Original Article
Common causes for unsatisfactory Pap tests in a high-risk population: insights into a yet unresolved problem in gynecologic cytology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2014.05.003Get rights and content

Introduction

Although the rates are generally low (0.2%-10%), unsatisfactory Papanicolaou (Pap) tests are associated with an increased risk of epithelial lesions on subsequent follow-up. Therefore, some studies have recommended extra laboratory processing, resampling of patients, and more recently, human papillomavirus testing.

Materials and methods

Consecutive cases signed out as unsatisfactory for evaluation (UE) were identified from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 in the cytology laboratory at Houston Methodist Hospital. Patient’s demographics, relevant prior clinical history, type of Pap test, reasons for UE diagnosis, and cytology or histology follow-up were obtained from the pathology database.

Results

Among 56,563 total Pap tests, 276 were signed out as UE (0.47%). Nearly half of these patients were older than 50 years (15 to 88 years). The majority (85%) of patients over 50 years old had a history of prior gynecologic cancer. Low squamous cellularity was the most common cause of UE in all age groups. Follow-up abnormalities were identified in 21 of 73 patients (29%).

Conclusions

Low squamous cellularity was the most common cause of UE and was often seen in women older than 50 years of age. The significant risk associated with UE emphasizes the importance of appropriate follow-up on these patients.

Introduction

The rate of unsatisfactory Papanicolaou (Pap) tests has been reportedly around 1.1% of cervicovaginal cytology specimens, according to the latest College of American Pathologists survey.1 Cases assigned to this category have been associated with an increased risk of epithelial lesions on subsequent follow-up.2, 3 Therefore, additional laboratory processing4, 5, 6 or resampling of patients7, 8 has been proposed. More recently, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been proposed for triaging the specimens with unsatisfactory cytology.7, 9 This becomes a relevant issue when we consider the anticipated increase in costs for both the patient and the laboratory.

Since the implementation of adequacy criteria from the Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology10 in conjunction with the introduction of liquid-based cytology (LBC) in our laboratory in 1998, we have noticed a reduction in unsatisfactory rates of Pap tests. The impact of LBC in reducing unsatisfactory Pap tests has been well recognized by many investigators.11, 12, 13, 14 However, complete eradication of this problem has not been accomplished to date. The current study aimed to investigate the prevalence, common causes, and clinical features associated with unsatisfactory Pap tests in our patient population following the implementation of LBC and the Bethesda Reporting System.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Pap tests signed out as unsatisfactory for evaluation (UE) were analyzed among consecutive cases examined from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010 in the cytology laboratory at Houston Methodist Hospital. Our laboratory processes approximately 19,000 Pap tests annually, with more than 99% of which being liquid-based preparations.

We have a high-risk population of patients from the Methodist dysplasia clinic, obstetrics and gynecology oncology clinics, and charity clinics in Houston region. The

Results

A total of 56,563 Pap tests were examined during the study period, including 64% ThinPrep (Hologic, Inc.), 35.35% SurePath (Becton, Dickinson, and Company), and 0.65% conventional smears (CS). Of these, 276 cases were interpreted as UE (0.47%). Despite a broad age distribution ranging from 15 to 88 years, nearly half of the patients with UE diagnosis were older than 50 years (see Table 1). About a third of the cases (n = 81) had relevant gynecologic history. The age group of 50 years or older

Conclusions

Although the unsatisfactory rate in our institution is relatively low and within the 50th percentile of the national average,1 the challenge remains from the clinical and laboratory standpoints.

The adoption of the Bethesda criteria for reporting cervical cytology10 and the transition from conventional cytology to liquid based methodologies (eg, LBC) has unquestionably contributed to the reduction of overall UE rate.2 Factors other than test platform factors (ie, patient's clinical scenario,

Funding sources

This work was completed without specific financial funding.

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors have no financial disclosures.

References (23)

  • L.S. Massad et al.

    2012 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines Conference. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors

    J Low Genit Tract Dis

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text