed over to the other formula for the next 16 hours. Continuous glucose measurement using STG-22 (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) was performed during the trial.

Results

Maximum blood glucose concentration was 181 mg/dL with IF, significantly lower than the 206 mg/dL with SF (P = .001). Mean glycemia during feeding periods was 162 mg/dL with IF, significantly lower than the 176 mg/dL with SF (P = .0001). Seven (87.5%) patients taking SF exceeded 180 mg/dL compared with 3 (37.5%) patients taking IF (P = .005). This effect was seen without any risk of hypoglycemia and complication.

Conclusions

Isomaltulose-based enteral formula might be useful for safer glycemic control in postoperative critically ill patients. Further study to determine clinical benefit of IF feeding is justified.

Introduction

Hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients [1], [2], and its control is considered important [3], [4], [5], [6]. Recently, lowering glycemia has been recommended to improve patient outcome [7], [8]. However, using insulin increases the risk of hypoglycemia [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Severe or prolonged hypoglycemia can result in cardiac arrhythmias, convulsions, irreversible brain damage, and death [15], [16], [17]. Accordingly, hypoglycemia is of great concern when delivering continuous insulin infusions, especially to sedated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). In recently published large randomized controlled studies, mortality rates in patients with hypoglycemia using intensive insulin therapy increased by a factor of 2 to 3.3 when compared with patients who did not [18]. The Normoglycaemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation trial also reported that an episode of hypoglycemia was associated with increased mortality [19], [20]. Thus, it would be important to avoid hypoglycemia as much as hyperglycemia.

Isomaltulose is a naturally occurring disaccharide composed of α-1,6-linked glucose and fructose [21]. An isomaltulose-based enteral formula (IF) (Inslow/MHN-01, Meiji Dairy Products, Tokyo, Japan) (Table 1) has been shown to improve insulin resistance [22] and reduce glycemia [23], [24], [25], [26]. Thus, IF feeding might also improve blood glucose control without any risk of hypoglycemia in postoperative critically ill patients [27]. However, there was limited information on the effects of IF feeding in critically ill patients.

Accordingly, we conducted a randomized controlled crossover study comparing IF to standard feeding formula (SF) (Table 1) in postesophagectomy patients requiring intensive care. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of IF with those of SF in such a cohort.

Section snippets

Subjects and methods

This study was conducted between January and December 2007 in the ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital. The human research ethics committee of Okayama University Hospital approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Results

Thirty patients admitted to the ICU after esophagectomy during the study period were enrolled in the study. One of those 30 patients was excluded because of alternation of operation plan. The remaining 29 patients underwent postoperative feeding and were screened for hyperglycemia. Nine (31.0%) patients developed hyperglycemia (>150 mg/dL [8.3 mmol/L]) under the E100 of SF feeding and were randomized. Of those 9 patients, 8 completed crossover feeding (16 feeding periods). One patient completed

Discussion

We conducted a pilot randomized controlled crossover study comparing the safety and efficacy of IF for glycemia in postesophagectomy patients admitted to the ICU. This is the first study to test the effect of IF in critically ill patients. Our investigation revealed that IF, compared with SF, reduces glycemia, HGI [31], and glucose variability [30] during feeding.

Lowering blood glucose levels has been recommended in international consensus guidelines as a means of improving patient outcomes in

Acknowledgments

Dr Egi developed the study designs, conducted the data analysis, and wrote and revised the manuscript. Drs Arai, Yamatsuji, and Naomoto developed the study designs and critiqued successive drafts of the manuscript. Drs Toda, Yokoyama, and Katayama collected original data and critiqued successive drafts of the manuscript. Dr Morita critiqued successive drafts of the manuscript. Dr Michael Bailey conducted additional analysis and proof reading. Dr Egi had full access to all of the data in the

References (47)

  • RobinsonL.E. et al.

    Insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in critical illness: role of insulin in glycemic control

    AACN Clin Issues

    (2004)
  • CoursinD.B. et al.

    Perioperative diabetic and hyperglycemic management issues

    Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • MalmbergK.

    Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. DIGAMI (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Study Group

    Bmj

    (1997)
  • DellingerR.P. et al.

    Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock

    Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • DellingerR.P. et al.

    Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008

    Intensive Care Med

    (2007)
  • BilottaF. et al.

    Intensive insulin therapy after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial

    Neurocritical Care

    (2008)
  • BrunkhorstF.M. et al.

    Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • OksanenT. et al.

    Strict versus moderate glucose control after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation

    Intensive Care Med

    (2007)
  • Van den BergheG. et al.

    Intensive insulin therapy in mixed medical/surgical intensive care units: benefit versus harm

    Diabetes

    (2006)
  • van den BergheG. et al.

    Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • BhatiaA. et al.

    Hypoglycemia and cardiac arrest in a critically ill patient on strict glycemic control

    Anesth Analg

    (2006)
  • BilottaF. et al.

    Glycemia management in neurocritical care patients: a review

    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol

    (2009)
  • OddoM. et al.

    Impact of tight glycemic control on cerebral glucose metabolism after severe brain injury: a microdialysis study

    Crit Care Med

    (2008)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Association of specialized enteral nutrition with glycemic control and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      2021, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, we were unable to extract outcome data from five studies [35,37,39,43,44], despite multiple but fruitless attempts to contact authors for data requests. Notably, meta-analyzable data of CoV and glucose SD were measured but not reported in two [37,43] and three studies [39,43,44], respectively. With regards to the GRADE assessment, we had multiple reasons for rating down the quality of evidence.

    • Diabetes-specific formulas high in monounsaturated fatty acids and metabolic outcomes in patients with diabetes or hyperglycaemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the 13 MLFU studies [20,25–36], there were patients with different hyperglycaemic situations: with only DM-oa [19,25,35], with only DM-I [33,36], with only stress hyperglycaemia [27], a mix of DM-oa and DM-i [26,29,34], and a mix of DM-oa, DM-i and stress hyperglycaemia [28,30–32]. The route of administration in all MLFU studies was continuous tube feed [26–34,36], except for two [25,35]. The differences in total fat content between the DSFs and the STDFs was 26% [31], 19%–20% [25,29,32,34,35], 15%–16% [19,33,36], 10%–11% [28,30,32], 8% [26] and 4.5% [27] (Table 1).

    • Isomaltulose: Recent evidence for health benefits

      2018, Journal of Functional Foods
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Study sites: Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan.

    ☆☆

    Funding: Supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.

    View full text