Value flow analysis based on EAP industrial chain: case of Huaning in Xichang, Sichuan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.07.004Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, based on symbiotic network of Eco-agricultural Park (EAP), value flows of different industrial chains are studied, and input–output efficiencies of industrial chain and individual enterprise accounted independently are compared in the case of Huaning EAP. The results indicate: (1) the total profit of industrial chain of feedstuff processing, breeder duck breeding, laying-hen breeding, farm garden, dairy farm and milk processing is more than the sum of profits of individual enterprises independently accounted, with a difference of 950,800 RMB yuan. Input–output efficiency of this industrial chain is 1.30 times higher than the average that of individual enterprises accounted independently. (2) The total profit of industrial chain of feedstuff processing, dairy farm, grass farm, laying-hen breeding and milk processing is more than the sum of profits of individual enterprises accounted independently, with a difference of 3,258,800 RMB yuan. Input–output efficiency of this industrial chain is 1.45 times higher than the average that of individual enterprises accounted independently. (3) Through collaboration among enterprises in the industrial system, the benefits of the industrial chain are much higher than the sum of those obtained by individual enterprises, which is benefited from the performance of resource and by-product exchange network among enterprises in the EAP.

Introduction

So far, world agriculture has experienced several development stages such as infant faming, traditional agriculture and modern agriculture. Since the 1970s, with improvement of environmental awareness and naissance of sustainable development idea of human beings, various thoughts on agricultural development were developed such as green revolution, natural agriculture and sustainable agriculture. Under guidance of these thoughts, different development patterns came into being, such as natural agriculture, biodynamic agriculture, organic agriculture, no-doing agriculture, eco-agriculture and low-input sustainable agriculture [1], [2], [3], [4]. Through long-term practice, people gradually recognized that eco-agriculture is an effective way for sustainable development of agriculture in the future [5].

Since the early 1980s, eco-agriculture has being constructed in more than 2000 counties, villages and towns across China [5], [6]. From 1995, the State Environmental Protection Administration of China has successively launched the construction of eco-agriculture demonstration zones all over the country. At present, eco-agriculture demonstration area has reached 667,000 hm2, accounting for 7% of national cultivated areas [7]. Early study on eco-agriculture conducted in China was mainly focused on technology application test, and then turned to study on technology integration after the 1990s. During the period of 10th Five-Year Plan (2000–2005), major special programs for tackling key problems in eco-agriculture were started up in China, among which eco-agricultural technology integration and innovation were still one of important issues. Green food production and research took a prominent position, with the research aiming to realize cleaner and high efficiency of production, etc. [7].

It is increasing clear that researcher puts more emphasis on: the role of diversified planting and husbandry [8], [9] model of symbiosis [10], [11], system approaches and design of sustainability [12], [13], [14], material, energy flow analysis and efficiency [15], [16], [17].

For economic benefits, many scholars did much research from various aspects [6], [18], [19], [20]. In addition, Wang et al. [21] introduced the recycling scheme for wastes of Beijing Xiedao Eco-agricultural Park (EAP), an eco-agricultural model with organic combination of planting, breeding and fertilizer processing. Zhu [22] made a brief evaluation on benefits of the EAP in Yuhang of Zhejiang Province where paddy planting is combined with duck breeding.

For value flow, Li and Zheng [23] analyzed value flows of ecological–economic systems of different types of farmers. Bian [24] compared input–output ratio of Shengli Oil Field through value flow in 1990. Zhu [25] and Wang [26] analyzed the value flow of paddy–crab–loach ecosystem through field test, and demonstrated significance of this system for sustainable development of paddy field. However, it has not attracted enough attention to systematically analyze value flow based on EAP, especially, to analyze cost–benefit difference between industrial chain and individual enterprise of EAP. And the literature focusing on value flow is very limited at present.

In this paper, from the dimension of symbiotic industrial network in the park, value flows of different industrial chains are studied, and input–output efficiency of industrial chains and individual enterprise accounted independently are compared in the case of Huaning EAP in Xichang, Sichuan. The aim is to sufficiently exert advantages of material exchange network in EAP, and discuss the way for sustainable development of agriculture based on community scale.

Section snippets

Study area

Huaning EAP is a private enterprise and built in 1993, with 160 employees at present and areas of 111.67 hm2. The park is located at Anning River flood bed of Xichang City in Sichuan Province (Fig. 1), with altitude of 1750 m, average annual rainfall of 1014 mm, and average annual temperature of 16.9 °C and sunlight time of 2365 h. The park takes livestock and poultry breeding and fruit planting as core, mainly developing breeder duck, meat duck, laying-hen, feedstuff, grass, cow breeding, milk

Value flow of industrial chain A

Material flow linked in the industrial chain A includes intermediate materials and final materials. Intermediate materials are composed of cattle feed, chicken feed, duck feed, chicken dropping, grass, fresh milk and duck fecal sewage (red mark frame shown in Fig. 4). Final materials are composed of cow manure, milk, pomegranate, vegetable, soybean, chicken, egg, duckling, duck, and duck egg (green mark frame shown in Fig. 4). Input costs of laying-hen farm, breeder duck farm, farm garden,

Conclusions

The following conclusions can be drawn from analysis of the case:

  • (1)

    The total profit of industrial chain of feedstuff, breeder duck, laying-hen, gardening, dairy farm and milk processing is higher than the sum of profits of the individual enterprises independently accounted, with the difference of 950,800 RMB yuan, wherein the shares contributed by breeder duck farm, laying-hen farm, farm garden, milk plant and dairy farm are 57.95%, 22.29%, 10.88%, 8.75% and 0.14%, respectively. The input–output

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the grant from the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 2007CB411507) and the Western Talent Light Training Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Program No. L10416004). The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to the anonym referees for remarks and suggestions that improved this paper significantly.

References (26)

  • H.S. Yang

    Agroecology

    (1992)
  • H.L. Sheng

    Agroecology

    (1993)
  • L.J. Yan

    World alternative agriculture and their development trends

    Eco-Agricultural Research

    (1996)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Sustainable supply chain management when focal firms are complex: A network perspective

      2015, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      Empirical findings also point to the necessity of collaborative approaches. Fang and Zhao (2009), for example, identify collaborative approaches to industrial systems resulting in much higher benefits of industrial chains compared to individual enterprises. To deal with issues of environmental and social character in a reactive, ad hoc, end-of-pipe manner has not proven efficient (Curkovic and Sroufe, 2011).

    View full text