The glass-melting crucibles of Derrière Sairoche (1699–1714 AD, Ct. Bern, Switzerland): a petrological approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.09.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Forty-three sherds of crucible found in the pre-industrial (1699–1714 AD) forest glassworks of Derrière Sairoche (Ct. Bern, Switzerland) were studied in order to determine the nature of raw materials and the technological aspects of their production and use. The samples were analysed using optical microscopy, XRD, XRF, UV–VIS spectrometry and SEM/EDS.

The crucibles were produced with local natural clayey sand and fired in two steps. After preliminary firing in a low-temperature furnace (800–1000 °C), the crucibles were brought to temperatures up to 1500 °C within the glass-melting furnace, before adding the glass batch. Using the structural order of cristobalite as an archaeothermometer, temperatures between 1370 and 1500 °C were estimated. The crucible surface shows corrosion by glass and furnace gases. Connections between glassmaking and crucible production are emphasised by this study.

Introduction

Crucibles are as important as melting furnaces in glassmaking. Good crucibles provide refractory behavior (high softening point), no chemical contamination (very low concentration of transition metals) and mechanical strength (thermal shock resistance). Since the Middle Ages, many treatises on glass discussed crucibles as fundamental tools in getting good quality glass. Theophilus (12th century) suggested making crucibles with a “white clay” and once dry, putting them in the “incandescent furnace” [23].

In De la pirotechnia (1540) Biringuccio [41] wrote that both the crucibles and the refractory lining of the melting furnace were made from the same fire-resistant clay (i.e. Valencia clay and Treguanda clay). After a long drying period (six or eight months), crucibles were heated in the fritting oven until they became red-hot, and then were moved with tongs, as quickly as possible, to the melting furnace for the last heating. Merret [30] in his translation of L'Arte vetraria by A. Neri (1612), quotes some source of refractory clays in England and describes the way they should be processed to get good crucibles. A distinction between large pots for cristallo and small pots for colored glass was made as well. The Encyclopédie by Diderot and D'Alembert [11] dedicated volume 17 to glassmaking. In addition to a description of the operating chain in glass production, they also showed how to build the furnaces and make pots. The recycling of broken crucibles as temper for new crucibles and for refractory materials was suggested to reduce shrinkage. Crucibles were fired in two steps in a similar way as reported by Biringuccio [41].

These authors recommended maximum care for crucible production and for the construction of the melting furnace. The technology for producing crucibles depends on glass composition. During the Roman period, the glass had lower liquidus temperatures (900–1100 °C) and common ware could be used as crucibles [24], [36], [40], while in the Middle Ages, crucibles were produced starting from silicatic raw materials able to yield during firing a phase association stable at high temperatures. The technological and pyrotechnological evolution caused by the higher liquidus temperatures (1000–1400 °C) of wood-ash glass demanded more performing raw materials and a better exploitation of combustibles [6], [7], [13], [45]. Owing to this technological dependence glass, crucibles and melting furnace can be considered as parts of the same system, as well as the pyrotechnology needed to melt a given glass. For these reasons in northern European glasshouses, each part was managed by glassmakers [7], [31], [34].

Section snippets

Crucibles from Derrière Sairoche

In the Jura region, dozens of pre-industrial glassworks (17th–19th century) have been localised by historical and archaeological researches [2], [17], [18], [19]. Excavations carried out by the Archaeological Survey of the Canton Bern in the glassworks of Derrière Sairoche (1699–1714 AD), one of four glassworks situated in the Chaluet Valley (Court) (Fig. 1), brought to light the workshop area and the glassmakers' dwellings [17], [18], [19]. Between 2000 and 2003, in the workshop area, a great

Original mineral composition

Under the petrographical microscope, monocrystalline quartz is the only recognizable component of the originally non-plastic fraction of the crucibles. Table 1 shows the analysed samples with their relative mineral compositions, obtained by XRD analysis. XRF analyses revealed that SiO2 and Al2O3 occur as major components, followed by TiO2 which rarely exceeds 1 wt.% (Table 2). The low content of alkali and alkaline earth elements (<1 wt.%) points to an original clay matrix consisting mainly of

Summary

By analysing the crystalline core of the crucible, an original mineral composition of quartz sand (∼80 wt. %) and kaolinite (∼20 wt.%) was determined. The homogeneous chemical composition points to a single source of raw materials. Furthermore, petrographical and chemical features allow to exclude recycling of crucible fragments as temper. These interpretations are in agreement with findings by Eramo [14], who reported a good correspondence between the crucibles and some of the local refractory

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of a Ph.D. thesis under the direction of Prof. M. Maggetti and of Dr. G. Thierrin-Michael (University of Fribourg). The author is grateful to them for their invaluable guidance in my research and constructive criticism in the preparation of this paper. Dr. V. Serneels for X-ray fluorescence analyses and his enlightening remarks. Thanks are also due to Mr. C. Neururer for his assistance on EDS analyses. Prof. B. Grobéty (University of Fribourg) is kindly acknowledged for his

References (50)

  • M.J. Buerger

    The stuffed derivative of the silica structures

    American Mineralogist

    (1954)
  • A.R. Cooper Jr., Dissolution kinetics in glass making, in: Advances in Glass Technology, Technical Papers of the VI...
  • A.D. Davis

    Refractories for glass melting

  • D. Diderot et al.

    L'art du verre, reprint 2002

    (1771)
  • W. Eitel

    Ceramics and hydraulic binders

    (1966)
  • G. Eramo, The melting furnace of the Derrière Sairoche glassworks (Court, Swiss Jura): heat-induced mineralogical...
  • G. Eramo, Pre-industrial glassmaking in Swiss Jura: the refractory earth for the glassworks of Derrière Sairoche (Ct....
  • C.N. Fenner

    The stability relations of the silica minerals

    American Journal of Science

    (1913)
  • E. Fries et al.

    Organische Reagenzien für die Spurenanalyse

    (1975)
  • C. Gerber

    Fouille d'une verrerie forestière du début du XVIIIe siècle à Court (Jura suisse)

    Bulletin de l'Association pour l'Archéologie du verre

    (2000)
  • C. Gerber

    Court-Chaluet – A la découverte d'une verrerie jurassienne du 18e siècle, Bern

    Nike Bulletin

    (2003)
  • C. Gerber

    Court-Chaluet bei Moutier (Berner Jura, Schweiz): eine Schwarzwälder Glasshütte

  • J. Hétru

    Le verre: l'art et la matière

    (1996)
  • V.G. Hill et al.

    Silica structure studies, VI, on tridymite

    Transactions of the British Ceramic Society

    (1958)
  • S.B. Holmquist

    Conversion of quartz to tridymite

    Journal of the American Ceramic Society

    (1961)
  • Cited by (17)

    • A glass workshop in ‘Aqir, Israel and a new type of compositional contamination

      2021, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      The trade and technology of ancient glass have attracted significant attention in the literature but the investigation of glassmaking and glassworking furnaces is largely limited to their forms. With a few notable exceptions (e.g. Rehren, 1997; Jackson et al., 1998, 2003; Paynter, 2008 as well as the pioneering study into LBA materials by Turner, 1954) plus some work on post-Medieval materials (e.g. Eramo, 2005, 2006; Dungworth, 2008), the structural and container materials have not been well investigated, and their interactions with the bulk glass have received limited attention. However, the selection and preparation of structural and container materials offers potential insights into the practices of the craftspeople and the diffusion and transfer of technological know-how, while compositional modification of the glass may affect the interpretation of provenance and workshop processes such as recycling (Jackson and Paynter, 2016; Barfod et al., 2018; Al-Bashaireh et al., 2016a).

    • The effect of mineralogy, microstructure and firing temperature on the effective thermal conductivity of traditional hot processing ceramics

      2017, Applied Clay Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The exploitation of BAR clays as refractory earth in the Berner Jura has historical and archaeometrical evidences (Amweg, 1941; Eramo, 2006a; Gerber et al., 2012). Such clayey sands provided a good refractory behaviour in service conditions for crucibles and refractory elements of the forest glass melting furnaces (Eramo, 2005, 2006a). Purest clayey sands have bulk chemical compositions of SiO2 and Al2O3 up to 99%, with an eutectic of about 1600 °C (Aramaki and Roy, 1962).

    • Ancient glass: From kaleidoscope to crystal ball

      2015, Journal of Archaeological Science
    • Roman double-layered crucibles from Autun/France: A petrological and geochemical approach

      2013, Journal of Archaeological Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      This range is generally higher than temperatures described for Roman metal-melting crucibles in literature (Freestone, 1989; Hein et al., 2007; Rehren, 2003; Tylecote, 1982). However, such high pre-firing temperatures are already reported from a 15th/16th century excavation in Hesse/Germany (Martinón-Torres et al., 2008) and from the 17th century glass-melting crucibles from Derrière Sairoche/Switzerland (Eramo, 2006). Overall, the crucibles were produced using a certain routine, which seems to be identical for all analysed fragments.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text