Research
Current Research
Genetic Sensitivity to 6-n-Propylthiouracil Has No Influence on Dietary Patterns, Body Mass Indexes, or Plasma Lipid Profiles of Women

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) has been reported to determine preferences for bitter, sweet, and fat-containing foods, affect dietary habits, influence body weight, and modify chronic disease risk.

Objective

To examine associations between PROP responsiveness, food choices, dietary intakes, and plasma chemistries in a clinical sample of adult women.

Subjects/design

This nested case-control study was based on female breast cancer patients (n=179) and cancer-free controls (n=179).

Main outcome measures

Taste responsiveness measure was based on a 25:50:25 split of summed bitterness ratings of five PROP solutions. Food preferences were based on a 171-item checklist. Food and nutrient intakes were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Heights and weights were measured and plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels were obtained.

Results

High PROP response was unrelated to reported preferences for sweet or high-fat foods. PROP responsiveness was unrelated to the reported frequency of food use, or to macronutrient composition of the diet. In regression models, PROP responsiveness had no influence on percent of dietary fat, body mass index, or plasma cholesterol, after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusions

In this study PROP responsiveness was not associated with diets lower in sugar and fat, more favorable plasma lipid profiles, or with lower body mass indexes. The study provided no evidence to suggest that genetic PROP taster status had a measurable influence on health outcomes. The clinical utility of PROP taster screening is not supported by these study results.

Section snippets

Participants

Female patients were recruited through the Breast Care Center at the University of Michigan Hospitals. The patient pool was based on consecutive admissions to the Breast Care Center for examination, diagnosis, or treatment. Women who were younger than 18 years old, who were pregnant or lactating, who had mental disabilities or language barriers that resulted in communication and comprehension problems, or who had other diseases that may affect taste function were not eligible for the study.

Participant Characteristics

Approximately 50% of the presenting women patients were ineligible, mostly because of a previous history of cancer. As shown in Table 1, the recruited patients were mostly white, well educated, and had above-average incomes. Mean age was 49.4 years, mean weight was 70.4 kg, and mean BMI was 26.2.

No significant differences in weights, BMIs, or body fatness were observed between cases and controls. Because breast cancer risk increases with age, cancer cases were older than controls (mean age 51.3

Discussion

In this study of 358 women, there were no significant links between PROP responsiveness and food preferences, food or macronutrient intakes, BMIs, measures of body fatness, or plasma lipids. The only significant finding was that high PROP responders consumed less energy than did low PROP responders. Study analyses made use of regression models, adjusting for covariates. There was no evidence in support of the argument that genetic taste responsiveness to PROP has a major influence on dietary

Conclusions

Understanding the nature of genetic variation in bitter taste and its relationship to dietary choices may have important implications for the health of human beings. Although genetic taste markers may influence self-reported liking for some bitter foods, they seem to have little influence on diet composition, body weight, plasma lipid profiles, or disease risk. Our data are consistent with recent reports that PROP tasting does not necessarily predict sensitivity to other bitter compounds, let

A. Drewnowski is a professor of epidemiology and medicine, Nutritional Sciences Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

References (60)

  • S.T. DiCarlo et al.

    Propylthiouracil tasting as a possible genetic association marker for two types of alcoholism

    Physiol Behav

    (1998)
  • K.L. Keller et al.

    Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children

    Appetite

    (2002)
  • A. Drewnowski et al.

    Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propyl-thiouracil and sensory responses to sugar and fat mixtures

    Physiol Behav

    (1998)
  • A. Drewnowski et al.

    Genetic taste markers and preferences for vegetables and fruit of female breast care patients

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2000)
  • R. Mattes et al.

    Bitter taste responses to phenylthiocarbamide are not related to dietary goitrogen intake in human beings

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (1989)
  • C. Yackinous et al.

    Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction

    Physiol Behav

    (2001)
  • C.A. Yackinous et al.

    Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy, and dietary intake measures for young men and women

    Appetite

    (2002)
  • A. Drewnowski et al.

    Both food preferences and food frequency scores predict fat intakes of women with breast cancer

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2000)
  • M.L. Polsinelli et al.

    Plasma carotenoids as biomarkers of fruit and vegetable servings in women

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (1998)
  • C.S. Hann et al.

    Validation of the Healthy Eating Index with use of plasma biomarkers in a clinical sample of women

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2001)
  • G. Block et al.

    Estimates of nutrient intake from a food frequency questionnaire: The 1987 National Health Interview Survey

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (1992)
  • A. Drewnowski et al.

    Food preferences and reported frequencies of food consumption as predictors of current diet in young women

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1999)
  • R.E. Patterson et al.

    Changes in food sources of dietary fat in response to an intensive low-fat dietary intervention: early results from the Women’s Health Initiative

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2003)
  • S.A. Bingham et al.

    Are imprecise methods obscuring a relationship between fat and breast cancer?

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • A. Drewnowski

    Obesity and the food environment: Dietary energy density and diet costs

    Am J Prev Med

    (2004)
  • H. Harris et al.

    The measurement of taste sensitivity to phenylthiourea

    Ann Eugen

    (1949)
  • H. Kalmus

    Improvements in the classification of the taster genotypes

    Ann Hum Genet

    (1958)
  • R. Fischer et al.

    Taste thresholds, cigarette smoking and food dislikes

    Medicina Experimentalis

    (1984)
  • E.V. Glanville et al.

    Food preference and sensitivity of taste for bitter compounds

    Nature

    (1965)
  • V.B. Duffy et al.

    Genetic variation in taste: Potential biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk?

  • Cited by (120)

    • Taste disorders in disease

      2022, Flavor: From Food to Behaviors, Wellbeing and Health, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A. Drewnowski is a professor of epidemiology and medicine, Nutritional Sciences Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

    S. A. Henderson is an information scientist, Pfizer Product Information, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Michigan Laboratories, Ann Arbor, MI.

    J. Cockroft is a Medical Research Council research fellow, Nutritional Epidemiology Group, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

    View full text