Original ContributionBevel direction of epidural needles reliably predicts direction of catheter placement and contrast spread in human cadavers: results of a pilot study☆
Introduction
In lower extremity surgery, direction of catheter insertion influences the efficacy of epidural anesthesia [1]. Bevel direction in the epidural space correlates with the directional spread of the injectate [2]. When a catheter is placed with the bevel of the needle facing in the cephalad direction in the mid-thoracic and low-thoracic spine, injected contrast spreads preferentially in the cephalad direction [3]. However, there are limited data assessing the direction of flow of the injectate when a catheter is threaded in the caudad direction. In this cadaver study, radiopaque contrast was used to confirm the relationship between bevel orientation, catheter direction, and radiopaque contrast spread in the lumbar region.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
After University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Institutional Review Board approval, 8 human cadavers were obtained from the anatomy laboratory. The cadavers were randomly divided into two groups of 4 cadavers. In Group 1, needle bevel direction at epidural entry was cephalad, while in Group 2 it was caudad. After each cadaver was placed prone, the L4-L5 interspace was identified using the posterior superior iliac crests as landmarks. We used anatomic landmarks because the study was
Results
Due to our inability to access the epidural space secondary to surgical changes in the lumbar spine, one cadaver in the cephalad group was excluded. In 7 of 7 (100%) cadavers, the catheter tip direction according to the radiograph corresponded directly with bevel direction. In Group 1, the radiopaque contrast flowed primarily in the cephalad direction in all three cadavers. In Group 2, radiopaque contrast flowed primarily in the caudad direction in three cadavers and equally caudad and cephalad
Discussion
For patients undergoing total hip replacement, neuraxial anesthesia (spinal and/or epidural) results in better outcomes than general anesthesia [4]. According to Capdevila et al, regional techniques also improved early rehabilitation after major knee surgery by effectively controlling postoperative pain during continuous passive motion, hastening convalescence. [5]. In addition, for patients who are elderly and/or have multiple comorbidities, regional anesthesia may be preferred over general
References (13)
- et al.
Quality of spinal extradural anaesthesia: the influence of spinal nerve root diameter
Br J Anaesth
(1975) - et al.
Relationship between the bevel of the Tuohy needle and catheter direction in thoracic epidural anesthesia
Reg Anesth Pain Med
(2006) - et al.
The lumbar extradural structure changes with increasing age
Br J Anaesth
(1997) - et al.
Anesthetic effect of epidural anesthesia with cephalad or caudad catheterization for ankle surgery or hemorrhoidectomy
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
(2005) - et al.
Direction of the needle bevel and epidural anesthetic spread
Anesthesiology
(1982) - et al.
Correlation between the distribution of contrast medium and the extent of blockade during epidural anesthesia
Anesthesiology
(2004)
Cited by (1)
Use of an epidural catheter inserted at L1-L2 in a dog undergoing pelvic limb amputation
2016, Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
- ☆
Supported by departmental funding only.