Trends in Immunology
Volume 36, Issue 9, September 2015, Pages 556-564
Journal home page for Trends in Immunology

Review
Series: Tissue-resident immune cells
Tissue instruction for migration and retention of TRM cells

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2015.07.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Effector T cells receive tissues instructions and establish long-term residency.

  • TRM are more protective than circulating memory cells based on their location and function.

  • Epithelial TRM cells express CD103 and shut off S1P1 and CCR7 to prevent egress.

  • Memory lymphocyte clusters (MLCs) retain CD103neg CD4 and CD8 TRM in the lamina priopria.

During infection, a subset of effector T cells seeds the lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues and gives rise to tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM). Recent findings have provided insight into the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying tissue instruction of TRM cell homing, as well as the programs involved in their retention and maintenance. We review these findings here, highlighting both common features and distinctions between CD4 TRM and CD8 TRM cells. In this context we examine the role of memory lymphocyte clusters (MLCs), and propose that the MLCs serve as an immediate response center consisting of TRM cells on standby, capable of detecting incoming pathogens and mounting robust local immune responses to contain and limit the spread of infectious agents.

Introduction

Immunological memory provides the vertebrate host with a crucial means to protect against multiple infections by the same pathogen, and forms the basis of vaccines. The cardinal features of immunological memory are that it is specific to the pathogen, provides more immediate and stronger response to the pathogen, and is long lived. Over the past decade, the field of immunology has come to appreciate the existence and the importance of the memory T cells that reside in peripheral tissues. Various non-lymphoid organs are seeded by effector T cells (Teffs) during infection or immunization, where these cells differentiate and develop into memory T cells with distinct phenotype and function. The tissue microenvironment provides instructive signals for the Teffs to express molecules that enable long-term residency and survival. Importantly, once established, such tissue-resident memory T cells (TRMs) provide protective immunity against infectious microbial agents that enter through the local tissues 1, 2. Therefore, studying and understanding the biology of TRMs will provide important insights into the natural immunological mechanism of host protection at the site of pathogen entry, as well as being a basis for designing future vaccines against mucosal pathogens.

The differentiation pathway from naïve lymphocytes to TRMs is beginning to be understood. In the secondary lymphoid tissue, naïve T cells that are activated in response to infection undergo differentiation programs to become Teffs that are capable of migrating to the site of infection to clear the pathogen. The Teff population can be largely divided into short-lived effector cells (SLECs), whose primary role is to control infection, and memory precursor effector cells (MPECs), which give rise to long-lived memory T cells 3, 4. SLECs and MPECs are characterized by distinct cell surface expression of KLRG1hiIL-7Rαlow and KLRG1lowIL-7Rαhi, respectively. Both of these Teff populations exit the lymph nodes through the efferent lymph and enter the circulation. In the post-capillary venules near the site of infection, Teffs receive signals to slow down, adhere to the endothelium, and enter the tissue through transendothelial migration. Once inside the tissue, Teff populations migrate toward the infected cells along the chemokine gradient to kill infected cells [5]. Notably, while both KLRG1hi and KLRG1low Teffs enter the tissue during the acute phase of infection, only the latter give rise to the CD8 TRM population in the skin after the resolution of infection [6].

Recent studies have also revealed distinct tissue classes with different degree of access to Teff entry at steady state (Table 1). Some tissues, such as the intestinal epithelium and peritoneal cavity, are seeded by TRM precursors (Teffs) in the absence of local inflammation, while others, including the skin epidermis, vaginal epithelium, lung airways, salivary glands, and ganglia, require direct infection or inflammation to recruit TRM precursors and maintain TRMs [7]. Permissive tissues constitutively express homing molecules that enable Teffs to enter and establish residency within the tissue, while restrictive tissues require inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to render endothelial cells permissive to Teff migration. A well-known example of a permissive tissue-homing molecule is mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MAdCAM-1), which is constitutively expressed by the endothelial cells of the intestinal mucosa. Curiously, α4β7, the homing receptor for MAdCAM-1, is upregulated on Teffs acutely around 4.5 days after infection, which permits access by Teffs to the intestinal epithelium [8]. While some TRMs reside in the epithelial layer in a seemingly random fashion in the absence of their cognate antigens, other types of TRM require a microenvironment that provides chemokine and antigenic stimuli. The latter type can be found within a recently reported structure, the memory lymphocyte clusters (MLCs) [9], located strategically close to the mucosal surface. Studies have also revealed that the superior protection provided by TRMs is based in part on their proximity to the invading pathogens but also on intrinsic and extrinsic factors that govern their immediate effector functions. In this review we discuss the role of the tissue microenvironment in supporting the recruitment, residency, and effector functions of TRMs. The main topics addressed include: (i) the homing receptors and chemokines that orchestrate each step of the migration of TRM precursors from the circulation into tissue; (ii) the retention signals provided by the surrounding cells that support the maintenance of CD8 TRMs and CD4 TRMs; (iii) a discussion of the MLC as a housing complex for TRMs; and (iv) the unique TRM features that enable efficient execution of their effector functions.

Section snippets

Rolling signals for TRM precursors

Lymphocyte migration into inflamed tissues occurs through sequential steps involving interaction between specific molecules expressed by lymphocytes and their counter-receptors (Box 1). The molecules that control each step of activated lymphocyte seeding of the TRM pool are being uncovered. Much of this understanding is based on a study of HSV-1 infection in mice and therefore may be different for other infections and immunizations. E-selectin ligand is expressed by most CD4 Teffs after

Chemokine activation of TRM precursors

The chemokines that are important in arresting rolling lymphocytes depend on the target tissue. It is well established that leukocyte stimulation by chemokines occurs through chemokines presented by heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans, which present the chemokines on their apical and basolateral surfaces of the endothelial cells [12]. A recent provocative study challenged this view for Teffs. Using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), the study demonstrated that silencing of

Arresting signals for TRM precursors

The next step to becoming a resident cell involves chemokine-dependent activation of integrins, which enables the lymphocytes to arrest on the endothelial surface [12]. Gut-homing T cells express the integrin α4β7 [29], which mediates T-cell binding to MAdCAM-1 at steady state 30, 31. MAdCAM-1 is expressed by intestinal but not cutaneous vascular endothelium [32]. In tissues that are restricted from entry of Teffs in the absence of local inflammation, there is little constitutive expression of

Transendothelial migration of TRM precursors

The arrested lymphocytes must cross the endothelial cells and their associated cell types (pericytes and perivascular macrophages) to gain access to the tissue [12]. The process of transendothelial migration requires sequential and reciprocal signaling between the lymphocytes and endothelial cells involving platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM)–PECAM (homophilic), CD99–CD99 (homophilic), junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs), integrins, and VE-cadherin [36] (Figure 1). Human CD4

Retention and survival signals for CD8 TRMs

Once inside the tissue, lymphocytes migrate toward the source of chemokines through sensing of the chemokine gradient. To remain resident in the tissue, lymphocytes are likely to respond to positive cues, probably via interaction with supportive structures such as the extracellular matrix and fibroreticular cells, and must also downregulate egress receptors to avoid exit cues. In addition to control of migration, memory T cells require growth factor for their survival. Recent studies have shed

Retention signals for CD4 TRMs

Although much less is understood regarding the signals for maintenance of CD4 TRMs, they appear similar to those for LP CD8 TRMs but distinct from those for epithelial CD8 TRMs, as discussed below. As with CD8 TRMs, CD4 TRM precursor (CD4 Teff) access is restricted in certain tissues (skin and vagina) and permissive in others (lung). CD4 memory T cells isolated from the lung of mice infected with influenza virus specifically home back to the lung after adoptive transfer, whereas those isolated

Memory lymphocyte clusters as hubs for TRM maintenance

After a local infection or immunization, memory lymphocytes formed within the parenchyma of the tissue are maintained in clusters comprising distinct cell types. Here we specifically focus on the MLC and not the clusters that mediate the induction of T cells during the primary immunization or infection 55, 56, 57. The MLCs are distinct from tertiary lymphoid organs (TLOs) in that MLCs do not have high endothelial venules (HEVs) and are therefore devoid of naïve lymphocytes, do not have direct

Effector phase of TRM control of pathogens

TRMs control invading pathogens more efficiently than circulating memory T cells. The enhanced ability of TRMs in antimicrobial function is based on their location and their cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic capabilities, as discussed further below. The location of TRMs with respect to the invading pathogen is likely to provide them with an advantage in responding more quickly than their circulating memory T cell counterparts. CD8 TRMs are localized within the epithelium where the viral infection

Concluding remarks

Effector T cells are programmed to proliferate, differentiate, and home to various lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues to become memory T cells. An important part of the programming occurs after the effector T cells migrate and enter their destination site. Thus, T-cell memory can be considered to have specificity not only to the molecular details of the pathogen (through the recognition of epitopes via the antigen receptor) but also to the location of invasion (through the establishment of TRMs).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Haina Shin for her advice on the manuscript and Katharine Ng for preparing the illustrations. Funding sources include grants from National Institutes of Health R01, AI081884, AI054359, AI062428, AI064705, and AI102625 and funding from Women's Health Research at Yale and the AbbVie–Yale collaboration. A.I. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

References (75)

  • G.N. Milligan et al.

    Interferon-γ enhances resolution of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection of the murine genital tract

    Virology

    (1997)
  • G.N. Milligan

    T-cell-mediated mechanisms involved in resolution of genital herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection of mice

    J. Reprod. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • M.B. Parr et al.

    The role of gamma interferon in immune resistance to vaginal infection by herpes simplex virus type 2 in mice

    Virology

    (1999)
  • T.A. Springer

    Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm

    Cell

    (1994)
  • W.A. Muller

    How endothelial cells regulate transmigration of leukocytes in the inflammatory response

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (2014)
  • S.N. Mueller

    Memory T cell subsets, migration patterns, and tissue residence

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (2012)
  • S.M. Kaech et al.

    Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2012)
  • L.K. Mackay

    The developmental pathway for CD103+CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells of skin

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2013)
  • H. Shin et al.

    Tissue-resident memory T cells

    Immunol. Rev.

    (2013)
  • D. Masopust

    Dynamic T cell migration program provides resident memory within intestinal epithelium

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2010)
  • N. Iijima et al.

    T cell memory. A local macrophage chemokine network sustains protective tissue-resident memory CD4 T cells

    Science

    (2014)
  • T. Gebhardt

    Different patterns of peripheral migration by memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

    Nature

    (2011)
  • J.S. Pober et al.

    Evolving functions of endothelial cells in inflammation

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2007)
  • L. Stoler-Barak

    Transendothelial migration of effector T cells across inflamed endothelial barriers does not require heparan sulfate proteoglycans

    Int. Immunol.

    (2014)
  • M. Svensson

    CCL25 mediates the localization of recently activated CD8ab+ lymphocytes to the small-intestinal mucosa

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (2002)
  • K. Hieshima

    CCL28 has dual roles in mucosal immunity as a chemokine with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity

    J. Immunol.

    (2003)
  • E.J. Kunkel

    Lymphocyte CC chemokine receptor 9 and epithelial thymus-expressed chemokine (TECK) expression distinguish the small intestinal immune compartment: epithelial expression of tissue-specific chemokines as an organizing principle in regional immunity

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2000)
  • J.J. Campbell

    The chemokine receptor CCR4 in vascular recognition by cutaneous but not intestinal memory T cells

    Nature

    (1999)
  • B. Homey

    CCL27–CCR10 interactions regulate T cell-mediated skin inflammation

    Nat. Med.

    (2002)
  • J.J. Campbell

    Cutting edge: chemokine receptor CCR4 is necessary for antigen-driven cutaneous accumulation of CD4 T cells under physiological conditions

    J. Immunol.

    (2007)
  • Y. Reiss

    CC chemokine receptor (CCR)4 and the CCR10 ligand cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK) in lymphocyte trafficking to inflamed skin

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2001)
  • B. Homey

    Up-regulation of macrophage inflammatory protein-3a/CCL20 and CC chemokine receptor 6 in psoriasis

    J. Immunol.

    (2000)
  • S.A. Islam

    Mouse CCL8, a CCR8 agonist, promotes atopic dermatitis by recruiting IL-5+ Th2 cells

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2011)
  • J.E. Kohlmeier

    CXCR3 directs antigen-specific effector CD4+ T cell migration to the lung during parainfluenza virus infection

    J. Immunol.

    (2009)
  • Y. Nakanishi

    CD8+ T lymphocyte mobilization to virus-infected tissue requires CD4+ T-cell help

    Nature

    (2009)
  • C. Nakajima

    Induction of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 on TCR-stimulated T cells: dependence on the release from persistent TCR-triggering and requirement for IFN-γ stimulation

    Eur. J. Immunol.

    (2002)
  • J.R. Groom et al.

    CXCR3 ligands: redundant, collaborative and antagonistic functions

    Immunol. Cell Biol.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (85)

    • PLGA particle vaccination elicits resident memory CD8 T cells protecting from tumors and infection

      2022, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      TRM cells have been found in barrier tissues, such as skin, lung, female reproductive tract, brain, liver, kidney, intestine, salivary glands and more recently also in primary and secondary lymphoid organs (Anderson et al., 2012; Beura et al., 2018b; Fernandez-Ruiz et al., 2016; Gebhardt et al., 2009; Jiang et al., 2012; Masopust et al., 2010; Schenkel et al., 2014; Wakim et al., 2008, 2010). They represent a very heterogeneous population which is strongly influenced by the microenvironment in the tissue of residence (Iijima and Iwasaki, 2015; Takamura, 2018). However, across tissues they share a common transcriptional phenotype and are often characterized by expression of CD69 and CD103 (Mueller and Mackay, 2016; Park and Kupper, 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text