Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Original ArticleCommon causes for unsatisfactory Pap tests in a high-risk population: insights into a yet unresolved problem in gynecologic cytology
Introduction
The rate of unsatisfactory Papanicolaou (Pap) tests has been reportedly around 1.1% of cervicovaginal cytology specimens, according to the latest College of American Pathologists survey.1 Cases assigned to this category have been associated with an increased risk of epithelial lesions on subsequent follow-up.2, 3 Therefore, additional laboratory processing4, 5, 6 or resampling of patients7, 8 has been proposed. More recently, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been proposed for triaging the specimens with unsatisfactory cytology.7, 9 This becomes a relevant issue when we consider the anticipated increase in costs for both the patient and the laboratory.
Since the implementation of adequacy criteria from the Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology10 in conjunction with the introduction of liquid-based cytology (LBC) in our laboratory in 1998, we have noticed a reduction in unsatisfactory rates of Pap tests. The impact of LBC in reducing unsatisfactory Pap tests has been well recognized by many investigators.11, 12, 13, 14 However, complete eradication of this problem has not been accomplished to date. The current study aimed to investigate the prevalence, common causes, and clinical features associated with unsatisfactory Pap tests in our patient population following the implementation of LBC and the Bethesda Reporting System.
Section snippets
Material and methods
Pap tests signed out as unsatisfactory for evaluation (UE) were analyzed among consecutive cases examined from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 in the cytology laboratory at Houston Methodist Hospital. Our laboratory processes approximately 19,000 Pap tests annually, with more than 99% of which being liquid-based preparations.
We have a high-risk population of patients from the Methodist dysplasia clinic, obstetrics and gynecology oncology clinics, and charity clinics in Houston region. The
Results
A total of 56,563 Pap tests were examined during the study period, including 64% ThinPrep (Hologic, Inc.), 35.35% SurePath (Becton, Dickinson, and Company), and 0.65% conventional smears (CS). Of these, 276 cases were interpreted as UE (0.47%). Despite a broad age distribution ranging from 15 to 88 years, nearly half of the patients with UE diagnosis were older than 50 years (see Table 1). About a third of the cases (n = 81) had relevant gynecologic history. The age group of 50 years or older
Conclusions
Although the unsatisfactory rate in our institution is relatively low and within the 50th percentile of the national average,1 the challenge remains from the clinical and laboratory standpoints.
The adoption of the Bethesda criteria for reporting cervical cytology10 and the transition from conventional cytology to liquid based methodologies (eg, LBC) has unquestionably contributed to the reduction of overall UE rate.2 Factors other than test platform factors (ie, patient's clinical scenario,
Funding sources
This work was completed without specific financial funding.
Conflict of interest disclosure
The authors have no financial disclosures.
References (23)
- et al.
Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate
Cytopathology
(2009 Jun) - et al.
Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2001) - et al.
Clinical determinants and smear characteristics of unsatisfactory conventional cervicovaginal smears
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
(2013) - et al.
Unsatisfactory reporting rates: 2006 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in gynecologic cytology
Arch Pathol Lab Med
(2009) - et al.
Unsatisfactory SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou tests: causes and significance
Cancer
(2009) - et al.
The unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap test: missed opportunity for disease detection?
Am J Clin Pathol
(2002 Mar) - et al.
Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions
Cancer
(2004) - et al.
Cell block findings from residual PreservCyt samples in unsatisfactory ThinPrep Paps: no additional benefit
Diagn Cytopathol
(2002) - et al.
Restoring satisfactory status in ThinPrep Pap test specimens with too few squamous cells and containing microscopic red blood cells
Diagn Cytopathol
(2008) - et al.
Cervical cytology specimen adequacy: patient management guidelines and optimizing specimen collection
J Low Genit Tract Dis
(2008)