Believing is seeing: Changes in visual perception following treatment for height fear
Section snippets
Participants
To be eligible, participants needed to have Acrophobia Questionnaire-Anxiety subscale scores of at least 45.45 (AQ-Anxiety; Cohen, 1972, 1977), and to score in the subthreshold or threshold range on the Specific Phobia section of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., SCID; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1994). See Steinman and Teachman (2014) for a CONSORT diagram for the parent study. Following treatment assignment
Materials1
Height fear. Participants completed the AQ-Anxiety (Cohen, 1977), a 20-item questionnaire measuring fear of various heights (e.g., “Riding a Ferris wheel”). Cronbach's alpha was .72 at pre-intervention and .89 at post-intervention.
Interpretation bias. Participants' interpretation of risks associated with heights was evaluated with the Heights Interpretation
Procedure
Potential participants completed the AQ-Anxiety and Specific Phobia section of the SCID. Participants were told that the purpose of the study was to investigate an experimental height fear intervention. Participants were sequentially assigned to the CBM-I, exposure, combined, or the control condition.2 Following consent, participants
Analytic plan
First, bivariate correlations were calculated. Second, unstandardized residual change scores were computed to capture change in the dependent variable (perceptual bias) and mediator (interpretation bias; see Hummel-Rossi & Weinberg, 1975). Third, a planned weighted contrasts Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted with condition (coded as control = +3; CBM = −1; exposure = −1; combined = −1) as the independent variable and change in perceptual bias as the dependent variable. Fourth,
Bivariate relations
To characterize the relations between pre- and post-intervention interpretation bias, height perception, and height fear, bivariate correlations were calculated (see Table 1). As expected, perceptual bias and interpretation bias were significantly correlated at both pre- and post-intervention assessments. Surprisingly, although height fear and perceptual bias were significantly correlated at the post-intervention assessment, they were not correlated at pre-intervention.
Discussion
The present study provided evidence that treatments for height fear may sometimes alter perceptual bias of heights. Results showed preliminary support, at the level of a nonsignificant trend, that participants in the active (CBM-I, exposure, and combined) vs. control condition experienced greater reductions in perceptual bias. Further, in follow-up t-tests, participants in the exposure condition demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in perceptual bias, and participants in the other
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by NIH grants RO1MH075781 and R01MH113752 to Bethany A. Teachman and an Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies Dissertation Award to Shari A. Steinman. The authors declare no conflict of interest. We thank Jessica Beadel, Joanna Chango, Meghan Cody, David Fask, Jennifer Green, Erin Miga, and Meg Reuland for their assistance as therapists in this study. We also thank Katherine Bian, Celia Cressy, Alexander Cutler, Lauren Faulkner, Victoria Gravett,
References (27)
- et al.
Does habituation matter? Emotional processing theory and exposure therapy for acrophobia
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2010) - et al.
A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2008) - et al.
Imagery and fear influence height perception
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2009) Comparison of self-report and behavioral procedures for assessing acrophobia
Behavior Therapy
(1977)- et al.
Optimizing inhibitory learning during exposure therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2008) - et al.
Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2014) - et al.
The process of exposure in vivo: Cognitive and physiological changes during treatment of acrophobia
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1985) - et al.
Fearful distortions
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1992) - et al.
Cognitive processing and acrophobia: Validating the heights interpretation questionnaire
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2011) - et al.
Mastering your fears and phobias: Workbook
(2006)
Cognitive bias modification to enhance resilience to a panic challenge
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Change processes during cognitive bias modification for obsessive compulsive beliefs
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Personality predictors and the outcome of varieties of desensitization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
Cited by (8)
Mind's eye: The impact of spider presence and cognitive therapy on size estimation biases in spider phobia
2021, Journal of Anxiety DisordersCitation Excerpt :Similarly, Shiban et al. (2016) reported that individuals with spider phobia reported lower estimates of a spider size after virtual reality exposure therapy in comparison to estimates obtained prior to treatment. Finally, Dreyer-Oren, Clerkin, Edwards, Teachman, and Steinman (2019) reported that estimates of vertical distance decreased from pre- to post-treatment assessments in individuals with acrophobia following exposure therapy, but not two other treatments (cognitive bias modification, or a combination of the two treatments – although, the same effect was evident at a non-significant trend level in these conditions). Overall, these studies provide some support for the notion that perceptual biases may diminish following successful treatment for phobias.
Biased estimations of interpersonal distance in non-clinical social anxiety
2020, Journal of Anxiety DisordersCitation Excerpt :For this reason, future studies should examine whether treating this bias has a therapeutic effect on the level of distress. In line with this notion, Dreyer-Oren et al. (2019) found that cognitive treatment decreased the overestimation of heights in people with a strong fear of heights, suggesting a causal relationship between the subjects’ fear and their estimation bias (see also Rachman & Cuk, 1992; Stefanucci et al., 2008; and for arachnophobia: Shiban et al., 2016). Accordingly, developing new treatment courses should be considered, given social anxiety’s high frequency and public burden (Baxter, Vos, Scott, Ferrari, & Whiteford, 2014; Kessler et al., 2009).
Body scaling of visually perceived metric space
2022, The Routledge Handbook of Bodily AwarenessThe Effects of Virtual Height Exposure on Postural Control and Psychophysiological Stress Are Moderated by Individual Height Intolerance
2022, Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceBiased distance estimation in social anxiety disorder: A new avenue for understanding avoidance behavior
2020, Depression and Anxiety