A decade of evolution in Indonesian orthopedic publication: A bibliographic report

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.016Get rights and content

Abstract

During the past decade, there was an increasing interest in orthopedic research in Indonesia. Therefore we aimed to investigate the profile of Indonesian orthopedic trend publication from 2010 to 2019. Systematic research was conducted to identify all orthopedic articles authored by Indonesian orthopedic surgeons. Article details (number of authors, authors’ affiliation, publishing journal), type of author’s affiliation, affiliate collaboration, study field, type, and level of evidence (LOE) were recorded and evaluated. Publishing journal metric and author h-index were also recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.

Two hundred and twenty articles were included in our study. Clinical studies were the most common article type, followed by case reports and basic science. Among clinical articles, therapeutic studies were found significantly more frequent. On the other hand, economic studies were not found in this study period. The most popular field was oncology, followed by knee and spine. The average number of authors per article was 5.23 with a total of 205 individuals who had contributed during this decade. University hospital was the most common affiliation found and single-center study was the most common affiliate collaboration. The most common level of evidence was level V (case reports). Eighty-seven specific publishing journals were identified. More than 42% of the articles were published in journals with SJR between 0.25 and 0.50. The average author h-index was 3.56 (0–7). Although there was an increasing trend and quantity of publications among Indonesian authors, most articles had level 5 evidence (case reports) and the quality of publishing journals was mostly Q3 with a low-moderate SJR. Improvement of the article’s quality and institutional collaboration will be needed for future contribution in global orthopedic society.

Introduction

Publishing in medical journal is one of various ways to communicate new research to clinicians, medical scientists, and other healthcare workers. Communications that facilitate the widest global dissemination of such information are advantageous to the public. Their ability to prevent disease and improve health quality would be aided by improved access to reliable medical information.1

The current analysis of publication trends examines changes in research methodology within the modern era amongst leading medical journals. A paradigm shift in the publication has occurred from small single-centre studies to large multicentre RCTs. Moreover, there has been an increase in multi-authored papers and an increase in the mean number of co-authors on papers recently published.2,3 Additionally, there has been an increase in collaboration between authors of different countries over the past 10 years, which further contributes to the globalization of academic medicine.3,4 This pattern demonstrates a positive step towards clarity in disclosure and conduct amongst clinical studies.5 The increased interests in publication has also occurred in the orthopedic field. Previous studies provided country rankings of orthopedic publications in major orthopedic journals. However, not every orthopedic article were included, since not every orthopedic article were published in orthopedic-specific journals.6, 7, 8

In Indonesia, there are also increasing interest to publication among Orthopedic surgeon especially in recent years, which is influenced by many factors. University or private hospital affiliated surgeon has some obligations to publish their works regularly. There are also increasing availability of government or private publication grants that can be obtained by the researchers. However, for the most part, the importance of scientific publication has been acknowledged by the Indonesian orthopedic society. The aim of this article is to systematically review the literature published by Indonesian orthopedic authors from 2010 to 2019 and evaluate the publication profile (article details and publishing journal metrics) which will show the contribution of Indonesian authors to orthopedic research.

Section snippets

Protocol and registration

This bibliograpic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.9,10

Search strategy

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken from several databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus). The date was restricted to all publications from January 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2019. The search was conducted on January 3rd, 2020. Search specifics were: (((((orthopedic[Affiliation]) OR orthopedic[Affiliation]) OR

Results

In total, 220 articles were included in our study. The summary of article selection process was summarized in Fig. 1. Before the selected study period, 3 original articles were published and the number of articles published increased significantly especially in 2018–2019, where the increase was 274%(Fig. 2). The publication profile was summarized in Table 1.

Overall, clinical studies were the most common article type, followed by case reports and basic science. Among these clinical articles,

Discussion

The aim of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of orthopedic articles published by Indonesian authors over the past decade. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to reveal the contribution of Indonesian authors to orthopedic research. We found a total 220 publications from 2010 to 2019. Although the trend in 2019 showed a significantly increasing number of publications (Fig. 2), the total number of publications was far lower when compared to other countries.

Conclusion

This bibliographic study documented 220 orthopedic articles involving 205 Indonesian authors. Clinical therapeutic article and single-center studies were most common. Although there was an increasing trend and quantity of publications among Indonesian authors, most articles had level 5 evidence (case reports) and the quality of publishing journals were mostly Q3 with low-moderate SJR. Improvement of the article’s quality and institutional collaboration will be needed for future contribution in

Funding

Not Applicable.

Contributions of Authors

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the Indonesian Orthopedic Association for their support in this study. On behalf of the research division, we would like to thank all Indonesian Orthopedic Researchers for their contribution in the past decade. Thank you for all the advice, ideas, and moral support throughout this project.

References (23)

  • M. Rahman et al.

    Japan’s share of articles in orthopedics

    J Orthop Sci

    (2002)
  • L. Grouse

    Open access medical publications

    J Thorac Dis

    (2014)
  • G. Gonzalez-Alcaide et al.

    Evolution of cooperation patterns in psoriasis research: Co-authorship network analysis of papers in medline (1942-2013)

    PloS One

    (2015)
  • A. Seetharam et al.

    Authorship trends in the journal of orthopaedic research: a bibliometric analysis

    J Orthop Res

    (2018)
  • A. Pinter

    Changing authorship patterns and publishing habits in the European journal of pediatric surgery: a 10-year analysis

    Eur J Pediatr Surg

    (2015)
  • A. Ivanov et al.

    Review and analysis of publication trends over three decades in three high impact medicine journals

    PloS One

    (2017)
  • B.H. Bosker et al.

    The international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000 to 2004

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2006)
  • K.M. Lee et al.

    Characteristics and trends of orthopedic publications between 2000 and 2009

    Clin Orthop Surg

    (2011)
  • A. Liberati et al.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

    PLoS Med

    (2009)
  • A. Booth et al.

    The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews

    Syst Rev

    (2012)
  • J. Howick et al.

    The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2

    (2011)
  • Cited by (1)

    View full text