H2 oxidation as criterion for PrOx catalyst selection: Examples based on Au–CoOx-supported systems
Graphical abstract
Introduction
One of the most important issues related to the hydrogen technology is the serious difficulty encountered for onboard H2 storage as well as for distribution from a centralized production facility [1]. As a result, many efforts have been focused on the conversion of more readily available fuels to hydrogen, either for on-board or for stationary applications. Hydrogen is mainly produced by hydrocarbons- or alcohols-reforming reactions [2] in which the hydrogen stream is often accompanied by relatively high levels of carbon oxides and steam [1], [3].
An essential requisite for fueling the polyelectrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) with hydrogen is the absence of CO or at least its presence within the ultra-low trace levels, preferably less than 10 ppm. Therefore, CO abatement processes must be applied to reduce its level within the H2 stream. The CO purification processes are commonly composed by a combination of high- and low-temperature water–gas shift reactions, allowing CO decrease to 1–2 vol.% level [4], [5], [6] and the preferential oxidation with air of the pre-cleaned reformate (PrOx) to reduce the CO to ultra-low level. The PrOx reaction is often preferred as a cheap and effective solution for the final purification step, since the range of working temperatures matches that of the PEM fuel cells operation [7].
For PrOx reaction, the gold-based catalysts are potentially advantageous [8], [9]. Earlier studies on Au/ceria catalysts found high activity and good selectivity of those systems in the 70–120 °C temperature range, caused by the active participation of ceria in the oxidation process governed by gold [10], [11], [12]. It is often reported that the presence of structural defects in the ceria lattice, for example, oxygen vacancies, potentiates the activity of the gold-based catalyst in the CO oxidation reaction [9], [13]. As a common strategy, the inclusion of aliovalent cations in the ceria lattice is employed to increase the number of those defects [13], [14], [15], [16]. The CO oxidation activity is then directly related to the concentration of those defects in such a way that higher the number of defects, greater the oxygen mobility and higher the oxidation activity.
However, those systems, together with the high efficiency in the CO oxidation, in terms of activity show limited selectivity due to their ability to burn H2 with the same facility. As a result, all future applications of those systems are questioned more by the selectivity than by its activity. Then it is essential to study the selectivity of the PrOx gold-based catalysts with the consideration of the H2 oxidation, as a separate process. Several authors have studied H2 oxidation and also the effect of H2 presence on the selective CO oxidation on gold catalysts with contradictory results [17], [18], [19], [20]. An enhancement of the CO oxidation activity in the presence of hydrogen was found in some studies [17], [19], and negative effect was reported by others [18], [20]. In addition, numerous reports comparing the PROX activity and selectivity of a variety of supported gold catalysts in dry and post-reformate conditions could be found in the literature [21], [22], [23], [24]. Notwithstanding the valuable information that can be extracted from these works, the influence of the realistic reforming streams, for example, the presence of H2O and CO2 and its effect on the hydrogen combustion, was obviated. This major topic and some other questions, such as, which is the role of the support in the H oxidation? Is there a support-dependent hydrogen effect on the CO oxidation? Are the gold nanoparticles the only responsible for the hydrogen oxidation? remain unclear.
In order to address these issues, the main goal of this work was to study the hydrogen combustion and PrOx activity in presence of CO2 and H2O over a series of gold–cobalt-based catalysts. The H2 oxidation has been discussed as a criterion for providing clues focused toward proper catalyst design and selection.
Section snippets
Support preparation
The supports were synthesized by a conventional impregnation method. The necessary amounts of metal precursor (cobalt and/or cerium nitrate, Aldrich) were impregnated on γ-alumina powder (Sasol). The impregnation was carried out in 50 mL of ethanol in rotary evaporator at reduced pressure and temperature of 50 °C. The obtained dry solid was treated with NH3 solution (10 mol L−1) during 30 min in order to assure the full conversion of the nitrate precursors to hydroxides. The supports were then
Results and discussion
Careful analysis of the catalyst properties often starts with an exhaustive analysis of its electronic and redox properties. Regarding the complexity of the series of catalysts chosen in this study, a separation between bi- and tri-component catalysts should be considered for better description of the systems. In all cases, the alumina component will be neglected pointing to its principal role of inert metal oxide used for “active oxide component” (CeO2, CoOx, or mixed) dispersion and
Conclusions
A series of effective CO-PrOx catalysts based on Au/CeO2/Al2O3 formulation have been developed. The inclusion of small amounts of cobalt oxide on the catalyst formula appreciably improves the CO-PrOx oxidation activity in a real post-reforming stream, being the Ce–Co mixed samples the most performing ones. The Ce–Co contact results in satisfactory electronic and redox properties and especially enhanced OSC that benefits the catalytic activity.
The combustion of H2 mainly occurs on the support.
Acknowledgments
T.R. Reina acknowledges CSIC for his JAE-Predoc fellowship. The Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación project (ENE2012-374301-C03-01) and Junta de Andalucía project (TEP-8196) provide financial support for this work, both programs being co-funded by the European Union FEDER. Dr. J.J. Delgado is also kindly acknowledged for the TEM experiments and Sasol for providing the γ-Al2O3.
References (45)
Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
(2005)- et al.
J. Power Sources
(2002) - et al.
Catal. Today
(2007) - et al.
Catal. Commun.
(2007) - et al.
Catal. Today
(2008) - et al.
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
(2008) - et al.
Catal. Today
(2002) - et al.
App. Catal. B: Environ.
(2011) - et al.
Appl. Catal. A
(2005) - et al.
Catal. Today
(2006)
J. Catal.
J. Catal.
J. Mol. Catal. A
J. Catal.
J. Catal.
Catal. Today
Catal. Today
J. Catal.
J. Catal.
Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
J. Solid State Chem.
Cited by (22)
Hydrogen purification of actual syngas streams for energy applications: Au-Cu supported over nano-shaped CeO<inf>2</inf> as stable catalysts for the carbon monoxide removal
2020, Applied Catalysis A: GeneralCitation Excerpt :Fig. 1c shows H2 losses up to 35 % depending on the catalyst and the temperature. The presence of O2 in excess favors H2 oxidation (Eq. 3) [29]. In this study, a previously optimized value [12] of λ = 1.8 was used, which is higher than the stoichiometric factor (λ = 1) for CO oxidation (Eq. 2).
The role of structural features in heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of H <inf>2</inf> on TiO <inf>2</inf> :MoO <inf>3</inf> nanocomposites
2019, Journal of Solid State ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Meanwhile such sensing materials suffer from certain drawbacks, high cost and low selectivity being the most significant among them. TiO2-MoO3 composites have an uncontestable advantage of low price in comparison with other oxide materials for hydrogen detection, which generally have noble metals in their composition [4,21–24]. Substitution of noble metals for MoO3 in oxide composite should enhance the selectivity of the gas sensing material due to the inability of MoO3 to catalyze heterogeneous oxidation of diverse burning gases at relatively low temperature (up to 350 °C) in contrast to noble metals that catalyze oxidation of the majority of burning gases at this temperature.
Remediation of CO by oxidation over Au nanoparticles supported on mixed metal oxides
2019, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Histograms show that the average particle size of gold on the catalysts vary as follows, 1Au/Mn-FeO (0–23 nm), 1Au/2Mn-FeO (7–30 nm), 2Au/Mn-FeO (2–20 nm) and 2Au/2Mn-FeO (0–6 nm). Fig. 6(a) and (b) shows the high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscope (HAADF-STEM) images depicting multiple white spots that are symbolic of the presence of a heavy metals such as gold [48,49]. A profile of the line scan taken between points A and B in Fig. 6(a) is shown in as Fig. 6(c).
Fuel-cell grade hydrogen production by coupling steam reforming of ethanol and carbon monoxide removal
2018, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyWGS and CO-PrOx reactions using gold promoted copper-ceria catalysts: “Bulk CuO[sbnd]CeO<inf>2</inf> vs. CuO[sbnd]CeO<inf>2</inf>/Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> with low mixed oxide content”
2016, Applied Catalysis B: EnvironmentalCitation Excerpt :As shown in table CuCe-0.4 and Au/CuCe-0.4 present the highest specific activity. The obtained rates matches well with those of similar gold-ceria based catalysts recently reported [68]. This result reinforces the discussion derived from the WGS tests.
- 1
Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.